User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:21:37 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Either she's about to uncover the biggest scandal in this country's history or she's the biggest liar in this country's history. We'll soon find out. She has no reason to lie. I would be shitting bricks if I was complicit in this fraud. This. There is no in-between anymore. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:22:19 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted: As someone upthread posted, you are impossible to underestimate. If I've got somebody like you against me I know I must be on the right side.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:23:37 PM EDT
[#3]
Well, it’s over folks.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:24:10 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I have no idea who you're referring to, but I feel the same way. How the hell do people have accounts for 5, 10, or 15+ years without ever buying or selling in the EE? That's one of the biggest draws of forums like this. Fucking weirdos lol I was active on other gun forums for many years and never bought anything from a buy/sell/trade section of a forum that I can recall. I would rather just pony up the cash from a legit vendor than mess with "USPS MO oNlY, WiLl hOlD fEr tOo WeEkS uNtIl FuNdS kLeAr" crap. *EDIT* I take that back, I sold a optic and a mag for a gun I no longer had on the FN forum years back. 20 years on forums, one transaction. I must be a trollbot. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:25:13 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I'm always skeptical of those with gigantic post count numbers yet zero EE feedback. What's their real purpose for being here? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: The nevertrumpers all flocked to this like flies on shit. Where is right-wing censorship when you need it? We don't need censorship, only pussies at the "left" needs them. The nevertrumpers, doomers, and paid shills are out in force in this thread......THEY ARE SCARED!!! President Trump is playing the "plausible deniability", and showing them how it's done. No, we do need censorship. This is much too serious and sensitive of a topic to have subversives walk into it and throw molotovs. Amazing. Some people thought he was a Russian bot back in 2016. I'm always skeptical of those with gigantic post count numbers yet zero EE feedback. What's their real purpose for being here? Not wasting money? Me, there aren't many parts kits for sale, and that's kinda my bag. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:27:38 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I'm always skeptical of those with gigantic post count numbers yet zero EE feedback. What's their real purpose for being here? Discussing guns on a forum maybe? I'm working on it! Got some goodies I need to get photographed to sell.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:27:41 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted: If what he says is true (and from what I've seen, I believe it is), the right has a third choice: Give up on Trump Devotion Syndrome, and recognize that the fact Trump even came close and the down-ballot races went pretty well in this election means something good: Most Americans still have conservative values and would love to vote for a conservative. They just don't like Trump very much. That’ll show him! And those dirty rotten three conservative Supreme Court appointments!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:28:39 PM EDT
[#8]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:29:09 PM EDT
[#9]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:29:23 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted: This. There is no in-between anymore. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Either she's about to uncover the biggest scandal in this country's history or she's the biggest liar in this country's history. We'll soon find out. She has no reason to lie. I would be shitting bricks if I was complicit in this fraud. This. There is no in-between anymore. Was it ever not gonna be? She alleged from the start the ballot was rigged; that is a very big deal, biggest political scandal ever. Apart from everyone's feverish impatience, nothing has really changed, apart from us learning about the shady, graft and communist filled underworld of the electronic voting machine industry. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:31:33 PM EDT
[#11]
Everyone posting here has changed my line of thinking.
