Posted: 3/2/2010 3:20:43 PM EDT
|
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who dissented in the 2008 ruling, wondered why the right to bear arms was necessary to extend to the states.
"If the notion is that these are principles that any free society would adopt, well, a lot of free societies have rejected the right to keep and bear arms," she said. |
|
You think that's bad? Look at what the racist wide latina came up with: JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR: Mr. Feldman, our selective incorporation doctrine under the Due Process Clause does suggest that there are some rights that were fundamental enough to be incorporated and some that are fundamental, but not fundamental enough to be incorporated. We have drawn a line. Take a wild guess whether she thinks that line includes the 2nd Amendment or not. |
|
Quoted:
Elections have consequences Guess who appointed Alito and Roberts? Who appointed Sotomayor? Some believe it's more important to have nothing––and "teach the Republicans a lesson"––than it is to have 75-80% of their agenda being promoted. Those individuals voted third party––or mostly, stayed home. 
|
|
Quoted:
Elections have consequences Guess who appointed Alito and Roberts? Who appointed Sotomayor? For Us: nominated by: Roberts: R Scalia: R Kennedy: R Thomas: R Alito: R Against Us: Stevens: R Ginsburg: D Breyer: D Sotomayor: D For the children still screaming that there's no difference between D & R, that's known by the scientific term of: "A fucking clue" |