User Panel
Posted: 4/17/2024 8:50:47 AM EST
Any update on when this will be available?
|
|
|
[#1]
We're expecting to release this optic this summer as part of Q2
|
|
|
[#2]
|
|
|
[#3]
I wish this was a 2X.
|
|
|
[#4]
tagged anxiously waiting
|
|
For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood from His workmanship, so that men are without excuse.
|
[#5]
What's the battery life listed as for this GLx 1x?
|
|
|
[#6]
|
|
|
[#7]
|
|
|
[#8]
|
|
For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood from His workmanship, so that men are without excuse.
|
[#9]
|
|
|
[Last Edit: 9divdoc]
[#10]
|
|
For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood from His workmanship, so that men are without excuse.
|
[#11]
good deal, can you share the link? I would like to buy one but can't find them on the site.
|
|
|
[#12]
tracking...
|
|
Tom Sawyer.
"If The Rules bought us to this, what use are they?" |
[#13]
|
|
|
[#14]
@PA is there plans for a 9mm GLx 1x?
|
|
|
[#15]
|
|
|
[#16]
|
|
|
[#17]
Thanks PA got mine...extremely well built.
I am having a little trouble trying to get the diopter to turn...any secret to this...heat it up a little? |
|
For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood from His workmanship, so that men are without excuse.
|
[#18]
|
|
|
[#19]
@PrimaryArms
I want mine haha. I have a rifle waiting on it. Where can I order? |
|
|
[#20]
Originally Posted By 9divdoc: Thanks PA got mine...extremely well built. I am having a little trouble trying to get the diopter to turn...any secret to this...heat it up a little? View Quote I would not recommend heating up the optic. The diopter is meant to be a little stiff so it doesn't move under recoil. I gave mine a few full rotations and essentially "worked it out". It did get better. |
|
|
[#21]
|
|
|
[#22]
|
|
Tom Sawyer.
"If The Rules brought us to this, what use are they?" |
[#23]
Originally Posted By PrimaryArms: I would not recommend heating up the optic. The diopter is meant to be a little stiff so it doesn't move under recoil. I gave mine a few full rotations and essentially "worked it out". It did get better. View Quote I get that my other Cyclops were difficult but I can get this to move at all kind of afraid to use a padded pliers for fear of voiding the warranty? |
|
For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood from His workmanship, so that men are without excuse.
|
[#24]
Update per PA today on IG is mid Q3.
|
|
|
[Last Edit: PrimaryArms]
[#25]
Originally Posted By HunterKiller86: Update per PA today on IG is mid Q3. View Quote Thank you! here is the post! GLx 1x Microprism release update! |
|
|
[#26]
Just got the email about these. Didn't realize until now this was a thing.
Does this mean there may be a GLX 3x in the near future? |
|
|
[#27]
|
|
|
[#28]
What’s this do that my 1x prism slx gen 2 won’t? Curious.
|
|
|
[#29]
|
|
|
[Last Edit: Burncycle]
[#30]
Such a nice little optic ruined by such a terrible in-package mount
|
|
|
[#31]
Originally Posted By Burncycle: Such a nice little optic ruined by such a terrible in-package mount IMO, if this had windage holds like the 3x does (which won't be particularly useful at 1x but under magnification would be much better than a red dot with just a dot or dot and BDC) then it would stand further apart from red dots and be a more intriguing option even for those without astigmatism. Keep innovating! I may snag the next version. View Quote What's wrong with the mount? |
|
|
[Last Edit: Burncycle]
[#32]
Apparently (per brass facts review) it's the same mount that fails basic durability tests that the optic itself passes, which means another $100-150 on top of the base cost to get a mount you can be confident in.
If this doesn't matter to you then it doesn't apply to you, rock on. A good mount especially if we're taking the glx line is low hanging fruit. |
|
|
[#33]
Will this be available in the Gemini 9mm reticle version in the future?
