User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:01:44 PM EDT
[#1]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:02:25 PM EDT
[#2]
Wasn’t the avatar exemption only made after posters brought up the aforementioned Site Staff’s avatar, and how it violated the CoC? Like, did I dream that?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:03:23 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted: No, but when mods give time outs for less shouldn't we be all held to the same standards? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Fucking Karen over here... That mod is ban happy. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:05:16 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Several people have pointed out that there has been a specific recent ruling that cleavage (up to a point) is allowed in avatars, but not in posts. I am pretty sure someone posted a link to the thread. That is NOT an exemption for Site Staff/mods, it is for everyone. Multiple people have pointed out that regular members have cleavage in their avatars, so you already know it is not a Staff/mod examption. You are correct that it is an oversight that the avatar exception to the cleavage prohibition is not mentioned in the CoC, and I totally understand how it is an exemption that not many people might be aware of. But you are full of shit in still complaining about it being some sort of Staff/mod-only exemption, because people have repeatedly pointed out to you how that is not the case, and how anyone can have cleavage in their avatars.  
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:05:18 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I got mine out right now. Had mine out all day it was 93 out. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:07:17 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Are you of the opinion that showing titties is exactly the same as showing a snooch? Because that's the only way your post makes any sense. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Not a double standard. Anyone can put ORLY? So if our female (straight) and male (gay) members (or whomever NTTAWWT) start putting dicks in their avatars you're Ok with that? Got it. I learned something today - I never knew that the answer to "What is pornography?" was "The size of the picture!" Originally Posted in CoC #9: "this includes photos of scantily clad men or women" |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:07:32 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Wasn’t the avatar exemption only made after posters brought up the aforementioned Site Staff’s avatar, and how it violated the CoC? Like, did I dream that? Oh you mean like... NYSP violating the Safeact and having to get last minute changes for Rules for thee not for me? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:08:55 PM EDT
[#8]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:11:48 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Wasn’t the avatar exemption only made after posters brought up the aforementioned Site Staff’s avatar, and how it violated the CoC? Like, did I dream that? PFFT! I've had my current avatar for a while and have never caught shit about it. It may predate "titty-gate", I don't know. Gemma is a whore anyways. Everyone has seen her titties. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:12:31 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Mods (err Site Staff so as not to offend anyone) enforcing rules (real or perceived violations, does not matter- that's another issue) while flaunting a Clear violation of the COC they are enforcing on others. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:12:59 PM EDT
[#11]
When I get home later tonight I'm going to have to post up a bunch of cleavage avatars I made many months ago so you guys can have a cleavatar like D_J's.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:13:40 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You wasted post 130,000 on that? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Several people have pointed out that there has been a specific recent ruling that cleavage (up to a point) is allowed in avatars, but not in posts. I am pretty sure someone posted a link to the thread. That is NOT an exemption for Site Staff/mods, it is for everyone. Multiple people have pointed out that regular members have cleavage in their avatars, so you already know it is not a Staff/mod examption. You are correct that it is an oversight that the avatar exception to the cleavage prohibition is not mentioned in the CoC, and I totally understand how it is an exemption that not many people might be aware of. But you are full of shit in still complaining about it being some sort of Staff/mod-only exemption, because people have repeatedly pointed out to you how that is not the case, and how anyone can have cleavage in their avatars. Ouchhhh. That's like wasting mile 100,000 pulling over to take a piss, and forgetting to take a picture. Kharn |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:16:29 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: BAN WHISKERSTHECAT You're GTG now Bro https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/319832/wcbro_jpg-1366400.JPG https://www.ar15.com/images/smilies/smiley_abused.gif 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:17:31 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:  Oh noes. @WhiskersTheCat you've been!...https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/425212/39m6im-1-1082512.gif Quote HistoryQuoted: Oh noes. @WhiskersTheCat you've been!...https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/425212/39m6im-1-1082512.gif You will never get the credit you deserve for starting that meme. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:18:09 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted: When I get home later tonight I'm going to have to post up a bunch of cleavage avatars I made many months ago so you guys can have a cleavatar like D_J's. Better do it now. You may not be able to log in when you get home. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:19:26 PM EDT
