Sudden Adult Death Syndrome Thread (Page 10 of 27)
|
Originally Posted By Sokarul: I was going to type a bunch but I will just say I will point it out when someone says something wrong or they use incorrect logic. Covid is an evidenced based topic, not a faith based one. 17 years on this forum, what percentage of your posts have been in this new Covid sub-forum? You are extremely invested in discounting any and all vaccine deaths/adverse effects. Why? There is plenty of 'wrongs' and 'incorrect logic' in GD... what do you squat in here? |
|
Originally Posted By Suhrthing: 17 years on this forum, what percentage of your posts have been in this new Covid sub-forum? You are extremely invested in discounting any and all vaccine deaths/adverse effects. Why? There is plenty of 'wrongs' and 'incorrect logic' in GD... what do you squat in here? Probably like 90+%. The bold is not what I do. I post in GD when I feel like it. You should of seen it when I posted out Florida did exactly what they claimed Disney World did. Took this picture for someone in GD 4 months ago. 
|
|
Originally Posted By Sokarul: I was going to type a bunch but I will just say I will point it out when someone says something wrong or they use incorrect logic. Covid is an evidenced based topic, not a faith based one. Except when arrogant snarky psychos demand that everyone "trust the science" regarding an untested experimental injection. Then having faith is not only ok, but ok to mandate and force on people. Anyone who questions it is a heretic and is to be silenced immediately of course. |
|
Originally Posted By Laredo: Except when arrogant snarky psychos demand that everyone "trust the science" regarding an untested experimental injection. Then having faith is not only ok, but ok to mandate and force on people. Anyone who questions it is a heretic and is to be silenced immediately of course. Here once again someone made the false claim it was untested. It may not have been tested to your elitist level, but it was sure tested. |
|
Originally Posted By Sokarul: I was going to type a bunch but I will just say I will point it out when someone says something wrong or they use incorrect logic. Covid is an evidenced based topic, not a faith based one. Almost nothing that has been done in relation to COVID had been evidence based, it is also absolutely a religion for some. That last sentence of your post may be one of the wrongest things you have ever posted. |
When people fear their government, there is tyrrany. When the government fears the people, there is liberty. ---- Thomas Jefferson
|
Originally Posted By Sokarul: Probably like 90+%. The bold is not what I do. I post in GD when I feel like it. You should of seen it when I posted out Florida did exactly what they claimed Disney World did. Took this picture for someone in GD 4 months ago. https://i.imgur.com/HX4PtWs.jpg I'm not implying you aren't an ar15 guy, just curious why you're in here trying to fact-check nearly any and every death/adverse effect attributed to the shots and carrying an limitless amount of water for the FEDGOV/BIGPHARMA narrative. And yes, in my view, that's exactly what 'you do' here... |
|
Originally Posted By Sokarul: Here once again someone made the false claim it was untested. It may not have been tested to your elitist level, but it was sure tested. Elitist level? What a joke! How about the standard for vaccine testing that's been in place for decades and was completely bypassed. Anything that's not immediately EUA'd, rubber stamped and mandated is just asking for too high of a standard for high caliber progressive sciencers I guess. |
|
Originally Posted By Sokarul: Here once again someone made the false claim it was untested. It may not have been tested to your elitist level, but it was sure tested. Originally Posted By Sokarul: Originally Posted By Laredo: Except when arrogant snarky psychos demand that everyone "trust the science" regarding an untested experimental injection. Then having faith is not only ok, but ok to mandate and force on people. Anyone who questions it is a heretic and is to be silenced immediately of course. Here once again someone made the false claim it was untested. It may not have been tested to your elitist level, but it was sure tested. What did they find it actually accomplished in said testing? |
|
Originally Posted By Sokarul: Here once again someone made the false claim it was untested. It may not have been tested to your elitist level, but it was sure tested. The Ford Pinto was tested. Just because something was tested doesn’t mean it’s infallible. Sig tested the P320. It doesn’t mean issues do not pop up in real world use and it’s rather narrow minded to dismiss that possibility. |
