User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 8/12/2003 5:47:20 PM EDT
[#1]
I may be wrong but i think they are aloowed if two conditions are met;
1) It goes on a preban 2) It is a legally registered Assualt Weapon. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/12/2003 6:06:10 PM EDT
[#2]
NOPE! They are banned their too (like everything else).
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/12/2003 7:41:25 PM EDT
[#3]
I have a FAB 10 CA legal AR-15(Not considered an Assault weapon) and the dealer that I got my lower from said that I could LEGALLY have one on my rifle, he also sells them. You can get some additional information from him if you wish. Heres his contact info.
L & G Weaponry (714)840-3772 |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2003 9:16:00 AM EDT
[#4]
Quoted: I have a FAB 10 CA legal AR-15(Not considered an Assault weapon) and the dealer that I got my lower from said that I could LEGALLY have one on my rifle, he also sells them. You can get some additional information from him if you wish. Heres his contact info. L & G Weaponry (714)840-3772 Because of the FAB's design, the launcher would interfere with the loading procedure. ed; check out [url]37mm.com[/url] |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2003 10:08:26 AM EDT
[#5]
Can anybody cite the CA law which states the flare launcher is illegal? I live in Cali, and while I consider the flare launcher useless, I still wonder why they would not be legal.
Thanks, --Dan |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2003 12:46:57 PM EDT
[#6]
[url]caag.state.ca.us/firearms/dwcl/12275.htm[/url]
Legal on registered pre-bans and on non-AWs. Counts as a banned feature, so adding one to a stock post-ban (and PRK-legal) Mini-14, for example, would be illegal, because it adds a feature. It would be legal to install on a FAB-10, due to the fixed magazine exempting the it from SB23. Similarly, a fixed-mag Mini-14 could have one. Note that using a flare gun in most areas of the PRK is a severe fire hazzard, and the penalties for setting wildfires are high. If you're going to use one, please use it over water, or someplace that is primarily rock and has little vegitation. -Troy |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2003 4:25:42 PM EDT
[#7]
I ended up having an email discussion w/ Randy Shivak today and hes said the 37mm flare launchers are legal. The problem is CA classifies both the 37mm and 40mm as DD's. I didn't ask whether the acquisition process for both launchers are the same since one is considered a DD by the federal govt (unless you have certain types of lethal 37mm ammunition) and the other one only by a state.
He also said he has sold 40mm M203's and M79's to civilians in CA. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
