Posted: 11/28/2018 6:31:47 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote History Quoted:
Who sent you that, was it Mitch? I sent a query myself (including to Mitch) and have only heard back from one of those that I contacted so far (not Mitch).
I had a very long discussion with my RTO this afternoon as well (I’m a Hunter Safety volunteer as well as an 07 FFL). I get the feeling that the DNR is not happy about these “new” pistols but they can’t do anything about it other than to discourage their use. They are obligated by state law to use the definition of a pistol as it is defined in statute. Thus, as long as it’s a legal pistol per statute, it’s permissible in the shotgun zone. I even clarified the <26” OAL misnomer by crafting a theoretical 96” OAL pistol with a barrel measuring 15.999” and, per state statute, it’s a pistol and thus legal for use. The DNR is simply unhappy about the new technology in pistols, specifically the new braces, many of the COs consider a brace to be a stock. As I mentioned to the RTO, just because it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, doesn’t mean it’s a duck. They know this and don’t like it. The RTO that I spoke with, and I’d wager this is true for many of the COs as well, was not aware of the current ATF position on shouldering a brace. He stated that if that is indeed the case, that is out of their hands as well. I also asked about the various comments concerning allowed aiming devices and shooting technique, his reply on those topics was that if it’s not addressed in statue and/or a federal opinion (ATF) then, once again, it’s out of their hands.
Long story short, adhere to MN state statute and federal laws and you’re good to go regardless of the COs personal opinion. This doesn’t mean that you won’t/can’t be cited and/or charged however. Just as not every LEO can know the intricate details about ever law, we can’t expect this from our COs either. Personally, I carry documentation with me in the woods when I’m hunting with my 6.5 Grendel pistols, it may not make a difference but having documention certainly won’t hurt my case either.
Personally, as long as the current laws remain unchanged, I will continue to hunt with my little Grendel’s. BTW, I also hunt zone 603. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quote History Quoted:
Quoted:
Here is the letter i received.
The above regulations have to be followed in order to hunt with a pistol/handgun in the shotgun/handgun zone. Most hunters seem to understand and understand the size restrictions, but some are not understanding the requirements of how to shoot a pistol/handgun in the shotgun zone. Hunters have to realize that if they are going to use an AR 15 pistol in the shotgun zone, they CAN’T shoulder it. An AR 15 pistol that has an arm brace is legal as long as the firearm is not shouldered. If a CO sees a hunter shoulder the firearm in any way, then the hunter could possibly get a citation. You also can’t have a rifle scope on the AR because a rifle scope has to be held close to the eye. Having a scope close to your eye means that the firearm has to be shouldered in order to be fired and this is illegal in the shotgun zone. You can have a scope, but it would have to be a pistol/handgun scope and the firearm would have to be fired with arms fully extended in front of you. Who sent you that, was it Mitch? I sent a query myself (including to Mitch) and have only heard back from one of those that I contacted so far (not Mitch).
I had a very long discussion with my RTO this afternoon as well (I’m a Hunter Safety volunteer as well as an 07 FFL). I get the feeling that the DNR is not happy about these “new” pistols but they can’t do anything about it other than to discourage their use. They are obligated by state law to use the definition of a pistol as it is defined in statute. Thus, as long as it’s a legal pistol per statute, it’s permissible in the shotgun zone. I even clarified the <26” OAL misnomer by crafting a theoretical 96” OAL pistol with a barrel measuring 15.999” and, per state statute, it’s a pistol and thus legal for use. The DNR is simply unhappy about the new technology in pistols, specifically the new braces, many of the COs consider a brace to be a stock. As I mentioned to the RTO, just because it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, doesn’t mean it’s a duck. They know this and don’t like it. The RTO that I spoke with, and I’d wager this is true for many of the COs as well, was not aware of the current ATF position on shouldering a brace. He stated that if that is indeed the case, that is out of their hands as well. I also asked about the various comments concerning allowed aiming devices and shooting technique, his reply on those topics was that if it’s not addressed in statue and/or a federal opinion (ATF) then, once again, it’s out of their hands. Long story short, adhere to MN state statute and federal laws and you’re good to go regardless of the COs personal opinion. This doesn’t mean that you won’t/can’t be cited and/or charged however. Just as not every LEO can know the intricate details about ever law, we can’t expect this from our COs either. Personally, I carry documentation with me in the woods when I’m hunting with my 6.5 Grendel pistols, it may not make a difference but having documention certainly won’t hurt my case either. Personally, as long as the current laws remain unchanged, I will continue to hunt with my little Grendel’s. BTW, I also hunt zone 603. Justin Badina, is who i have been in contact with.Mitch Boyum is our local CO,i have not talked to him yet.
|