|
Originally Posted By Suhrthing: I'm not implying you aren't an ar15 guy, just curious why you're in here trying to fact-check nearly any and every death/adverse effect attributed to the shots and carrying an limitless amount of water for the FEDGOV/BIGPHARMA narrative. And yes, in my view, that's exactly what 'you do' here... Here is what I do. This recent thread. Look at the title of the thread. Look at what I had to point out. Look at the response the OP made to my response. That's a classic example of what I have to do. Even then the OP is probably telling his friends at the bar "Did you know sudden death is #1 killer in people under age 65 if vaccinated?". |
|
Originally Posted By Laredo: Elitist level? What a joke! How about the standard for vaccine testing that's been in place for decades and was completely bypassed. Anything that's not immediately EUA'd, rubber stamped and mandated is just asking for too high of a standard for high caliber progressive sciencers I guess. What was the standard that was bypassed? |
|
Originally Posted By Smokey0844: The Ford Pinto was tested. Just because something was tested doesn’t mean it’s infallible. Sig tested the P320. It doesn’t mean issues do not pop up in real world use and it’s rather narrow minded to dismiss that possibility. Yes, and nobody claimed they weren't tested. To make a proper comparison you would have had to say the P320 and Ford Pinto were untested. |
|
Originally Posted By Sokarul: What was the standard that was bypassed? They normally take 5-10 years worth of testing and eval to get approved--so all the stuff that takes place in that amount of time. Time itself being an important factor. You think it's a great product and will never believe it's anything but a great product. We get it. Time, that impossible to replace factor, has absolutely trashed your beloved "vax" from the rollout until now. At the beginning it was "100%" and "95%" effective, remember that? That was before reality started to be revealed through the passage of something called time. |
|
Originally Posted By Laredo: They normally take 5-10 years worth of testing and eval to get approved--so all the stuff that takes place in that amount of time. Time itself being an important factor. You think it's a great product and will never believe it's anything but a great product. We get it. Time, that impossible to replace factor, has absolutely trashed your beloved "vax" from the rollout until now. At the beginning it was "100%" and "95%" effective, remember that? That was before reality started to be revealed through the passage of something called time. Ok. See here. You changed "testing" to testing and eval". Those are not the same. Nor is it correct in either one. Read up. The whole process takes 5,10, or 15 years. It is not just the testing step. I have already explained this many times. |
|
Originally Posted By Sokarul: Ok. See here. You changed "testing" to testing and eval". Those are not the same. Nor is it correct in either one. Read up. The whole process takes 5,10, or 15 years. It is not just the testing step. I have already explained this many times. Testing, eval, whatever the hell you want to call it dude, the semantics are of little importance to the point....they need a lot of time to know what the hell to expect from products like this. They shitcanned that and told everyone to just trust it anyway. How in the world ANYONE, let alone "scientists", thought that was a good idea is a question that needs to be studied for a long time. |
|
Originally Posted By Sokarul: Ok. See here. You changed "testing" to testing and eval". Those are not the same. Nor is it correct in either one. Read up. The whole process takes 5,10, or 15 years. It is not just the testing step. I have already explained this many times. So we’re at the post licensure monitoring stage. Have they released any data on study participants long term or anything at all regarding any potential issues and the prevalence of said issues? |
|
