Why are these not more common?
Are they generally considered to be not needed? Too fragile? Because the military does not have an approved version?
Some are being used, like on the West Coast (?) USMC SAM, and in even smaller numbers by Spec Ops units who are not regularly photographed. In fact our own KevinB has posted photos of himself with an operational-looking rifle equipped with a KAC folding front sight/gas block.
The Colt ACR of the 1980's had a folding front sight from the start...because it was the first M-16 to have a flat top, and they considered it to be primarily an optics weapon; the irons were considered to be secondary only.
But when the military adopted the flat-top upper, they did not at the same time include a folding front sight...if they had, would we also be using them? Why did they not adopt one? Oversight? Because there was not a suitable one out there? The ACR one was available...
Now, with the advent of advanced free-float handguards, is it a mistake to NOT have a folding front sight also? You are adding a major upgrade to the rifle as is; why not go further and get the tower out of your line of sight? With a magnifying optic it casts a ghost shadow and is no big deal, but if using an Aimpoint or Eotech, the tower obscures a large part of your viewing area.
But the SEALS did not ask for such a thing in their Recce specs. They can have anything they want; did they also overlook the benefits of a folding front sight, or did they have a reason not to want one?