User Panel
I don’t believe that the west wants Russia to collapse. That’s too dangerous.
|
|
|
NorCal_LEO callsign: Brussel Sprout
I, for one, welcome our new Hawkeye overlords. |
Originally Posted By Dominion21: Thanks! Ukraine appears to have relied primarily on 2 types of drones (prior to us sending Switchblades + others): The famous Turkish Bayraktar, and various commercial quad-copters dropping the ironic Russian-invented “RKG-3” anti-tank hang grenade in modified form: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/RKG-3_anti-tank_grenade No sane foot-solder wants to be within throwing distance of an enemy tank. And given good tactics & training, that should never happen. So this weapon was sort a suicide/last ditch / Hail-Mary way to fight off an enemy tank. Little regard for the lives of their own soldiers seems to be the Russian way. But for drone use against the lightly armored top of many armored vehicles , these things are great! Here is a cross sectioned display model: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5e/RKG-3_anti-tank_grenade_%28DOSAAF_Museum_in_Minsk%29.jpg/1536px-RKG-3_anti-tank_grenade_%28DOSAAF_Museum_in_Minsk%29.jpg The Ukrainians remove the rear section, and attach fins they print on their own 3D printers. Then hopefully there is little wind, and it is good night Ivan! View Quote |
|
|
Originally Posted By outofbattery: This area I circled in green has had my curiosity for a while. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/56204/97A48E8D-BA5E-4D52-A014-0E02FE2B10EF_jpe-2386924.JPG It’s surrounded but has long been labeled as “contested” or ““strong partisan activity”. It would be interesting to know why and how Russia hasn’t pacified it and what the story has been. View Quote I've been wondering as well. Perhaps the area has no immediate value and few good roads so the Russians correctly decided to bypass it for now? |
|
|
Originally Posted By Illegible_Signature: I've been wondering as well. Perhaps the area has no immediate value and few good roads so the Russians correctly decided to bypass it for now? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Illegible_Signature: Originally Posted By outofbattery: This area I circled in green has had my curiosity for a while. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/56204/97A48E8D-BA5E-4D52-A014-0E02FE2B10EF_jpe-2386924.JPG It's surrounded but has long been labeled as "contested" or ""strong partisan activity". It would be interesting to know why and how Russia hasn't pacified it and what the story has been. I've been wondering as well. Perhaps the area has no immediate value and few good roads so the Russians correctly decided to bypass it for now? |
|
Coyote with 40 people crammed into a minivan gets into a chase with DPS, Paco over estimates his driving abilities and *whmmo!* the Astrovan of Immigration becomes a Pinata of Pain, hurling broken bodies like so many tasty pieces of cheap candy...
|
Originally Posted By CS223: If I were driving down a tree lined road bordering a field pock marked by artillery strikes, I don't think I'd stick around. View Quote How about the dudes standing in front of the revetment watching their SAM burn? Presumably in the middle of an artillery barrage. No thanks! |
|
|
Originally Posted By JAD762: Eh. Russia's already collapsed once in my lifetime. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By JAD762: Originally Posted By Ryan_Scott: I don’t believe that the west wants Russia to collapse. That’s too dangerous. Eh. Russia's already collapsed once in my lifetime. The Soviet Union collapsed and the US had to pay for guards for Russian nuclear materials. |
|
|
Coyote with 40 people crammed into a minivan gets into a chase with DPS, Paco over estimates his driving abilities and *whmmo!* the Astrovan of Immigration becomes a Pinata of Pain, hurling broken bodies like so many tasty pieces of cheap candy...
