I am personally a fan of the .300 Win Mag, but there are better alternatives to fill the gap between 7.62 and .50 BMG. For example, .408 Cheytac would be a better choice. This is an extremely capable cartridge that has the range comperable to the .50 BMG with some of the anti-material capability and a reduction of system weight. When compared to the .338 Lapua and .408 Cheytac the .300 Win Mag is antiquated. Current Remington 700 based sniper systems chambered in 7.62 NATO which are being used by the DoD have the capability to be converted to .300 Win Mag, but short of competition and limited combat use, the conversion has stalled. Since current 7.62
NATO systems have proven to be effective out to 1000 yards and with the .50 BMG and new 25mm for longer ranges, converting to .300 Win Mag isn't nescessary. A gas piston would be inappropriate for this type of weapon. The system isn't capable of the precision required for 1000 yard shots and precision weapons must receive special attention and this attention and care improves reliability. AR's capable of .300 Win Mag performance already exist. As mentioned, DPMS makes an AR in .300 RSAUM and others make AR in the various WSSM's, including .300.
Both the .300 Remington and Winchester "short magnums" generate .300 Win Mag performance without re-designing the platform. For all practical purposes, the 7.62 NATO fired from the Remington 700, M21/M25 or Mk11 has proven to be very effective, especially when supplemented with .50 BMG. Though the 7.62 NATO is extremely effective, there are better purpose built sniper cartridges which would offer increased lethality and anti-material performance without the weight penalty of current .50 BMG weapons. My vote is for a SASR chambered in .408 Cheytac.