I now believe Trump, Lin Wood, Rudy and Powell are ALL DeepState and they are all stringing us along to crush our Patriotic Spirt and usher in the Great Reset. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:32:34 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Everyone posting here has changed my line of thinking. I now believe Trump, Lin Wood, Rudy and Powell are ALL DeepState and they are all stringing us along to crush our Patriotic Spirt and usher in the Great Reset. They were |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:32:57 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Is that true? Did a bunch of people just gaslight themselves into assuming she was formally part of the Trump campaign? FWIW, it's been difficult and complicated to suss exactly who and what Trump's legal team is. Lots of personnel and letterhead changes, Powell was definitely working with them but perhaps in an advisory or collaborative way. 'Disavowel' is a strong claim for this statement. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:34:11 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Yep. Separation of powers to keep other attack angles open. She is also doing this without pay, although she now has opened a fund. As I said before, nothing has changed. At all. Welp, I'll send her money if this thing really takes off. Its the least I can do. For now, I'm keeping my wallet closed. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:34:35 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Everyone posting here has changed my line of thinking. I now believe Trump, Lin Wood, Rudy and Powell are ALL DeepState and they are all stringing us along to crush our Patriotic Spirt and usher in the Great Reset. Which is why you keep your eye on the real goal, which is keeping Biden's carcass out of that chair. This has always been bigger than Trump. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:34:39 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I think the vote should be post poned until the presidential is behind us and we can reassess the loss/win scenario. Not a good time to vote. Not a good time to direct people's attention away from what just happened. Just like the media, you're getting sucked into the moveOn.org message from democrats. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: The nevertrumpers all flocked to this like flies on shit. Where is right-wing censorship when you need it? All you have left isn't it? It'd be sad if it wasn't so pathetic. Government malfeasance is hard enough to expose but with quislings that carry their water on message forums, its that much harder. Do you think people should vote for the Republican candidate in the two upcoming Georgia Senate races? I think the quislings are the ones demanding we turn over control of the Senate to the Democrats. But, apparently, massaging Trump's ego is more important than the fucking Senate. Those two Republicans running in Georgia aren't going to do shit to expose the corruption in our government and seek justice. They're milquetoast. I can't help it no one is excited about them enough to forget about Trump. Nice attempt to change the subject, but I'm referring to what Lin Wood posted on Twitter. He said people shouldn't vote for the Republicans in the upcoming Georgia Senate races. Do you agree? Yes or no? I know it's difficult when you actually have to answer a question but it really shouldn't be a hard one to answer. I think the vote should be post poned until the presidential is behind us and we can reassess the loss/win scenario. Not a good time to vote. Not a good time to direct people's attention away from what just happened. Just like the media, you're getting sucked into the moveOn.org message from democrats. You're still not answering. The election isn't going to be postponed. There's absolutely zero chance that happens as it would violate Georgia state law. Should the Republican candidates be supported or not? It's a simple question. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:35:39 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Powell spent nearly a decade in the 2000s representing firms and executives involved in the Enron scandal, including the accounting firm Arthur Andersen and former Merrill Lynch executive Jim Brown.[16] Enron's financial misconduct was exposed in October 2001, leading to the bankruptcy of Enron and the de facto dissolution of Arthur Andersen, one of the five largest audit and accountancy partnerships in the world, because of audit failures.[17] Chief executives of Enron were indicted for a variety of charges and some were later convicted and sentenced to prison. Arthur Andersen was found guilty of illegally destroying relevant documents, which voided its license to audit public companies and effectively closed the firm. Your point is? She's just doing her job. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:36:47 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I enjoy the discussion board and the firearm community. I own a few guns but haven't got a huge investment yet. I like to discuss politics and I'm willing to die for freedom. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: The nevertrumpers all flocked to this like flies on shit. Where is right-wing censorship when you need it? We don't need censorship, only pussies at the "left" needs them. The nevertrumpers, doomers, and paid shills are out in force in this thread......THEY ARE SCARED!!! President Trump is playing the "plausible deniability", and showing them how it's done. No, we do need censorship. This is much too serious and sensitive of a topic to have subversives walk into it and throw molotovs. Amazing. Some people thought he was a Russian bot back in 2016. I'm always skeptical of those with gigantic post count numbers yet zero EE feedback. What's their real purpose for being here? I enjoy the discussion board and the firearm community. I own a few guns but haven't got a huge investment yet. I like to discuss politics and I'm willing to die for freedom. Fair enough. We've often disagreed, but I do think you're sincere. We just strongly disagree on Trump's usefulness to the 2A. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:37:34 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Welp, I'll send her money if this thing really takes off. Its the least I can do. For now, I'm keeping my wallet closed. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Yep. Separation of powers to keep other attack angles open. She is also doing this without pay, although she now has opened a fund. As I said before, nothing has changed. At all. Welp, I'll send her money if this thing really takes off. Its the least I can do. For now, I'm keeping my wallet closed. A wise move. Blind donations are stupid; I donated to Rittenhouse because there was an explicit purpose (bail, then legal expenses) so it was highly unlikely to be squandered. Once Powell files and we have an idea what goods she has, we can make an informed decision. I still have no evidence to suggest this is all a brazen fabrication, so I am looking forward to supporting her, but I won't until I have evidence to support my donation being effective. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:37:39 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I have no idea who you're referring to, but I feel the same way. How the hell do people have accounts for 5, 10, or 15+ years without ever buying or selling in the EE? That's one of the biggest draws of forums like this. Fucking weirdos lol I don’t go to tag sales either, I don’t buy used stuff. Bought ONE thing from the EE many years ago, it was a PITA having to get a money order, and got no feedback. Nothing compelling since then. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:38:54 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Well, it's over folks. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:39:32 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Your point is? She's just doing her job. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Powell spent nearly a decade in the 2000s representing firms and executives involved in the Enron scandal, including the accounting firm Arthur Andersen and former Merrill Lynch executive Jim Brown.[16] Enron's financial misconduct was exposed in October 2001, leading to the bankruptcy of Enron and the de facto dissolution of Arthur Andersen, one of the five largest audit and accountancy partnerships in the world, because of audit failures.[17] Chief executives of Enron were indicted for a variety of charges and some were later convicted and sentenced to prison. Arthur Andersen was found guilty of illegally destroying relevant documents, which voided its license to audit public companies and effectively closed the firm. Your point is? She's just doing her job. Sounds like she has a strong background handling fraud arguments, on both sides. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:39:48 PM EDT
[#23]
So is it confirmed that something this week is about to drop?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:40:29 PM EDT
[#24]
When you've lost Infowars...
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:40:34 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistorySource being? |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:41:07 PM EDT
[#26]
The usual suspects are repeating the Lincoln Project/Shareblue and defeatist talking point of "There can't be fraud if Republicans down the ballot did well." This argument does not make sense to me for the following reasons:
Ask a Trump hater how they feel about the rest of the Republican party. They will either claim to be "independents" or go on to tell you how awful they think the GOP is. Ask a reliable GOP voter how they feel about Biden, and why they vote GOP. They will explanation for voting GOP will be that they hate the things that the Democrats push for. These are the very things Biden has promised to double down on. They may not always like Trump's big city ways, but they hate Biden's policy more. This talk about a mass exodus to Biden while staying loyal to the rest of the GOP, is something that only a small minority of voters even considers doing. A Republican is unlikely to vote for a socialist because some Trump tweets hurt his feelings, and a Democrat sure as hell is not going to vote for GOP candidates down the ballot. The fraud is obvious in multiple different ways. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:41:07 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You're still not answering. The election isn't going to be postponed. There's absolutely zero chance that happens as it would violate Georgia state law. Should the Republican candidates be supported or not? It's a simple question. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: The nevertrumpers all flocked to this like flies on shit. Where is right-wing censorship when you need it? All you have left isn't it? It'd be sad if it wasn't so pathetic. Government malfeasance is hard enough to expose but with quislings that carry their water on message forums, its that much harder. Do you think people should vote for the Republican candidate in the two upcoming Georgia Senate races? I think the quislings are the ones demanding we turn over control of the Senate to the Democrats. But, apparently, massaging Trump's ego is more important than the fucking Senate. Those two Republicans running in Georgia aren't going to do shit to expose the corruption in our government and seek justice. They're milquetoast. I can't help it no one is excited about them enough to forget about Trump. Nice attempt to change the subject, but I'm referring to what Lin Wood posted on Twitter. He said people shouldn't vote for the Republicans in the upcoming Georgia Senate races. Do you agree? Yes or no? I know it's difficult when you actually have to answer a question but it really shouldn't be a hard one to answer. I think the vote should be post poned until the presidential is behind us and we can reassess the loss/win scenario. Not a good time to vote. Not a good time to direct people's attention away from what just happened. Just like the media, you're getting sucked into the moveOn.org message from democrats. You're still not answering. The election isn't going to be postponed. There's absolutely zero chance that happens as it would violate Georgia state law. Should the Republican candidates be supported or not? It's a simple question. I'd vote for the Republicans but as for Lin wood's comment on not voting, he's engaged in a fight with the State GOP and I agree with where he is coming from. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:42:27 PM EDT
[#28]
Retarded thread is retarded.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:43:13 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted: A wise move. Blind donations are stupid; I donated to Rittenhouse because there was an explicit purpose (bail, then legal expenses) so it was highly unlikely to be squandered. Once Powell files and we have an idea what goods she has, we can make an informed decision. I still have no evidence to suggest this is all a brazen fabrication, so I am looking forward to supporting her, but I won't until I have evidence to support my donation being effective. Exactly, my wife wanted to donate. I told her let’s see the goods FIRST! |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:43:19 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryThe mentioning of those four countries is clearly a signal of what to expect in at least one element of what we’ll see filed next week. China Iran Venezuela Serbia Possibly just a coincidence, and possibly not, but it was reported that four countries were allegedly tied to data transfers through the seized Frankfurt, Germany server. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:45:04 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Was it ever not gonna be? She alleged from the start the ballot was rigged; that is a very big deal, biggest political scandal ever. Apart from everyone's feverish impatience, nothing has really changed, apart from us learning about the shady, graft and communist filled underworld of the electronic voting machine industry. The claims now are far more than just old fashioned ballot stuffing. They have moved to both sides use it in a pay-to-play, buy-your-election-from-dominion or lose claim. She will be a hero or a has-been by the end of the week. I suspect she has plenty of career left. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:45:06 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The usual suspects are repeating the Lincoln Project/Shareblue and defeatist talking point of "There can't be fraud if Republicans down the ballot did well." This argument does not make sense to me for the following reasons: Ask a Trump hater how they feel about the rest of the Republican party. They will either claim to be "independents" or go on to tell you how awful they think the GOP is. Ask a reliable GOP voter how they feel about Biden, and why they vote GOP. They will explanation for voting GOP will be that they hate the things that the Democrats push for. These are the very things Biden has promised to double down on. They may not always like Trump's big city ways, but they hate Biden's policy more. This talk about a mass exodus to Biden while staying loyal to the rest of the GOP, is something that only a small minority of voters even considers doing. A Republican is unlikely to vote for a socialist because some Trump tweets hurt his feelings, and a Democrat sure as hell is not going to vote for GOP candidates down the ballot. The fraud is obvious in multiple different ways. Down ballot means nothing as we are talking about hijinks in a few heavily dem cities. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:51:44 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted: So is it confirmed that something this week is about to drop? Well that's what she said, last, so yeah |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:53:21 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The usual suspects are repeating the Lincoln Project/Shareblue and defeatist talking point of "There can't be fraud if Republicans down the ballot did well." This argument does not make sense to me for the following reasons: Ask a Trump hater how they feel about the rest of the Republican party. They will either claim to be "independents" or go on to tell you how awful they think the GOP is. Ask a reliable GOP voter how they feel about Biden, and why they vote GOP. They will explanation for voting GOP will be that they hate the things that the Democrats push for. These are the very things Biden has promised to double down on. They may not always like Trump's big city ways, but they hate Biden's policy more. This talk about a mass exodus to Biden while staying loyal to the rest of the GOP, is something that only a small minority of voters even considers doing. A Republican is unlikely to vote for a socialist because some Trump tweets hurt his feelings, and a Democrat sure as hell is not going to vote for GOP candidates down the ballot. The fraud is obvious in multiple different ways. It also is consistent with the type of fraud being alleged; depressing or enhancing turnout at the precinct level does not budge the down ballot races around, but it does shift the tip ticket totals dramatically. It makes it much harder to spot, since the overall results are expected, and a bit of media gaslighting on the top ticket candidate makes their failure expected for many voters as well. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:54:02 PM EDT
