Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
9/22/2017 12:11:25 AM
Posted: 8/16/2005 1:47:23 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 8/16/2005 8:42:03 PM EDT by Geohans]
And is it good?? Thanks!
Link Posted: 8/16/2005 2:06:39 PM EDT
Here you go

It's the ACOG.

I have the M-4 version and really like it.

Danny
Link Posted: 8/16/2005 2:19:00 PM EDT

Originally Posted By Minuteman419:
Here you go

It's the ACOG.

I have the M-4 version and really like it.

Danny



+1
Link Posted: 8/16/2005 6:08:14 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 8/16/2005 6:09:58 PM EDT by Geohans]
Wow! you guys are efficient. Thanks!

So they took a ta31f and added a "chalk" outline of a target. . . . .

And is it true that the sniper/headshot version includes an outline of a rag????
Link Posted: 8/16/2005 6:10:13 PM EDT

Originally Posted By Geohans:
And is it true that the sniper/headshot version includes an outline of a rag????




I predict that BAC and the BDC reticle will be too complicated for you.
Link Posted: 8/16/2005 6:13:58 PM EDT
Does the M4 version use a drop for a 14.5in barrel? Thanks.
Link Posted: 8/16/2005 6:37:10 PM EDT
Link Posted: 8/16/2005 6:41:13 PM EDT
Sorry for the sarcasm. The questions were serious.
Link Posted: 8/16/2005 6:50:22 PM EDT
Link Posted: 8/16/2005 7:51:57 PM EDT
Got it. The one I saw was from the Trijcon website, and had a blue outline of a target at what must have been close to 100yd. It looks like it could have been a rangefinding element, added to the chevron reticle. . .
Top Top