User Panel
[#1]
Quoted: well... I mean not even the titular Enterprise was the first ship of its line. Original Trek Enterprise was a Constitution class vessel. The first ship of that line was named the Constitution. Next gen... it was a Galaxy class... updated one for the later movies was a Sovereign Class. I'm not sure... but maybe the one from Enterprise ... since it was an experimental prototype ship might have been the only time the Enterprise was the first ship in a line. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: No, it should become a tradition that the first spaceship of a line that is American made should be named Enterprise. Original Trek Enterprise was a Constitution class vessel. The first ship of that line was named the Constitution. Next gen... it was a Galaxy class... updated one for the later movies was a Sovereign Class. I'm not sure... but maybe the one from Enterprise ... since it was an experimental prototype ship might have been the only time the Enterprise was the first ship in a line. Has Star Trek established that class naming convention in canon, or is that just a reasonable assumption based on modern conventions? |
|
[#2]
Quoted: Personally, I am against any military tradition being based on a cheesy television show. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: No, it should become a tradition that the first spaceship of a line that is American made should be named Enterprise. Original Trek Enterprise was a Constitution class vessel. The first ship of that line was named the Constitution. Next gen... it was a Galaxy class... updated one for the later movies was a Sovereign Class. I'm not sure... but maybe the one from Enterprise ... since it was an experimental prototype ship might have been the only time the Enterprise was the first ship in a line. Personally, I am against any military tradition being based on a cheesy television show. Nonsense. Red shirts for all Space Force security forces! I have spoken. |
|
[#3]
|
|
[#4]
Quoted: Has Star Trek established that class naming convention in canon, or is that just a reasonable assumption based on modern conventions? View Quote Rando tangent. Reason number 23 why I detest Star Trek Discovery. Discovery is a Scott Crossfield class starship. Not only is that, (at least in my book) dishonoring the memory of my favorite test pilot. There is no USS Scott Crossfield in that fictional universe. The only ships of that class were the USS Discovery and the USS Glenn. Attached File Find me an uglier and more glitchy spaceship in all of fiction than this POS. Star Trek naming conventions are a mess. In canon there are 2 Miranda class starships with the name Saratoga. Edit. If anyone ever makes a Scott Crossfield class starship it had better be impressive looking and fast as fuck. I've even played around with a story idea of a 'spore drive' but used strictly as a navigational system. Not a way of powering a ship. Another edit. Crossfield helped in the designing and was the first test pilot of the X15. Outlaw Star did a decent job of creating a fictional updated and enlarged X15. Attached File Attached File Attached File |
|
[#5]
|
|
[#6]
|
|
[#7]
|
|
[#8]
Quoted: heretic! View Quote Heresy? TTS - Heresy Scene |
|
[#9]
|
|
[#10]
|
|
[#11]
Quoted: Quoted: Has Star Trek established that class naming convention in canon, or is that just a reasonable assumption based on modern conventions? Yes that is canon. Interesting. Never really thought about it until this thread. Always thought the Enterprise D was first Galaxy class... and don't even remember mention of class in TOS. Not that I ever laid that level of attention. |
|
[#12]
Quoted: Interesting. Never really thought about it until this thread. Always thought the Enterprise D was first Galaxy class... and don't even remember mention of class in TOS. Not that I ever laid that level of attention. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Has Star Trek established that class naming convention in canon, or is that just a reasonable assumption based on modern conventions? Yes that is canon. Interesting. Never really thought about it until this thread. Always thought the Enterprise D was first Galaxy class... and don't even remember mention of class in TOS. Not that I ever laid that level of attention. There was the sister ship that was a galaxy class that blew itself up. |
|
[#13]
NASA astronauts will be ringing the bell to open the NASDAQ this morning.
Failed To Load Title |
|
[#14]
Quoted: Interesting. Never really thought about it until this thread. Always thought the Enterprise D was first Galaxy class... and don't even remember mention of class in TOS. Not that I ever laid that level of attention. View Quote I want to say the Enterprise was the third one. Galaxy and Yamato were made first. I think the Odyssey from DS9 was the only other one given a name. You saw a few in formations and fleet battles toward the end of DS9. |
|
[#17]
View Quote |
|
[#18]
|
|
[#19]
Quoted: Think this booster is a one and done? Hell no. |
|
[#20]
|
|
[#21]
View Quote Beautiful. Just beautiful. |
|
[#22]
Quoted: Think this booster is a one and done? It's going to be refurbished and flown again. |
|
[#23]
Quoted: It's going to be refurbished and flown again. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Think this booster is a one and done? It's going to be refurbished and flown again. |
|
[#24]
|
|
[#25]
Elon Musk said he’s concerned about the re-entry. Slowing down from
|
|
[#26]
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1267917354647904263.html?refreshed=yes |
|
[#27]
|
|
[#28]
|
|
[#29]
|
|
[#30]
Quoted: ISS orbits at 4.76 miles / second. That’s more like Mach 25. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Elon Musk said he’s concerned about the re-entry. Slowing down from Mach 5 as it hits the atmosphere could be problematic due to the asymmetric design of the re-entry vehicle. ISS orbits at 4.76 miles / second. That’s more like Mach 25. Isn't his concern with the booster and not the capsule's return? The booster wasn't doing that when it came in. I am not sure what the ISS's velocity has to do with it. Thanks |
|
[#31]
