That fucker should've been put down on the day of his attack.

I’ve heard these make nice necklaces
Attached File

"the Waukesha Christmas Parade tragedy trial"
This jumped out at me from the NPR article in the OP. It was murder, not some unforeseen tragedy like a landslide or house fire.

How much is this trial going to cost?

Ironically, he forfeits his appellate or habeas ground for relief of ineffective assistance of counsel - because he is his own ineffective counsel.

I love sovereigns.  

He's already playing the "I can't taste so we need to wait for tests" game, and I guarantee you he's going to pull that every day to try and keep this going.

Youtube terminated his account. Can you believe it?!?

Oh no, he doesn't get off that easy.

He needs to linger and beg for death.

For about 2 weeks.

https://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/2591419_Rekieta-Law-removed-from-Youtube-live-.html

It's bad for the media / Democrat narrative if they let him speak or rant, their narrative is that this was just totally random and done for no reason at all other than him being a lunatic...yet, his social media was all about how much he hates white people, and was especially pissed off that Kyle Rittenhouse was found not guilty - then two days later he plows into a Christmas Parade that's nearly all white. A random coincidence my ass.

OST

Not how that works.

Want CNN, NBC and the other fuck-tards cover it

Memory holed.

Yeah, I caught your thread after trying to use the link in this thread. I hope the Rumble thing works well for him. Youtube is asshole.

Recalling the last 1960's cases where the defendants were bound and gagged.
They had some poor schmuck lawyers doing their thing.
If you want to disrupt the curt you will be bound and gagged.

Somebody go look up some of those pictures.

My brain is saying The Chicago 7/8
I might be wrong

Christmas parade tragedy... F*ck NPR!!!

It's going to get appealed. Over and over again.

Legal Vices: DARRELL BROOKS ON TRIAL!!!


Fox6: Darrell Brooks trial: Opening statements to get underway | FOX6 News Milwaukee

State bringing up his mental competency. "These are deliberate action as we get closer to the trial.  ... we have zero concerns as to the mental competency of Darrel Brooks to proceed."

Judge agrees. "it is his sole intent to make a mockery of this trial."

State filed a motion to reconsider showing witnesses faces during testimony due to stress from what Darrell Brooks might do.

Mr.. Brooks argued you already denied that prior.

Judge complemented him on his argument.

Jury brought in .
Judge reading jury instructions. I think 69 pages.
6 counts 1st degree intentional homicide - use of a dangerous weapon.
61 individual counts 1st degree recklessly endangering safety -use of a dangerous weapon.

About 1:30  into reading jury instructions. Currently on count 26 verdict form.

ETA: Lunch break for jury at Form 38.

Judge reads note from Mr. Brooks, "I don't consent to that name. It is not me. Please let me object to this. As it is my right."

Judge, " his objection is noted. I'm not going to take any futher argument on that for the reasons I've already stated."

Second note  from Mr. Brooks, " Are you going to acknowledge my objection?  What law are you citing when you say his intent? How do I know it is what the law actually says."

Judge, " .. we cannot give you legal advice .. or explain court procedures."

Mr. Brooks will be treated for his boo boo on his finger and bruise during the lunch break.

Today on Oct. 6, Judge Jennifer R. Dorow called out #Waukesha massacre suspect Darrell Brooks for stripping his clothing off at the trial & causing disruptions. #DarrellBrooks pic.twitter.com/3UVh9UnrGG

— Andy Ngô \uD83C\uDFF3??\uD83C\uDF08 (@MrAndyNgo) October 6, 2022

Brooks is not legally nuts…he is just trying to delay being in prison, (for a short time),  with Christopher Scarver…HaHaHa!

Mr. Brooks claims to recognize one of the jurors of flipped him off in his initial appearance.
Judge says, you missed your opportunity in jury selection.
Judge indulges to have the bailiff ask the juror of the issue.

Judge is about to lose it.
Mr. Brooks wants to know if he has the right to his first amendment in court.

They sure "whitened" him up for the photo in that NPR story.

Darrell Brooks trial: Opening statements to start after more court proceedings | FOX6

Mr. Brooks postponed his open statement to a later time.

Brooks is a piece of shit.  I was in LE/Corrections in Milwaukee Co. (retired) for 29 years and he was a POS while in custody.  Too bad the residents of WI voted down a referendum to bring back the death penalty some years back because this animal deserves it.

Darrell Brooks Trial Day 2 - Prosecution Witnesses - Waukesha Parade Killer

Court gave DB his covid test results. DB refused to look at them. Court went off the record to get the results for the judge to read.  Back on the record. There was an altercation "using reasonable force" to get the results, DB was upset so he is back in the separate courtroom now (he will be back).
Covid test was NEGATIVE.

DB appears to be "crying".
Lunch.

Darrell Brooks trial; week 2 of testimony gets underway | FOX6 News Milwaukee


ETA: State expects to rest Thursday or Friday.

I wonder what percent of blacks approved his work?

Darrell Brooks Trial Day 4 - Suited Up and Ready to Go!

Darrell Brooks trial: Prosecutors to follow path of SUV down Main Street | FOX6 News Milwaukee



ETA: In true sovereign citizen form, Darrell Brooks' 13th witness subpoena for is for the "State of Wisconsin" as the plaintiff.

