|
Not much Ruger or Magpul left. Wonder how heavy I can get this thing lol.. Steel god rod is on the way. I will be keeping the mag release/trigger shoe as is though. Attached File Attached File Excuse the OLight, but honestly the battery powered versions are decent for the money. I don't trust the rechargeables. The Comp is a SCT, only works with OEM slides sadly. But it does work with Remsport. It's basically a great value Ramjet Comp. 50 state legal too. Not sure what to do with the Ruger Slide and barrel.. Buy another SCT frame? ![]() Sharpsm does have a magwell that converts the grip length to a G17. Wonder if that will balance it out a bit. Isn't really a carry gun or anything. |
|
Originally Posted By Capt_Destro: The Comp is a SCT, only works with OEM slides sadly. But it does work with Remsport. It's basically a great value Ramjet Comp. 50 state legal too. Is that the comp and barrel that Aim Surplus was selling for $199? Edit.... I see they were closed out for $99.99 ![]() I probably would have picked up one for that price |
|
Got the RXM out of jail this morning, and ran 300 flawless rounds through it. Mix of weights. Its definitely going to be a learning curve, after the years of shooting and carrying a P320 and a P365 Macro. But the grip was more comfortable than I was expecting. My biggest gripe is getting my support hand set up right. Something doesn't feel natural. Second grip is the takedown pin getting hot with rapid fire. Once I get my Macro back from my brother, I'll have to make a choice on which to carry. But I feel well served by the RXM. Oh, the OSight red dot worked flawlessly, as well. As big as it looks, I don't think it takes away from concealed carry at all. Attached File Attached File |
Bullets, blades, bourbon, and buoyancy. Not necessarily in that order.
|
Well today at lunch I hit up a few of the pawn shops near my work just browse as I am often prone to do, and one of them had an RXM with Primary arms RS-15 red dot on it. after a bit of negotiation i talked them down to $300 plus tax. Attached File i didnt know much about this red dot, but after googling it seems like its a C-More pattern red dot. which is... interesting. From my understanding the RXM is able to accept RMR, DPP, & RMSc pattern optics which are not interchangeable with the c-more footprint. when i get home today i'm gonna pull the optic off and see whats up. I bet the previous owner just put screws in and there are none of the locator pins installed. |
"The only place where success comes before work is in the dictionary"
-Vince Lombardi
|
It's my understanding that the holes for the DPP and the C-More match up. Since there are no built in recoil bosses, it'll fit. The ACSS version has a standard price of $359, so you got quite the deal. If the pawn shop is in the Dallas area and you don't mind sharing, send me a PM and I'll check them out one day
|
|
Originally Posted By DavidY: It's my understanding that the holes for the DPP and the C-More match up. Since there are no built in recoil bosses, it'll fit. The ACSS version has a standard price of $359, so you got quite the deal. If the pawn shop is in the Dallas area and you don't mind sharing, send me a PM and I'll check them out one day ![]() I pulled the optic off the slide and sure enough it was just held on by screws. I question if that’s a good idea as I’m worried the screws will shear after a bit. I’m debating re-mounting it up. Although I did call Ruger today and told them that I had just acquired it second hand and that there were no optic locator pins included, I asked how much it would be to have a set sent out to me plus the optic cover plate. No charge, they said they’d get the in the mail. Now I wait for magpul to release the full size grip module I DM’d you the pawn shop info Edit. Fuck it. I Put some loctite on the screws, grabbed my torque driver and mounted it back up. We’ll see if it holds |
"The only place where success comes before work is in the dictionary"
-Vince Lombardi
|
Originally Posted By Birddog1911: Got the RXM out of jail this morning, and ran 300 flawless rounds through it. Mix of weights. Its definitely going to be a learning curve, after the years of shooting and carrying a P320 and a P365 Macro. But the grip was more comfortable than I was expecting. My biggest gripe is getting my support hand set up right. Something doesn't feel natural. Second grip is the takedown pin getting hot with rapid fire. Once I get my Macro back from my brother, I'll have to make a choice on which to carry. But I feel well served by the RXM. Oh, the OSight red dot worked flawlessly, as well. As big as it looks, I don't think it takes away from concealed carry at all. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/180161/1000010671_jpg-3636678.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/180161/1000010673_jpg-3636680.JPG Nice! thats exactly how Im going to set mine up. |
|
