User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 6/14/2019 9:36:44 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
They won bigly in 2016. Control of the Senate, House of Represenates, and the oval office Why is Obamacare still the law of the land? Why is there no wall? Why are foreigners free to invade with impunity? Why the fuck did we bomb Syria in 2017? Stop accepting the blue suppository and wake up. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Exactly! If you're going to piss and moan about bump stocks, suppressors, and foreigners being denied P-Mags, all while ignoring the fact that we are getting a Wall, stopped the flow of illegals coming into this country, repealed Obamacare, gotten out of Syria and Afghanistan, brought Iran to heel, and ended China's unfair trade policies, then you're a real dufus!  Why is Obamacare still the law of the land? Why is there no wall? Why are foreigners free to invade with impunity? Why the fuck did we bomb Syria in 2017? Stop accepting the blue suppository and wake up. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/14/2019 9:37:09 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Just think what we can do with all three chambers of government after 2020. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/14/2019 9:38:27 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What other country allows their citizens to own 32rd mags? A big nothing burger. The issue is that if Trump is OK with stopping foreign citizens from possessing magazines over 32 rounds, if Trump's State Department* is OK with stopping foreign citizens from possessing magazines over 32 rounds through export, if Trump is fine with a provision of the U.N. Small Arms Treaty being enforced when there is no mandate to do so THEN TRUMP IS PROBABLY IN FAVOR WITH STOPPING THE IMPORTATION OF MAGAZINES OVER 32 ROUNDS AND TRUMP DOES NOT NEED DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS TO PASS ANYTHING - HE CAN DO THAT HIMSELF. (Remember that George Bush 1st stopped all imports of "assault weapons" in 1989 because as president he did not need anyone's permission to do so as he is in charge of imports and he held the ban until congress caught up with a law). And, its not too far off that Trump would support a national ban on magazines over 30 or 32 rounds. IF Trump is IN FAVOR OF citizens possessing magazines over 32 rounds, he can change this export policy on Monday morning. Read the article. *(yes its Trump's State Department - those of you who keep making excuses that those are all Obama's people in there causing this don't know how things work in the Department of State.) |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/14/2019 9:51:52 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You and many others HAVE MISSED THE WHOLE POINT OF THIS ARTICLE probably because you all did not read it. The issue is that if Trump is OK with stopping foreign citizens from possessing magazines over 32 rounds, if Trump's State Department* is OK with stopping foreign citizens from possessing magazines over 32 rounds through export, if Trump is fine with a provision of the U.N. Small Arms Treaty being enforced when there is no mandate to do so THEN TRUMP IS PROBABLY IN FAVOR WITH STOPPING THE IMPORTATION OF MAGAZINES OVER 32 ROUNDS AND TRUMP DOES NOT NEED DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS TO PASS ANYTHING - HE CAN DO THAT HIMSELF. (Remember that George Bush 1st stopped all imports of "assault weapons" in 1989 because as president he did not need anyone's permission to do so as he is in charge of imports and he held the ban until congress caught up with a law). And, its not too far off that Trump would support a national ban on magazines over 30 or 32 rounds. IF Trump is IN FAVOR OF citizens possessing magazines over 32 rounds, he can change this export policy on Monday morning. Read the article. *(yes its Trump's State Department - those of you who keep making excuses that those are all Obama's people in there causing this don't know how things work in the Department of State.) Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
What other country allows their citizens to own 32rd mags? A big nothing burger. The issue is that if Trump is OK with stopping foreign citizens from possessing magazines over 32 rounds, if Trump's State Department* is OK with stopping foreign citizens from possessing magazines over 32 rounds through export, if Trump is fine with a provision of the U.N. Small Arms Treaty being enforced when there is no mandate to do so THEN TRUMP IS PROBABLY IN FAVOR WITH STOPPING THE IMPORTATION OF MAGAZINES OVER 32 ROUNDS AND TRUMP DOES NOT NEED DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS TO PASS ANYTHING - HE CAN DO THAT HIMSELF. (Remember that George Bush 1st stopped all imports of "assault weapons" in 1989 because as president he did not need anyone's permission to do so as he is in charge of imports and he held the ban until congress caught up with a law). And, its not too far off that Trump would support a national ban on magazines over 30 or 32 rounds. IF Trump is IN FAVOR OF citizens possessing magazines over 32 rounds, he can change this export policy on Monday morning. Read the article. *(yes its Trump's State Department - those of you who keep making excuses that those are all Obama's people in there causing this don't know how things work in the Department of State.) Sure we're getting gun control,more spending,more illegals,etc...,but it would have been way worserer if hillary had won,right? |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/14/2019 10:18:37 PM EDT
