User Panel
Quoted: Ummmm....am I the first to think it was likely the US? Removes Russian bargaining chip, teaches the Germans a lesson, increases reliance on the US. Also, we're probably the only interested party that has the technical capability to get it done. View Quote My first thought was 'it's us.' |
|
If I was betting money I'd bet escalation from here is a certainty.
At least one side doesn't give a single solitary fuck about their populace or that of their allies. The US treasury 10 year bond will break a recent record when smart investors cogitate how nuts the decision makers in this freak show truly are. |
|
Quoted: Hell we could have had the Navy emplace charges weeks after the pipeline was laid and remote detonated whenever it was necessary. I am not saying we did or that is how but it is not a far fetched concept. View Quote I don't think Ukraine has the ability to do this. I guess anyone could hire an energy services company, they certainly have the ability, I don't know if they would do it...maybe but I doubt it. That leaves a few other European navies, and the US. The US has the most experience with deep sea exploitation of infrastructure. We have built multiple dedicated submarines for the job. This is kinda wild, I have no idea what really happened but if it's both pipelines the chance that it's random failure is approaching zero. |
|
|
Didn't Russia already stop shipping gas through that pipeline months ago?
|
|
|
Quoted: If I was betting money I'd bet escalation from here is a certainty. At least one side doesn't give a single solitary fuck about their populace or that of their allies. The US treasury 10 year bond will break a recent record when smart investors cogitate how nuts the decision makers in this freak show truly are. View Quote Broken. US 10 year bond 3.92 and rising. |
|
Quoted: As you know methane is a major greenhouse gas. Best to flare it. Plus that will look awesome at night! View Quote Plus one for that. I remember that the Brits dropped napalm on a oil slick from a tanker that had broken up off the coast of Franch to burn off as much of the oil while it was still at sea before it reached the English Coast. When in Doubt?? Kill It With Fire!!! Bigger_Hammer |
|
|
Quoted: Video of bubbles here.
Quoted: https://64.media.tumblr.com/3000517d5d4ec1ba92ca7eda8c966315/tumblr_p0a6msQfn41wzw0ebo1_500.gifv View Quote Quoted: Thread Winner right there!!! Bigger_Hammer |
|
If there's a gas leak about half way in the sea, doesn't that mean someone's getting gas delivered? I'd assume the Russian's would have just shut off the gas going through the pipeline at Slavyanskaya Compressor Station
|
|
|
Quoted: If there's a gas leak about half way in the sea, doesn't that mean someone's getting gas delivered? I'd assume the Russian's would have just shut off the gas going through the pipeline at Slavyanskaya Compressor Station View Quote I'm guessing here but they might keep it pressurized to maintain system integrity and act as a leak detector. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
View Quote Any of our energy business people shed some light? |
|
Quoted: Ummmm....am I the first to think it was likely the US? Removes Russian bargaining chip, teaches the Germans a lesson, increases reliance on the US. Also, we're probably the only interested party that has the technical capability to get it done. View Quote Maybe that'll be the Russian claim - "It wasn't us; it was the Yanks!" |
|
Quoted: Maybe that'll be the Russian claim - "It wasn't us; it was the Yanks!" View Quote Why not just shut it off? I would think we're beyond caring about contracts and law suits at this point... I'm stuck on this viewpoint..I realize..but I think some element of this administration has a raging hard on for destroying Russia or at least Putin. Not just defending Ukraine. |
|
|
View Quote |
|
Quoted: You don’t think the USA has the capability to sabotage that line? It’s so publicly known that American divers exit via torpedo tubes that the navy has shown how it’s done on tv. And deep diving capabilities even in US commercial business is well known. So why isn’t the US capable of doing this? And the US does what it wants when it wants. This has been exhibited time and time again. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: You don’t think the USA has the capability to sabotage that line? It’s so publicly known that American divers exit via torpedo tubes that the navy has shown how it’s done on tv. And deep diving capabilities even in US commercial business is well known. So why isn’t the US capable of doing this? And the US does what it wants when it wants. This has been exhibited time and time again. Re-read the part in red: And other actors with something to gain (Ukraine, OPEC nations, USA) probably either don’t have the undersea capability to sabotage the line, or are strong enough European allies to probably not want to do this. I mean obviously we have reason to “want” to do this, and we undoubtedly have the capability to do so, but I’d frankly be shocked if Biden made the order to do this unilaterally, without at least tacit approval by German or EU partners. |
|
Quoted: Definitely want to be mindful when flying over stuff like that. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: It's definitely leaking. Danish F16s overflew the area (near the Danish island of Bornholm) and reportedly saw "bubbling" on the surface. Definitely want to be mindful when flying over stuff like that. yeah no shit eh |
|
Quoted: Ummmm....am I the first to think it was likely the US? Removes Russian bargaining chip, teaches the Germans a lesson, increases reliance on the US. Also, we're probably the only interested party that has the technical capability to get it done. View Quote China also comes to mind. Widens rift between EU and RU, does long term economic harm to both, doesn't hurt them much at all, encourages Russia to look elsewhere for long term customers. |
|
Quoted: Well, apparently Biden said he'd take out Nord stream:
Looks like we found our saboteur. View Quote If I was the international community, I would find those words pretty damning |
|
Quoted: Unless I misunderstand, Russia is the sole source of gas shipped through those pipes. They control the supply. Why not just shut it off? I would think we're beyond caring about contracts and law suits at this point... I'm stuck on this viewpoint..I realize..but I think some element of this administration has a raging hard on for destroying Russia or at least Putin. Not just defending Ukraine. View Quote Didn't the Russians have a kill-order out on Soros for undermining the ruble years ago? A lot of the world-wide drama in the last few years does seem to fit his MO. |
|
3 different explosions, one registering a 2.3 richter. Russia already salty about the pipeline and fucking with it, Biden threatened to "shut it down" back in February before we convinced Germany to give it up.
