Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Posted: 9/27/2005 9:47:30 AM EDT
Link Posted: 9/27/2005 9:48:10 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 9/27/2005 9:51:48 AM EDT by pyro6988]


ETA: Here are the details. link
Link Posted: 9/27/2005 9:59:04 AM EDT
100 rounds of 7.62mm in the C-MAG adds 10.5 pounds of weight to your rifle
Link Posted: 9/27/2005 10:04:01 AM EDT

Originally Posted By H2O_MAN:
100 rounds of 7.62mm in the C-MAG adds 10.5 pounds of weight to your rifle



Not for very long
Link Posted: 9/27/2005 10:18:38 AM EDT

Originally Posted By QuinlanV:

Originally Posted By H2O_MAN:
100 rounds of 7.62mm in the C-MAG adds 10.5 pounds of weight to your rifle



Not for very long



Indeed.


Link Posted: 9/27/2005 2:48:42 PM EDT
Now I've got a reason to buy that bipod and E2 stock I've always wanted.
Link Posted: 9/27/2005 3:02:11 PM EDT
sweet
Link Posted: 9/27/2005 5:15:46 PM EDT
CLICK CLICK CLICK
Link Posted: 9/27/2005 9:00:47 PM EDT
Pure unadulterated sex...I need a couple of those.
Link Posted: 9/28/2005 4:35:57 PM EDT
SMOKING!!!!!!
Link Posted: 9/28/2005 4:36:35 PM EDT

Originally Posted By H2O_MAN:
100 rounds of 7.62mm in the C-MAG adds 10.5 pounds of weight to your rifle



Link Posted: 9/28/2005 7:50:44 PM EDT
Holy shit batman!! That is why god invented belt fed 7.62 support weapons....

Steve
Link Posted: 9/28/2005 10:24:19 PM EDT
Damn
Link Posted: 9/30/2005 3:08:40 AM EDT
Link Posted: 9/30/2005 3:17:25 AM EDT

Originally Posted By Chuck:
The 5.56mm version for the M16 doesn't work. Why the excitement over the 7.62mm version for the M14? Probably won't work any better.

-- Chuck



They're a toy, use it as such and you wont be disappointed. I love my Cmag, it's as close to belt fed as I can afford. Cant wait for one for the FAL. I'll definitely have to put the bipod back on tho!
Link Posted: 9/30/2005 6:35:54 AM EDT

Originally Posted By Chuck:
The 5.56mm version for the M16 doesn't work. Why the excitement over the 7.62mm version for the M14? Probably won't work any better.

-- Chuck



Mine works fine. Who told you it doesn't work? Did you have one that didn't work? I'm just curious, because I have NEVER had a malfunction with mine.

In combat, it might not be the best thing, since you have to lube it with this stuff that attracts the fine sand in the desert, and there the higher chance of dropping it hard or banging it up against something. I could see where that would cause some trouble. But for civilian use, it should work perfectly.
Link Posted: 9/30/2005 8:38:48 AM EDT

Originally Posted By Chuck:
The 5.56mm version for the M16 doesn't work. Why the excitement over the 7.62mm version for the M14? Probably won't work any better.

-- Chuck



I have seen them the 5.56 ones in use at local MG shoots, and dpmmn has a couple. They all seem to work great.
They are cool, impractical, but cool. I've got no use for one personally, but they still amuse me
Link Posted: 9/30/2005 9:01:16 AM EDT

Originally Posted By Chuck:
The 5.56mm version for the M16 doesn't work.

Why the excitement over the 7.62mm version for the M14? Probably won't work any better.

-- Chuck




Hey Chuck, they work fine trust me I have done some back to back Beta Dumps with the M-16 and never had a problem.

I am still a little leary of trusting one in a SHTF situation, but I am slowly being convinced that it could be great add on to any platform

Here is a video check it out Beta Dump
Link Posted: 9/30/2005 1:55:28 PM EDT
If they made one for the M1 would it eject a clip after each 8 rounds?
Link Posted: 9/30/2005 4:38:52 PM EDT
It looks really heavy and impractical.

<­BR>





Stra­ngely, I still want one.
Link Posted: 10/1/2005 3:46:39 AM EDT
Tell me that their making them for the HK91
Link Posted: 10/1/2005 5:13:22 AM EDT
Top Top