Quoted:
Quoted: Naming the maker of a part he is having a problem with is not "calling out" anything. He already emailed POF and they said send it in. We were looking for an alternative to that. Leave your bullshit remarks in GD where they belong and get out of this thread.
Why is it that you cant even ask a tech question without some asshat causing a problem in every thread on ARFCOM?hinking.gif
|
This problem could happen with any LPK. It's not like the operation of the POF LPK is any different than any other LPK out there. If there was a problem relating to specific gas piston system then I'd say go ahead and ID.
t's all about common courtesy to these guys. Give them a chance to make it right. If they don't respond or fail to make it right, call 'em out. But when they offer to fix it why ID the maker?
What you also forgot to mention in your original post is 'your friend" already emailed POF and they were going to make it right.
Why is it that a manufacturer can't even take care of a problem without some asshat calling them out in a thread in ARFCOM?
|
To politely answer your question,
The lower I purchased from POF does not ( to my limited knowledge) have a
generic LPK. The POF416 has one fire and two safety positions. I asked Jeff to post my question on your forum because I was not registered at the time.
Neither Jeff nor myself made any derogatory comments about POF, I asked him to pose this genuine question because I am under a time restraint to qualify with my rifle. The hostility shown to Jeff and myself for asking advice is a bit severe if you really think about it.
To use an example, if I said my, *insert your favorite gun part here* is not functioning properly, could I have some advise on how to fix this or has this happened to anyone else; that is a legitimate question, not "
calling them out".
I am also not clear on your logic that I
should "call them out" if POF's upper does not function properly, but if the lower is unusable to me (full auto is fun, but not for a Patrol rifle) then I should avoid saying anything, as it would somehow hurt POF's reputation. To my (limited) knowledge, the LPK of the P416 is unique to POF or at least is not generic, and (in my belief) was not functioning properly. Is that the "death knell" to POF, I hardly think so. Had I tried to qualify with my rifle using that lower, I would have been disqualified. Fact, not opinion, not derogatory or inflammatory.
To further explain my position, I currently employ a *insert you least favorite rail system*. If I were to have a problem with it, wouldn't identifying the manufacture (if done in a neutral fashion, which was my intention) bring together someone else that may have experienced a similar problem.
My correspondence with POF has been nothing but positive, in the past or present.