[#16]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:20:56 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Several people have pointed out that there has been a specific recent ruling that cleavage (up to a point) is allowed in avatars, but not in posts. I am pretty sure someone posted a link to the thread. That is NOT an exemption for Site Staff/mods, it is for everyone. Multiple people have pointed out that regular members have cleavage in their avatars, so you already know it is not a Staff/mod examption. You are correct that it is an oversight that the avatar exception to the cleavage prohibition is not mentioned in the CoC, and I totally understand how it is an exemption that not many people might be aware of. But you are full of shit in still complaining about it being some sort of Staff/mod-only exemption, because people have repeatedly pointed out to you how that is not the case, and how anyone can have cleavage in their avatars. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: OP: "Waaaa, life is not fair and I don't like it!" Several people have pointed out that there has been a specific recent ruling that cleavage (up to a point) is allowed in avatars, but not in posts. I am pretty sure someone posted a link to the thread. That is NOT an exemption for Site Staff/mods, it is for everyone. Multiple people have pointed out that regular members have cleavage in their avatars, so you already know it is not a Staff/mod examption. You are correct that it is an oversight that the avatar exception to the cleavage prohibition is not mentioned in the CoC, and I totally understand how it is an exemption that not many people might be aware of. But you are full of shit in still complaining about it being some sort of Staff/mod-only exemption, because people have repeatedly pointed out to you how that is not the case, and how anyone can have cleavage in their avatars. @DK-Prof If anyone with a firearms-related employment looks something up in the tech forum, they shouldn't be treated to tits, thongs, 6-packs, etc, in avatars. That was the point of the BOTD rules to begin with, first requiring they stay in GD, then BOTD-marked threads, and then in the BOTD forum. Because Goatboy was trying to moderate while at work, and got in trouble over all the tits on his screen. But now we're supposed to just tolerate avatar tits on our screens when we might be looking for technical information at work, showing something to a boss, coworker, purchasing officer, etc? "Yeah, I need the Trijicon because ____, but ignore those animated tits over there, please don't report me for sexually harassing you..." The entire screen should be work friendly, not all but the left 2", unless someone goes into the BOTD or HOTD forums, and then they've made a conscious choice to seek out that content. Kharn |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:22:02 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Better do it now. You may not be able to log in when you get home.https://www.ar15.com/images/smilies/icon_smile_wink.gif
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:22:32 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Are these ARF GD appropriate? https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/403845/hot_dog_muffins-1366247.jpg 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:22:47 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I see what you did their. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: They're sight there rules I see what you did their. You're sure ? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:22:50 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Better do it now. You may not be able to log in when you get home.https://www.ar15.com/images/smilies/icon_smile_wink.gif What would be hilarious? I posted #FreeTheTitties He can't log in. Creates new account. He comes back with new S/N TheTitties TheTitties free at last! |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:27:48 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Are these ARF GD appropriate? https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/403845/hot_dog_muffins-1366247.jpg Are they in an oven or freezer? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:28:10 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I have immunity as long as I keep Russia chick as my avatar. I'm safe. So... Tits in avatars/GD works like.... the Hughes amendment... All bikini/boobs/cleavage pre blat asses causing bikini/cleavage pics to be offenses are safe, especially avatars for paying members (200 dollar tax stamp) But no new boobs after ruling? Avatars on the EE! NFA subsection! Profit! |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:31:33 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Are these ARF GD appropriate? https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/403845/hot_dog_muffins-1366247.jpg Are they in an oven or freezer? https://www.ar15.com/images/smilies/smiley_abused.gif Doesn't matter as long as the picture was taken on a moving yacht. Kharn |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:33:31 PM EDT
