Quoted:
Quoted:
On the rare occasion when I DO switch the selector to semi, it doesn't bother me that it is a crisp, precise single-stage vs. a double-stage, because in my experience a double-stage trigger is never as precise as a single-stage. When I need to shoot semi it is for accuracy, and unless you are running a military drill that requires DS, single-stage will always be more accurate.
Again, YMMV.
Do you do much precision shooting? I shoot a fair amount out to 700 yards, and IME, a 2 stage trigger on a semi is much easier to shoot accurately than a single stage.
I don't have any full auto experience, but my m16 went pending on the 3rd, so that will change soon.
-dan
I don't do much precision shooting today, but I did seriously for several decades. At the time, when shooting out to 1,000 yards, I preferred set triggers with pull weights in the 3 to 6-ounce range. I spend my entire life shooting single-stage (including "set") triggers, so that is what I am used to.
For so many reasons I won't bother to list them here, I would not want a 3- to 6-ounce trigger on a full-auto firearm.
I have the JP trigger on my M16 set to 3.4 pounds. At that weight, it works fine for me for both precision semi and for FA use.
AFAIK,
all full-auto fire-control groups are single-stage on FA. That includes the Knight's I have used, and AFAIK it includes the Geisselle. The KNS and Geisselle are 2-stage semi, single-stage FA. The JP is single-stage for both.
I find it useful and comforting to have the same design –– single-stage –– on both semi and FA in the same firearm. Maybe some folks don't mind shooting one gun where when the selector is set to semi it is two-stage and when it is set to FA it is single-stage. But that is not me. I prefer having the exact-same trigger design, weight and pull regardless of where the selector is set.
Whatever works for you. Obviously, YMMV.