The other major pipeline runs through Ukraine...Russia has a history of fucking with undersea cables with their subs, we have entire deep sea explosives teams constantly engaged in classified training...I'm leaning towards NATO (us), but who really knows. One thing is for sure: Germany is getting fucked |
|
Quoted: Just like WE shouldn't have put all our eggs in China's basket Bunch of dumb F politicians all over the place! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
|
Quoted: Unless I misunderstand, Russia is the sole source of gas shipped through those pipes. They control the supply. Why not just shut it off? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Unless I misunderstand, Russia is the sole source of gas shipped through those pipes. They control the supply. Why not just shut it off? If they just shut it off, it makes them the "bad guys". If they sabotage it - and then blame it on the US - it makes the US the "bad guys", and sows division between Europe and America. Quoted: If I was the international community, I would find those words pretty damning Yep - And it gives further credence to any claim the Russians make about the US being responsible for this leak. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Assume that any such report is propaganda. Lies. So's the Rus Attached File https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/kremlin-sabotage-cannot-be-ruled-out-reason-nord-stream-damage-2022-09-27/ |
|
Quoted: I find this a bit…perplexing. Doesn’t make sense for Russia to attack their own pipeline; they can just shut it off (which it sounds like they had more or less done anyway?). Destroying it only takes both leverage and potential much-needed revenue away from them. A genuine accident / unforeseen consequence of shutting it down (or whatever) would seem to be a possibility, but the Germans seem pretty confident it was an intentional attack. And other actors with something to gain (Ukraine, OPEC nations, USA) probably either don’t have the undersea capability to sabotage the line, or are strong enough European allies to probably not want to do this. View Quote If they shut it off, it’s a “fuck you” move. If it “breaks”, it’s… Attached File TC |
|
|
|
Quoted: If they shut it off, it's a "fuck you" move. If it "breaks", it's https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/197999/4D5FA7ED-02B7-4A4C-9B9E-8BEA79E07FA7_jpe-2541216.JPG TC View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I find this a bit perplexing. Doesn't make sense for Russia to attack their own pipeline; they can just shut it off (which it sounds like they had more or less done anyway?). Destroying it only takes both leverage and potential much-needed revenue away from them. A genuine accident / unforeseen consequence of shutting it down (or whatever) would seem to be a possibility, but the Germans seem pretty confident it was an intentional attack. And other actors with something to gain (Ukraine, OPEC nations, USA) probably either don't have the undersea capability to sabotage the line, or are strong enough European allies to probably not want to do this. If they shut it off, it's a "fuck you" move. If it "breaks", it's https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/197999/4D5FA7ED-02B7-4A4C-9B9E-8BEA79E07FA7_jpe-2541216.JPG TC Nord 1 already shut down in August for Maint - never came back and Russia indicated it wouldn't until "collective west" lifts sanctions |
|
If we had a media with any balls they would track these people down now an get a opinion from them now on tape.
|
|
Quoted: If they just shut it off, it makes them the "bad guys". If they sabotage it - and then blame it on the US - it makes the US the "bad guys", and sows division between Europe and America. Yep - And it gives further credence to any claim the Russians make about the US being responsible for this leak. View Quote Russia is repeatedly threatening to use nuclear weapons - I really don't think they give a fuck about looking like the bad guy. Given their difficulty maintaining or building this type of infrastructure, especially under sanctions, it would not make any sense for them to do it. |
|
Quoted: Russia is repeatedly threatening to use nuclear weapons - I really don't think they give a fuck about looking like the bad guy. Given their difficulty maintaining or building this type of infrastructure, especially under sanctions, it would not make any sense for them to do it. View Quote Definitely the US benefits the most from this pipeline being down. That doesn't definitely mean we did it, but I'm leaning that way until we know more. |
|
Quoted: Definitely the US benefits the most from this pipeline being down. That doesn't definitely mean we did it, but I'm leaning that way until we know more. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Russia is repeatedly threatening to use nuclear weapons - I really don't think they give a fuck about looking like the bad guy. Given their difficulty maintaining or building this type of infrastructure, especially under sanctions, it would not make any sense for them to do it. Definitely the US benefits the most from this pipeline being down. That doesn't definitely mean we did it, but I'm leaning that way until we know more. Yeah. Me too.
|
|
|
|
With the slowdown (and probably stoppage) of gas out of the fields in Russia, they will be forced to shutdown the wells, or let them be damaged (same thing, really).
This happed before and it took 30 years to get it all working again. |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.