User Panel
Posted: 7/7/2020 4:34:55 PM EDT
|
|
|
Sig's lessons learned in the capture of MHS should give them an edge.
|
|
Not a lot of out Of the box thinking with this stuff. Pretty much just rebatreled shit for a new caliber. We aren’t going to go to a bull pup andvSIG isn’t doing anything innovative. It’s time we did away with buffer tubes and get a truly folding stock weapon system like what’s on the Scar Or SIG 553 .
|
|
So what happens to all the old M249s/M4s once they're replaced? They'll just scrap them?
|
|
Put the Vortex aimbot optic on the Textron LMG, use it to replace SAWs/DMRs/GPMGs, and leave the M4 alone.
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Not a lot of out Of the box thinking with this stuff. Pretty much just rebatreled shit for a new caliber. We aren’t going to go to a bull pup andvSIG isn’t doing anything innovative. It’s time we did away with buffer tubes and get a truly folding stock weapon system like what’s on the Scar Or SIG 553 . View Quote The Sig doesn't use a buffer tube and it's foldable on the carbine. |
|
The LOP on the Sig belt gun is ridiculously short. Even extended, it's got to be way short.
Tony |
|
Interesting that they all copied Vortex’s color from their Razor line. I hope @VortexSam has a patent on it!
|
|
lol @ that stock height on the LMGs. I guess they don't intend anybody to shoot it while wearing helmet mounted NODs or a gas mask. That's some stupidly high cheek weld.
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Close up of the Textron offering: https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/PA090035.jpg SIG looks like the only weapon designed by people who've used guns. Not sure what is going on with the LMG stock, but the older submissions had a more normal looking stock. View Quote The Textron rifle is filler content. A non-bullpup rising block. IIRC, they were thinking Ares AIWS until cockblocked by the req for a mag-fed rifle. |
|
Quoted: https://cdn.rockislandauction.com/dev_cdn/79/1497.jpg https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/75/Army_Heritage_Museum_B.A.R..jpg View Quote Oh hell yes. GWOT would have been over in a week. Or so I hear. |
|
Quoted: Close up of the Textron offering: https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/PA090035.jpg SIG looks like the only weapon designed by people who've used guns. Not sure what is going on with the LMG stock, but the older submissions had a more normal looking stock. View Quote That's the old design that was close too the M4. The new design is in the OP. |
|
SIG is least awful but looks like NERF
GD looks like that stupid Boring Co weed burner Musk sells Textron looks like something cooked up by an early Soviet R&D shop Also... SIG; modern comfort grip GD; A2 grip (works, but passe) Textron; is that an MP5 grip profile? Yeah, you can really tell which group actually shoots |
|
|
Quoted: And all the rifles are using 20 round mags. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: SIG is least awful but looks like NERF GD looks like that stupid Boring Co weed burner Musk sells Textron looks like something cooked up by an early Soviet R&D shop And all the rifles are using 20 round mags. I'll allow it, they're shooting 6mm stuff in semi-auto with an eye for accuracy I personally think 24 is the ideal number, seeing as 6mm is halfway between 30x of .22 and 20x of .30 |
|
Quoted: Not a lot of out Of the box thinking with this stuff. Pretty much just rebatreled shit for a new caliber. We aren’t going to go to a bull pup andvSIG isn’t doing anything innovative. It’s time we did away with buffer tubes and get a truly folding stock weapon system like what’s on the Scar Or SIG 553 . View Quote Sig may have leave a lot to be desired in the execution, but they are pushing innovation in recent years. More than a lot of companies are even attempting. The MCX was an innovative design in that it took what modern users were asking for, and made that work in something that kept it familiar with the AR that has dominated the market. This NGSW thing is basically the MCX scaled up to the round the Army demanded. It’s a pretty pointless endeavor overall, but they didn’t set the parameters. The stock is folding or collapsing, depending on the configuration. Not that it matters too much, that’s not really as important as people make it out to be. The SCAR had an issue with that as well, stocks breaking, since a hinge is a potential weak point in any design. |
|
|
Quoted: The Sig doesn't use a buffer tube and it's foldable on the carbine. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Not a lot of out Of the box thinking with this stuff. Pretty much just rebatreled shit for a new caliber. We aren’t going to go to a bull pup andvSIG isn’t doing anything innovative. It’s time we did away with buffer tubes and get a truly folding stock weapon system like what’s on the Scar Or SIG 553 . The Sig doesn't use a buffer tube and it's foldable on the carbine. Regardless. Doesn’t look like any innovation is going on, just a rebarreling to a marginally better round. Mght be good for a SAW weapon but not necessary on a carbine. |
|
Almost looks like there is an airburst grenade component that this rifle can attach to? Are they resurrecting the XM29 airburst grenade part?
|
|
Quoted: No telescoping cartridge, no want. https://cdn.athlonoutdoors.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2018/03/Textron-Lightweight-Small-Arms-2.jpg https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/wV5UVry.png View Quote Lol Have the environment wackos said anything? |
|
The whole thing is such a stupid waste. It’s good that industry innovation and forward progress are being considered in some aspects but this NGSW shit really doesn’t make any significant difference.
Oh well. It would appear that joglee and the competitors are the only ones still interested in the program so we’re lucky he keeps us updated. |
|
High pressure ammo, plastic cases, OWL tracers and aimbot optics are all steps forward and make guns better at a distance past what individual riflemen do most of the time.