Originally Posted By Capt_Destro: Is the optic snug in the pocket? Kinda looks like it fills the entire thing. Might be okay without pins in that case. when i was mounting it back up last night, i tested how snug it set in the pocket, there was a tiny amount of fore and aft play unfortunately. But we'll see. I think i'm going to end up dropping a holosun 407c that is currently an orphan in my collection on this thing once i get the locator pins in the mail anyways. |
"The only place where success comes before work is in the dictionary"
-Vince Lombardi
|
Originally Posted By D_Man: You have to buy the black grip module separately to make one. Originally Posted By D_Man: Originally Posted By BriansM4: Does Ruger make an all black RXM? Or spend $5 on a bottle of Dit Dyemore (for synthetics). |
|
Originally Posted By D_Man: You have to buy the black grip module separately to make one. Not a fan of the grey. I bought the black grip at the same time as my RXM. That was the first thing I changed. I might pick up the tan grip though. I kind of like the two tone look. |
|
Originally Posted By DavidY: Magpul says we'll have them for "Pumpkin Spice" season ![]() I'd show the post, but I can't upload photos since the upgrade Hey Magpul, pumpkin spice season is almost over, where is my G17 compatible grip? I bought my RXM last December for purpose of swapping on one of the G17 sized grips. Here I am almost a year later and still no grip....but I do like the pistol. I think the trigger is great, love the sights, and the magazine release is way better than a standard Gen 3. I guess Magpul didn't say what year the pumpkin spice season they were shooting for is.... |
|
Originally Posted By mbinky: Hey Magpul, pumpkin spice season is almost over, where is my G17 compatible grip? I bought my RXM last December for purpose of swapping on one of the G17 sized grips. Here I am almost a year later and still no grip....but I do like the pistol. I think the trigger is great, love the sights, and the magazine release is way better than a standard Gen 3. I guess Magpul didn't say what year the pumpkin spice season they were shooting for is.... Originally Posted By mbinky: Originally Posted By DavidY: Magpul says we'll have them for "Pumpkin Spice" season ![]() I'd show the post, but I can't upload photos since the upgrade Hey Magpul, pumpkin spice season is almost over, where is my G17 compatible grip? I bought my RXM last December for purpose of swapping on one of the G17 sized grips. Here I am almost a year later and still no grip....but I do like the pistol. I think the trigger is great, love the sights, and the magazine release is way better than a standard Gen 3. I guess Magpul didn't say what year the pumpkin spice season they were shooting for is.... I read elsewhere that they heard from Magpul early this week and we're told the end of November ![]() It was introduced on December 11th. Ight as well make it a full year. |
|
Originally Posted By DavidY: I read elsewhere that they heard from Magpul early this week and we're told the end of November ![]() It was introduced on December 11th. Ight as well make it a full year. Originally Posted By DavidY: Originally Posted By mbinky: Originally Posted By DavidY: Magpul says we'll have them for "Pumpkin Spice" season ![]() I'd show the post, but I can't upload photos since the upgrade Hey Magpul, pumpkin spice season is almost over, where is my G17 compatible grip? I bought my RXM last December for purpose of swapping on one of the G17 sized grips. Here I am almost a year later and still no grip....but I do like the pistol. I think the trigger is great, love the sights, and the magazine release is way better than a standard Gen 3. I guess Magpul didn't say what year the pumpkin spice season they were shooting for is.... I read elsewhere that they heard from Magpul early this week and we're told the end of November ![]() It was introduced on December 11th. Ight as well make it a full year. Wallets and Daka pouches take priority probably. |
|
Originally Posted By Capt_Destro: Wallets and Daka pouches take priority probably. I am both surprised and unsurprised at this point. Surprised in the sense that Ruger themselves hasn’t leaned on them to get the accessories out. It has to be hurting some sales. Completely unsurprised since this is just Magpul now. Can’t execute, no ability to stick to a deadline, more focused on the lifestyle business. Probably kept afloat by government PMAG sales. At this point I think AC-Unity is better when it comes to mags, Strike Industries attempts to innovate even if it’s occasionally weird, UTG Pro has quality American-made (and Taiwan-made) gear for comparable prices, and so on. Magpul just flew too close to the sun and after the founder sold out, it’s just another company run by a New York City private investment group. I’m watching for the debt-loading step and the inevitable bankruptcy since that’s the script most of them follow. |
Opinions are my own and not the views of my employers, organizations, or other associated people.
