https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hn-P3qnlB10

Anyone else watch this video? From 13:56 to 15:51 if true is very disturbing.

I know this isn't gd but come on OP, either more details or a hotlink :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hn-P3qnlB10

edit to add: im not sure what to say about all the dead sea life, and I admit I didn't watch it all, but I feel like the video producer is linking Fukushima to radiation on an airplane? I don't know if I would reach the same conclusion

Check out http://www.spaceweather.com/

and scroll 3:4 of the way down to hot flights to see what sort of dosage of radiation you get on some long commercial flights.

Not trying to be a nay sayer, but I wanted to share my thoughts.

Uh, for one I highly doubt the reading from his meter, two he lacks basic understanding of the issue. He tells you to take potassium iodate to "rid your body of excess radiation."

You take it so your thyroid doesn't absorb radioactive iodine. Ignore this dude.

I'm surprised the airlines go along with that.

Watched the whole thing, sorry I gave it another "view".  Nothing more than propaganda.  I used to be fish biologist with USF&WS (back in the olden days); just did a lit search through their pubs, nothing mentioned about any of this other than a few radiation studies (the Fukushima disaster effects are felt on the west coast); nothing even remotely like what this video describes, not even a shadow of it.

Poorly put together with juvenile conclusions; 16 minutes of my life I won't get back, plus the time it took to write this response.  20 minutes of my life wasted.  I could have been clipping my toenails, or something else more worthy of my time.  This is on par with the Blair Witch Project.

Thank you, I just noticed my toenails could use a little attention.

If you fly at 30,000+ feet you get extra radiation exposure, as you are above much of the atmosphere CDC.  If they were actually getting 1,436 Sieverts everyone would be dead, dead, dead.

That alone casts extreme doubt on the quality of the video...

But Fukushima was multiple nuclear meltdowns... bad bad bad.

lol.. I guess i lose for not having a bigger screen.  saw the vid link and not the comments below - watched the series of headlines (lacking complete context) and then the radiation meter part.  First off the meter is showing count per minute not sieverts, the actual unit would be microsieverts, and there is a conversion from count to microsieverts.  on a plane you'll get from 2 microsieverts to maybe as high as 20 microsieverts (millionths of a sievert) per hour.  I posted some plots from my own gear in a prior thread titled "you need a radiation meter".   as you vary your location on earth the readings will vary because of differences in teh athmosphere - going over the rockies the planes tend to go higher it seems, because I got my highest reading there (3.5 microsieverts/hr).  Those levels wont do anything to you unless you live in them.  even then it would take some time - astronauts take more like 20 microsieverts an hour which is quite a bit, but they dont all keel over dead so take that as a reference point.

but I would also say the newspaper headlines about the dead animals are misleading also  - none of those stories made any association to radiation as the cause.  I bet I could locate stories about animal deaths anywhere over 5 years and pile them up and try to hoax up a conspiracy.  When the Comments are disabled you know its all bunk.

I was out in Seattle a couple of weeks ago, and i can say for certain based on my own reading that radiation levels there - especially on the coast (where I was staying) are completely normal on the ground.

That are STILL spewing crap into the environment every day with no end in sight and no way to stop it as yet.

But hey, No worries. It will all be dispersed in the really big ocean and everything will be just peachy. (or not)

Amazes me how quiet the media has been about this ongoing disaster. Let someone like Russia have a small radiation leak anywhere and it is front page news everywhere but fukushima? Not worth mentioning any more?