Originally Posted By Laredo: They normally take 5-10 years worth of testing and eval to get approved--so all the stuff that takes place in that amount of time. Time itself being an important factor. You think it's a great product and will never believe it's anything but a great product. We get it. Time, that impossible to replace factor, has absolutely trashed your beloved "vax" from the rollout until now. At the beginning it was "100%" and "95%" effective, remember that? That was before reality started to be revealed through the passage of something called time. Originally Posted By Laredo: Originally Posted By Sokarul: What was the standard that was bypassed? They normally take 5-10 years worth of testing and eval to get approved--so all the stuff that takes place in that amount of time. Time itself being an important factor. You think it's a great product and will never believe it's anything but a great product. We get it. Time, that impossible to replace factor, has absolutely trashed your beloved "vax" from the rollout until now. At the beginning it was "100%" and "95%" effective, remember that? That was before reality started to be revealed through the passage of something called time. Remember that the actual trial data gathering period of the pfraudulent Pfizer trial was actually only about 4 months. That's not even enough time to look at mid-term severe effects much less long-term effects. |
|
Originally Posted By Sokarul: Here is what I do. This recent thread. Look at the title of the thread. Look at what I had to point out. Look at the response the OP made to my response. That's a classic example of what I have to do. Even then the OP is probably telling his friends at the bar "Did you know sudden death is #1 killer in people under age 65 if vaccinated?".  You didn't do shit, you couldn't answer simple questions.....and now can't stay on topic. This is adult death syndrome not OOOOOHhhhh I tried to make someone else look bad and failed. ...back on topic facefuck post June of 2022...  spontaneously expire...increasingly more common....OMG....  I am waiting to see if they are using a few select Middle Eastern countries where people actually explode wearing a vest or was this something else.... I spent a few years in really WARM areas, all the people there were used to it. Nothing above average. I guess people should stop moving to FL and TX....escaping places like MN, NY, IL, and a few other areas due to climate change....  All the extra excuses like died from joy and other bullshit is over the top. The latest life insurance report from a glance doesn't paint a pretty picture after the beginning of 2021. |
RIP CeCe and FCSD you will be missed
Mike_314..If there was communism in the desert, there would soon be a shortage of sand.
87% shit posting - 13% I am caught in a rule change
RSM 20/21 RSL 4522: we will shit on your pillow.. (3613 note)
Mike_314..If there was communism in the desert, there would soon be a shortage of sand.
87% shit posting - 13% I am caught in a rule change
RSM 20/21 RSL 4522: we will shit on your pillow.. (3613 note)
|
Originally Posted By Laredo: Testing, eval, whatever the hell you want to call it dude, the semantics are of little importance to the point....they need a lot of time to know what the hell to expect from products like this. They shitcanned that and told everyone to just trust it anyway. How in the world ANYONE, let alone "scientists", thought that was a good idea is a question that needs to be studied for a long time. Originally Posted By Laredo: Originally Posted By Sokarul: Ok. See here. You changed "testing" to testing and eval". Those are not the same. Nor is it correct in either one. Read up. The whole process takes 5,10, or 15 years. It is not just the testing step. I have already explained this many times. Testing, eval, whatever the hell you want to call it dude, the semantics are of little importance to the point....they need a lot of time to know what the hell to expect from products like this. They shitcanned that and told everyone to just trust it anyway. How in the world ANYONE, let alone "scientists", thought that was a good idea is a question that needs to be studied for a long time. The link he posted totally destroys his own argument. The HEGT shots didn't go thru the regular process and the process they did go thru was abbreviated even for that. |
|
Originally Posted By Sokarul: What was the standard that was bypassed? 6 months of trials for an EUA....trials for fully FDA approved stuff would have been more like 2-3 years.... ...honestly it doesn't matter the timeline because they jabbed the control group before the end of the trial...."SCIENCE" at its best.... |
RIP CeCe and FCSD you will be missed
Mike_314..If there was communism in the desert, there would soon be a shortage of sand.
87% shit posting - 13% I am caught in a rule change
RSM 20/21 RSL 4522: we will shit on your pillow.. (3613 note)
Mike_314..If there was communism in the desert, there would soon be a shortage of sand.
