User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 2/10/2022 9:11:29 PM EDT
[#1]
WTF?
By the way, I owe you an IM. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2022 10:02:59 PM EDT
[#2]
well that’s what we need, judges in California telling us what to do in Wisconsin (I get that it’s probably a federal judge)
Just feel slimy |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2022 11:40:17 PM EDT
[#3]
I don't think what a loony Cali. judge does will change things much. They're still gonna get plunked.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2022 11:52:26 PM EDT
[#4]
Shoot, shovel and shut up.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2022 10:28:30 AM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I don't think what a loony Cali. judge does will change things much. They're still gonna get plunked. Now, even more so. He just signed a death warrant on them. Local sentiment is this: as long as the govt is doing something to control the population, we'll let the system work. But, when some liberal asshole (especially one from Commiefornia) tries telling the people who have to live with the wolves in their daily lives that "you can't harm them", and nothing will be done to address their very real concerns (for "touchy-feely" reasons), the response will be on the order of "Oh yeah? Hold my beer and watch this, asshole". The S.S.S. season just began.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2022 10:37:03 AM EDT
[#6]
It sounds like some cat lady Karen complained to the right person. I hope she takes her dog to the Nicolet or Chequamegon once.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2022 3:09:36 PM EDT
[#7]
I'm curious as to what the judge used as evidence in his moronic decision?
edit: after reading a little more about it, he claimed that the deregulation didn't take into account ALL the States ? So why in the hell don't they just let the individual states decide based on their populations and keep the Feds out of it? If I personally had a wolf problem, I personally would take care of it. But that's just me. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2022 3:22:48 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted: It sounds like some cat lady Karen complained to the right person. I hope she takes her dog to the Nicolet or Chequamegon once. I take my dog to the Nicolet a lot, to hunt grouse, and just go for walks. It's only a few miles away. But since my Chocolate Lab can't shoot to defend herself, I carry the Glock 20sf 10mm instead. If they think I'm going to just stand by and watch if a wolf attacks my pet because it's "endangered" and off limits, they can kiss my mofo ass. It won't be "endangered" for very long ...
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2022 7:08:19 AM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted: well that’s what we need, judges in California telling us what to do in Wisconsin (I get that it’s probably a federal judge) Just feel slimy +1 |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/11/2022 10:05:11 PM EDT
[#10]
We can think that we just can't say it
 -ussrangersm
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/12/2022 11:41:21 PM EDT
[#11]
Should only be 350 wolves in WI the number of wolves is 1200-2000 depending on who you believe.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/12/2022 11:43:13 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted: It sounds like some cat lady Karen complained to the right person. I hope she takes her dog to the Nicolet or Chequamegon once. They have to kill some rich lady's alpacas before they get back on the ok to hunt again list. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2022 6:50:11 PM EDT
[#13]
We should send some to his home town since it's apparently dependent on the national population
 He should foster a couple dozen for the good of all.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2022 9:12:03 PM EDT
[#14]
Yep. Since they were once Native to the areas of Dane and Milwaukee counties, I think we should double fence those two counties with some really impressive fencing, capture every wolf in the state, and release them inside those fences so they can take care of the urban deer problem w/o sharpshooters etc.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/14/2022 11:32:01 AM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Yep. Since they were once Native to the areas of Dane and Milwaukee counties, I think we should double fence those two counties with some really impressive fencing, capture every wolf in the state, and release them inside those fences so they can take care of the urban deer problem w/o sharpshooters etc. Can you imagine karen's reaction to a pack of wolves ripping bambi apart in her back yard? The enforcement of pack order would have her shitting her pants. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/14/2022 8:50:24 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Can you imagine karen's reaction to a pack of wolves ripping bambi apart in her back yard? The enforcement of pack order would have her shitting her pants. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2022 10:02:09 PM EDT
[#17]
There has always only been one solution. There continues to be only one solution - whether or not some judge in California thinks differently.
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