|
Originally Posted By Ryan_Scott: The Soviet Union collapsed and the US had to pay for guards for Russian nuclear materials. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Ryan_Scott: Originally Posted By JAD762: Originally Posted By Ryan_Scott: I don’t believe that the west wants Russia to collapse. That’s too dangerous. Eh. Russia's already collapsed once in my lifetime. The Soviet Union collapsed and the US had to pay for guards for Russian nuclear materials. So... What? if this happens again the Russian government is going to say, "eh fuck it." This time then sell or give a stock of nuclear weapons to the Iranians and/or North Koreans just to stick it to the western world? |
|
|
Originally Posted By sentionaut: What is their official reason? I know they are slimy as fuck, but what is the spin? View Quote The woman seems to be fighting the narrative all the way... even the look on her face at times is one of disbelief as if she can't believe he would be so crazy as to speak such things. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Hesperus: So... What? if this happens again the Russian government is going to say, "eh fuck it." This time then sell or give a stock of nuclear weapons to the Iranians and/or North Koreans just to stick it to the western world? View Quote No, they will sell them to us because we have the money. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Hesperus: So... What? if this happens again the Russian government is going to say, "eh fuck it." This time then sell or give a stock of nuclear weapons to the Iranians and/or North Koreans just to stick it to the western world? View Quote Delivering such weapons would cause them to be included in the response. If they don’t do it themselves, they won’t have someone else do it. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Hesperus: So... What? if this happens again the Russian government is going to say, "eh fuck it." This time then sell or give a stock of nuclear weapons to the Iranians and/or North Koreans just to stick it to the western world? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Hesperus: Originally Posted By Ryan_Scott: Originally Posted By JAD762: Originally Posted By Ryan_Scott: I don’t believe that the west wants Russia to collapse. That’s too dangerous. Eh. Russia's already collapsed once in my lifetime. The Soviet Union collapsed and the US had to pay for guards for Russian nuclear materials. So... What? if this happens again the Russian government is going to say, "eh fuck it." This time then sell or give a stock of nuclear weapons to the Iranians and/or North Koreans just to stick it to the western world? I recall several "incidents" where what might have been real nuclear material turned up on the open market already... So, "Same as every day Pinky?" and a resounding MEH! to that fud. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Ryan_Scott: The Soviet Union collapsed and the US had to pay for guards for Russian nuclear materials. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Ryan_Scott: Originally Posted By JAD762: Originally Posted By Ryan_Scott: I don’t believe that the west wants Russia to collapse. That’s too dangerous. Eh. Russia's already collapsed once in my lifetime. The Soviet Union collapsed and the US had to pay for guards for Russian nuclear materials. And we had to hire their dirtbag rocket scientists at NASA to keep them from selling their services to the Norks and Iran. |
|
I've been battling some internal demons this week, so far I'm 0 for 6.
كافر. |
Originally Posted By stone-age: Putin thinking everybody around him is an idiot and he is the only one smart enough to make these decisions? Yes. That definitely does sound plausible. And the worse the war goes for him, the more he will think he has to make the decisions himself. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By stone-age: Originally Posted By outofbattery: US intelligence apparently thinks Putin is inserting himself into operations at the level of a major or colonel. How hilarious would it be if Putin himself is the idiot who came up with the river crossing or who kept putting helicopters at Kherson airport because nobody could tell him why it was a bad idea? Putin thinking everybody around him is an idiot and he is the only one smart enough to make these decisions? Yes. That definitely does sound plausible. And the worse the war goes for him, the more he will think he has to make the decisions himself. Sounds a lot like our previous president |
|
|
MPS thread again
|
|
"People, ideas, and hardware...in that order!" Col John Boyd
|
World ain't what it seems, is it Gunny?
|
Originally Posted By Cypher15: @outofbattery https://understandingwar.org/sites/default/files/Kherson%20and%20Mykolaiv%20Battle%20Map%20Draft%20May%2016%2C2022.png View Quote I don't understand why this area has been so quiet. Maybe just hold them up to they clear out the donbass and then UA moves towards Mariupol and cuts off the entire southern side of the Russian army. But that won't be till july-august |
|
|
Originally Posted By Ryan_Scott: I don’t believe that the west wants Russia to collapse. That’s too dangerous. View Quote I believe it's inevitable now. Russia has shown its ass and it isn't as pretty as they thought everybody should think. I bet even China is eyeing that country now and waiting to pounce. Nobody would jump in to save Russia either. |
|
It's a strange, strange world we live in, Master Jack
|
Originally Posted By Dagger41: I believe it's inevitable now. Russia has shown its ass and it isn't as pretty as they thought everybody should think. I bet even China is eyeing that country now and waiting to pounce. Nobody would jump in to save Russia either. View Quote They would unquestionably nuke China for that. |
|
|
Is Oblast like a district/county type of deal ?
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Chokey:
View Quote https://www.ebay.com/itm/125040433641 |
|
World ain't what it seems, is it Gunny?
