Questions and Comments:
9mm Pros: Cheaper
Lighter
Slightly higher capacity (vs. 40)
Less recoil
40 Pros: Larger diameter = more tissue damage = a hit to a vital or blood vessel that could be a miss or a nick with a slightly smaller caliber
Not as much kick as some might suggest (JMO), though more than a 9mm.
While many will tell you that you should get a military caliber, I say so what, unless you are attempting to smuggle your weapon into a foreign combat zone. You are not going to get re-supplied by the military in SHTF any more than you are getting re-supplied by some LEO agency (40). Then they will tell you that ammo is cheaper so you can stock up for SHTF. Ok, do you plan on using 9mm ball? 115gr to 124gr at that? If I am relying on ball I will take 45acp not 9mm or 40 thank you!
I am SLOWLY starting to appreciate the 9 for what it is (mostly a training round for myself) but I am still part of the “big bullets make bigger holes” camp. It should be noted that the most reliable fight stopping loads for the 9 are the 147gr loads. What does that tell me? 9mm is the LOWEST end of the spectrum. Mass (ie bullet weight) is more important in handgun calibers that velocity. This is still somewhat true with rifle rounds though to a lesser extent. I have witnessed 5.56 fail to penetrate or literally “bounce off” of auto bodies that I am sure a 7.62 would have penetrated. Light bullets at high velocities have a tendency to yaw or ricochet pretty easily. 9mm is not much for windshield penetration either (147gr being the exception). Remember that the wounding mechanisms of handgun rounds are not the same as rifle rounds.
With all of that said, the 9mm will do you fine if loaded with the proper defensive loads and you are able to obtain solid hits.
? – I have heard about the 9mm after market barrels for the 22, 23 ect. but who makes them? Glockmeister list the 19 and the 23 as being incompatible for a barrel swap for example.
Contractor