[#35]
https://parler.com/post/eabf5153256749b09d416254ec600b2c
 sorry, didn't notice this was already posted |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:54:06 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
/Thread |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:55:02 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Down ballot means nothing as we are talking about hijinks in a few heavily dem cities. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: The usual suspects are repeating the Lincoln Project/Shareblue and defeatist talking point of "There can't be fraud if Republicans down the ballot did well." This argument does not make sense to me for the following reasons: Ask a Trump hater how they feel about the rest of the Republican party. They will either claim to be "independents" or go on to tell you how awful they think the GOP is. Ask a reliable GOP voter how they feel about Biden, and why they vote GOP. They will explanation for voting GOP will be that they hate the things that the Democrats push for. These are the very things Biden has promised to double down on. They may not always like Trump's big city ways, but they hate Biden's policy more. This talk about a mass exodus to Biden while staying loyal to the rest of the GOP, is something that only a small minority of voters even considers doing. A Republican is unlikely to vote for a socialist because some Trump tweets hurt his feelings, and a Democrat sure as hell is not going to vote for GOP candidates down the ballot. The fraud is obvious in multiple different ways. Down ballot means nothing as we are talking about hijinks in a few heavily dem cities. To have a chance at the game-winning field goal, you first need to be within field goal range. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:56:45 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Either she's about to uncover the biggest scandal in this country's history or she's the biggest liar in this country's history. We'll soon find out. She has no reason to lie. I would be shitting bricks if I was complicit in this fraud. Very few people will give a shit about Sidney Powell in six months. She’ll be just another talking head on far right YouTube, occasionally popping up on far right TV. She’s pushing her brand right now. Lies or not lies, doesn’t matter. It’s branding. KrakenOnSteroids and the like tell you all you need to know. Branding. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2020 11:59:41 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted: /Thread Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted:
/Thread Also, I don't think Powell has ever said she needs Trump people to testify, etc. Think about it; she doesn't *need* to be affiliated to pursue her claims/suits, apart from *maybe* certain standing claims. And it may be that formal affiliation makes some things more difficult, such as controlling leaks (note the frustrating lack of leaks, even as we hear daily who's been supposedly hired, fired, or gotten angry in the Trump camp). It certainly makes certain associations & contacts more legally hazardous, of the president is seeking information from foreigners, making claims against private companies, etc. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/23/2020 12:00:24 AM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The mentioning of those four countries is clearly a signal of what to expect in at least one element of what we’ll see filed next week. China Iran Venezuela Serbia Possibly just a coincidence, and possibly not, but it was reported that four countries were allegedly tied to data transfers through the seized Frankfurt, Germany server. How could a server seized last summer have anything to do with a November election? |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/23/2020 12:00:28 AM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Is that true? Did a bunch of people just gaslight themselves into assuming she was formally part of the Trump campaign? FWIW, it's been difficult and complicated to suss exactly who and what Trump's legal team is. Lots of personnel and letterhead changes, Powell was definitely working with them but perhaps in an advisory or collaborative way. 'Disavowel' is a strong claim for this statement. I keep hearing separation of powers. Sounds like she either is working for someone in Congress or on the Judicial side. Or is it true she's not getting paid at all? |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/23/2020 12:01:16 AM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted: https://parler.com/post/eabf5153256749b09d416254ec600b2c https://is2.4chan.org/pol/1606102155116.jpg sorry, didn't notice this was already posted Sidney's still talking shit, so I'm going to ride with her until she gives me a reason not to. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/23/2020 12:01:18 AM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted: https://parler.com/post/eabf5153256749b09d416254ec600b2c https://is2.4chan.org/pol/1606102155116.jpg sorry, didn't notice this was already posted Sounds like they just want some legal breathing room for a two prong attack. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/23/2020 12:03:39 AM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Listen up defeatists and shills! Sidney Powell was never working for the president. This changes nothing. She is not getting paid by him. She is working on her own for the benefit of the American people. That's how it's been from the beginning. I don't know why the legal team is clarifying that now, but I'm sure there's a legal reason. So, she will still be prominent in the Trump legal team press conferences and such? Nothing has changed in her role? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/23/2020 12:04:06 AM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Very few people will give a shit about Sidney Powell in six months. She’ll be just another talking head on far right YouTube, occasionally popping up on far right TV. She’s pushing her brand right now. Lies or not lies, doesn’t matter. It’s branding. KrakenOnSteroids and the like tell you all you need to know. Branding. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Either she's about to uncover the biggest scandal in this country's history or she's the biggest liar in this country's history. We'll soon find out. She has no reason to lie. I would be shitting bricks if I was complicit in this fraud. Very few people will give a shit about Sidney Powell in six months. She’ll be just another talking head on far right YouTube, occasionally popping up on far right TV. She’s pushing her brand right now. Lies or not lies, doesn’t matter. It’s branding. KrakenOnSteroids and the like tell you all you need to know. Branding. Interesting that we’re not seeing more competition for that 73-million strong market. Half the nation wrapped up in one brief push at a money grab? ~Marketing Agency Directors Hate Her! |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/23/2020 12:05:34 AM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Powell spent nearly a decade in the 2000s representing firms and executives involved in the Enron scandal, including the accounting firm Arthur Andersen and former Merrill Lynch executive Jim Brown.[16] Enron's financial misconduct was exposed in October 2001, leading to the bankruptcy of Enron and the de facto dissolution of Arthur Andersen, one of the five largest audit and accountancy partnerships in the world, because of audit failures.[17] Chief executives of Enron were indicted for a variety of charges and some were later convicted and sentenced to prison. Arthur Andersen was found guilty of illegally destroying relevant documents, which voided its license to audit public companies and effectively closed the firm. Quote HistoryQuoted: Powell spent nearly a decade in the 2000s representing firms and executives involved in the Enron scandal, including the accounting firm Arthur Andersen and former Merrill Lynch executive Jim Brown.[16] Enron's financial misconduct was exposed in October 2001, leading to the bankruptcy of Enron and the de facto dissolution of Arthur Andersen, one of the five largest audit and accountancy partnerships in the world, because of audit failures.[17] Chief executives of Enron were indicted for a variety of charges and some were later convicted and sentenced to prison. Arthur Andersen was found guilty of illegally destroying relevant documents, which voided its license to audit public companies and effectively closed the firm. @EOTWAKI You might want to learn a little bit more about that "conviction" before using it to bash Powell. If you don't remember almost all of the convictions were overturned years later. Nothing happened to him but it was found out that, like so many times in the past, prosecutor Andrew Weissman intimidated witnesses and defendants. U.S. Supreme Court Reverses Criminal Conviction of Arthur Andersen in Enron Scandal In a unanimous decision, the U.S. Supreme Court recently reversed Arthur Andersen's criminal conviction for violating a federal witness tampering statute by encouraging its employees to shred Enron documents pursuant to a document retention policy. Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States, 125 S. Ct. 2129, 2005 WL 1262915 (U.S. May 31, 2005). Merryl Lynch ex-employees guilty verdict vacated Four Merrill Lynch ex-employees were found guilty, but in 2006, the 5th US Court of Appeals vacated the verdict, which observers found stunning, due to the court's typical reluctance to overturn lower cases. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/23/2020 12:06:28 AM EDT
[#47]
Yes, because she hasnt backed anything up.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/23/2020 12:06:53 AM EDT
[#48]
Sidney Powell is going after anyone and everyone she finds involved in this attack on our country.
Doesn't matter if you have an (R) by your name. Trump is head of the (R) party... Things clearer now? Kemp is in her cross hairs. Raffensperger, too. Trump campaign says, "Powell hasn't show us any evidence." Wow. I wonder why. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/23/2020 12:07:14 AM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted: So, she will still be prominent in the Trump legal team press conferences and such? Nothing has changed in her role? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Listen up defeatists and shills! Sidney Powell was never working for the president. This changes nothing. She is not getting paid by him. She is working on her own for the benefit of the American people. That's how it's been from the beginning. I don't know why the legal team is clarifying that now, but I'm sure there's a legal reason. So, she will still be prominent in the Trump legal team press conferences and such? Nothing has changed in her role? I guess we'll find out at the next press conference, don't you think? |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/23/2020 12:07:28 AM EDT
[#50]
I support the Trump and his legal team’s decision to distance themselves from Powell.
Why don’t YOU support Trump? |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
Attached File