87% shit posting - 13% I am caught in a rule change
RSM 20/21 RSL 4522: we will shit on your pillow.. (3613 note)
|
Originally Posted By Scoobysmak: 6 months of trials for an EUA....trials for fully FDA approved stuff would have been more like 2-3 years.... ...honestly it doesn't matter the timeline because they jabbed the control group before the end of the trial...."SCIENCE" at its best.... Wait… what kind of tard nukes the control group?? That defeats any purpose of long term tracking as you have nothing to compare against. Disregard my prior post as these fucks have no intention of actually doing what is correct. Edit: can someone link the control group info. I’d like to read it if possible. |
|
Originally Posted By Sokarul: Ok. See here. You changed "testing" to testing and eval". Those are not the same. Nor is it correct in either one. Read up. The whole process takes 5,10, or 15 years. It is not just the testing step. I have already explained this many times. So you would take something that has been "tested" and before the results come in? |
|
Originally Posted By Smokey0844: Wait… what kind of tard nukes the control group?? That defeats any purpose of long term tracking as you have nothing to compare against. Disregard my prior post as these fucks have no intention of actually doing what is correct. Why do you think they pushed so hard to get everyone "vaccinated." 
|
RIP CeCe and FCSD you will be missed
Mike_314..If there was communism in the desert, there would soon be a shortage of sand.
87% shit posting - 13% I am caught in a rule change
RSM 20/21 RSL 4522: we will shit on your pillow.. (3613 note)
Mike_314..If there was communism in the desert, there would soon be a shortage of sand.
87% shit posting - 13% I am caught in a rule change
RSM 20/21 RSL 4522: we will shit on your pillow.. (3613 note)
|
Originally Posted By Sokarul: Here is what I do. This recent thread. Look at the title of the thread. Look at what I had to point out. Look at the response the OP made to my response. That's a classic example of what I have to do. Even then the OP is probably telling his friends at the bar "Did you know sudden death is #1 killer in people under age 65 if vaccinated?". Why do you 'have to do' anything? Why now, why covid, why so pro-vax, why so dismissive of the anti-covid-shot narrative? Do you really believe you're being objective at this point? |
|
Originally Posted By Smokey0844: Wait… what kind of tard nukes the control group?? That defeats any purpose of long term tracking as you have nothing to compare against. Disregard my prior post as these fucks have no intention of actually doing what is correct. Edit: can someone link the control group info. I’d like to read it if possible. They literally declared that it would have been immoral and cruel not to give the control group the miraculous vaccine. |
When people fear their government, there is tyrrany. When the government fears the people, there is liberty. ---- Thomas Jefferson
|
Originally Posted By g8rgunner: They literally declared that it would have been immoral and cruel not to give the control group the miraculous vaccine. https://www.winterwatch.net/2021/08/this-is-nuts-moderna-and-pfizer-intentionally-lost-the-clinical-trial-control-group-testing-vaccine-efficacy-and-safety/ The Moderna and Pfizer vaccine tests were conducted, as customary, with a control group; a group within the trial who were given a placebo and not the test vaccine. However, during the trial -and after the untested vaccines were given emergency use authorization- the vaccine companies conducting the trial decided to break protocol and notify the control group they were not vaccinated. Almost all the control group were then given the vaccine. There are still a few parts of the clinical trials AFTER the EUA was given.....like long term effects. Not to mention that the one part of the trials that was supposed to take 6 months (for an EUA) was done in just over 4. |
RIP CeCe and FCSD you will be missed
Mike_314..If there was communism in the desert, there would soon be a shortage of sand.
87% shit posting - 13% I am caught in a rule change
RSM 20/21 RSL 4522: we will shit on your pillow.. (3613 note)
Mike_314..If there was communism in the desert, there would soon be a shortage of sand.
