User Panel
Posted: 2/20/2019 6:29:21 PM EDT
Well I agree with her on this.
https://www.stripes.com/news/us/supreme-court-limits-power-of-states-and-localities-to-impose-fines-seize-property-1.569409 “WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court ruled unanimously Wednesday that the Constitution's prohibition on excessive fines applies to state and local governments, limiting their abilities to impose financial penalties and seize property. The decision delighted critics of civil asset forfeiture, who welcomed it as a new weapon in their war against what's been labeled "policing for profit" - the practice of seizing cash, cars and other property from those convicted, or even suspected, of committing a crime. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, on her second day back on the bench after undergoing cancer surgery in December, announced the court's decision, saying the Eighth Amendment's Excessive Fines Clause protects against government retribution at all levels. "For good reason, the protection against excessive fines has been a constant shield throughout Anglo-American history: Exorbitant tolls undermine other constitutional liberties," Ginsburg wrote. "Excessive fines can be used, for example, to retaliate against or chill the speech of political enemies. . . . Even absent a political motive, fines may be employed in a measure out of accord with the penal goals of retribution and deterrence." |
|
We really haven't developed at all since the Magna Charta. The main motivation 800 years ago was excessive fines by the king and his stooges.
|
|
Quoted:
Well I agree with her on this. https://www.stripes.com/news/us/supreme-court-limits-power-of-states-and-localities-to-impose-fines-seize-property-1.569409 “WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court ruled unanimously Wednesday that the Constitution's prohibition on excessive fines applies to state and local governments, limiting their abilities to impose financial penalties and seize property. The decision delighted critics of civil asset forfeiture, who welcomed it as a new weapon in their war against what's been labeled "policing for profit" - the practice of seizing cash, cars and other property from those convicted, or even suspected, of committing a crime. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, on her second day back on the bench after undergoing cancer surgery in December, announced the court's decision, saying the Eighth Amendment's Excessive Fines Clause protects against government retribution at all levels. "For good reason, the protection against excessive fines has been a constant shield throughout Anglo-American history: Exorbitant tolls undermine other constitutional liberties," Ginsburg wrote. "Excessive fines can be used, for example, to retaliate against or chill the speech of political enemies. . . . Even absent a political motive, View Quote Repeal the NFA. |
|
Did the notorious RGB just smoke the fuck outta the NYC permit system? Cause I think she did.
It's like she really did die and was possessed by her friend Antonin |
|
Quoted:
Did the notorious RGB just smoke the fuck outta the NYC permit system? Cause I think she did. It's like she really did die and was possessed by her friend Antonin View Quote |
|
Quoted: For real. Is she going to go all 87D chess on us and start ruling for the constitution? And we will be praying that SHE STAYS ON the SC?!!!! View Quote She's not stupid, she has always had her agenda. This case doesn't really offend her agenda, and in some ways helps it slightly. Remember, she's not a neo-lib. Ruling FOR civil asset forfeiture would go against her beliefs even if there wasn't a constitutional issue in play. Either way, I agree with her on this one. |
|
Quoted:
For real. Is she going to go all 87D chess on us and start ruling for the constitution? And we will be praying that SHE STAYS ON the SC?!!!! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Did the notorious RGB just smoke the fuck outta the NYC permit system? Cause I think she did. It's like she really did die and was possessed by her friend Antonin |
|
Quoted:
We really haven't developed at all since the Magna Charta. The main motivation 800 years ago was excessive fines by the king and his stooges. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
And THAT is exactly why the Constitution is NOT a living document. The constitution is about governing people and people have not changed. Until the human brain evolves and somehow becomes incapable of greed, violence, and malice the consitution does not need to be, and should NOT be, a living document. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
We really haven't developed at all since the Magna Charta. The main motivation 800 years ago was excessive fines by the king and his stooges. Unfortunately we have let our elected officials circumvent, twist, and redefine the Constitution using unconstitutional means for the last 100 years or so give or take a century. It is nobodies fault but our own. As we speak they continue to infringe on the constitution and we do nothing to stop them. Our founders faught a revolution for far less. We are, as a people, spineless and lack the intestinal fortitude to stand against it. |
|
Impossible, the brainiacs here said she has been dead for months now.
|
|
Quoted:
I called it first in the Pet Semetary thread. She died, was buried in the Pet Semetary, she came back but is now a constitutional conservative. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Did the notorious RGB just smoke the fuck outta the NYC permit system? Cause I think she did. It's like she really did die and was possessed by her friend Antonin |
|
TIL that 5-4 SCOTUS decisions are in the minority (19%) of cases, and 9-0 unanimous decisions are the majority (36%).
|
|
hmm some veryyyy interesting lines in the ruling about rights being incorporated vs states.....
|
|
|
Quoted: It IS a living document. See the article V process. Unfortunately we have let our elected officials circumvent, twist, and redefine the Constitution using unconstitutional means for the last 100 years or so give or take a century. It is nobodies fault but our own. As we speak they continue to infringe on the constitution and we do nothing to stop them. Our founders faught a revolution for far less. We are, as a people, spineless and lack the intestinal fortitude to stand against it. View Quote |
|
|
The embarassing 2nd always gets their jimmies rustled no matter rights.
|
|
Her reasoning was flawed but the ruling was right. Thomas's and Gorsuch's concurrence should have made the majority opinion. Fyi, Gorsuch cited to Thomas's concurrence in McDonald.
|
|
I concur with the decision.
