Posted: 1/21/2014 8:32:19 AM EDT
[#25]
Quote History Quoted:
The difference is, I am not in the military. I do not have a DI chasing after me to make sure I didn't blink too many times in the last hour. And where procedure in the military might say you are neglectful if you don't spit shine your boots every day, I wouldn't say what i did qualifies as neglectful in any way.
Now if say, the manual that came with the weapon specified not to do this, and I just failed to listen, than yes, neglectful. But after owning many guns for a very long time, and many of the manuals actually suggesting this method, there was nothing telling me I shouldn't do what I did. No range master, no DI, no user manual, none of the other shooters that were with me (two of which were Marines, including an Armorer).
I'm not even necessarily saying that me not knowing qualifies the absence of neglect, but when people that have been trained to maintain these guns by our military don't know about this issue, I would hardly say it is common knowledge, let alone anything but accidental. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quote History Quoted:
Quoted:
Guys, have this on a hot range during basic, explain to the to D.I or Range master how you did not load the weapon correctly and this happened, and trust me, by the time you get done wearing out many pairs of boots on your nature runs with a full pack filled with extra rocks, you will understand the difference between a AD, and a incorrectly charging of the weapon that resulted in a neglectful discharge instead.
And as stated, incorrect loading is nothing new. Way back it the colt 1911 days, same would happen when a round was not correctly loaded out of the mag, and pretty much ending up with long nature runs as well (that is after you had choked yourself out a few times on both the DI and range masters hands before the military become more PC that is has become today).
The difference is, I am not in the military. I do not have a DI chasing after me to make sure I didn't blink too many times in the last hour. And where procedure in the military might say you are neglectful if you don't spit shine your boots every day, I wouldn't say what i did qualifies as neglectful in any way.
Now if say, the manual that came with the weapon specified not to do this, and I just failed to listen, than yes, neglectful. But after owning many guns for a very long time, and many of the manuals actually suggesting this method, there was nothing telling me I shouldn't do what I did. No range master, no DI, no user manual, none of the other shooters that were with me (two of which were Marines, including an Armorer).
I'm not even necessarily saying that me not knowing qualifies the absence of neglect, but when people that have been trained to maintain these guns by our military don't know about this issue, I would hardly say it is common knowledge, let alone anything but accidental.
The eight steps of functioning (feeding, chambering, locking, firing, unlocking, extracting, ejecting, and cocking) begin after the loaded magazine has been inserted into the weapon.
http://quarterbore.com/library/pdf_files/fm23_9v1.pdf
To put it as nicely as possible, I highly doubt your story about a USMC armorer being present for your event and having no clue as to what could have gone wrong.
|