User Panel
I'd pick the one that starts with C and ends with Z. Love the grip shape.
|
|
Sig is never the answer to any question, save for the classics.
|
|
|
|
I'm curious as to what you mean when you say you would send the X5 to Gray Guns and have it rebuilt. I voted Sig because I want one and have mags. Milling a new gun for an optic is annoying but if you like it better I get it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Own both, X5 is a nicer gun IMO View Quote Quoted: My 226 X5 is an amazing shooter. View Quote Current one or old one? I really am considering a new one. |
|
|
Quoted: I have the new one (STAS model) but had a German xshort a couple years ago. They’re extremely close quality wise View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Current one or old one? I really am considering a new one. I have the new one (STAS model) but had a German xshort a couple years ago. They’re extremely close quality wise I had my hands on one of each today at two different LGS locations. They both feel incredibly high quality, very much worth the roughly $2k price tag |
|
Quoted: If the DWX had an optic cut, it’s no contest View Quote Quoted: Why not optic cut on the DWX? View Quote … From my original post: If the DWX it’d get the slide machined for an optic… View Quote |
|
|
|
Quoted: I'm curious as to what you mean when you say you would send the X5 to Gray Guns and have it rebuilt. I voted Sig because I want one and have mags. Milling a new gun for an optic is annoying but if you like it better I get it. View Quote Send it to Bruce Gray and have him do all the action enhancement/tuning work he does to create perfected works of firearms art. I’m leaning very heavily towards the P226 right now, kind of just wanting to see if anyone has any horror stories about them before dropping the $2,200 |
|
Quoted: Send it to Bruce Gray and have him do all the action enhancement/tuning work he does to create perfected works of firearms art. I’m leaning very heavily towards the P226 right now, kind of just wanting to see if anyone has any horror stories about them before dropping the $2,200 View Quote I have an old one (2012), and remember reading reports of extractor issues on some pistols. I haven't experienced it though. I did the 2,000 round challenge with it back when that thread was going in the handgun forum (2k rounds, no clean, no lube). It worked just fine. IIRC people with the early extractor issues were sending them to Bruce Gray (grayguns) rather than Sig to get them working. ETA: My early X-Five came with checkmate mags. Toss those right in the trash the followers were too shallow and would tilt. |
|
Quoted: I have an old one (2012), and remember reading reports of extractor issues on some pistols. I haven't experienced it though. I did the 2,000 round challenge with it back when that thread was going in the handgun forum (2k rounds, no clean, no lube). It worked just fine. IIRC people with the early extractor issues were sending them to Bruce Gray (grayguns) rather than Sig to get them working. ETA: My early X-Five came with checkmate mags. Toss those right in the trash the followers were too shallow and would tilt. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Send it to Bruce Gray and have him do all the action enhancement/tuning work he does to create perfected works of firearms art. I’m leaning very heavily towards the P226 right now, kind of just wanting to see if anyone has any horror stories about them before dropping the $2,200 I have an old one (2012), and remember reading reports of extractor issues on some pistols. I haven't experienced it though. I did the 2,000 round challenge with it back when that thread was going in the handgun forum (2k rounds, no clean, no lube). It worked just fine. IIRC people with the early extractor issues were sending them to Bruce Gray (grayguns) rather than Sig to get them working. ETA: My early X-Five came with checkmate mags. Toss those right in the trash the followers were too shallow and would tilt. When I bought my X6 there were extra extractors in the case so I assume the previous owner either had issues or was expecting them. Gray Guns doesn't even list services other than lightening for the X series guns which is why I am asking. Mainly it was the term rebuilt that threw me. I doubt these need much work if they are indeed anything like the old guns. |
|
Quoted: Yep. Why a company puts out a gun without an optic cut option in today’s world is beyond me. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: If the DWX had an optic cut, it’s no contest Yep. Why a company puts out a gun without an optic cut option in today’s world is beyond me. That's why I'm holding off for now. My luck runs just that way -- buy the DWX right before they release a new model with all the stuff I wish mine had. |
|
I’ve got a German Mastershop X5. It’s a dream. Accurate a fuck. Softest shooting pistol I own.
The only complaint is the trigger pull is 2lb and barely touching it will fire. This is not a gun for an optic. Join the X5 master race. |
|
I have always liked the Sig X5 for many reasons. I wish I bought some a while back as they are worth much more than what they sold for originally and will only get higher.
|
|
|
Quoted: I’ve got a German Mastershop X5. It’s a dream. Accurate a fuck. Softest shooting pistol I own. The only complaint is the trigger pull is 2lb and barely touching it will fire. This is not a gun for an optic. Join the X5 master race. View Quote What do you mean this is not a gun for an optic? |
|
Quoted: What do you mean this is not a gun for an optic? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I’ve got a German Mastershop X5. It’s a dream. Accurate a fuck. Softest shooting pistol I own. The only complaint is the trigger pull is 2lb and barely touching it will fire. This is not a gun for an optic. Join the X5 master race. What do you mean this is not a gun for an optic? Every gun is a gun for an optic |
|
I want a DWX terribly. They’re gorgeous and I’ve never heard a single complaint about how they shoot.