Elon Musk's biggest worry about SpaceX's first astronaut mission isn't the rocket launch — it's the spaceship's return to Earth
"Musk added that while the threat was low, his "biggest concern" about the new spaceship was the capsule's asymmetric design, which is driven by its emergency escape system. While screaming back to Earth at 25 times the speed of sound, the capsule's heat shield will deflect and absorb the energy of superheated plasma — but the forces of atmospheric reentry have a slim chance of causing catastrophe." "If you rotate too much, then you could potentially catch the plasma in the super Draco escape thruster pods," Musk said, adding this could overheat parts of the ship or cause it to lose control (by wobbling). "We've looked at this six ways to Sunday, so it's not that I think this will fail. It's just that I worry a bit that it is asymmetric on the backshell." |
|
[#32]
Quoted: It's mostly out of the atmosphere. Although there is some atmospheric drag even at that altitude necessitating occasional boosts. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: ISS orbits at 4.76 miles / second. That’s more like Mach 25. It's mostly out of the atmosphere. Although there is some atmospheric drag even at that altitude necessitating occasional boosts. I had the good fortune to fly the full motion Shuttle sim two times. We flew several launch abort and reentry profiles. On one of the reentry profiles we were just at the edge of the atmosphere and the airspeed tape was dead. We were showing Mach 32 with 0 indicated airspeed. As we started to just bump the upper air the airspeed started to just barely move 1-2 knots Mach 25. As soon as we had airspeed the computer switched from reaction jets to aerodynamic control surfaces. The switch was flawless, we proceeded to fly it to touchdown KSC. |
|
[#33]
Quoted: Elon Musk's biggest worry about SpaceX's first astronaut mission isn't the rocket launch — it's the spaceship's return to Earth "Musk added that while the threat was low, his "biggest concern" about the new spaceship was the capsule's asymmetric design, which is driven by its emergency escape system. While screaming back to Earth at 25 times the speed of sound, the capsule's heat shield will deflect and absorb the energy of superheated plasma — but the forces of atmospheric reentry have a slim chance of causing catastrophe." "If you rotate too much, then you could potentially catch the plasma in the super Draco escape thruster pods," Musk said, adding this could overheat parts of the ship or cause it to lose control (by wobbling). "We've looked at this six ways to Sunday, so it's not that I think this will fail. It's just that I worry a bit that it is asymmetric on the backshell." View Quote Copy. |
|
[#34]
Quoted: It's going to be refurbished and flown again. View Quote SpaceX will continue to need new first stages to replace those that are lost due to failures like two earlier this year. With as many Starlink launches as they will need and as few astronaut launches each year, I don't see a problem. |
|
[#35]
|
|
[#36]
Quoted: It's not like they haven't done this before, multiple times. View Quote Meh. It's easy !!! http://nassp.sourceforge.net/wiki/Entry_Monitoring_System#:~:text=Command%20Module%20Reentry,- |
|
[#37]
Quoted: I agree that Elon doesn’t “run” SpaceX in terms of actual operations. His role is to provide the vision and direction for them, but he has extremely competent people actually running the operations for him. View Quote |
|
[#38]
You video game nerds that are following this thread should wrap your heads around this.
Done with slide rules !!! Apollo - Atmospheric Entry Phase (1968) |
|
[#39]
Quoted: Several former SpaceX employees tell similar stories of when they said something was impossible, and Elon Musk pushed them aside and did it. View Quote It is well known that Musk is more than just a figurehead. He doesn't call himself the CEO or such, he calls himself the Chief Designer (something like that) because he does go to the CAD, table, and back of a napkin often. The dude designed the F9, the engines also. He is our generation's Howard Hughes. |
|
[#40]
View Quote That is what freedom and success looks like! |
|
[#41]
|
|
[#42]
|
|
[#43]
Quoted: With basically the same capsule even. Where did he say this anyways? Would like a link to that View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: It's not like they haven't done this before, multiple times. With basically the same capsule even. Where did he say this anyways? Would like a link to that Not really, the crew dragon capsule with the super Draco escape thrusters has only flown to space and back once, unmanned. It’s a very different outer mold line than the cargo dragon. |
|
[#44]
Quoted: Not really, the crew dragon capsule with the super Draco escape thrusters has only flown to space and back once, unmanned. It’s a very different outer mold line than the cargo dragon. View Quote Yes, it has flown and landed already once. They should have gotten a little bit of data from that. |
|
[#45]
|
|
[#46]
Quoted: It is well known that Musk is more than just a figurehead. He doesn't call himself the CEO or such, he calls himself the Chief Designer (something like that) because he does go to the CAD, table, and back of a napkin often. The dude designed the F9, the engines also. He is our generation's Howard Hughes. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Several former SpaceX employees tell similar stories of when they said something was impossible, and Elon Musk pushed them aside and did it. It is well known that Musk is more than just a figurehead. He doesn't call himself the CEO or such, he calls himself the Chief Designer (something like that) because he does go to the CAD, table, and back of a napkin often. The dude designed the F9, the engines also. He is our generation's Howard Hughes. In that case, I wish he would spend ALL of his time on SpaceX, and hand off Tesla to someone else to deal with. |
|
[#48]
|
|
[#50]
do they bring the legs to 90deg to assist with aerodynamic braking?
I don't recall seeing them deployed until just before touchdown edit: probably disrupts the airflow to the mesh fins near the top |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.