[#5]
So the gov can approve the sale of missiles, tanks, automatic weapons, and fighter jets to other parts of the world by the gov backed defense industry. But magpul cannot export higher cap mags? Strange world we live in.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/14/2019 10:21:38 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
guess I won't ever get a d60 :( not that I could ever use it, because it'd be pinned to 5. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/14/2019 10:27:23 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
More no wall, more epic migration of Guatemalans to America, more no repeal of Obamacare, more Iranians with nukes, more MAGA! Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Just think what we can do with all three chambers of government after 2020. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/14/2019 10:38:54 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You and many others HAVE MISSED THE WHOLE POINT OF THIS ARTICLE probably because you all did not read it. The issue is that if Trump is OK with stopping foreign citizens from possessing magazines over 32 rounds, if Trump's State Department* is OK with stopping foreign citizens from possessing magazines over 32 rounds through export, if Trump is fine with a provision of the U.N. Small Arms Treaty being enforced when there is no mandate to do so THEN TRUMP IS PROBABLY IN FAVOR WITH STOPPING THE IMPORTATION OF MAGAZINES OVER 32 ROUNDS AND TRUMP DOES NOT NEED DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS TO PASS ANYTHING - HE CAN DO THAT HIMSELF. (Remember that George Bush 1st stopped all imports of "assault weapons" in 1989 because as president he did not need anyone's permission to do so as he is in charge of imports and he held the ban until congress caught up with a law). And, its not too far off that Trump would support a national ban on magazines over 30 or 32 rounds. IF Trump is IN FAVOR OF citizens possessing magazines over 32 rounds, he can change this export policy on Monday morning. Read the article. *(yes its Trump's State Department - those of you who keep making excuses that those are all Obama's people in there causing this don't know how things work in the Department of State.) "OMG.....Trump allowed them to change the breakfast menu at the Ft. Leonard wood chow hall !!!!!!" There aren't enough hours in the day for the President to be directly involved with 1/10th of the shit some people hold him responsible for.... but don't let the media stop trying to undermine his support from gun owners.....whatever you do |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/14/2019 10:38:55 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Some countries should be stuck using Thermolds.  
I use Thermolds. All are preban mags and still going strong. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/14/2019 10:42:38 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted: This isn't even a blip on Trumps radar screen...... "OMG.....Trump allowed them to change the breakfast menu at the Ft. Leonard wood chow hall !!!!!!" There aren't enough hours in the day for the President to be directly involved with 1/10th of the shit some people hold him responsible for.... but don't let the media stop trying to undermine his support from gun owners.....whatever you do |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/14/2019 10:45:47 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
This isn't even a blip on Trumps radar screen...... "OMG.....Trump allowed them to change the breakfast menu at the Ft. Leonard wood chow hall !!!!!!" There aren't enough hours in the day for the President to be directly involved with 1/10th of the shit some people hold him responsible for.... but don't let the media stop trying to undermine his support from gun owners.....whatever you do Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted: You and many others HAVE MISSED THE WHOLE POINT OF THIS ARTICLE probably because you all did not read it. The issue is that if Trump is OK with stopping foreign citizens from possessing magazines over 32 rounds, if Trump's State Department* is OK with stopping foreign citizens from possessing magazines over 32 rounds through export, if Trump is fine with a provision of the U.N. Small Arms Treaty being enforced when there is no mandate to do so THEN TRUMP IS PROBABLY IN FAVOR WITH STOPPING THE IMPORTATION OF MAGAZINES OVER 32 ROUNDS AND TRUMP DOES NOT NEED DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS TO PASS ANYTHING - HE CAN DO THAT HIMSELF. (Remember that George Bush 1st stopped all imports of "assault weapons" in 1989 because as president he did not need anyone's permission to do so as he is in charge of imports and he held the ban until congress caught up with a law). And, its not too far off that Trump would support a national ban on magazines over 30 or 32 rounds. IF Trump is IN FAVOR OF citizens possessing magazines over 32 rounds, he can change this export policy on Monday morning. Read the article. *(yes its Trump's State Department - those of you who keep making excuses that those are all Obama's people in there causing this don't know how things work in the Department of State.) "OMG.....Trump allowed them to change the breakfast menu at the Ft. Leonard wood chow hall !!!!!!" There aren't enough hours in the day for the President to be directly involved with 1/10th of the shit some people hold him responsible for.... but don't let the media stop trying to undermine his support from gun owners.....whatever you do 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/14/2019 10:47:49 PM EDT
