User Panel
Posted: 2/27/2007 10:38:42 PM EDT
|
|
I'm being forced to study up on their party. Why don't they tone that stuff down? I get it, personal rights. All for it. But a big weed leaf on the screen like that just isn't going to cut it. Is that even real? That's how ridiculous it is.
|
|
www.voteshaw.info/
Sorry, I should have included the link. Yes, very real. And very telling. And they don't tone it down because that is the ONLY issue all LP'ers agree on. And why do you think that is? |
|
Please read the site. Notice the first issue in the "issue" box is.....wait for it.....marjiuana.
Notice the big paragraph on the front page is about.....wait for it......marjiuana. Notice the word guns is no where on the page. On the About page. 1st paragraph -About Lynnette- "I am the Marijuana Peace and Hemp candidate. I am calling for the imediate release of all non-violent marijuana prisoners. Last count was 1,429 that we know of in CA jails. We can free our people as part of a Marijuana Truce. Our fettered society needs baby steps right now.."-Rev Lynnette Shaw Libertarian Party Candidate for LT. Governor California 2006a But of course none of the ones here do drugs. |
|
That's why I asked if it was real. It's pathetic. always. |
|
|
This coupled with their new antiwar newsletter is why I'm renouncing my membership.
|
|
A big problem with the Libertarians is that they have practically zero grass roots support. How many Libertarians are actually holding an office at the local levels of govt(city, county, School board)? They can't win.
|
|
Here we go again.
First, this is CALIFORNIA where a porn star ran for Governor. Second, potheads are as much true Libertarians as KKK guys are true Republicans. It's simply as close to representation as they are capable of getting. And I find the fact that a politician (from any party) would pander to the weed crowd in California spectacularly unremarkable. Maybe I'll pop over to Stormfront and ask them how they are voting and use that as evidence that Bush and the Republicans truly are Nazis. |
|
Because the Libertarians are about LIMITING government authority in most things. Next question. Somewhere on DU is your counterpart going on and on about how Libertarians are about NOTHING ELSE but guns. And how we are all a bunch of armed terrorists. |
|
|
And again I will ask you. Does MJ use define the LP party? Does racial hatred define the Republican party? |
|
|
Not about her. She has guns no where on her site. And after reading it I bet she is a screaming lib. |
||
|
If they have so much to offer, now is the time, and I don't see too many people banging down their door. I don't see them banging on any doors, either.
|
|
No MJ use does NOT define the LP party. I'm a Libertarian and I've NEVER used it. As a Libertarian I've never been directed to use it by the LP. But the LP is about LIMITING GOVERNMENT and on MOST ISSUES defers to the LIBERTY of the CITIZEN. Same as with guns. |
||
|
You're too old to still have the mindset of "A is bad, and is a member of B, so everything that is a member of B must be bad too." Nobody said that all Libertarians don't want to do drugs. Some of them do, some don't. What they all want is the freedom to make their own decisions about what's 'for their own good'. I don't smoke weed, I never have, and have no desire to ever use it. I've never used any drugs except alcohol and I don't plan on ever using any. But I want the freedom to be able to. Weed isn't the only issue, it's not a main focus for most of us, but it's a good starting point. If we can get the government to stop outlawing harmless things just because they don't want use to have them, then it sets the precedent to restore more freedoms we never should have lost. |
|
|
Guess what. Not EVERYONE who professes to be a Libertarian holds all Libertarian views. Kinda like those 10 Republicans who voted FOR the Assault Weapon Ban renewal. Kinda like how George Bush vowed to sign it. Does that make Republicans ANTI GUN? I mean I have 10 examples to your 1. |
|||
|
Here We Go Folks...
