User Panel
Posted: 1/24/2022 11:16:27 PM EDT
I mean, FJB. But let’s be real.
What should our phased and flexible response options be? How does GD think we should posture? |
|
Sell Ukraine Javelins and Stingers.
Train their people in their use. Forces in Poland on alert but will only engage if Russian forces enter Poland. |
|
Troops and aircraft to Poland, Estonia, Lithuania, and Latvia, as a deterrent and insist that NATO members match with troops alongside. Advisors and air defense systems for Ukraine and a shit ton of antitank weapons.
|
|
I think we should pull all of our shit out of the rest of the world. Fortify the fuck out of our defenses. Build an economy around our own production and resources and mind our own fucking business. With our nuke supply nobody will ever invade or attack us. We just need to be more self sufficient.
|
|
Spread as many troops as we can across as many fronts as we can so the Russians have to call all of their units. Make them move their chess pieces on the board.
|
|
We hate communists, right?
Until it’s time to actually bring some hate to the communists? |
|
I don't see a clear win here.
The moment the US commits to war in Ukraine, I see China rolling into Taiwan. If we commit in Taiwan, Russia is probably steam-rolling in Ukraine. If we commit to both, I think we lose a lot of Americans and both countries fall to Russia and China. If we do nothing, both countries fall to bad people. Not that either are perfect on their own. Losing Taiwan means we're completely dependant on China for microchips, unless that has changed. Losing Ukraine means Russia has more access to the oil pipeline there (name escapes me) and the EU is at Russia's mercy for a considerable percentage of their oil. |
|
Here are a few ideas:
Sanction the oligarchs including Putin directly. Reinforce Eastern European NATO nations; expand NATO (Sweden, Finland… anyone else??). Get Germany and France in line. Lock Russia out of swift. |
|
Quoted: We hate communists, right? Until it’s time to actually bring some hate to the communists? View Quote What? We love communist. We can’t get enough of their cheap shit and we sell them our property for cash. Half the country already is communist. The majority of the shit in your house is made by communist. The cloths you are wearing right now were made by the hands of communist. |
|
Quoted: I mean, FJB. But let’s be real. What should our phased and flexible response options be? How does GD think we should posture? View Quote let them take care of their own security...and why are we still paying for european defense anyway? time to leave |
|
You already know the answer, a massive troop deployment into Eastern Europe.
|
|
Not our monkey, not our circus.
But large numbers of DC pols are making money in Ukraine... |
|
Quoted: Here are a few ideas: Sanction the oligarchs including Putin directly. Reinforce Eastern European NATO nations; expand NATO (Sweden, Finland… anyone else??). Get Germany and France in line. Lock Russia out of swift. View Quote France seems to be on board. Germany, on the other hand.... |
|
I'll have a Coke. Eastern Ukraine is predominately Ethnic-Russians.
|
|
Fund and supply Ukraine so they can maintain an active insurgency against Russia that is simply unbearable for Russia long term. Bleed Russia dry. Then flood eastern Europe with men and equipment so that the very thing Putin seems to fear most (US troops in the region) comes to pass on a grand scale. And cut them off at the ankles with sanctions for good measure. We can't go kinetic on the bastards over Ukraine. But we should do pretty much anything short of that. Now, if they actually try to pull any shit with any NATO member nation, then we need to immediately do to them what we did to the Wagner Group contractors in Syria. Squash those fuckers like bugs.
|
|
Quoted: I think we should pull all of our shit out of the rest of the world. Fortify the fuck out of our defenses. Build an economy around our own production and resources and mind our own fucking business. With our nuke supply nobody will ever invade or attack us. We just need to be more self sufficient. View Quote That is the North Korean plan for the last 70 years and it has worked out wonderfully for them as well! |
|
Ask Russia to pay off our national debt then let them have the Ukraine.
|
|
|
Quoted: I think we should pull all of our shit out of the rest of the world. Fortify the fuck out of our defenses. Build an economy around our own production and resources and mind our own fucking business. With our nuke supply nobody will ever invade or attack us. We just need to be more self sufficient. View Quote I'm on board with this. |
|
What possible upside is there for us?
We go in and break a bunch of shit, then we fix said shit on our dime? Yeah, not interested. |
|
|
Sell stuff to them at profit. We can’t afford charity for a dubious regime with questionable competence. Then again, we have a dubious regime with questionable competence.
|
|
Quoted: Spread as many troops as we can across as many fronts as we can so the Russians have to call all of their units. Make them move their chess pieces on the board. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Spread as many troops as we can across as many fronts as we can so the Russians have to call all of their units. Make them move their chess pieces on the board. Horizontal escalation works both ways. US and allies are hard pressed to take on Russia and China at the same time. You don't think that Putin and Xi would encourage Iran and N Korea to join in the fun? Quoted: We hate communists, right? Until it’s time to actually bring some hate to the communists? There's more communists in DC and Portland than there are in Moscow. Why don't we deal with problems at home instead of searching abroad for monsters to destroy. |
|
I think the deep state was planning on war in 2017. I remember all the news stories about Russia prior to the 2016 elections. Then Trump got in and didn’t start a war.
IMO, the deep state is just picking their game plan back up. What should we do? We should do what Trump did in situations like this. Send in a strong alpha to sit down and have both sides talk. Beyond that, sanctions at most. I think all the anti-Russia talk is deep state bullshit to sell bombs. |
|
According to gd bend over and spread our buttcheeks because the military is just a bunch of purple haired fags.