|
|
|
[#34]
Originally Posted By Burncycle: Apparently (per brass facts review) it's the same mount that fails basic durability tests that the optic itself passes, which means another $100-150 on top of the base cost to get a mount you can be confident in. If this doesn't matter to you then it doesn't apply to you, rock on. A good mount especially if we're taking the glx line is low hanging fruit. View Quote Well, if using the largest cantilever possible while surviving hard drops on the optic is a priority you should probably buy a 1 piece mount anyway. For anyone else that just uses the straight mount with this optic it'll be fine. The mount is the way it is to give you the most options, it's not going to be the best possible solution for every scenario. If you wanted a box full of one piece mounts to come with it that's adding significant cost for something most people are going to throw away or leave in the box. |
|
|
[Last Edit: Burncycle]
[#35]
Originally Posted By King_Mud: For anyone else that just uses the straight mount with this optic it'll be fine. The mount is the way it is to give you the most options, it's not going to be the best possible solution for every scenario. If you wanted a box full of one piece mounts to come with it that's adding significant cost for something most people are going to throw away or leave in the box. View Quote No argument here regarding sticking to the straight mount. Keep in mind though, not everyone does their due diligence and scours the web / youtube reviews to see how their particular mount configuration holds up; they may not realize there have been issues with the included cantilever mount. Therefore, especially when we're talking about the GLX line, if they cannot find a way to solve known issues at a reasonable cost as you assert, then frankly I'd rather they just ship with the straight mount. They can always do what primary arms does, and right there on the product page offer a discounted one piece cantilever mount that can be bundled with the optic under "optional accessories". That way, customers can spend the money if they want to, save the money if they don't, and either way they walk away with something that holds up and doesn't hurt the reputation of the optic (which is great) and company (which is also great) if they make a mistake and use... the wrong item included in their purchase. |
|
|
[#36]
Originally Posted By Burncycle: No argument here regarding sticking to the straight mount. Keep in mind though, not everyone does their due diligence and scours the web / youtube reviews to see how their particular mount configuration holds up; they may not realize there have been issues with the included cantilever mount. Therefore, especially when we're talking about the GLX line, if they cannot find a way to solve known issues at a reasonable cost as you assert, then frankly I'd rather they just ship with the straight mount. They can always do what primary arms does, and right there on the product page offer a discounted one piece cantilever mount that can be bundled with the optic under "optional accessories". That way, customers can spend the money if they want to, save the money if they don't, and either way they walk away with something that holds up and doesn't hurt the reputation of the optic (which is great) and company (which is also great) if they make a mistake and use... the wrong item included in their purchase. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Burncycle: Originally Posted By King_Mud: For anyone else that just uses the straight mount with this optic it'll be fine. The mount is the way it is to give you the most options, it's not going to be the best possible solution for every scenario. If you wanted a box full of one piece mounts to come with it that's adding significant cost for something most people are going to throw away or leave in the box. No argument here regarding sticking to the straight mount. Keep in mind though, not everyone does their due diligence and scours the web / youtube reviews to see how their particular mount configuration holds up; they may not realize there have been issues with the included cantilever mount. Therefore, especially when we're talking about the GLX line, if they cannot find a way to solve known issues at a reasonable cost as you assert, then frankly I'd rather they just ship with the straight mount. They can always do what primary arms does, and right there on the product page offer a discounted one piece cantilever mount that can be bundled with the optic under "optional accessories". That way, customers can spend the money if they want to, save the money if they don't, and either way they walk away with something that holds up and doesn't hurt the reputation of the optic (which is great) and company (which is also great) if they make a mistake and use... the wrong item included in their purchase. That’s fair and a broken mount, even if “free” doesn’t look great to the customer. |
|
|
[#37]
Mount works fine for me, no complaints.
|
|
|
[#38]
Mine came shipped with a dead battery!
|
|
|
[#39]
I have never had a problem with any of my SLx 1x or 3x mounts, and I have multiple. No reason why the GLx mount should be any different. We'll see when I get mine mounted up. I don't abuse my guns/optics/mounts, but they do get used and tossed around quite a bit.
|
|
Protego quod vallo.
Si vis pacem, para bellum. |
[#40]
Primary Arms - will yall's 6x magnifier work with the new GLX 1x Microprism, or will it still have the same issues as it does with the SLX one?
|
|
|
[#41]
I received mine and have it mounted up on an ADM mount. Super happy with it and the killflash I got with it. The only thing I kinda was surprised by was the lack of the bikini cover. Not a deal breaker but I do like having something covering the glass for storage purposes. Other than that I am super happy with the optic and will probably get another one.
|
|
|
[#42]
Originally Posted By Hawkeye: I have never had a problem with any of my SLx 1x or 3x mounts, and I have multiple. No reason why the GLx mount should be any different. We'll see when I get mine mounted up. I don't abuse my guns/optics/mounts, but they do get used and tossed around quite a bit. View Quote We have seen good results through testing with the 6X magnifier |
|
|
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.