User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 8:55:22 PM EDT
[#1]
Linkage?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 8:56:46 PM EDT
[#2]
That's not what Joe said.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 8:56:47 PM EDT
[#3]
SCOTUS is not going to intervene in this. My bet is they are taking them up so they can sweep them off the table.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 8:57:15 PM EDT
[#4]
They're not gonna do shit. We're in box 4 now.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 8:57:26 PM EDT
[#5]
If true, theyll just dump them anyway.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 8:57:34 PM EDT
[#6]
Interesting.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 8:58:21 PM EDT
[#7]
They are going to vote 7-2 not to hear them
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:00:43 PM EDT
[#8]
How much no standing can the standing stand against standing?
This point in history. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:00:47 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted: They are going to vote 7-2 not to hear them Unfortunately probably so 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:00:50 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted: They are going to vote 7-2 not to hear them Yep. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:01:18 PM EDT
[#11]
They’ll say that all the cases are moot because the EC had already met and voted.
They played the standing card already. Mootness is the other star of the judicial punt team. Seen it over and over again this year, as the judicial branch shows its utter cowardice. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:02:48 PM EDT
[#12]
I have to wonder if they have been threatened or if they are just scared?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:03:53 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted: How much no standing can the standing stand against standing? This point in history. Well maybe that's why there's a chair against the wall... ? |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:04:46 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted: SCOTUS is not going to intervene in this. My bet is they are taking them up so they can sweep them off the table. My bet as well. Legal mumbo jumbo and lawyer wordsmithing will be used to prevent any further action. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:05:28 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted: SCOTUS is not going to intervene in this. My bet is they are taking them up so they can sweep them off the table. Unfortunately this. Then the left will be able to say “sEe? tHe SuPrEmE cOuRt ProVeD yOuRe AlL cOnSPiRaCy ThOrIsTs”. Paving the way for a total big tech blackout of all information and bans for anyone who brings it up. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:06:48 PM EDT
[#16]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:07:36 PM EDT
[#17]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:08:25 PM EDT
[#18]
Really. They are not going to do shit.
Kick it down the road, throw it in the garbage anything but rule on it. Fuck them all. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:13:29 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I have to wonder if they have been threatened or if they are just scared? https://americasvoice.news/ They were given the results of the audit today from Michigan and it's shows I think 65% error rate. This might have been what did it, plus the fact that all 4 states have done something that is against the laws the the Legislatures, in those states passed, so they could simply say that they are void in so far as "article 1, section 2" violations...plus I think Sidney is giving them other options as well. Still looking for something in writing, but that is the news link I heard it on. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:14:10 PM EDT
[#20]
Her plaintiff's (GOP electors) had suffered no injury in fact before the elector college voted and certified said votes. GTG
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:16:23 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I have to wonder if they have been threatened or if they are just scared? I'm thinking they are some how in cahoots. ?? |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:16:28 PM EDT
[#22]
SCOTUS isn't going to turn this thing around.
No one is. Get ready to live in China-lite cause that's where we are now. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:18:09 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I have to wonder if they have been threatened or if they are just scared? This whole summer's-worth of blm/antifa protesting was the threat. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:21:11 PM EDT
[#24]
See this is how it works now.
You don't have standing because the electors haven't been seated. So, case dismissed. The electors have been seated, so it's too late for them to change that. So, case dismissed. Mazel Tov! FJB wins! See how that works.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:23:04 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted: They are going to vote 7-2 not to hear them I've been saying for the last week, i've never seen a political body willingly make itself irrelevant before. And yet they are. Fascinating. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:25:04 PM EDT
[#26]
Fool me 67 times shame on you.