Where's the innovation for 100m? Where are the 4.9mm, 100kpsi, 6 gram cartridges in 50rnd mags for 5lb 1200rpm PDW-carbines? NGSW may outshoot a AK at 600m, but it's probably inferior at 50m. |
|
The stocks on the ARs look like shit, literally just a block. lol I like the look of the Sig's AR and Textron's R.
|
|
Is that ejection port on the Textron not smashing brass right into your support hand if you happen to grab it up close? |
|
Quoted: I'll allow it, they're shooting 6mm stuff in semi-auto with an eye for accuracy I personally think 24 is the ideal number, seeing as 6mm is halfway between 30x of .22 and 20x of .30 View Quote Most engagements take place less than 150 yards away. If troops have had trouble since the beginning of time with rifles to hit anything past 150 yards in combat conditions. Giving them a heavier recoiling and shorter magazine weapon is not going to make things any better. The M16A2 musket was designed with an eye for accuracy too. It was fucking dumb as hell, and quickly abandoned by the Army. |
|
Quoted: High pressure ammo, plastic cases, OWL tracers and aimbot optics are all steps forward and make guns better at a distance past what individual riflemen do most of the time. Where's the innovation for 100m? Where are the 4.9mm, 100kpsi, 6 gram cartridges in 50rnd mags for 5lb 1200rpm PDW-carbines? NGSW may outshoot a AK at 600m, but it's probably inferior at 50m. View Quote Nice post! I can see the need for a better belt-fed than the M249, and for a DMR that outperforms 7.62. I can’t see this work as an improvement on carbines. |
|
|
Quoted: lol @ that stock height on the LMGs. I guess they don't intend anybody to shoot it while wearing helmet mounted NODs or a gas mask. That's some stupidly high cheek weld. View Quote They intend the user to be using optics and inline is much better for recoil control. I honestly think the optic and machine guns have a great chance at adoption, being able to replace all 7.62 machine guns and 5.56 saws with a lighter and much better performing round is a big step forward. |
|
Quoted: Gotta learn to shoot right handed. Lefties need not apply, also its polymer cased. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Is that ejection port on the Textron not smashing brass right into your support hand if you happen to grab it up close? Gotta learn to shoot right handed. Lefties need not apply, also its polymer cased. Not sure how to phrase that... empties?? Ejecting polymers doesn’t sound right. Look at the ejection port though. That’s some prime real estate for holding the gun unless I’m missing something. |
|
Quoted: Most engagements take place less than 150 yards away. If troops have had trouble since the beginning of time with rifles to hit anything past 150 yards in combat conditions. Giving them a heavier recoiling and shorter magazine weapon is not going to make things any better. The M16A2 musket was designed with an eye for accuracy too. It was fucking dumb as hell, and quickly abandoned by the Army. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I'll allow it, they're shooting 6mm stuff in semi-auto with an eye for accuracy I personally think 24 is the ideal number, seeing as 6mm is halfway between 30x of .22 and 20x of .30 Most engagements take place less than 150 yards away. If troops have had trouble since the beginning of time with rifles to hit anything past 150 yards in combat conditions. Giving them a heavier recoiling and shorter magazine weapon is not going to make things any better. The M16A2 musket was designed with an eye for accuracy too. It was fucking dumb as hell, and quickly abandoned by the Army. I''m a dirty civvy but my understanding of modern fire and maneuver warfare was one element fixes the enemy so another can close with and destroy. Having a heavier rifle with less capacity seems to be counter productive. Or updated COIN we been doing, the force fixes with fire to call in ordnance but same issues. |
|
I handled the Sig offerings at SHOT, and they weren't half bad, especially the scaled-up MCX.
|
|
More interested in learning about the new optics being designed by Vortex and L3... Out of everything, those and maybe Sig’s new MG will end up seeing use.
Otherwise, the M4 isn’t going anywhere. |
|
Quoted: So what happens to all the old M249s/M4s once they're replaced? They'll just scrap them? View Quote 5.56 isn’t going away anytime soon. If the new 6.8 magnum is everything we’ve been promised, it will be punishing shoulders and wearing out barrels at an alarming rate until the bugs are worked out (years at least). |
|
Quoted: Most engagements take place less than 150 yards away. If troops have had trouble since the beginning of time with rifles to hit anything past 150 yards in combat conditions. Giving them a heavier recoiling and shorter magazine weapon is not going to make things any better. The M16A2 musket was designed with an eye for accuracy too. It was fucking dumb as hell, and quickly abandoned by the Army. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I'll allow it, they're shooting 6mm stuff in semi-auto with an eye for accuracy I personally think 24 is the ideal number, seeing as 6mm is halfway between 30x of .22 and 20x of .30 Most engagements take place less than 150 yards away. If troops have had trouble since the beginning of time with rifles to hit anything past 150 yards in combat conditions. Giving them a heavier recoiling and shorter magazine weapon is not going to make things any better. The M16A2 musket was designed with an eye for accuracy too. It was fucking dumb as hell, and quickly abandoned by the Army. Quickly? Took over twenty years, and some units still have them. M16A1 was adopted in 1964, M16A2 in 1983, the M4 didn't really start seeing issue outside of SOF and some infantry units until the late '90's. |
|
6.5 Lightmachinegun maybe KACs version.
The rest, throw in the trash. |
|
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.