And since it was a 9-0 decision, its not just a good idea - its the law. |
|
|
|
Police 3 pages and on page one
https://www.ar15.com/forums/General/Breaking-Supreme-court-throws-out-Indiana-s-excessive-civil-asset-seizure/5-2195989/ |
|
|
|
This ruling only applies to drug dealers.
Gun owners will NOT be extended the same courtesies. 5-4 with Roberts joining the communist caucus IF they ever bring up a case which I doubt. |
|
|
The purpose of the timing is to close off the avenue of siezures being used to fund a border wall
|
|
Quoted:
Constitution is about limiting government View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: It IS a living document. See the article V process. Unfortunately we have let our elected officials circumvent, twist, and redefine the Constitution using unconstitutional means for the last 100 years or so give or take a century. It is nobodies fault but our own. As we speak they continue to infringe on the constitution and we do nothing to stop them. Our founders faught a revolution for far less. We are, as a people, spineless and lack the intestinal fortitude to stand against it. |
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
Nothing happens by accident with these people. The offered justification is never the real reason View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
|
Quoted:
Nothing happens by accident with these people. The offered justification is never the real reason View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
|
Quoted:
It's still the correct ruling, however. View Quote it's useful to understand the reason though. That way, you're not blindsided by inconsistency when they go a different direction for political convenience in the future |
|
She’s right ordered but not correct
See Thomas’ argument below the RBG authored opinion |
|
Quoted:
That's possible..but these opinions were likely written a while ago. Plus the citing of previous 2A related cases can't be a coincidence. I think this is pointed directly at the NYC case. If I was red Billy I wouldn't be feeling confident. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
I'm not a purist. I'm fine with someone doing the right thing for the wrong reason. it's useful to understand the reason though. That way, you're not blindsided by inconsistency when they go a different direction for political convenience in the future View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
I wish people on our side understood that commies are gonna commie and the implications of same View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted:
I wish people on our side understood that commies are gonna commie and the implications of same View Quote Lets pretend for a moment that there is an active group of people seeking to destroy the constitution and the american form of government in the pursuit of a one world government and globalist agenda. Lets pretend they have control of the courts, the federal bureaucracy, the media, the culture and the richest people in the world. Lets also pretend that you have a bunch of bad ass internet cowboys who have a III% patch on their helmet at home with PVS-15s. So do we maintain the facade and our comfortable way of life that this is simply a disagreement on interpretation? And trust to the courts and the FBI and the Media to do the right thing? Just ignorance on their part, right? Or do we maintain our self-image of guardians of the constitution and get arrested, or shot, or fired and ruin our lives (and, more to the point, our families' lives) in some quixote-esque blaze of short lived (and most likely mocked) resistance? RBG was lead council for the ACLU, an organization dedicated to the destruction of the US Constitution in support of global communism. She doesn't give a fuck about the 8th or any other amendment. |
|
|
Quoted: Its important to maintain the fiction. Lets pretend for a moment that there is an active group of people seeking to destroy the constitution and the american form of government in the pursuit of a one world government and globalist agenda. Lets pretend they have control of the courts, the federal bureaucracy, the media, the culture and the richest people in the world. Lets also pretend that you have a bunch of bad ass internet cowboys who have a III% patch on their helmet at home with PVS-15s. So do we maintain the facade and our comfortable way of life that this is simply a disagreement on interpretation? And trust to the courts and the FBI and the Media to do the right thing? Just ignorance on their part, right? Or do we maintain our self-image of guardians of the constitution and get arrested, or shot, or fired and ruin our lives (and, more to the point, our families' lives) in some quixote-esque blaze of short lived (and most likely mocked) resistance? RBG was lead council for the ACLU, an organization dedicated to the destruction of the US Constitution in support of global communism. She doesn't give a fuck about the 8th or any other amendment. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
TIL that 5-4 SCOTUS decisions are in the minority (19%) of cases, and 9-0 unanimous decisions are the majority (36%). View Quote |
|
Quoted: which is why gun owners getting excited over this is fucking retarded. View Quote I still think its significant that the conservative judges cited previous 2a cases...at the same time they granted cert to a 2a case. They've been pretending they never happened for a decade. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.