Well, that was an interesting read. Thanks for the info and taking the time to find it and link it here.
I agree, it is kind of strange. By ATF regulations, the serialized receiver is the weapon, however, if you remove certain aspects from that receiver and it changes the classification of the weapon? Contradiction, it seems, is always present when there's restrictions.
I guess I better go ahead and get a cheap pre-ban barrel or something from this guy as well and just have him ship it all together and then there would be no doubt and once again I, as a law abiding citizen, have to spend more money to stay within the law while gang bangers in larger cities get arrested and released the same day while having illegal firearms in their posession.
I may have to start another thread for this, but as I mentioned above, since the reciever itself is considered the actual firearm, isn't it in fact illegal or again their own regulations when they say that selling the receiver no longer makes it that type of weapon? With the Brady bill sunsetting, maybe we should start sending letters to our pro-gun congressmen/women and senators pointing this shit out so they can start building a case against renewing the ban.