[#25]
The real question is why can you catch a ban if you link an article or video that has "racial" language in it. The coc interpretations here make the 9th circuit seem rational.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:34:07 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted: @DK-Prof If anyone with a firearms-related employment looks something up in the tech forum, they shouldn't be treated to tits, thongs, 6-packs, etc, in avatars. That was the point of the BOTD rules to begin with, first requiring they stay in GD, then BOTD-marked threads, and then in the BOTD forum. Because Goatboy was trying to moderate while at work, and got in trouble over all the tits on his screen. But now we're supposed to just tolerate avatar tits on our screens when we might be looking for technical information at work, showing something to a boss, coworker, purchasing officer, etc? "Yeah, I need the Trijicon because ____, but ignore those animated tits over there, please don't report me for sexually harassing you..." The entire screen should be work friendly, not all but the left 2", unless someone goes into the BOTD or HOTD forums, and then they've made a conscious choice to seek out that content. Kharn LOLZ When do you ever not seen the female form NOT sexualized. Hell, you can't even go to a G rated Disney movie without boobies playing a central part. The "SFW" crap is... crap. A lot of places ban ARF just because of "gun related", not because of possible a nip slip. Since when have the prudes EVER been pro-gun? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:36:15 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted: So... Tits in avatars/GD works like.... the Hughes amendment... All bikini/boobs/cleavage pre blat asses causing bikini/cleavage pics to be offenses are safe, especially avatars for paying members (200 dollar tax stamp) But no new boobs after ruling? Avatars on the EE! NFA subsection! Profit! Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: I have immunity as long as I keep Russia chick as my avatar. I'm safe. So... Tits in avatars/GD works like.... the Hughes amendment... All bikini/boobs/cleavage pre blat asses causing bikini/cleavage pics to be offenses are safe, especially avatars for paying members (200 dollar tax stamp) But no new boobs after ruling? Avatars on the EE! NFA subsection! Profit!  She is however like an immunity idol on Survivor, you can't vote me off the island.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:39:02 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted: LOLZ When do you ever not seen the female form NOT sexualized. Hell, you can't even go to a G rated Disney movie without boobies playing a central part. The "SFW" crap is... crap. A lot of places ban ARF just because of "gun related", not because of possible a nip slip. Since when have the prudes EVER been pro-gun? I'm pretty sure Afghan Taliban/Mujahideen/Al Queda/ISIS (WASWAS) are pro gun... They're quite the prudes... they beat broads half to death if ankle shows... Thus. Arfcom Taliban. Note the odd love for little Toyota trucks around this site... Starting to see the connection yet?  |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:40:07 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryWell, they appear to be fresh, hot, from the oven but there may be a cool breeze blowing through the kitchen. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:40:09 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted: My avatar actually doesn't show any cleavage. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/139619/139619-1037373.gif She is however like an immunity idol on Survivor, you can't vote me off the island. Because her tits aren't big enough to be able to show cleavage. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:42:56 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Because her tits aren't big enough to be able to show cleavage. https://www.ar15.com/images/smilies/anim_nana.gif Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: My avatar actually doesn't show any cleavage. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/139619/139619-1037373.gif She is however like an immunity idol on Survivor, you can't vote me off the island. Because her tits aren't big enough to be able to show cleavage. https://www.ar15.com/images/smilies/anim_nana.gif  Almost as bad as when you did this to her.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:44:37 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted: @DK-Prof If anyone with a firearms-related employment looks something up in the tech forum, they shouldn't be treated to tits, thongs, 6-packs, etc, in avatars. That was the point of the BOTD rules to begin with, first requiring they stay in GD, then BOTD-marked threads, and then in the BOTD forum. Because Goatboy was trying to moderate while at work, and got in trouble over all the tits on his screen. But now we're supposed to just tolerate avatar tits on our screens when we might be looking for technical information at work, showing something to a boss, coworker, purchasing officer, etc? "Yeah, I need the Trijicon because ____, but ignore those animated tits over there, please don't report me for sexually harassing you..." The entire screen should be work friendly, not all but the left 2", unless someone goes into the BOTD or HOTD forums, and then they've made a conscious choice to seek out that content. Kharn Yeah, well...that just, like...your opinion...man. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:45:24 PM EDT