We let T. Clair Binger do it, so why not other pieces of shit?

Darrell Brooks trial: State's case nears end with new witness testimony | FOX6 News Milwaukee


Megan Fox Livestreams Darrell Brooks Trial 9 am ET/ 8am CT

State expects to rest Monday.


Continuing the DARRELL BROOKS TRIAL (part 2)

This Mfer is crazy as a bag of cats.

I’d argue that he knows exactly what he’s doing. He’s going down and is going to do as much as he can swinging the entire way.

I'm behind due to Parkland.
D Brooks going into the Sovereign citizen mode. ( with all the passion of a flat-earther)
Brooks, "is this a common law court or an admiral court?"

Requesting an affidavit from the judge that she has no bias in the outcome of the case.

"I need your oath of office...."
"I need my 6th amendment right to face my accuser , the state of Wisconsin..."
" No record of the Bond"
" there are so many clear bias made by your honor."
" subject matter jurisdiction need to be verified and proven."

" If not I move for this case to be dismissed for failure to appear by the plaintiff, and failure to state a claim to which relief can be granted.  Everything I say has merit and validity.  As we sit here today I'm still being charged with charges that shouldn't even exist due to testimony that we have heard for the last few days."

" the prosecution team hasn't even proven that they're licensed to practice law in the state of Wisconsin, or are they just BAR association members or do they have state issued licenses, that has not been proven.

" Your honor, you still haven't stated for the record if you have full judicial power of the state or is this military power.  That hasn't been proven."
... " My sixth amendment right has basically been trampled over.  No complaints I have been shown. Nothing has been certified.

" It is to the point your honor ... where you should recues yourself at this point. If you're not going to abide by the oath that you swore."
" which was in your oath... You swore to protect constitution, WE THE People, but that is not being done here."
" I'm merely seeking understanding."
" I have the right to face my accuser. Where is the injured party? Who is making the claim. I ask you judge if you have a claim"
" that would be a tactic (sp) agreement"
" when I ask if the witnesses if they see the State of Wisconsin in the court room, the question is shut down.  which is a valid question....  The plaintiff should be present,  where is the plaintiff? Who is bringing the claim?  An Entity can't bring a claim. It has to be a living breathing human being.
" I have teh right to demand that the court place into evidence any "unrevealed contract"...

" I haven't even entered a plea"
" you have to let me go through all the discovery in 3 days.
"... because of all this, the motion to dismissed should be granted. There is no injured party in this matter.  So who makes the claim? Who?"
" TI have th right to recuse the judge at anytime.
" my speedy trial has been violated.... We are way past that time"
" change of venue denied.
" where is the plaintiff?  will they be allowed to testify? No they will no because they don't exist. For all those reasons the case should be dismissed."
" the document sheet is inaccurate, the name is in all capital letters. ... That is not my name."

" Allen.. how did you come up with a 4th method to remove me to another room.?"
" which leads to today. .. not noting the reason for objections. Assistance of council... I did not wave my right to assistance of council.... you accepted the paperwork that "I Altered"... But I still have to come in here with no help."
Talking about hate mail now. ( back to moving trial.) Insensitive things being said in chat groups.  

All said with out interruption by the judge. (50 minutes)

State response.
refering to a legai desiction."
"  The majority of redsolufs(sp) filing is incomprehensive jargon and cut-and-paste legal mumbo-jumbo. Sovereign citizens theories and frivolous and wholly without merit."


State" Mr. Brooks knowingly... willingly voluntarily insisted that he represent himself in this trial. He has no constitutional right to standby council whatsoever.  The court patiently went through the form and advised him of many of the things he is complaining aboutt.... his ignorance of the law,  And his words to the court and I quote to the best of my ability:
" It don't make me flinch one bit"

State, " he appears to be reading from a typewritten transcript.  His intention here is to stall, delay, disrupt, intimidate and it is not going to work."

Brooks,"  Your honor that's a load of crap."

Judge " it's my turn I gave yo 50 minutes to raise all your issues you want to bring up. I gave th state a chance to respond... that is proper procedure, I followed decorum, I followed civility. ... I'm going to render a decision.,. please listen, do not interrupt.

Point by point rebuke of D Brooks.


4000 then 1400 called for jury.
10 strikes allowed for media exposure, Brooks failed to use all of his.

Pissing off the Judge is a bad idea lol.

Judge, " The issues you raise regarding subject matter jurisdiction your Baseless, frivolous and they are not anything this court need to address further. ... The fact that you are bringing up admiral court or military court, or a court of competent jurisdiction, is frivolous. This court has jurisdiction over the criminal cases brought before it by the State of Wisconsin, in this particular case, these are allegations that criminal conduct occurred in the City of Waukesha. The City of Waukesha is in the County of Waukesha.... This court sits to here these case."

'This trial will keep going."


"those sovereign arguments... are baseless sir and this court need not address them further."
Next witness.

Brooks "blaa blaaa bla"

He may be representing himself, but he is probably coached in his "me" time.  I suspect there are a lot of 13% on his side.