87% shit posting - 13% I am caught in a rule change
RSM 20/21 RSL 4522: we will shit on your pillow.. (3613 note)
|
Originally Posted By Scoobysmak: https://www.winterwatch.net/2021/08/this-is-nuts-moderna-and-pfizer-intentionally-lost-the-clinical-trial-control-group-testing-vaccine-efficacy-and-safety/ The Moderna and Pfizer vaccine tests were conducted, as customary, with a control group; a group within the trial who were given a placebo and not the test vaccine. However, during the trial -and after the untested vaccines were given emergency use authorization- the vaccine companies conducting the trial decided to break protocol and notify the control group they were not vaccinated. Almost all the control group were then given the vaccine. There are still a few parts of the clinical trials AFTER the EUA was given.....like long term effects. So the un-vaxxed are literally the control group. Yay.  |
|
Something something Bill Burr something something less traffic on the freeway something something these things happen Maybe now I'll be able to buy ALL the on sale meat at my grocery store, instead of "limit 3" Solid. |
Pain of regret is far worse than pain of discipline.
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat your meat?
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat your meat?
|
Originally Posted By Smokey0844: The Ford Pinto was tested. Just because something was tested doesn’t mean it’s infallible. Sig tested the P320. It doesn’t mean issues do not pop up in real world use and it’s rather narrow minded to dismiss that possibility. Originally Posted By Smokey0844: Originally Posted By Sokarul: Here once again someone made the false claim it was untested. It may not have been tested to your elitist level, but it was sure tested. The Ford Pinto was tested. Just because something was tested doesn’t mean it’s infallible. Sig tested the P320. It doesn’t mean issues do not pop up in real world use and it’s rather narrow minded to dismiss that possibility. Vioxx was FDA approved. Tested too. |
What is written is my opinion, and my opinion only.
|
Originally Posted By Suhrthing: Imagine if doctors could have mandated and/or coerced Vioxx to all arthritis patients, and their children, and their grandchildren... Originally Posted By Suhrthing: Originally Posted By exponentialpi: Vioxx was FDA approved. Tested too. Imagine if doctors could have mandated and/or coerced Vioxx to all arthritis patients, and their children, and their grandchildren... Class action lawyers would be on every bus stop, TV commercial, and billboard for decades. |
What is written is my opinion, and my opinion only.
|
Originally Posted By exponentialpi: Class action lawyers would be on every bus stop, TV commercial, and billboard for decades. Originally Posted By exponentialpi: Originally Posted By Suhrthing: Originally Posted By exponentialpi: Vioxx was FDA approved. Tested too. Imagine if doctors could have mandated and/or coerced Vioxx to all arthritis patients, and their children, and their grandchildren... Class action lawyers would be on every bus stop, TV commercial, and billboard for decades. My crystal ball is broken but I somehow see something like this in the future.....especially if they show the trials were fraudulent.... That will be a really high bar to achieve with how many were in on it....but time will tell. |
RIP CeCe and FCSD you will be missed
Mike_314..If there was communism in the desert, there would soon be a shortage of sand.
87% shit posting - 13% I am caught in a rule change
RSM 20/21 RSL 4522: we will shit on your pillow.. (3613 note)
Mike_314..If there was communism in the desert, there would soon be a shortage of sand.
87% shit posting - 13% I am caught in a rule change
RSM 20/21 RSL 4522: we will shit on your pillow.. (3613 note)
Land of the once free & the home of the narrative.