TRUE REPUBLICANS... The Senate voted 52-47 for an amendment that would have renewed the 10- year ban on the sale of assault weapons. Republicans who voted in favor: -- Chafee, R.I.; Collins, Me.; DeWine, Ohio; Fitzgerald, Ill., Gregg, N.H. ; Lugar, Ind.; Smith, Ore.; Snowe, Me.; Voinovich, Ohio; Warner, Va.; Before the bill was scuttled, Feinstein and her supporters, who included 10 GOP senators, had a few hours to savor victory. "This is a tremendous day," Feinstein said after the initial vote, which was in doubt until the last few minutes. "It was an uphill battle, but it was a battle worth fighting. The NRA went all out to repeal this legislation, and we won. ... Once in a while, when you have something in which you deeply believe, and that something is made into law and sustained, it is so elating and so important.'' So CLEARLY, using sherrick13 logic, the Republicans ARE the party of GUN CONTROL. I mean the proof is RIGHT THERE. |
|
Then she's not a fucking libertarian. Sorry to interject facts into (yet another) of your anti-libertarian rants, but unless she is for every personal freedom from gun rights to abolishing seat belt laws to recreational drug use, she isn't a real libertarian any more than someone that wants to massacre Jews is a real Christian. |
|||
|
And let's not forget George Bush Sr. with his 89 Import ban. At least Clinton's AW Ban had a sunset. The 89 Bush Ban doesn't ever expire. More proof that Republicans are ANTI GUN. And these aren't CANDIDATES mind you, these are the guys who actually GOT ELECTED and HELD OFFICE. |
|
|
In reality yes, the current majority of Republicans are for moderate forms of gun control. And unfortunately that is also in line with the majority of Americans. That is why we didn't get rid of much over the last six years. I'm not aruging that. However I would say 90% of the LP are for MJ legalization or rec use. That is NOT even close to mainstream American. IMO, it would be much easier to shift the Republicans slightly to the right than to change the LP enough to make it mainstream and then actually get them elected in enough numbers to make a difference. |
|
|
Not arguing it. But we got Republicans elected that let the AWB expire. Passed protection for gun manufacturers and more States with CCW. Much better than supporting candidates that, although may repeal NFA34, are never going to be elected. |
||
|
Steyr, why aren't they out telling the world this, shouting from the rooftops what they can offer? They don't seem to work too hard for votes.
|
|
If the majority of Americans wanted to abolish the constitution and turn the country into a fascist state, would you go along with that? How is MJ in any way dangerous? Have you ever seen a perfectly normal person get hopped up on weed and start shooting up day care centers? No, because drugs don't change a person. If you're going to do bad things to other people, then you're going to. Drugs don't just make that happen, and especially weed doesn't. |
|
|
Yes she is. There are many LP'ers that are screaming libs. Notice those don't mention guns much. They are still LP'ers. In fact if they are elected to run as an LP how can you say they aren't LP'ers. LP elected them. |
||||
|
Where the hell do you get 90%? The above is the ONLY "weed candidate" you could find. If 90% were as you say, you'd have DOZENS of examples. Do you even KNOW 10 Libertarians? Just because Bill Maher CLAIMS to be a Libertarian doesn't mean he is. I think the Republicans are lost, not because they are anti gun, but because they are full of people like YOU who have no problem with misrepresentation of the truth and promotion of agenda over fact. I got a news flash for you. More people who smoke weed are registered Republicans than registered Libertarians. So I am forced to conclude the GOP is the major pothead party. Must be true because I think I'm right. Isn't that how that works for you? I'm not gonna take the time to decide if any of that is true, I'm just gonna state it as fact and keep doing so at every opportunity. So what have we learned? The Republicans are nothing but a bunch of ANTI GUN POTHEADS. I don't know how you guys live with yourselves. |
|
|
You know why they won't get elected? Because too many idiots in this country have the same view as you. They probably won't win, so let's just not support them. If everyone ditched the idea of choosing a lesser evil and voted for freedom, then the NFA act could be repealed. If you refuse to support them from the start, then they can't do anything at all, and nothing will change. |
|
|
I would have to go along with it. Or die. Do a little study on Germany, 1930's. You think it is easy to be a hero and die fighting the man? If so, you probably don't have a family yet. The average person really needs to be pushed to the edge and have nothing to lose before they are willing to die AND sacrifice their wife and children also. I see what MJ does just about every day. Yes, it is dangerous. Not for this thread. There have been multiple others on that. |
||
|
Just wanted to take this one by itself. This was NOT "moderate gun control" I sourced. This was the RENEWAL of the Clinton Assault Weapon Ban. Don't try and sugar coat shit. |
||
|
