User Panel
[#1]
Because they are that thing betwixt a womans legs that men lust after.
|
|
[#2]
Their marketing folks have to know that the locks are hugely unpopular.
Just a guess, but maybe they are worried about liability if they remove a "safety feature" that they previously deemed necessary to add. |
|
[#4]
Probably all tooling now has this feature and would cost millions to backtrack to old tooling.
|
|
[#7]
Quoted: Probably all tooling now has this feature and would cost millions to backtrack to old tooling. View Quote It's a hole. You just have to change the gcode to not drill it. It would actually save an operation in the milling of the frame, and save someone from having to put the lock in. Unless the hole is like forged in or something. |
|
[#8]
|
|
[#10]
Because they are in the business of selling guns and some areas require locks.
|
|
[#11]
|
|
[#12]
It's funny, for me, it's honestly not a big deal. I've never used the lock, and never had it cause any malfunction. I dunno, I really don't even notice 'em.
|
|
[#13]
They are a large corporation.
Large corporations have their agenda. Satisfying their customers or making a truly great product is usually very low on their agenda. |
|
[#14]
Smith & Wesson was bought by the lock company.
They are putting revolvers on their locks, not locks on their revolvers. Now you know. |
|
[#15]
Quoted: Quoted: Just a guess, but maybe they are worried about liability if they remove a "safety feature" that they previously deemed necessary to add. I’m going with this. +1. Though having it on there is not a guarantee that someone won’t sue them frivolously anyways. |
|
[#16]
|
|
[#17]
I removed the lock on mine and installed the plug. Attached File
|
|
[#18]
Heard a rumor the performance center variants may not come with the locks??
Would be nice if they’d at least make it an option...kind of like the thumb-safety on the M&P shields? Stupid as it sounds, I’d pay more for one without the lock even though one would think it’s cheaper to build’em without it... |
|
[#20]
Quoted: Liberals that just bought their first handgun, yes. They probably also use that shitty cable lock every gun comes with too View Quote My brother is one of those guys. Every conversation I have with him about guns I have to bite my tongue. He was just showing me this expensive cabinet with locks on it he bought to store his ammo in. Something like a 500 dollar cabinet. Just for ammo. He's in CA so maybe there is a law that says it has to be locked up, but still. |
|
[#21]
|
|
[#22]
|
|
[#23]
Are they still putting the safety warning billboards on the sides ?
|
|
[#24]
|
|
[#25]
It's been a while, but i think either 10 or 12 states require it.
|
|
[#26]
|
|
[#27]
To give me something to drill out is all I get out of it. I bought a Mk III and had fun drilling out the lock, removing the mag. safety and loaded chamber indicator. I swear the trigger's a bit smoother and it's easier to take down now.
|
|
[#29]
|
|
[#30]
|
|
[#31]
Yep. READ ALL ABOUT IT! Saf-T-Hammer purchased S&W in 2002 for $15 Million. Think about that Only $15 Million for one of the biggest names ever in the firearms industry! We could have easily found 30 ARFCOMMERS who would have been “in” on a group buy. |
|
[#32]
|
|
[#34]
Quoted: https://justapewreviews.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/BFF3F9A4-80B2-4D1A-80F1-2F6ED334661B-1024x913.jpeg Why do they still do this? They can cause rare functional issues. It adds parts and expense to manufacture. It's been almost 20 years since the AWB sunset. Their agreement to put the locks in was 4 presidential administrations ago. "Pre-lock" is literally an advertising term for use S&W revolvers. Why hasn't management for S&W just stopped putting these in? View Quote Can anyone point me to a place that makes the delete kit for that shit? Hopefully one that doesn’t want an addressed envelope with a check in it? (That dude is kind of odd (but somewhat understandably)) For a .460 if size matters |
|
[#36]
Surprised that by now they haven’t invented and installed a discrete non visible lock.
Well I’m not that surprised. |
|
[#37]
Quoted: lawyer-proofing View Quote OK. I've seen this a few times in the thread now. Here's the thing about legal liability... The vast majority of guns that s&w make don't have locks. None of their semi autos have them (that I'm aware of). None of their rifles have them. Also, as far as optics related to them being a public company, Ruger is also a public company. They had locks in some of their pistols are one point. And I think they still may in some models. But several models no longer have internal locks. It hasn't hurt their stock price at all. |
|
[#38]
Quoted: Quoted: When did Glock start making wheelguns? They didn't? Okay, cool. get with the times grandpa To start, this is thread about revolvers and Glock does not make revolvers. You had nothing to add to the discussion so you interjected with "mah glock perrfeckshun". Spare us, we've heard it all before. Anyway, my choice of striker-fired handgun is the VP9 which was designed and bulit in this century. Glock "Let's just let 3rd party do our innovation for us" continues resting on their laurels while the rest of the gun industry cuts into their shrinking market share. |
|
[#39]
|
|
[#40]
I have a 638 J-frame in my pocket right now. It has the lock, which I pretty much ignore. Still wish it didn't have one.
|
|
[#42]
I don't know, but they should know that I'll never buy one with a lock. I think Ruger makes a better revolver anyway.
|
|
[#43]
|
|
[#44]
|
|
[#45]
Quoted: Their marketing folks have to know that the locks are hugely unpopular. Just a guess, but maybe they are worried about liability if they remove a "safety feature" that they previously deemed necessary to add. View Quote I would go with this. First guy that leaves out a gun that a kid finds would open them up for a lawsuit. They do make " collectable" j frames occasion that i lock free i believe. |
|
[#47]
They sign an agreement with the government. (Clinton administration)
|
|
[#48]
Because the company that bought S&W from the British after the Clinton debacle in 2000 was Saf-T-Hammer. The company that designed and made the locks in the first place. Also the locks makes it legal for sale in California, which is a huge market.
|
|
[#49]
|
|
[#50]
Because of one of the thorns in the side of America...PHUCKING LAWYERS!
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.