|
Originally Posted By TacticalPlinker: Hopefully if Magpul doesn't make them, someone else will. At least someone else that won't charge $300+ for it. If Wilson Combat sold one for $100 that felt like their 365 XL (up sized), I'd order one immediately. There are 3D files out there, but I don't have a printer or know anyone with one. I'm waiting to see if anyone offers them for sale. |
|
Originally Posted By DavidY: I read elsewhere that they heard from Magpul early this week and we're told the end of November ![]() It was introduced on December 11th. Ight as well make it a full year. Any actual date or timeframe is confidential insider info. Magpul won't answer questions from their customers or otherwise "comment on future product releases". That's coming straight from Magpul. |
|
Originally Posted By TacticalPlinker: Any actual date or timeframe is confidential insider info. Magpul won't answer questions from their customers or otherwise "comment on future product releases". That's coming straight from Magpul. Originally Posted By TacticalPlinker: Originally Posted By DavidY: I read elsewhere that they heard from Magpul early this week and we're told the end of November ![]() It was introduced on December 11th. Ight as well make it a full year. Any actual date or timeframe is confidential insider info. Magpul won't answer questions from their customers or otherwise "comment on future product releases". That's coming straight from Magpul. Except for the emails from Magpul that do give a Time frame. Sure ![]() If I had known Magpul was such a shitty company with the inability to send out products, I wouldn't have even bothered buying one when I did. But as long as they have their gay ass clothing line, people will line up for them. |
|
Originally Posted By DavidY: We should all be completely honest. Magpul doesn't have a fucking clue when the frames are going to be ready. I think they'll be completely fucking shocked when they are ![]() |
Zero to DeeJ in about 5 posts. - Troutman84
|
Originally Posted By DavidY: If Wilson Combat sold one for $100 that felt like their 365 XL (up sized), I'd order one immediately. There are 3D files out there, but I don't have a printer or know anyone with one. I'm waiting to see if anyone offers them for sale. Originally Posted By DavidY: Originally Posted By TacticalPlinker: Hopefully if Magpul doesn't make them, someone else will. At least someone else that won't charge $300+ for it. If Wilson Combat sold one for $100 that felt like their 365 XL (up sized), I'd order one immediately. There are 3D files out there, but I don't have a printer or know anyone with one. I'm waiting to see if anyone offers them for sale. I would definitely try a WC grip. The 320 one was fan-fucking-tastic. I can’t complain about the stock grip, though, it’s about as good as you can expect a stock grip to be for both function and comfort when carried. |
|
Originally Posted By rb889: I would definitely try a WC grip. The 320 one was fan-fucking-tastic. I can't complain about the stock grip, though, it's about as good as you can expect a stock grip to be for both function and comfort when carried. Originally Posted By rb889: Originally Posted By DavidY: Originally Posted By TacticalPlinker: Hopefully if Magpul doesn't make them, someone else will. At least someone else that won't charge $300+ for it. If Wilson Combat sold one for $100 that felt like their 365 XL (up sized), I'd order one immediately. There are 3D files out there, but I don't have a printer or know anyone with one. I'm waiting to see if anyone offers them for sale. I would definitely try a WC grip. The 320 one was fan-fucking-tastic. I can't complain about the stock grip, though, it's about as good as you can expect a stock grip to be for both function and comfort when carried. I agree 100% if you're wanting to keep a G19 length grip. I like the RXM G19 size grip over most others, but I bought it for the ability to have a G17 length grip (without any added doodads). It would be a good battle between a Wilson Combat G45 variant and the Magpul. |
|
Originally Posted By NoDakWolfPack: So what are the odds all the Glock clones (RXM included) that use the cruciform are going to get wrapped up in this California Glock Ban lawsuit? Are Gen3 clones not long for this world? I've been thinking about the same thing. But, we don't know anything yet, all we have are assumptions. Although a newer product, it won't kill Ruger or Magpul to 86 the RXM. It also wouldn't kill PSA to 86 the Dagger. Maybe they could modify something to get around it as well. I didn't bother to look, but I also have no idea if the RXM or Dagger are on the Roster and even legal to own in PRK in the first place. Though I have no idea how it would effect the Glock after market as a whole, or companies like Shadow Systems. |
|