They know because they heard it from the people they get all their bias confirming news from. |
|
|
|
Quoted: Fund and supply Ukraine so they can maintain an active insurgency against Russia that is simply unbearable for Russia long term. Bleed Russia dry. Then flood eastern Europe with men and equipment so that the very thing Putin seems to fear most (US troops in the region) comes to pass on a grand scale. And cut them off at the ankles with sanctions for good measure. We can't go kinetic on the bastards over Ukraine. But we should do pretty much anything short of that. Now, if they actually try to pull any shit with any NATO member nation, then we need to immediately do to them what we did to the Wagner Group contractors in Syria. Squash those fuckers like bugs. View Quote Fuck yes |
|
Didn't Ukraine play both sides of our political parties or vice versa?
I say sell them weapons, force a bloody war using advisors, and split the country 80% Ukraine NATO accepted /20% Russia so they can save face and not launch stupid nukes. |
|
Of course, there is always
War Games - Shall We Play A Game |
|
send Hunter, kerry and knee pads to negotiate a peace deal with a carbon reduction agreement in fine print, save the world!
|
|
Quoted: I don't see a clear win here. The moment the US commits to war in Ukraine, I see China rolling into Taiwan. If we commit in Taiwan, Russia is probably steam-rolling in Ukraine. If we commit to both, I think we lose a lot of Americans and both countries fall to Russia and China. If we do nothing, both countries fall to bad people. Not that either are perfect on their own. Losing Taiwan means we're completely dependant on China for microchips, unless that has changed. Losing Ukraine means Russia has more access to the oil pipeline there (name escapes me) and the EU is at Russia's mercy for a considerable percentage of their oil. View Quote Shit wouldn’t have happened under MAGA. MAGA had red Chinese economy on the ropes. They wouldn’t have tested him. Pres jerk off McFeeble is inviting Putin to get it on. |
|
The guarantee of Ukraine's borders and independence from the UK, US, and Russia was all wrapped up with them giving up their ~3000 nukes. Since Russia isn't respecting that anymore (and obviously won't be giving Ukraine back the nukes they gave up) and harshly worded letters from the UN mean fuck-all, the fair thing to do would be to give a half dozen nukes to the Ukraine. We talked them into giving up the nuclear deterrent that they so desperately need right now.
Not that it's a smart thing to do, but it's the fair thing. |
|
For anyone who hasn't read it, this is the agreement we signed:
https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/s_1994_1399.pdf Here's the important bits: ANNEX I [Original: English and Russian] Memorandum on Security Assurances in Connection with Ukraine’s Accession to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Ukraine, the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America, Welcoming the accession of Ukraine to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons as a non-nuclear-weapon State, Taking into account the commitment of Ukraine to eliminate all nuclear weapons from its territory within a specified period of time, Noting the changes in the world-wide security situation, including the end of the cold war, which have brought about conditions for deep reductions in nuclear forces, Confirm the following: 1. The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America reaffirm their commitment to Ukraine, in accordance with the principles of the Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, to respect the independence and sovereignty and the existing borders of Ukraine; 2. The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America reaffirm their obligation to refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine, and that none of their weapons will ever be used against Ukraine except in self-defence or otherwise in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations; 3. The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America reaffirm their commitment to Ukraine, in accordance with the principles of the Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, to refrain from economic coercion designed to subordinate to their own interest the exercise by Ukraine of the rights inherent in its sovereignty and thus to secure advantages of any kind; 4. The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America reaffirm their commitment to seek immediate United Nations Security Council action to provide assistance to Ukraine, as a non-nuclear-weapon State party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, if Ukraine should become a victim of an act of aggression or an object of a threat of aggression in which nuclear weapons are used; 5. The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America reaffirm, in the case of Ukraine, their commitment not to use nuclear weapons against any non-nuclearweapon State party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, except in the case of an attack on themselves, their territories or dependent territories, their armed forces, or their allies, by such a State in association or alliance with a nuclear-weapon State; 6. Ukraine, the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America will consult in the event a situation arises that raises a question concerning these commitments. View Quote |
|
What would happen if we had a poll that asked would you rather have Putin as President or Biden?
|
|
Send Biden across the Ukraine border, shirtless, riding a horse bareback, to negotiate a peace deal.
|
|
Quoted: Guess they shouldn't have kept deciding to not join NATO View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Give this a read: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/defense-national-security/in-1994-the-us-succeeded-in-convincing-ukraine-to-give-up-its-nukes-but-failed-to-secure-its-future The lesson is that while other countries may sanction a nuclear weapons state, they won’t dare invade it. No one understands the questionable value of unenforceable assurances better than Russia, which has violated numerous agreements since Putin took over, not the least of which was the promise made by his predecessor Yeltsin not to violate Ukraine’s sovereign territory. So, there was a rich bit of irony after the latest U.S.-Russia talks in Geneva this month when Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov insisted Moscow must have more than vague assurances that Ukraine would never join NATO. “We need ironclad, waterproof, bulletproof, legally binding guarantees. Not assurances, not safeguards, but guarantees,” Ryabkov told reporters. He knows whereof he speaks. |
|
|
Let the European union deal with it. The way I see it.
We have no business in that part of the world. Let the Euros deal with their own problems........ Not our problem. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.