[#12]
Whatever is going on here, Trump has been a bitter disappointment on 2A issues.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/14/2019 10:50:44 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Denying exports hurts sales for the US gun industry. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Good. Inferior, foreign people should not have them. The UK had them, then they gave them up and got Muslim child rape gangs. Except in commie states, is there any sort of a federal ban on those being manufactured and sold to the general public? Why do you hate US manufacturing jobs? |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/14/2019 10:52:27 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Aren’t there US companies that make many of these magazines, too? Except in commie states, is there any sort of a federal ban on those being manufactured and sold to the general public? Why do you hate US manufacturing jobs? |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/14/2019 10:53:22 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote History |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/14/2019 11:00:47 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You do know the difference between export and import....right? Anyways, don’t really care that much if we don’t export magazines that will end up in the hands of commies or islamists, anyways. I’m sure favorable aligned countries will still get theirs for military. Not like most of the rest of the world has any basic human rights anyways, anymore. None of them have been so inclined to pick up a gun and right that wrong. Only the islamists, and their motives are not about rights. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/14/2019 11:06:20 PM EDT
[#17]
I disagree....I'm not a fan of the government telling private business who they can and cannot sell to. Further, we should be in the business of distributing freedom.
Seems we don't have an issue selling military wares to all manner or fair weather friends.... |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/14/2019 11:10:49 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You and many others HAVE MISSED THE WHOLE POINT OF THIS ARTICLE probably because you all did not read it. The issue is that if Trump is OK with stopping foreign citizens from possessing magazines over 32 rounds, if Trump's State Department* is OK with stopping foreign citizens from possessing magazines over 32 rounds through export, if Trump is fine with a provision of the U.N. Small Arms Treaty being enforced when there is no mandate to do so THEN TRUMP IS PROBABLY IN FAVOR WITH STOPPING THE IMPORTATION OF MAGAZINES OVER 32 ROUNDS AND TRUMP DOES NOT NEED DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS TO PASS ANYTHING - HE CAN DO THAT HIMSELF. (Remember that George Bush 1st stopped all imports of "assault weapons" in 1989 because as president he did not need anyone's permission to do so as he is in charge of imports and he held the ban until congress caught up with a law). And, its not too far off that Trump would support a national ban on magazines over 30 or 32 rounds. IF Trump is IN FAVOR OF citizens possessing magazines over 32 rounds, he can change this export policy on Monday morning. Read the article. *(yes its Trump's State Department - those of you who keep making excuses that those are all Obama's people in there causing this don't know how things work in the Department of State.) Please tell me what shithole country cannot manage to fabricate this type of product. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/14/2019 11:14:26 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
holy shit lol Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Sorry your girl lost! Time to throw gun rights from a helicopter
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/14/2019 11:18:28 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I disagree....I'm not a fan of the government telling private business who they can and cannot sell to. Further, we should be in the business of distributing freedom. Seems we don't have an issue selling military wares to all manner or fair weather friends.... |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/14/2019 11:20:01 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Are we unable to manufacture 32+ round magazines? Are these other countries unable to produce 32+ round magazines? Please tell me what shithole country cannot manage to fabricate this type of product. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted: You and many others HAVE MISSED THE WHOLE POINT OF THIS ARTICLE probably because you all did not read it. The issue is that if Trump is OK with stopping foreign citizens from possessing magazines over 32 rounds, if Trump's State Department* is OK with stopping foreign citizens from possessing magazines over 32 rounds through export, if Trump is fine with a provision of the U.N. Small Arms Treaty being enforced when there is no mandate to do so THEN TRUMP IS PROBABLY IN FAVOR WITH STOPPING THE IMPORTATION OF MAGAZINES OVER 32 ROUNDS AND TRUMP DOES NOT NEED DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS TO PASS ANYTHING - HE CAN DO THAT HIMSELF. (Remember that George Bush 1st stopped all imports of "assault weapons" in 1989 because as president he did not need anyone's permission to do so as he is in charge of imports and he held the ban until congress caught up with a law). And, its not too far off that Trump would support a national ban on magazines over 30 or 32 rounds. IF Trump is IN FAVOR OF citizens possessing magazines over 32 rounds, he can change this export policy on Monday morning. Read the article. *(yes its Trump's State Department - those of you who keep making excuses that those are all Obama's people in there causing this don't know how things work in the Department of State.) Please tell me what shithole country cannot manage to fabricate this type of product. Like damn near all over SE Asia for example. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/14/2019 11:20:03 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted: ITAR and similar laws help us retain our technilogical advantage. I don't have an issue with this. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/14/2019 11:20:30 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Sorry your girl lost! Time to throw gun rights from a helicopter 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/14/2019 11:21:13 PM EDT
[#24]
He wants to be sure there is enough supply for Americans. MAGA.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/14/2019 11:46:03 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
guess I won't ever get a d60 :( not that I could ever use it, because it'd be pinned to 5. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/14/2019 11:53:45 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
He probably doesn't even know. The Government is still 90% Obama Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
The fresh fuck is this? More state department fuckery? ETA: Didn't the NZ murderer have a D60? Could be some faceless bureaucrat do-gooder just went ahead and did it, and no one else thinks anything of it or said anything because most of govt isn't filled with firearms enthusiasts... and tends to be located in states actively hostile to rights so even if one were, it can be career suicide to come out of the closet as pro-gun. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/15/2019 5:46:22 AM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Yes. I just thought it said import though. Anyways, don’t really care that much if we don’t export magazines that will end up in the hands of commies or islamists, anyways. I’m sure favorable aligned countries will still get theirs for military. Not like most of the rest of the world has any basic human rights anyways, anymore. None of them have been so inclined to pick up a gun and right that wrong. Only the islamists, and their motives are not about rights. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/15/2019 6:07:05 AM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Or any weapons or accessories that their building technology allows them to do. Like damn near all over SE Asia for example. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: You and many others HAVE MISSED THE WHOLE POINT OF THIS ARTICLE probably because you all did not read it. The issue is that if Trump is OK with stopping foreign citizens from possessing magazines over 32 rounds, if Trump's State Department* is OK with stopping foreign citizens from possessing magazines over 32 rounds through export, if Trump is fine with a provision of the U.N. Small Arms Treaty being enforced when there is no mandate to do so THEN TRUMP IS PROBABLY IN FAVOR WITH STOPPING THE IMPORTATION OF MAGAZINES OVER 32 ROUNDS AND TRUMP DOES NOT NEED DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS TO PASS ANYTHING - HE CAN DO THAT HIMSELF. (Remember that George Bush 1st stopped all imports of "assault weapons" in 1989 because as president he did not need anyone's permission to do so as he is in charge of imports and he held the ban until congress caught up with a law). And, its not too far off that Trump would support a national ban on magazines over 30 or 32 rounds. IF Trump is IN FAVOR OF citizens possessing magazines over 32 rounds, he can change this export policy on Monday morning. Read the article. *(yes its Trump's State Department - those of you who keep making excuses that those are all Obama's people in there causing this don't know how things work in the Department of State.) Please tell me what shithole country cannot manage to fabricate this type of product. Like damn near all over SE Asia for example. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/15/2019 6:14:17 AM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What country is buying these mags. Norway? Mexico? France? UK? China? Who are we worried won't get these freedom devices? Seriously no citizens in other countiers are being denied the god given right to keep and bear arms because they already gave that right away, willingly in a lot of cases. Don't care. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/15/2019 6:24:32 AM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
@1srelluc,
I use Thermolds. All are preban mags and still going strong. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Some countries should be stuck using Thermolds.
I use Thermolds. All are preban mags and still going strong.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/15/2019 6:27:32 AM EDT
[#31]
Just imagine how many informative threads we will have in the months leading up to the election. I can't wait. . .