Originally Posted By TacticalPlinker: I've been thinking about the same thing. But, we don't know anything yet, all we have are assumptions. Although a newer product, it won't kill Ruger or Magpul to 86 the RXM. It also wouldn't kill PSA to 86 the Dagger. Maybe they could modify something to get around it as well. I didn't bother to look, but I also have no idea if the RXM or Dagger are on the Roster and even legal to own in PRK in the first place. Though I have no idea how it would effect the Glock after market as a whole, or companies like Shadow Systems. Originally Posted By TacticalPlinker: Originally Posted By NoDakWolfPack: So what are the odds all the Glock clones (RXM included) that use the cruciform are going to get wrapped up in this California Glock Ban lawsuit? Are Gen3 clones not long for this world? I've been thinking about the same thing. But, we don't know anything yet, all we have are assumptions. Although a newer product, it won't kill Ruger or Magpul to 86 the RXM. It also wouldn't kill PSA to 86 the Dagger. Maybe they could modify something to get around it as well. I didn't bother to look, but I also have no idea if the RXM or Dagger are on the Roster and even legal to own in PRK in the first place. Though I have no idea how it would effect the Glock after market as a whole, or companies like Shadow Systems. |
|
Originally Posted By November5: The RXM isn't on the roster, I don't see PSA listed at all. Shadow Systems does have a few models on there that might be affected. True, but the CA roster is not what the other 11 states are using to justify their lawsuits. Glock is one of only 4 (I believe Beretta, FNH, and Sig are the others) Billion dollar gun companies . If fighting these lawsuits is not profitable for them, how can Ruger or anyone else using a Gen3 clone stand up to it? |
|
Originally Posted By NoDakWolfPack: True, but the CA roster is not what the other 11 states are using to justify their lawsuits. Glock is one of only 4 (I believe Beretta, FNH, and Sig are the others) Billion dollar gun companies . If fighting these lawsuits is not profitable for them, how can Ruger or anyone else using a Gen3 clone stand up to it? ![]()
|
|
Originally Posted By D_Man: Welp, looks like we might be finding that out sooner than later. ![]()
Originally Posted By D_Man: Originally Posted By NoDakWolfPack: True, but the CA roster is not what the other 11 states are using to justify their lawsuits. Glock is one of only 4 (I believe Beretta, FNH, and Sig are the others) Billion dollar gun companies . If fighting these lawsuits is not profitable for them, how can Ruger or anyone else using a Gen3 clone stand up to it? ![]()
Well damn. Here’s to hoping Ruger somehow finds the wherewithal to fight and win against these losers. This needs to stop here and now. |
|
Originally Posted By NoDakWolfPack: Well damn. Here’s to hoping Ruger somehow finds the wherewithal to fight and win against these losers. This needs to stop here and now. Originally Posted By NoDakWolfPack: Originally Posted By D_Man: Originally Posted By NoDakWolfPack: True, but the CA roster is not what the other 11 states are using to justify their lawsuits. Glock is one of only 4 (I believe Beretta, FNH, and Sig are the others) Billion dollar gun companies . If fighting these lawsuits is not profitable for them, how can Ruger or anyone else using a Gen3 clone stand up to it? ![]()
Well damn. Here’s to hoping Ruger somehow finds the wherewithal to fight and win against these losers. This needs to stop here and now. All these mother fucks do is "Demand" things. Not once have they said "Please" |
|
Originally Posted By D_Man: Welp, looks like we might be finding that out sooner than later. ![]()
Well shit, that sucks. I have 2 already, so I'm good on that front. But think I'm going to pick up some spare parts just in case if there is anything left to buy. I'm afraid this will kill any chance of ever seeing additional grip frames, at least from Magpul/Ruger. I hope I'm wrong. |
|
Originally Posted By TacticalPlinker: Well shit, that sucks. I have 2 already, so I'm good on that front. But think I'm going to pick up some spare parts just in case if there is anything left to buy. I'm afraid this will kill any chance of ever seeing additional grip frames, at least from Magpul/Ruger. I hope I'm wrong. If the RXM becomes the ACR of the pistol world I will be incredibly disappointed. |
|
Originally Posted By D_Man: Welp, looks like we might be finding that out sooner than later. ![]()
Originally Posted By D_Man: Originally Posted By NoDakWolfPack: True, but the CA roster is not what the other 11 states are using to justify their lawsuits. Glock is one of only 4 (I believe Beretta, FNH, and Sig are the others) Billion dollar gun companies . If fighting these lawsuits is not profitable for them, how can Ruger or anyone else using a Gen3 clone stand up to it? ![]()
I might be incorrect, but I was under the impression the RXM was not able to be 'converted' by a 'switch' like the Glock. Maybe it doesn't use the 'cruciform' style trigger bar? I'm not saying it can't, it's just not as simple as the Glock. TX22 for example, it can be done but there's a bit of work involved to install it and making certain it runs right. |