[#33]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:47:08 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Fucking Karen over here... /thread |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:48:59 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Several people have pointed out that there has been a specific recent ruling that cleavage (up to a point) is allowed in avatars, but not in posts. I am pretty sure someone posted a link to the thread. That is NOT an exemption for Site Staff/mods, it is for everyone. Multiple people have pointed out that regular members have cleavage in their avatars, so you already know it is not a Staff/mod examption. You are correct that it is an oversight that the avatar exception to the cleavage prohibition is not mentioned in the CoC, and I totally understand how it is an exemption that not many people might be aware of. But you are full of shit in still complaining about it being some sort of Staff/mod-only exemption, because people have repeatedly pointed out to you how that is not the case, and how anyone can have cleavage in their avatars. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: OP: "Waaaa, life is not fair and I don't like it!" Several people have pointed out that there has been a specific recent ruling that cleavage (up to a point) is allowed in avatars, but not in posts. I am pretty sure someone posted a link to the thread. That is NOT an exemption for Site Staff/mods, it is for everyone. Multiple people have pointed out that regular members have cleavage in their avatars, so you already know it is not a Staff/mod examption. You are correct that it is an oversight that the avatar exception to the cleavage prohibition is not mentioned in the CoC, and I totally understand how it is an exemption that not many people might be aware of. But you are full of shit in still complaining about it being some sort of Staff/mod-only exemption, because people have repeatedly pointed out to you how that is not the case, and how anyone can have cleavage in their avatars. TIL I can call other members full of shit. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:49:56 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I'm pretty sure Afghan Taliban/Mujahideen/Al Queda/ISIS (WASWAS) are pro gun... They're quite the prudes... they beat broads half to death if ankle shows... Thus. Arfcom Taliban. Note the odd love for little Toyota trucks around this site... Starting to see the connection yet? https://www.primalunleashed.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/tumblr_m8553wQW2n1r7xa2f.jpg 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:50:11 PM EDT
[#37]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:51:08 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted: TIL I can call other members full of shit. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: OP: "Waaaa, life is not fair and I don't like it!" Several people have pointed out that there has been a specific recent ruling that cleavage (up to a point) is allowed in avatars, but not in posts. I am pretty sure someone posted a link to the thread. That is NOT an exemption for Site Staff/mods, it is for everyone. Multiple people have pointed out that regular members have cleavage in their avatars, so you already know it is not a Staff/mod examption. You are correct that it is an oversight that the avatar exception to the cleavage prohibition is not mentioned in the CoC, and I totally understand how it is an exemption that not many people might be aware of. But you are full of shit in still complaining about it being some sort of Staff/mod-only exemption, because people have repeatedly pointed out to you how that is not the case, and how anyone can have cleavage in their avatars. TIL I can call other members full of shit. Yeah, I should probably have phrased that a bit better.  Sorry, everyone. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:51:30 PM EDT
[#39]
Profanity has never been allowed in avatars.
"Avatars/Siglines Members may not use their sigline, avatar, or title to advertise any business, website, or sales ad. The use of profanity or obscene images is also prohibited." The lax enforcement of CoC2 began when we started allowing nipples in the BOTD. Could you honestly give someone a warning for linking to ARFCOM? I couldn't, so I didn't. All of the experienced GD mods, including me, voted to keep the avatar exclusion because it is simpler to ban cleavage then make a judgement call on Every. Single. One. and judgement calls are the bane of the membership when it comes to mods, plus it is a pain in the ass to be trying to figure it out. FWIW, I agree that boobs should either be allowed or not. In fact it would be much better from a mod's point of view to allow them in GD threads instead of avatars and that way they aren't in tech threads but what I think doesn't mean much, so there is that.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:54:41 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/319832/ha_jpg-1366467.JPG What was OP bitching about again?  |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 10:57:40 PM EDT
[#41]
It should be an easy call, if there is no areola visible... it's legal.
