A Colt is so great because of the quality control and the military spec that only they and FN have, right? Well when does a Colt stop being a Colt? I've read on this board and others a hundred times that you don't take a built rifle to a training class, you take one from the ABC's (Armalite Bushmaster Colt). Well when do we cross the line from Colt to built gun?
Replace the stock. That doesn't affect the function of the rifle. Replace the handgrip. That doesn't affect the function of the rifle. Replace the plastic forend with a nicer looking one. Well that doesn't really affect the function of the rifle either. But now it gets tricky. Replace the barrel? Let's say with a Noveske. If quality control and such are hallmarks of Colt, and Noveske barrels are definately quality, does that really affect the function of the gun? Replace the gas block with a low profile gas block. That doesn't really affect the function of the gun, does it? As long as you're not widening the gas port, or adding expansion chambers or whatever it has still got the same function, but it looks different. (And lets you change the length of the handguard, since carbine is a bit short for some tastes.) What about switching, say, a 6920 from a carbine-length to a mid-length gas system? I would suppose that this is the point where you've changed enough of the function that it's a built gun. But then there's the recoil buffer. I never did like that
SRPOING! sound, and from the 14 page thread about the Enidine hydraulic buffer, it seems that they do nothing but good things. How does the recoil buffer affect the function of the rifle? I'm not sure if this would be catagorized under cosmetic change (like the grip and stock), or functionality change (like a new barrel and gas block).
So let me pose the final question. A 6920 with a VLTOR stock, Magpul grip and trigger guard, Enidine hydraulic recoil buffer, Noveske 14.5" barrel with low profile gas block (keeping the carbine-length gas system) and Krink flash hider, and a LaRue 13.2" handguard. The upper/lower/internals are all still the same. The only major change is the barrel and gas block, but they retain the carbine-length gas system. Where does the recoil buffer fall? All other changes are cosmetic, so do they even matter to the function of the rifle? Would this rifle be considered a "customized Colt" or just another build? Would this gun be something that could be trusted to fire 3,000 rounds over the course of a 4 or 5 day course like a stock Colt?
This is all just curiosity. I'm too poor at the moment to even think of buying a Colt, let alone putting LaRue and Noveske parts on it.