|
Originally Posted By Yojimbo: As far as I can tell, the RXM has cruciform trigger just like my other Gen3 Glocks. I forgot to mention, but the Glock SCD (Striker Control Device) also fit on the RXM slide and functioned exactly like it did on my Gen 3 Glocks. It appears that other than the FCI frame, locking block and trigger housing that all the other RXM internal parts are basically the same as a Gen 3 Glock. https://i.imgur.com/GSIt9G2.jpeg Originally Posted By Yojimbo: Originally Posted By bmarshall1: I might be incorrect, but I was under the impression the RXM was not able to be 'converted' by a 'switch' like the Glock. Maybe it doesn't use the 'cruciform' style trigger bar? I'm not saying it can't, it's just not as simple as the Glock. TX22 for example, it can be done but there's a bit of work involved to install it and making certain it runs right. As far as I can tell, the RXM has cruciform trigger just like my other Gen3 Glocks. I forgot to mention, but the Glock SCD (Striker Control Device) also fit on the RXM slide and functioned exactly like it did on my Gen 3 Glocks. It appears that other than the FCI frame, locking block and trigger housing that all the other RXM internal parts are basically the same as a Gen 3 Glock. https://i.imgur.com/GSIt9G2.jpeg I googled and results were it does not have that style but you may know better than I. There's also a video I watched not long after the RXM came out, something like '20 reasons the RXM is better than the Glock', it seems more than a few changes/upgrades were made. |
|
Originally Posted By bmarshall1: I googled and results were it does not have that style but you may know better than I. There's also a video I watched not long after the RXM came out, something like '20 reasons the RXM is better than the Glock', it seems more than a few changes/upgrades were made. |
|
Originally Posted By D_Man: The RXM trigger bar uses the same cruciform arrangement as a gen3 Glock. The parts are nearly 1:1 identical. Originally Posted By D_Man: Originally Posted By bmarshall1: I googled and results were it does not have that style but you may know better than I. There's also a video I watched not long after the RXM came out, something like '20 reasons the RXM is better than the Glock', it seems more than a few changes/upgrades were made. |
|
Originally Posted By Capt_Destro: For a switch, I thought a channel had to be cut into the frame? Doesn't the steel FCU make this a bit "harder" to do? (Obviously not really) Not talking about FRTs and stuff. But can't that be argued? |
|
Originally Posted By bmarshall1: I googled and results were it does not have that style but you may know better than I. There's also a video I watched not long after the RXM came out, something like '20 reasons the RXM is better than the Glock', it seems more than a few changes/upgrades were made. Originally Posted By bmarshall1: Originally Posted By Yojimbo: Originally Posted By bmarshall1: I might be incorrect, but I was under the impression the RXM was not able to be 'converted' by a 'switch' like the Glock. Maybe it doesn't use the 'cruciform' style trigger bar? I'm not saying it can't, it's just not as simple as the Glock. TX22 for example, it can be done but there's a bit of work involved to install it and making certain it runs right. As far as I can tell, the RXM has cruciform trigger just like my other Gen3 Glocks. I forgot to mention, but the Glock SCD (Striker Control Device) also fit on the RXM slide and functioned exactly like it did on my Gen 3 Glocks. It appears that other than the FCI frame, locking block and trigger housing that all the other RXM internal parts are basically the same as a Gen 3 Glock. https://i.imgur.com/GSIt9G2.jpeg I googled and results were it does not have that style but you may know better than I. There's also a video I watched not long after the RXM came out, something like '20 reasons the RXM is better than the Glock', it seems more than a few changes/upgrades were made. |
|
Originally Posted By DavidY: Jesus Christ, just shut up. Do you always quit so easily? Are you 23 years old? What exactly did I quit? I have no control or influence over Ruger, Magpul or anyone else but myself. I have 2 RXM's. I've replaced the grip frame on both of them. Are we no longer allowed to express opinions and relay facts? |
|
Originally Posted By TacticalPlinker: Are we no longer allowed to express opinions and relay facts? What fucking facts? One anti gun group Posts a message online and you're already spreading your cheeks and running around like the sky is falling. Just because a foreign company run by foreigners is throwing in the towel, doesn't mean an American company owned by Americans is going to do the same thing. I would expect cry baby nonsense from GD, not here. It's sickening |








