The possession component is what really makes me mad for you OR folks. In WA, there were multiple rewrites of the mag bill, including removing the possession part, for which I’m thankful but still concerned they may push for it down the road. IIRC, possession was originally only going to be permitted at home, one’s place of business, ranges and ‘property in immediate control of the owner’ or something to that effect, whatever that meant. Anywhere else, mags had to be locked up and not immediately accessible. There were even rewrites to allow a 17 rd limit to account for most pistol mags in an attempt to recognize common use for self defense, but that fell through.
Biggest issue now is a potential AWB. Given what was identified as an ‘assault weapon’ in I-1639, an AWB passing is gonna impact a LOT.