Quote History Quoted:
@TNVC_Augee
Not to derail but, there certainly is a important element of performance missing from my full power Perst3 that I would like to know if the MAWL fills.
The perst is basically great for everything except what I consider to be my most likely use regarding distance. Which is:
A somewhat open area between 50-100 yards where I want a relatively wide but defined spill or coverage with the illuminator. If the MAWLs mid setting gives a wide coverage of IR at this distance, I would likely consider buying one (for other known reasons as well)
Right now I am dealing with an extremely tight and overwhelmingly bright hot spot of an illuminator that is far from ideal (even on the lowest power settings) and only covers around 4-8 yards in width @ 100 yards at the widest adjustment setting. I would prefer something closer to 15-30 yards of coverage in width at that distance. I think this would really open up my situational awareness under NODs when hunting (or potentially defending myself)
I will also mention that I am using a Filmless system, so the low light performance of my 14 is not really the issue.
Do both new and old versions of MAWL remedy the above issue, and which would be more ideal for my intended purpose?
View Quote
Thanks @TDunn for doing some of the math for me.
Honestly I'd think that either would do a great job for you--however which is "better" might somewhat depend on your application.
Again, I don't think you can go wrong with either beam divergence pattern, but if we really
had to split these hairs:
You mentioned that you're in a "somewhat" open area, but defining that a little further might be helpful.
If you're in tall brush and/or shooting low to the ground, I would probably recommend the newer (post June 2021) version.
If you're hunting and "living" almost exclusively in the mid-ranges, as I've mentioned elsewhere, the combined 16
o and 4
o illuminator pattern may be preferable, especially if groups of animals may scatter and you want to be able to track them better for potential follow-up shots.
At 100 yards the 16
o illuminator would cover ~28.11 yards, with a ~6.98 yard "hot spot" in the center with the aiming laser from the 4
o illuminator.
This will be most effective if you're in more open areas, and shooting from a higher position, e.g., a tripod, from the top of a vehicle, etc., if you're low to the ground, the splash-back from the 16
o can get a little distracting, though again, I'd never found it to be an insurmountable issue prior to the change.
I believe we do have some NOS "old" MAWL-C1+s currently if someone is interested in one and would prefer the older beam divergences to the newer ones.
~Augee