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/15/2019 6:44:53 AM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
He probably doesn't even know. The Government is still 90% Obama Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
The fresh fuck is this? More state department fuckery? This is some bureaucratic fuckery propagated by Clinton people from the 90s. “In terms of ‘why,’ the State Department has authority under the statute (the Arms Export Control Act) to govern exports ‘in furtherance of world peace and the security and foreign policy of the U.S.,’” Reeves elaborated. “Under the law they do not have to get more specific, although sometimes they may give more information concerning a specific export. The courts have held there is no constitutional right to engage in exports or imports, and there is considerable deference granted to the State Department for making national security or foreign policy decisions.”
While license applications are considered on a case-by-case basis, the magazine capacity limitation appears to be across the board. Nevertheless, [b]good luck finding definitive clarification in the regulations or in firearms and ammunition guidelines DDTC offers through its website. And that creates a situation where limits are imposed when they don’t need to be.[b] |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/15/2019 6:46:26 AM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Just imagine how many informative threads we will have in the months leading up to the election. I can't wait. . . |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/15/2019 6:53:24 AM EDT
[#34]
I would hope the people OK with this export ban aren’t the same people complaining about the German government forcing HK to sell neutered long guns/subguns to us.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/15/2019 7:10:56 AM EDT
[#35]
Why do we care if foreigners get high cap magazines? I care about my rights here in America!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/15/2019 7:12:34 AM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Exactly! If you're going to piss and moan about bump stocks, suppressors, and foreigners being denied P-Mags, all while ignoring the fact that we are getting a Wall, stopped the flow of illegals coming into this country, repealed Obamacare, gotten out of Syria and Afghanistan, brought Iran to heel, and ended China's unfair trade policies, then you're a real dufus! Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
LOL Trump is such a failure. But hey Botswanins can have poopy butt sex now. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/15/2019 12:14:23 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Why do we care if foreigners get high cap magazines? I care about my rights here in America! This is a BIG problem with many "conservatives" and gun owners: 1) no attention span and 2) the need to have all information in a 30 second summary or in 50 words or less. You and many others HAVE MISSED THE WHOLE POINT OF THIS ARTICLE probably because you all did not read it. The issue is that if Trump is OK with stopping foreign citizens from possessing magazines over 32 rounds, if Trump's State Department* is OK with stopping foreign citizens from possessing magazines over 32 rounds through export, if Trump is fine with a provision of the U.N. Small Arms Treaty being enforced when there is no mandate to do so THEN TRUMP IS PROBABLY IN FAVOR WITH STOPPING THE IMPORTATION OF MAGAZINES OVER 32 ROUNDS AND TRUMP DOES NOT NEED DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS TO PASS ANYTHING - HE CAN DO THAT HIMSELF. (Remember that George Bush 1st stopped all imports of "assault weapons" in 1989 because as president he did not need anyone's permission to do so as he is in charge of imports and he held the ban until congress caught up with a law). And, IF TRUMP LETS THE EXPORT BAN STAND, its not too far off that Trump would support a national ban on magazines over 30 or 32 rounds. IF Trump is IN FAVOR OF citizens possessing magazines over 32 rounds, he can change this export policy on Monday morning. Read the article. *(yes its Trump's State Department - those of you who keep making excuses that those are all Obama's people in there causing this don't know how things work in the Department of State.) |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/15/2019 12:30:26 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What other country allows their citizens to own 32rd mags? A big nothing burger.  Attached FileThat’s the only gun I have that takes 32 round magazines,not sure why Uzis are getting picked on... I am guessing this is something to do with Trump making a deal with Mexico and someone told him entrepreneurs in the US are selling cartels heaps of 33 round Glock mags. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/15/2019 12:30:30 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