It is not a major part of their platform? I've probably talked to hundereds of LP'ers in my lifetime. And can not remember one that didn't bring weed up. |
||
|
The basis of libertarianism is personal freedom. If she is against gun rights, then she is not libertarian. The same way that someone who is pro-gay marriage and socialized medicine isn't really a conservative. |
|||||
|
But if Bill Maher got elected to represent them, he would be. |
||
|
Honestly? Not my job and my job keeps me pretty busy. Anyone who wants to find out what Libertarians ACTUALLY stand for can do so pretty easily. |
|
|
So define moderate gun control. Beleive me, the old AWB didn't really do much. It was very moderate. You of all people should know this. Have you read 1022? That is serious gun control. If it is enacted as written. |
|||
|
There's a word for that. Bahhhh. It's obvious that you don't care about freedom, so I don't think there's even much point in arguing this with you. Even if I convinced you that there is nothing wrong with personal freedom you would still go along with the masses anyway. |
|
|
ABSOLUTELY NOT TRUE AT ALL. The amendment to add the renewal to Larry Craigs bill PASSED with the help of 10 Republicans. Larry Craig then killed his own bill. Had Craig not done so, and had it passed other amendments, it would have gone to Bush who had vowed to sign it. |
|
|
I totally agree. I challege those that have never really checked into the LP party to do so. And then post what you find. Be sure to include talking to a few, it is hard to otherwise really get a feel for what people really believe. |
||
|
No, the reason why they won't get elected is that a majority of Americans on BOTH SIDES actively OPPOSE THE MAJORITY OF WHAT THEY STAND FOR... Try again... |
||
|
Moderate gun control is things like background checks, and restricting gun ownership from felons (not all of which are violent). |
||||
|
Did I say anywhere I wouldn't fight? Don't you call me a coward. I don't see you pulling an Ed Brown. I said your average person would have to have nothing left to lose to sacrifice his children and wife. Are you willing to let your kids die in gunfire over HR1022? |
||
|
Stop hanging out with stoners. Not that you are in the least bit interested. But here is what the LP platform actually looks like. A Libertarian’s Platform THE PLATFORM of the libertarian candidate is simple. It has only one plank in it: No special privilege for anyone. He conceives himself with only two methods of achieving this worthy objective: 1. The free market. 2. Government limited to the defense of life and property. There is no way known to man to determine prices of goods or rates of wages or where man should travel or where he should work or how long he should labor or in what manner he should exchange the fruits of his efforts, except in a market free of coercion or by some measure of authoritarianism. There is no possible way of determining value except by what an unfettered people will offer — of their own free will — in exchange for any product or for any service. But governmental authoritarianism can, and does, curtail and destroy this freedom, in the marketplace by granting special privileges to various persons and groups. Special privilege cannot be granted, however, except by a government that is out-of-bounds. Government, limited to the defense of the life and livelihood of all citizens equally, has no special privilege within its power to grant. A government cannot grant anything to anyone which it does not take from someone else. The libertarian candidate, regardless of how great his competence may be, reasons thusly: “You as a person are better able to control your life than I am. Your life is your personal affair, for better or for worse, except as in the living of your life you may impair or endanger the life and livelihood of others. No person or set of persons on this earth has any logical right to interfere with you except as you may do injury to them.” No person, without an element of authoritarianism, can argue otherwise. Libertarians — nonauthoritarians — recognize that they have no logical rights, with respect to other people, beyond the defense of themselves. Nor do they grant to an agency — government in any of its forms — any rights which they themselves do not possess. A libertarian’s government has nothing to dispense except equal protection against, or equal penalizing of, fraud, misrepresentation, predatory practices, and violence. The variations among men — in their intelligence, their talents, their inheritances — are the handiwork of God; and the libertarian accepts this fact. He refuses to play the role of god-man and to attempt a coercive readjustment of that which God has provided. He stands on the single platform of no special privilege for anyone, insofar as his dispensing of it is concerned. The libertarian goes on the political stage more to present his view than to seek his office. For special privilege will prevail unless its error is understood at least by those whom others follow. Votes, the concern of those who cast them, are not to be sought at the expense of integrity or by concessions to authoritarianism. The libertarian has faith in free men. He is conscious of their natural inclination to cooperate for their own benefit and he knows that only in the release of their energy is good accomplished. He, therefore, does not want power. He wants only freedom from power, the mark of civilization. And he reasons that he cannot correct uncivilized man by becoming uncivilized himself. As you can see, it's all weed, weed, weed. |