Joined:
Jan 2012
Posts:
17653
EE: 100% (216)
AL, USA
|
Originally Posted By Sokarul: Probably like 90+%. The bold is not what I do. I post in GD when I feel like it. You should of seen it when I posted out Florida did exactly what they claimed Disney World did. Took this picture for someone in GD 4 months ago. https://i.imgur.com/HX4PtWs.jpg I thought I saw your screen name on a show lol. I had to snap a pic and come see but it was not. Still good for giggles. Attached File |
"Whoever makes himself great will be made humble. Whoever makes himself humble will be made great." -Jesus
"if it can be destroyed by the truth, it deserves to be destroyed by the truth" - Linus from Charlie Brown
"if it can be destroyed by the truth, it deserves to be destroyed by the truth" - Linus from Charlie Brown
|
Originally Posted By Laredo: Testing, eval, whatever the hell you want to call it dude, the semantics are of little importance to the point....they need a lot of time to know what the hell to expect from products like this. They shitcanned that and told everyone to just trust it anyway. How in the world ANYONE, let alone "scientists", thought that was a good idea is a question that needs to be studied for a long time. Semantics are very important. A 10 year process isn't required when they were able to save many years of time. |
|
Originally Posted By Suhrthing: Why do you 'have to do' anything? Why now, why covid, why so pro-vax, why so dismissive of the anti-covid-shot narrative? Do you really believe you're being objective at this point? I don't have to do anything. But I will. What do you mean now? You act like have haven't been doing this for over 15 years. Look at what my posts say and you will actually see if I'm being "objective" or not. |
|
Originally Posted By Sokarul: Semantics are very important. A 10 year process isn't required when they were able to save many years of time. Given the effectiveness of the shots, why don’t we just release the hounds on all drug research. Just imagine how many diabetics or even cancer patients we could save if we just wait until after it’s in use to see if it works or not. |
|
Originally Posted By Sokarul: I don't have to do anything. But I will. What do you mean now? You act like have haven't been doing this for over 15 years. Look at what my posts say and you will actually see if I'm being "objective" or not. Not being emotional in an argument is not the same as being objective. I’ve yet to see you concede on any point ever. While I don’t lurk here that often anymore, it’s my observation. I am open to correction. |
|
Originally Posted By Smokey0844: Given the effectiveness of the shots, why don’t we just release the hounds on all drug research. Just imagine how many diabetics or even cancer patients we could save if we just wait until after it’s in use to see if it works or not. That’s not what happened though. |
|
Originally Posted By Smokey0844: Not being emotional in an argument is not the same as being objective. I've yet to see you concede on any point ever. While I don't lurk here that often anymore, it's my observation. I am open to correction. WHO instructional brochure: 
|
|
Originally Posted By Smokey0844: Originally Posted By tucansam: Something something Bill Burr something something less traffic on the freeway something something these things happen Maybe now I'll be able to buy ALL the on sale meat at my grocery store, instead of "limit 3" Solid. /media/mediaFiles/sharedAlbum/EgcB5I3-51.gif Bill Burr has a bit about more dead people means less freeway traffic. In my case it will also mean I don't have to share the meat counter with everyone else. |
Pain of regret is far worse than pain of discipline.
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat your meat?
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat your meat?
Nice (retired) JBT that says Let's Go Brandon!
Joined:
Nov 2002
Posts:
107962
EE: 100% (229)
OK, USA
|
Originally Posted By Sokarul: That's not what happened though. Originally Posted By Sokarul: Originally Posted By Smokey0844: Given the effectiveness of the shots, why don't we just release the hounds on all drug research. Just imagine how many diabetics or even cancer patients we could save if we just wait until after it's in use to see if it works or not. That's not what happened though. You are exactly correct. The shots had no effectiveness. |
2021, the year America died of democratism.
Nice (retired) JBT that says Let's Go Brandon!
Joined:
Nov 2002
Posts:
107963
EE: 100% (229)
OK, USA
|
Originally Posted By tucansam: They are very effective at killing people. Originally Posted By tucansam: Originally Posted By S13: You are exactly correct. The shots had no effectiveness. They are very effective at killing people. Well yeah, there is that. But they do nothing effective at all to the covid virus. 
|
2021, the year America died of democratism.
|
Originally Posted By S13: Well yeah, there is that. But they do nothing effective at all to the covid virus. Theoretically, dead people cannot transmit the rice rabies, or occupy hospital beds when "ERs are overrun." So maybe they do work..... Maybe...... |
Pain of regret is far worse than pain of discipline.
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat your meat?
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat your meat?