Fool me 71 times shame on me. There was no reason for the SCOTUS to pass on Texas other than to dodge it. Texas clearly has standing. Now if a red state gets stuck with a blue SOS they can make up whatever guidelines they want in defiance of the law and there will be nothing to stop them. From here on out there will be special voting rules for urban blue counties in every state. We are left with the last option - the final box. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:25:09 PM EDT
[#27]
SCOTUS ain't doing shit.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:26:28 PM EDT
[#28]
Nothing but a lawyer circle jerk.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:26:28 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I've been saying for the last week, i've never seen a political body willingly make itself irrelevant before. And yet they are. Fascinating. They do seem determined to do that very thing. Once, the Democrats get enough votes to pack the court with 100 seats, they'll wish they had been a little less spineless, but it will be too late. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:26:36 PM EDT
[#30]
They put the TX law suit on the docket as well.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:28:35 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Nothing but a lawyer circle jerk. So reach a rounds for everybody then? |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:31:12 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted: They are going to vote 7-2 not to hear them |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:32:36 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted: They're not gonna do shit. We're in box 4 now. Holy shit, there are 4 boxes? I thought we only had 3. I almost jumped the gun and went ahead and prepped myself for the last one. What did I miss? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:34:48 PM EDT
[#34]
Soap box: Failed
Ballot box: Failed Jury box: Failed <-We are here Ammo box: ??? |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:34:54 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted: They do seem determined to do that very thing. Once, the Democrats get enough votes to pack the court with 100 seats, they'll wish they had been a little less spineless, but it will be too late. Meh They were probably all friends in law school, so they probably wont care |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:35:52 PM EDT
[#36]
In before we get new voting methods, but since FJB has already been selected tough shit?
Why else did this happen a few months ago? https://www.businessinsider.com/usps-blockchain-patent-prevent-mail-in-voting-fraud-trump-attacks-2020-8?op=1 |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:37:19 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted: They are going to vote 7-2 not to hear them Prediction. Thomas gets so sick of the BS he gives up his seat not long into the Biden administration. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:37:50 PM EDT
[#38]
If shit kicks off, where are these higher ups going to run to? Canada? I doubt it, as we'll need to invade that shithole while we're at it. I suspect China.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:38:32 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Fool me 67 times shame on you. Fool me 71 times shame on me. There was no reason for the SCOTUS to pass on Texas other than to dodge it. Texas clearly has standing. Now if a red state gets stuck with a blue SOS they can make up whatever guidelines they want in defiance of the law and there will be nothing to stop them. From here on out there will be special voting rules for urban blue counties in every state. We are left with the last option - the final box. We have two more boxes. The cartridge. Then the wooden one you kick out from under the caught traitors after you are done with the aforementioned cartridge box. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:39:12 PM EDT
[#40]
Them taking 4 cases of hers feels like a stretch, and makes me question this altogether.
Hope I'm wrong. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:40:43 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I've been saying for the last week, i've never seen a political body willingly make itself irrelevant before. And yet they are. Fascinating. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: They are going to vote 7-2 not to hear them I've been saying for the last week, i've never seen a political body willingly make itself irrelevant before. And yet they are. Fascinating. Probably already working on the changes in office space that will be necessitated by their new peers that will be showing up in the next year or two. Likely even making sure that the bathrooms are all access, gender neutral and at least one office faces Mecca. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:41:26 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted: They’ll say that all the cases are moot because the EC had already met and voted. They played the standing card already. Mootness is the other star of the judicial punt team. Seen it over and over again this year, as the judicial branch shows its utter cowardice. I just saw on NTC News the gop electors voted for Trump in all five battle ground states. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:43:30 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted: They're not gonna do shit. We're in box 4 now. This. Prep accordingly gentlemen. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:43:59 PM EDT
[#44]
I'm not getting excited about any more SCROTUS cases after they ruled that the rule of law is dead and themselves irrelevant.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:44:25 PM EDT
[#45]
The USSC is not the final word.
They have bailed on legal and constitutional issues. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:44:44 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted: This whole summer's-worth of blm/antifa protesting was the threat. FUCK THEM, when Trump wins he'll squash them so fast they won't know what happened. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:45:06 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted: SCOTUS is not going to intervene in this. My bet is they are taking them up so they can sweep them off the table. This |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:46:02 PM EDT
[#48]
Are we still pretending that a case showing up on the SCOTUS website docket search means that it will be heard?
Didn't pan out for the original jurisdiction Texas case that was denied leave to file, or the appealed Kelly/Parnell case that was not granted cert. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:46:17 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Them taking 4 cases of hers feels like a stretch, and makes me question this altogether. Hope I'm wrong. I don't think they took the cases as it appears that every appeal gets a docket number. You can see this on a search for all granted cases. The docket numbers skip frequently, and sometimes in large chunks. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/14/2020 9:46:38 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted: SCOTUS is not going to intervene in this. My bet is they are taking them up so they can sweep them off the table. Can SCOTUS sanction or disbar an attorney? |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
Attached File
Attached File