|
Originally Posted By Dagger41: I believe it's inevitable now. Russia has shown its ass and it isn't as pretty as they thought everybody should think. I bet even China is eyeing that country now and waiting to pounce. Nobody would jump in to save Russia either. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Dagger41: Originally Posted By Ryan_Scott: I don’t believe that the west wants Russia to collapse. That’s too dangerous. I believe it's inevitable now. Russia has shown its ass and it isn't as pretty as they thought everybody should think. I bet even China is eyeing that country now and waiting to pounce. Nobody would jump in to save Russia either. I think at this point what it will all come down to is finding out if anyone in a position of power has the balls to challenge Putin's authority. I'm not optimistic, I think Putin could keel over from a heart attack and many people would still be trying to carry out his orders. It's not like Russia hasn't had corpse-emperors before. Just look at the early 1980s. "How am I supposed to get anywhere with the Russians when they keep dying on me?" Probably my favorite Reagan quote. |
|
|
Originally Posted By LoBrau: You made the accusation, which is quite similar to known Russian propaganda. If it is a legitimate issue, you can back it up with open source information. If it is not, please stop muddying the waters. Saying "I can't talk about it in public," after you talk about it in public, is a non starter. View Quote you nailed it when you said Eastern Europe is a security vipers' nest In the not too distant past Ukraine was a snake pit of criminal cartel E-crime activity. But I understand the knee-jerk, lynch mob mentality of "anything critical of Ukraine means you suckputinsdick". It's GD |
|
"People, ideas, and hardware...in that order!" Col John Boyd
|
Originally Posted By Ryan_Scott: Essentially. Probably a bit more powerful, but not sovereign like a state. Those are Republics and such in the Russian speaking countries. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Ryan_Scott: Originally Posted By Swampgrass: Is Oblast like a district/county type of deal ? Essentially. Probably a bit more powerful, but not sovereign like a state. Those are Republics and such in the Russian speaking countries. Thanks. |
|
|
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By lorazepam: Originally Posted By Chokey:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/125040433641 $10 (probably cheaper off of alibaba) shell, a reusable drone, and a leftover freebee grenade to reap casualties and sow unfettered terror amongst an invading force? Deal of the century. Truly enough to make an engineer or accountant proud. Peak bang for buck right there. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Ryan_Scott: I’ve heard of Ukrainian E-crime but from everything I’ve seen it differs from Russian E-crime in that it is not state sponsored. View Quote Neither are "state sponsored" by the legal definition. Russia's "state" is a criminal cartel. In the not too distant past, Ukraine's E-crime was driven by criminal cartels who preyed upon American assets. |
|
"People, ideas, and hardware...in that order!" Col John Boyd
|
First strikes by Brimstone missiles on two tanks.
|
|
It's not stupid, it's advanced!!
|
The Finnish President is currently visiting Sweden, and formal applications to join will be done simultaneously tomorrow.
The Norwegian military sent a liaison officer to the Swedish MoD yesterday. Someone just needs to throw Erdogan something so he can placate his supporters. |
|
"you ought to listen to our resident Swede, he's genetically superior." -Bohr_Adam
"They are superior beings those Swedes." -RockHard13F "Everyone knows that geese are notorious liars ... and whores." -DK-Prof |
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By lorazepam: Originally Posted By Chokey:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/125040433641 Link to source for the grenades? |
|
"Major, with the weapon shops out of the way we can introduce steadying laws that could not be flouted." -A.E. Van Vogt 1951
|
— BlueSauron\uD83D\uDC41? (@Blue_Sauron) May 17, 2022 |
|
|
Originally Posted By Dagger41: He's dying. One way or another, he will be dead soon. Sooner the better. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Dagger41: Originally Posted By realwar: Putin Says Russia Has No Problem With Sweden or Finland https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcA_kSDIOfA He's dying. One way or another, he will be dead soon. Sooner the better. There were some photos of Putin floating around after the 5/9 parade where it looked like he had no teeth (removed?) and he was not even wearing dentures. Had that collapsed jaw look Possibly some good photoshopping to give that embarrassing look, but if they were , they were very well done |
|
|
|
|
It's not stupid, it's advanced!!
|
|
"...Capitalism...shares its blessings unequally; ...Socialism...shares its miseries equally."
Winston Churchill |
Originally Posted By Illegible_Signature: Should I relay this rather simplistic statement to my daughter with triplets? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Illegible_Signature: Originally Posted By ludder093: Originally Posted By mrrick: have you had to buy formula? I bet not. shits hard to find. that crazy bitch does have a good point on THAT Should I relay this rather simplistic statement to my daughter with triplets? Don’t talk to Bette Midler like that! |
|
|
|
|
World ain't what it seems, is it Gunny?