IF YOU WOULD READ THE ARTICLE OR POSTS ABOVE MAYBE YOU WOULD KNOW "Why." This is a BIG problem with many "conservatives" and gun owners: 1) no attention span and 2) the need to have all information in a 30 second summary or in 50 words or less. You and many others HAVE MISSED THE WHOLE POINT OF THIS ARTICLE probably because you all did not read it. The issue is that if Trump is OK with stopping foreign citizens from possessing magazines over 32 rounds, if Trump's State Department* is OK with stopping foreign citizens from possessing magazines over 32 rounds through export, if Trump is fine with a provision of the U.N. Small Arms Treaty being enforced when there is no mandate to do so THEN TRUMP IS PROBABLY IN FAVOR WITH STOPPING THE IMPORTATION OF MAGAZINES OVER 32 ROUNDS AND TRUMP DOES NOT NEED DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS TO PASS ANYTHING - HE CAN DO THAT HIMSELF. (Remember that George Bush 1st stopped all imports of "assault weapons" in 1989 because as president he did not need anyone's permission to do so as he is in charge of imports and he held the ban until congress caught up with a law). And, IF TRUMP LETS THE EXPORT BAN STAND, its not too far off that Trump would support a national ban on magazines over 30 or 32 rounds. IF Trump is IN FAVOR OF citizens possessing magazines over 32 rounds, he can change this export policy on Monday morning. Read the article. *(yes its Trump's State Department - those of you who keep making excuses that those are all Obama's people in there causing this don't know how things work in the Department of State.) Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Why do we care if foreigners get high cap magazines? I care about my rights here in America! This is a BIG problem with many "conservatives" and gun owners: 1) no attention span and 2) the need to have all information in a 30 second summary or in 50 words or less. You and many others HAVE MISSED THE WHOLE POINT OF THIS ARTICLE probably because you all did not read it. The issue is that if Trump is OK with stopping foreign citizens from possessing magazines over 32 rounds, if Trump's State Department* is OK with stopping foreign citizens from possessing magazines over 32 rounds through export, if Trump is fine with a provision of the U.N. Small Arms Treaty being enforced when there is no mandate to do so THEN TRUMP IS PROBABLY IN FAVOR WITH STOPPING THE IMPORTATION OF MAGAZINES OVER 32 ROUNDS AND TRUMP DOES NOT NEED DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS TO PASS ANYTHING - HE CAN DO THAT HIMSELF. (Remember that George Bush 1st stopped all imports of "assault weapons" in 1989 because as president he did not need anyone's permission to do so as he is in charge of imports and he held the ban until congress caught up with a law). And, IF TRUMP LETS THE EXPORT BAN STAND, its not too far off that Trump would support a national ban on magazines over 30 or 32 rounds. IF Trump is IN FAVOR OF citizens possessing magazines over 32 rounds, he can change this export policy on Monday morning. Read the article. *(yes its Trump's State Department - those of you who keep making excuses that those are all Obama's people in there causing this don't know how things work in the Department of State.) It wont matter if he bans imports,or does a mag ban/AWB-the vast majority will still vote for him no matter what. We're screwed,and just get to watch shit unfold......... |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/15/2019 12:51:53 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The problem is,there isn't a damn thing we can do about it. It wont matter if he bans imports,or does a mag ban/AWB-the vast majority will still vote for him no matter what. We're screwed,and just get to watch shit unfold......... Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Why do we care if foreigners get high cap magazines? I care about my rights here in America! This is a BIG problem with many "conservatives" and gun owners: 1) no attention span and 2) the need to have all information in a 30 second summary or in 50 words or less. You and many others HAVE MISSED THE WHOLE POINT OF THIS ARTICLE probably because you all did not read it. The issue is that if Trump is OK with stopping foreign citizens from possessing magazines over 32 rounds, if Trump's State Department* is OK with stopping foreign citizens from possessing magazines over 32 rounds through export, if Trump is fine with a provision of the U.N. Small Arms Treaty being enforced when there is no mandate to do so THEN TRUMP IS PROBABLY IN FAVOR WITH STOPPING THE IMPORTATION OF MAGAZINES OVER 32 ROUNDS AND TRUMP DOES NOT NEED DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS TO PASS ANYTHING - HE CAN DO THAT HIMSELF. (Remember that George Bush 1st stopped all imports of "assault weapons" in 1989 because as president he did not need anyone's permission to do so as he is in charge of imports and he held the ban until congress caught up with a law). And, IF TRUMP LETS THE EXPORT BAN STAND, its not too far off that Trump would support a national ban on magazines over 30 or 32 rounds. IF Trump is IN FAVOR OF citizens possessing magazines over 32 rounds, he can change this export policy on Monday morning. Read the article. *(yes its Trump's State Department - those of you who keep making excuses that those are all Obama's people in there causing this don't know how things work in the Department of State.) It wont matter if he bans imports,or does a mag ban/AWB-the vast majority will still vote for him no matter what. We're screwed,and just get to watch shit unfold......... |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
