User Panel
|
Lithuania is purchasing 2 more nasams systems for the AFU and they are supposed to be delivered in the next 3 months.
Interesting |
|
|
|
Quoted: https://www.thedrive.com/uploads/2023/07/03/Patriot.Bryansk.7.3.23.jpeg?auto=webp&optimize=high&quality=70&width=1200 https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/ukraine-situation-report-patriot-kill-marks-hint-that-it-downed-aircraft-inside-russia So, daemon734 was right and Ukraine is indeed using Patriots to shoot down $20k Iranian drones. Edited to add: https://www.thedrive.com/uploads/2023/07/03/Patriot7.3.23Top.jpg?auto=webp&crop=16%3A9&auto=webp&optimize=high&quality=70&width=1200 Along with cheap ass glide bombs. View Quote The correct question is not "how much does the offensive weapon cost?" It's "How much is the defended asset worth?" If a $20K drone or cruise missile destroys a patriot radar, or oil refinery, would it have been smarter to shoot it down with whatever can do the job? Probably. |
|
What ADA asset does the US intend to deploy to protect airspace from drones and how much does it cost?
|
|
Quoted: What ADA asset does the US intend to deploy to protect airspace from drones and how much does it cost? View Quote Yes. We shut down the global economy, for 18 months, over the common cold. "if it saves just one life." You asked a logical question, but you are living in clown world now. |
|
Imagine if the Covid money had been used for national defense. The Lockheed press release would be coming tomorrow for the 200,000th PAC-5 interceptor.
|
|
Quoted: The correct question is not "how much does the offensive weapon cost?" It's "How much is the defended asset worth?" If a $20K drone or cruise missile destroys a patriot radar, or oil refinery, would it have been smarter to shoot it down with whatever can do the job? Probably. View Quote That is true, but those DALs Aare going to have a hell of a time staying defended if 25% of Patriots are burned on OWAs. It seems to consistently be a "tomorrow problem", but tomorrow will actually come one day. At some point there has to be a tear line both for them and for us. |
|
Quoted: That is true, but those DALs Aare going to have a hell of a time staying defended is 25% of Patriots are burned on OWAs. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: The correct question is not "how much does the offensive weapon cost?" It's "How much is the defended asset worth?" If a $20K drone or cruise missile destroys a patriot radar, or oil refinery, would it have been smarter to shoot it down with whatever can do the job? Probably. That is true, but those DALs Aare going to have a hell of a time staying defended is 25% of Patriots are burned on OWAs. That's showbiz baby. Don't like it? Try playing more / better offense. A swift and vigorous transition to attack-the flashing sword of vengeance-is the most brilliant point of the defensive. |
|
Quoted: That's showbiz baby. Don't like it? Try playing more / better offense. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes That's our plan, doesn't seem to be working for everyone. Quoted: What ADA asset does the US intend to deploy to protect airspace from drones and how much does it cost? The Raytheon Coyote at $15K a pop. It was also layered with NASAMs in CENTCOM to burn older A2A missiles, but the few that were made ended up in Ukraine. |
|
Quoted: The Raytheon Coyote at $15K a pop. It was also layered with NASAMs in CENTCOM to burn older A2A missiles, but the few that were made ended up in Ukraine. View Quote We have tens of thousands of them and sufficient launchers to cover a 2000km front? Nice. Interesting about NASAMs though, I’ve never been able to find a public reference to the US using them anywhere but DC. |
|
Quoted: We have tens of thousands of them and sufficient launchers to cover a 2000km front? Nice. Interesting about NASAMs though, I’ve never been able to find a public reference to the US using them anywhere but DC. View Quote Not yet, no. You said intend to deploy. We intend to do a lot of things, its the doctrinal answer we aren't fully prepared for yet. We barely have enough to cover Iraq and Syria. We had NASAMs systems in CENTCOM but moved them to Ukraine. |
|
|
Quoted: Not yet, no. You said intend to deploy. We intend to do a lot of things, its the doctrinal answer we aren't fully prepared for yet. We barely have enough to cover Iraq and Syria. We had NASAMs systems in CENTCOM but moved them to Ukraine. View Quote Seems like the army got caught again being fucked up like Polio. |
|
|
|
|
|
Not surprising. Russia is shifting attacks to cities that don’t have Patriot batteries.
