How else are they going to make up for the loss of deer tags due to declining numbers and terrible seasons. [/sarcasm]
Seriously though, maybe if they stopped setting ridiculous hunting regulations that make it harder to hunt, they'd keep their numbers up. Just a few of the bad calls lately have been:
1)Cut the number of waterfowl blinds more than in half
2)Continue to give Ohio bad hunting dates in favor to "keep some waterfowl for the southern states"
3)Cut the number of deer permitted (i know, it fluctuates by year and county, but less = less revenue period)
Hell, I'm already shelling out over $100/year to the state (license, wetland stamp, federal stamp, deer tag), nobody wants to pay any more. And they wonder why the number of hunters keeps declining.
I will be emailing against this proposal, but last time the response was "we don't care".