|
Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest:
View Quote Stayed out on the road for a.lomg time there |
|
|
Originally Posted By doc540: Neither are "state sponsored" by the legal definition. Russia's "state" is a criminal cartel. In the not too distant past, Ukraine's E-crime was driven by criminal cartels who preyed upon American assets. View Quote Russia uses military and security cyber units to conduct criminal activities, and taxes criminal organizations in the mafia way also. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Jack67: Or possibly a strategy to get the F-35 deal back on track. It was cancelled in 2019 but they are in talks now to get the deal back on track. Possibly it's just leverage to make sure the deal goes through this time. They have wanted Patriots, been denied them. That's what led to the S-400 purchase. They can also use this as leverage to dump the s-400s to Ukraine, get the Patriots, then the S-35s. I would imagine that's the real play here. I believe they have floated that idea already. View Quote Then who makes the first move? The Turks? Or the bidet regime? Are they smart enough to put that sort of deal out there? Is there anything in it for the bidet family? |
|
|
Originally Posted By Ryan_Scott: I don’t believe that the west wants Russia to collapse. That’s too dangerous. View Quote What's happening now is better? What if there are only 2 options, russia is strong enough to attack neighbors just because they want to, or, russia is collapsed? The rest of the world needs to build their iron curtain for them. |
|
SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS
|
Originally Posted By stgdz: Stayed out on the road for a.lomg time there View Quote They are fighting troops with little to no training, and no nco corps to guide them. There is a video here somewhere of a kid who graduated from an "elite" russian command school, who had no idea what was going on, and watched as his armor was blown up around him. No comms, no direction, their gun didn't work. Any kid playing world of tanks could have kicked his ass in real life, lol. |
|
World ain't what it seems, is it Gunny?
|
I have a question for people who would know. Is there value in slinging projectiles at the enemy even though it is well understood those projectiles will probably miss? I'm thinking of a small unit engaging the enemy. I would be tempted to get comfortable and hidden, and wait for a good target so that when I fire somebody is going down.
|
|
SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS
|
Originally Posted By stone-age: I have a question for people who would know. Is there value in slinging projectiles at the enemy even though it is well understood those projectiles will probably miss? I'm thinking of a small unit engaging the enemy. I would be tempted to get comfortable and hidden, and wait for a good target so that when I fire somebody is going down. View Quote Suppressive fire, harrashment fire, or reconnassiance by fire. |
|
In the real world off-campus, good marksmanship trumps good will.
|
Originally Posted By Dagger41: I believe it's inevitable now. Russia has shown its ass and it isn't as pretty as they thought everybody should think. I bet even China is eyeing that country now and waiting to pounce. Nobody would jump in to save Russia either. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Dagger41: Originally Posted By Ryan_Scott: I don’t believe that the west wants Russia to collapse. That’s too dangerous. I believe it's inevitable now. Russia has shown its ass and it isn't as pretty as they thought everybody should think. I bet even China is eyeing that country now and waiting to pounce. Nobody would jump in to save Russia either. Is China more competent/less corrupt though? I’m think not, their military contractors and leadership would have to be above the observable corruption within the nation, stuff like tofu dreg buildings falling apart, the largest gold rehypothication scam in history, cities bankrupting themselves just to temporarily meet insane quotas, the list of corruption of the CCP is very long, and that’s the stuff that’s made it to our ears. I doubt their military wouldn’t be less corrupt than Russia. |
|
|
Originally Posted By stone-age: What's happening now is better? What if there are only 2 options, russia is strong enough to attack neighbors just because they want to, or, russia is collapsed? The rest of the world needs to build their iron curtain for them. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By stone-age: Originally Posted By Ryan_Scott: I don’t believe that the west wants Russia to collapse. That’s too dangerous. What's happening now is better? What if there are only 2 options, russia is strong enough to attack neighbors just because they want to, or, russia is collapsed? The rest of the world needs to build their iron curtain for them. A wounded Russia but still has it's full empire under control is the ideal situation. Let them spend decades on keeping their populace inline. Broken up we would probably see a strong man leader come back and try to rebuild the commie empire all over again. Yeah wounding them is the best bet. |
|
|
Originally Posted By R0N: Suppressive fire, harrashment fire, or reconnassiance by fire. View Quote I doubt the US military is going to take my totally inexperienced advice. Suppressive fire I get. But still seems like harassing them and reconnassianceing them would be done best by putting bullets in them. I expect a tank would find it quite bothersome for their driver to catch a bullet in the face from a dirtpile. |
|
SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS
|
Originally Posted By stone-age: I doubt the US military is going to take my totally inexperienced advice. Suppressive fire I get. But still seems like harassing them and reconnassianceing them would be done best by putting bullets in them. I expect a tank would find it quite bothersome for their driver to catch a bullet in the face from a dirtpile. View Quote |
|
Partisan: "Should we be nice to you in hopes we could get sent to one of the good camps?"
Vacaduck: "We're Californians. We're already in a camp." |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.