Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Posted: 5/5/2022 4:33:56 PM EDT
https://www.gunowners.org/nh05052022/

Lo and behold, a New Hampshire Fish and Game bill pending before the General Court (H.B. 490) has a ticking timebomb:  It would replace New Hampshire's current definition of "firearm" and related terms with a much broader federal definition, which contains parts, silencers, etc.  

New Hampshire law has several definitions of "firearm" or similar terms, but they all revolve around the gun, rather than parts and accessories.

Current NH law defines “firearm” as:

   “Firearm” means any weapon, including a starter gun, which will, is designed to, or may readily be converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive.

It also defines "deadly weapon” thusly:

   V. "Deadly weapon" means any firearm, knife or other substance or thing which, in the manner it is used, intended to be used, or threatened to be used, is known to be capable of producing death or serious bodily injury.  

The amendment to HB 490 would replace these with the new federal definitions of “firearm.”

18 U.S.C. 921(a)(3), specifically includes:

   (A) any weapon,

   (B) the frame or receiver of any such weapon,

   (C) any firearm muffler or firearm silencer.

In addition, the Biden administration is expanding the definition of firearm to include "firearms kits" and "ghost guns."

GOA will soon be suing to challenge that rule.  And a year from now, we will know a lot more about what "firearm" means for the purposes of federal law.

In the meantime, it's much too dangerous to incorporate the federal definition as New Hampshire's definition until we know what the implications of the federal definition are.
Link Posted: 5/6/2022 8:26:35 AM EDT
[#1]
This amendment on HB490 passed yesterday and now is headed back to the House for Concur/NonConcur.  The target for any contacting should be your state reps at this point.



The senate roll calls aren't updated yet, but i know French, Avard, Birdsell, and Morse are R senators that voted for it.  Morse is running for US Senate and he just voted to shackle NH to the Feds.

The captioner doesn't catch everything and everyone.


Link Posted: 5/6/2022 8:17:55 PM EDT
[#2]
So the roll call is up for this amendment which seeks to shackle NH's definition to the feds.

French, Avard, Birdsell, Morse, Bradley, Carson(of course), and Gannon are the Rs who voted for it.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top