|||
|
OK, I agree. That is very moderate gun control. So in your opinion serious gun control is the old AWB? |
|
|
You're distorting the truth: 1) Craig's bill passed the very next year, WITHOUT the AWB... 2) The AWB expired under the same Congress that added the 'poison pill' AWB amendment... |
||
|
So David Duke is what Republicans are all about huh? |
|||
|
Show me which office he is running for. |
||||
|
If you think the Clinton AW Ban was "moderate" then we are done here. I don't find magazine restrictions and feature bans passed with the hope of doing away with an entire class of weapons "moderate." |
||||
|
No, it's all unworkable utopian bullshit, suffering from the same fatal flaw as Marxisim... IT IGNORES THE FACT THAT HUMANITY IS INHERANTLY EVIL AND CORRUPT By not accounting for human nature - in fact by ignoring it - libertarianisim is doomed to failure... Men do not have a "natural inclination to cooperate" - they have a natural inclination towards greed & corruption... The only solution is to balance my greed & corruption against yours, and thus get a zero-sum effect... That's where government comes in.... Rights are meaningless without coercive force to ensure they are observed... Freedom is short lived without something preserving it by force of law/arms... And so on... Libertarianism ignores it all P.S. I am a realist. I have NO FAITH in my fellow man at all... |
||||
|
Notice in this lawsuit who the LP has associated themselves with.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Ix GREEN PARTY OF NEW YORK STATE, LIBERAL PARTY OF NEW YORK STATE, LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF NEW YORK STATE, MARIJUANA REFORM PARTY OF NEW YORK STATE, NEW YORK STATE RIGHT TO LIFE PARTY et aI Plaintiffs, ? against NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, ~ FOR ONLINE PLJBLLCATION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MODIFYING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 02-CV-6465 (JO) Defendants. Ix APPEARANCES JEREMY M. CREELAN Brennan Center for Justice 161 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10013 Attorneys for Green Party HERBERT RUB IN JACK OLCJ-IIN Herzfeld & Rubin, P.C. 40 Wall Street New York, NY 10005 THOMAS J. HILLGARDNER 82-63 170th Street Jatnaica,NY 11432 Attoroey for M&~uana Reform Party THOMAS 0. TERE SKY S Band Place South l4unlington, NY 11746 Attorney for Right to Life Patty Attorncys for LibcrtMian Party |
|
Unless we can have (for the most part) the same arms as the military, then the second amendment doesn't mean much. The AWB was a direct step towards fascism, so yes, it was serious.
No parent wants their kid to die, for anything. But the fact is, if no one dies for it now, then farther down the line, even more people are going to die for it. I'd rather my kids die for freedom than live under oppression. |
|||||
|
Not distorting the truth at all. The Senate voted 52-47 for an amendment that would have renewed the 10- year ban on the sale of assault weapons. Republicans who voted in favor: -- Chafee, R.I.; Collins, Me.; DeWine, Ohio; Fitzgerald, Ill., Gregg, N.H. ; Lugar, Ind.; Smith, Ore.; Snowe, Me.; Voinovich, Ohio; Warner, Va.; When it was time for a vote on the overall liability bill, the bill's chief sponsor, Sen. Larry Craig, R-Idaho, urged his colleagues to kill the legislation because of the poison-pill amendments. "It is so dramatically wounded that it should not pass,'' said Craig, a National Rifle Association board member. Before the bill was scuttled, Feinstein and her supporters, who included 10 GOP senators, had a few hours to savor victory. "This is a tremendous day," Feinstein said after the initial vote, which was in doubt until the last few minutes. "It was an uphill battle, but it was a battle worth fighting. The NRA went all out to repeal this legislation, and we won. ... Once in a while, when you have something in which you deeply believe, and that something is made into law and sustained, it is so elating and so important.'' Which is EXACTLY how it happened when we watched it live on CSPAN. |
|||
|
It doesn't make sense for Marijuana Reform and the Libertarians to fight each other and hurt each other's vote total, IF A HIGH VOTE TOTAL FOR GOVERNOR IS TOP PRIORITY. I know that for Tom Leighton, a vote total allowing not just for 4-year placement, but a good ballot position relative to other parties, is THE short-term goal, failing which he'll abandon the effort. I've discussed things with him, and he wants our help with the nominating petition drive and, secondarily, with the campaign. So what if, when the statewide nominating petitions of LP and of Marijuana Reform are filed, I (and my lieutenant governor LP running mate) decline the LPNY nomination for governor, and I accept a Marijuana Reform nomination for lieutenant governor?
ny.lp.org/essays/goodman/good98a.htm |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.