|
|
|
|
Quoted: As far as "procurement" vs "production"...your statement that it has all started to increase and the output is there will be true....in several years. It absolutely is not correct now at all. Production rates for a lot of these complex systems was already low for years. Covid dropped most production to nothing and it still hasn't recovered. Waving money at it and writing contracts didn't magically solve that problem. View Quote A friend from childhood works for one of the high tech defense contractors. He told me that DoD sent a purchase order for something like 1000 per month. They currently produce approximately 30 per.....year. And the last few years have been assembly of parts in stock. |
|
|
born with an unusual condition... palms on both sides of his hands
|
|
Quoted: https://www.thedrive.com/uploads/2023/07/03/Patriot.Bryansk.7.3.23.jpeg?auto=webp&optimize=high&quality=70&width=1200 https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/ukraine-situation-report-patriot-kill-marks-hint-that-it-downed-aircraft-inside-russia So, daemon734 was right and Ukraine is indeed using Patriots to shoot down $20k Iranian drones. Edited to add: https://www.thedrive.com/uploads/2023/07/03/Patriot7.3.23Top.jpg?auto=webp&crop=16%3A9&auto=webp&optimize=high&quality=70&width=1200 Along with cheap ass glide bombs. View Quote It's not like they're paying for them...and we get rid of ours and buy new stuff from our own MIC Buy Ratheon I guess..not like Ike didn't give us a heads up...and Vietnam was really never about "winning"... imo |
|
Quoted: What in the fuck do your Grindr pen pals have to do with Pakistani Anza 2 MANPADs? You were buying Pakistani SAM's? Neato. You are the great value lord of war. Your irrelevant personal armored vehicle experience aside, everyone else whose job it is to look at them says they are shit. Even though you had a stroke and confused SAMs with AFV's, I can still reasonably assure you I have a LOT more time in Ukrainian armored vehicles than you do, especially considering your time is sitting at zero. 5 systems in 18 months eh? I guess your definition of quick is much different than mine, as well as your thoughts on the impact 5 systems will have on anything 18 months from now. I don't have to, because they already burned up their non-strategic systems shooting them at Shaheds. It's not a problem anymore when you have nothing left. View Quote Nuttier than a big dump of squirrel shit. Attached File |
|
|
Quoted: Is that speculation, open source or oversharing? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I don't have to, because they already burned up their non-strategic systems shooting them at Shaheds. It's not a problem anymore when you have nothing left. Is that speculation, open source or oversharing? Scott Ritter, McDumpshit or his pals from RT told him that. So it MUST be true. |
|
View Quote Detailed and informative. Thank you. |
|
|
Quoted: Thankfully Raytheon is expanding patriot production 200% from 5 to 12 units per year. So one a month. 2 different sources on the missiles, one says 160 a year that's being doubled and another says 500 per year and going to 550 by the end of 2023. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: What expertise do you bring to this discussion? It's certainly not in English, nor logic. What's been argued is that our magazines are low, and frankly that's pretty well known and has been for six months or better since the SECNAV brought it up publicly. Thankfully Raytheon is expanding patriot production 200% from 5 to 12 units per year. So one a month. 2 different sources on the missiles, one says 160 a year that's being doubled and another says 500 per year and going to 550 by the end of 2023. Orders for something is not the same as production of same Raytheon production staff is thin on the ground and a lot of institutional knowledge has retired. |
|
|
Quoted: Orders for something is not the same as production of same Raytheon production staff is thin on the ground and a lot of institutional knowledge has retired. View Quote You'll notice all of the sources on increased production use terms such as "anticipates", "plans to", "aims to", etc. Everybody is just hoping the supply and skilled labor problems will all subside in time for contract deadlines to be met, which are typically years out anyway. https://leehamnews.com/2023/01/25/ge-raytheon-report-orders-surges-but-labor-and-supply-chain-headwinds/ |
|
|
|
Quoted: https://www.armytimes.com/land/2023/08/08/us-army-plans-to-grow-patriot-missile-defense-force/ View Quote They have a lot of plans. The Army plans on standing up SHORAD too. In reality the Army continues to shrink. |
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.