To Each his own I guess, there is no one size fits all but if TSHTF I’ll grab my AR not my FAL or M1A unless there is a specific threat in which case I would grab the rifle best suited for that specific threat.
[url=http://www.rand.org/publications/CF/CF162/]Preparing for Urban Operations in the Twenty-First Century
Appendix M: The Urban Area During Support Missions Case Study:
Mogadishu - The Tactical Level I
by SFC Matthew Eversmann, U.S. Army[/url]
[b]Quote:
You can only plan so deep, and you can only carry a finite amount of ammo. I shot 13 magazines, as did most. In a situation where you must shoot or die, it is a terrible feeling to know that you are out of ammo.[/b]
This is from the main character portrayed in ‘Blackhawk Down’.
That is (13) 30rnd magazines, that’s 390 rounds; tell your friend to carry 390 rounds or (20) 20rnd mags for his M1A or FAL or whatever, ouch???
Besides the weight, how could you even carry that many 7.62 mags, my SOE Gear patrol vest will only hold (8) 20rnd 7.62 mags while it can also carry (12) 30rnd 5.56 mags.
[b]Quote:
The 50 meter battlefield is very fast, very close, and very frantic.[/b]
My AR is much faster for multiple target scenarios (combat matches, I’ve never been in combat), and follow up shots (double taps) are much faster with my AR than my FAL or M1A. I am also much, much, faster changing mags with the AR than my FAL or M1A.
Besides what is the average engagement distance encountered by US troops over say the past 30 years, I don’t have it in front of me but I think it is pretty short?
The 7.62 is definitely a better anti-material rifle than the 5.56 although not truly up to the task and still no comparison to a .50 BMG; conversely the 5.56 has the fragmentation effect and reduced penetration in modern construction materials making it well suited to CQB reducing to possibility of collateral damage, but still giving reliable incapacitation at <50 yards with the ability to penetrate soft body armor. While hard body armor with stop either one…
Weapon weight compared to a 7.62 rifle is also significantly less.
In regards to military effectiveness a select fire M14 is almost useless in full-auto. It is also much easier to teach someone who had never fired a weapon before to get hits with a 5.56 that it is with a 7.62, flinch…
From a civilian standpoint the cost a quality firearm, the cost of M1A magazines (not true for a FAL), and the cost for quality ammo is significantly less for a 5.56 than a 7.62.
7.62 is total and complete overkill for home defense, where as 5.56 is nicely suited for reasons stated above about CQB.
I watched a show on OLN last night ‘Training the SAS, are you tough enough’ they were training with FAL’s. Our American special forces (SEALs, Force Recon, Delta, etc…) have access to M14’s. The Israelis have the 7.62 Galil’s. But what do all these elite units use most of the time in actual operations, a 5.56mm M4 w/ an M203 GL.
If the 5.56 was “toy gun, under powered, and blah, blah, blah” why would the worlds most elite fighting forces use them when they have access to anything they want with a virtually unlimited budget???
In today’s battle space (or your personal SHTF scenario) I feel true long range shooting, or shooting at hard targets is no longer a job of a rifleman. Most hard targets HMMWV’s as an example have an M60, M240, M2, or Mk19 on them, if you fire on that with a FAL, M-14, M-16 you’ll be cut to pieces in short order. You’ll need a grenade launcher or a crew served weapon, and reinforcements.
If you are in a military operation, other than a sniper, you won’t engage the enemy at long range 500+ meters you’ll call in air support, arty, etc… If you’re a freedom fighter in your personal SHTF scenario you won’t engage the enemy at long range, as this will be suicide revealing your location, instead you will hide or exfil the area and live to fight another day.
In my opinion the long arm (carbine/rifle) is for soft targets up close, say under 100 to 150 yards in which case a 5.56 will do great, for truly hard targets a 7.62 is still under powered.
Just my personal inexperienced civilian opinion,
I hope my rambling will be of some help to you,