You see more "explicit" stuff on broadcast news during Spring Break than you do on a supposed pro 1A/2A website. That's sad. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 11:00:59 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I'm pretty sure Afghan Taliban/Mujahideen/Al Queda/ISIS (WASWAS) are pro gun... They're quite the prudes... they beat broads half to death if ankle shows... Thus. Arfcom Taliban. Note the odd love for little Toyota trucks around this site... Starting to see the connection yet? https://www.primalunleashed.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/tumblr_m8553wQW2n1r7xa2f.jpg  Attached File |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 11:01:06 PM EDT
[#43]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 11:02:46 PM EDT
[#44]
Since the avatar issue seems to be resolved can we pivot and talk about giant red font threat that was made? Now if we link to anything containing racial language we can lose our accounts. Can we talk about that or does it need its own thread? Or would that be a callout? Because that needs to be resolved pronto.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 11:06:06 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Since the avatar issue seems to be resolved can we pivot and talk about giant red font threat that was made? Now if we link to anything containing racial language we can lose our accounts. Can we talk about that or does it need its own thread? Or would that be a callout? Because that needs to be resolved pronto.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 11:08:00 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Since the avatar issue seems to be resolved can we pivot and talk about giant red font threat that was made? Now if we link to anything containing racial language we can lose our accounts. Can we talk about that or does it need its own thread? Or would that be a callout? Because that needs to be resolved pronto. The SS that made the decision is online now, and has been @‘d several times over it 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 11:10:23 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Since the avatar issue seems to be resolved can we pivot and talk about giant red font threat that was made? Now if we link to anything containing racial language we can lose our accounts. Can we talk about that or does it need its own thread? Or would that be a callout? Because that needs to be resolved pronto. Boobies are way more important than any racial issue! |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 11:12:37 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted: It should be an easy call, if there is no areola visible... it's legal. You see more "explicit" stuff on broadcast news during Spring Break than you do on a supposed pro 1A/2A website. That's sad. Well that wasn't the rule, isn't the rule and wasn't the proposed rule, so I'm not sure how you came up with it. Again, the guys that had been doing it a while thought it was a can of worms that didn't need to be opened. YMMV |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 11:14:00 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Boobies are way more important than any racial issue!  |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2020 11:15:28 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted: LOLZ When do you ever not seen the female form NOT sexualized. Hell, you can't even go to a G rated Disney movie without boobies playing a central part. The "SFW" crap is... crap. A lot of places ban ARF just because of "gun related", not because of possible a nip slip. Since when have the prudes EVER been pro-gun? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: @DK-Prof If anyone with a firearms-related employment looks something up in the tech forum, they shouldn't be treated to tits, thongs, 6-packs, etc, in avatars. That was the point of the BOTD rules to begin with, first requiring they stay in GD, then BOTD-marked threads, and then in the BOTD forum. Because Goatboy was trying to moderate while at work, and got in trouble over all the tits on his screen. But now we're supposed to just tolerate avatar tits on our screens when we might be looking for technical information at work, showing something to a boss, coworker, purchasing officer, etc? "Yeah, I need the Trijicon because ____, but ignore those animated tits over there, please don't report me for sexually harassing you..." The entire screen should be work friendly, not all but the left 2", unless someone goes into the BOTD or HOTD forums, and then they've made a conscious choice to seek out that content. Kharn LOLZ When do you ever not seen the female form NOT sexualized. Hell, you can't even go to a G rated Disney movie without boobies playing a central part. The "SFW" crap is... crap. A lot of places ban ARF just because of "gun related", not because of possible a nip slip. Since when have the prudes EVER been pro-gun? You don't have to be pro-gun to browse the tech forum, people from all walks of life need firearms information for their day jobs. The military takes SHARP very seriously, one wrong situation can end a 20+ year career in an instant. Kharn |
|
|
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
Attached File
Attached File
Attached File