I almost bought an X5 several years ago, but I got a PVS14 instead. |
|
|
|
Quoted: Considering the market competition and the quality I think it’s about right. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: How much should they be? Considering the market competition and the quality I think it’s about right. Agree to disagree gentleman. There's no machining, or other magical manufacturing that could drive the price into several times the cost of standard handguns. Neat anodizing aside. But I'm too stupid to pay for that kind of thing. |
|
Quoted: Agree to disagree gentleman. There's no machining, or other magical manufacturing that could drive the price into several times the cost of standard handguns. Neat anodizing aside. But I'm too stupid to pay for that kind of thing. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: How much should they be? Considering the market competition and the quality I think it’s about right. Agree to disagree gentleman. There's no machining, or other magical manufacturing that could drive the price into several times the cost of standard handguns. Neat anodizing aside. But I'm too stupid to pay for that kind of thing. So how much should they cost? |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: How much should they be? Considering the market competition and the quality I think it’s about right. Agree to disagree gentleman. There's no machining, or other magical manufacturing that could drive the price into several times the cost of standard handguns. Neat anodizing aside. But I'm too stupid to pay for that kind of thing. So how much should they cost? $1200 tops. Still seems a stretch to me. You have CZ's with allegedly the exact same manufacturing, that cost several hundred dollars apart because of the color of orange or blue in anodizing? I'm no scientist' but i see what i see when i see it. What do you think they are worth? |
|
|
Quoted: $1200 tops. Still seems a stretch to me. You have CZ's with allegedly the exact same manufacturing, that cost several hundred dollars apart because of the color of orange or blue in anodizing? I'm no scientist' but i see what i see when i see it. What do you think they are worth? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: How much should they be? Considering the market competition and the quality I think it’s about right. Agree to disagree gentleman. There's no machining, or other magical manufacturing that could drive the price into several times the cost of standard handguns. Neat anodizing aside. But I'm too stupid to pay for that kind of thing. So how much should they cost? $1200 tops. Still seems a stretch to me. You have CZ's with allegedly the exact same manufacturing, that cost several hundred dollars apart because of the color of orange or blue in anodizing? I'm no scientist' but i see what i see when i see it. What do you think they are worth? I can't think of a single comparable gun for $1200. The Prodigy is probably the closest and it didn't take a whole lot of new parts. This is a clean sheet gun that doesn't use a bunch of old parts. Even CZ's Tactical Sport that they have been making forever costs more than $1200 so I just don't think it's realistic. I wish they were $1500 which is closer to what they were originally supposed to be I think but the inflation hosed all that. Just like you used to be able to get a $1600 STI but they slowly crept up over $2k and are still there under the new company. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Agree to disagree gentleman. There's no machining, or other magical manufacturing that could drive the price into several times the cost of standard handguns. Neat anodizing aside. But I'm too stupid to pay for that kind of thing. How much do you shoot? Not as much as you. Enough to stay current with my defense utility of choice. |
|
Quoted: I can't think of a single comparable gun for $1200. The Prodigy is probably the closest and it didn't take a whole lot of new parts. This is a clean sheet gun that doesn't use a bunch of old parts. Even CZ's Tactical Sport that they have been making forever costs more than $1200 so I just don't think it's realistic. I wish they were $1500 which is closer to what they were originally supposed to be I think but the inflation hosed all that. Just like you used to be able to get a $1600 STI but they slowly crept up over $2k and are still there under the new company. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: How much should they be? Considering the market competition and the quality I think it’s about right. Agree to disagree gentleman. There's no machining, or other magical manufacturing that could drive the price into several times the cost of standard handguns. Neat anodizing aside. But I'm too stupid to pay for that kind of thing. So how much should they cost? $1200 tops. Still seems a stretch to me. You have CZ's with allegedly the exact same manufacturing, that cost several hundred dollars apart because of the color of orange or blue in anodizing? I'm no scientist' but i see what i see when i see it. What do you think they are worth? I can't think of a single comparable gun for $1200. The Prodigy is probably the closest and it didn't take a whole lot of new parts. This is a clean sheet gun that doesn't use a bunch of old parts. Even CZ's Tactical Sport that they have been making forever costs more than $1200 so I just don't think it's realistic. I wish they were $1500 which is closer to what they were originally supposed to be I think but the inflation hosed all that. Just like you used to be able to get a $1600 STI but they slowly crept up over $2k and are still there under the new company. I'd never waste money on an STI or Staccato either. I've shot enough to know the point of diminishing returns. I probably don't make the incredulous amounts of money you do though. I'm just an average person. |
|
Inflation is a thing, and nice things cost money. I think $1,500-2,500 is a decent range for higher-end still predominantly production (maybe with a bit of hand finishing) metal-framed pistols, most of which are marketed for competition or general-purpose high-performance handguns. This is where most entry-level 2011s and 2011-style pistols are
|
|
Quoted: I'd never waste money on an STI or Staccato either. I've shot enough to know the point of diminishing returns. I probably don't make the incredulous amounts of money you do though. I'm just an average person. View Quote Just because you can’t afford something doesn’t make it a waste of money |
|
Like most things in life, price is a point of subjectivity. I challenge either of you to prove the difference in price to performance. Hate on me all you want. Idc. I know in my experience steep admission doesn't necessarily improve shooters capability. I'd reckon the improvement from a $900 gun doesn't justify the delta of a $3000 gun.
ETA: Spelling correction. |
|
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.