Does #4 include having borders that mean something?

I'm in as long as it's called the Palmetto party

Don't get me wrong, I agree strongly with every point raised in this proposed "movement". That's what *should* happen. I just don't see it going anywhere.

We should have been building alternate communications networks over the past few decades that the socialists couldn't control. We should have our own internet. But we didn't build it, and now they're about to silence us all. We will not be able to stop it, because they control every relevant leverage point.

Once we're unable to communicate, it'll be easy for them to continue the indoctrination of the populate and to silence those who still dissent.

China laid out the map for this. That's the model we're going to follow. The Great Reset is simply a Western version of Chinese fascism, with a globalist flavor. Buying another 4 years to prepare for that with Trump was our last shot at stopping it.

The way I see it, we're stuck in a box with a bunch of fucking venomous snakes, and if we don't get out of the box we're all done for. Staying in the box isn't a winning proposition.

I’m in 100%.

ETA: I sent you an IM.

ANTICOM

I've been thinking the very same thing this morning.

I was going for America First Party and think America First should be the first priority of the party.

One of my thoughts.

Term Limits, the party will not back any candidate that choses to run for more than two terms NO EXCEPTIONS.

@Jman_JJE

You should get in touch with Jack Murphy.

Attached File

I'm all for any attempt to retake our Republic from the elites.

IN!!!

For sure.

Innovation and Communication.

Twitter/ Facebook have a stranglehold on society. Tech is leading the world and shaping society. I went to SCAD and a lot of my peers went on to tech companies like Google, IBM, Facebook, and other mega heavyweights that are shaping our society. My peers are/were 95% liberal- no need to explain.

Creative ideation sessions on design teams aren't just about picking pretty colors and enhancing button placement on User interfaces, they focus on reframing the issue.  It's a deep dive into human ergonomics, habbits, thought processes, what they ate for breakfast etc. They are exhaustively building a product that captivates users and this has given them a monopoly on communication. How many conservatives do you know that won't give up Facebook pre-election or post-election?


I see this as a keystone issue. Twitter suppressing the Hunter Biden laptop alone could have flipped the election. Liberals are dominating movies, education, news, social media, music etc. We need not just an opposing news channel (that's a start) or a faux Facebook /Twitter competitor. We need our own innovative strategic approach, a tech trojan horse. What that will look like IDK. It could start as an app for gardening for all I know. Hell Tik Tok has the power to morph the next generation's perception on the 2A more than the NRA can or did in 50 years and TikTok has been here for 2 years and started as an app for users to sing along to songs.

We need a better way to combat the narrative. If I had your capital I would also be looking to invest in long term innovative ways that might not seem like they are a direct approach.  A news channel is just a start, but it isn't strategic enough like the social media giants are.


One of the best reframe examples I saw recently was a project Jordan Peterson was funding. He wants (hopefully still) to start a new untraditional online platform for higher learning. One where you can accredit your compiled knowledge, getting rid of the traditional student teacher in a classroom hierarchy. Lots of us already are self-motivated to read forums and watch youtube videos etc in things that interest us and we become near subject matter experts (this forum is a good example, how many here are actual gunsmiths? and how many could be if we wanted to? It wouldn't be a large leap for some). We are just missing a few golden puzzle pieces and a seal of approval from those who are. We have access to loads of information and having it congregated and restricted to the halls of an institute with biased authority figures with sometimes no real-world experience does seem like a dated model. I think the project was a great example of a reframing of the educational system utilizing existing technology, end-user habits, and trends.  I am excited to see more development on that project.  

This example of a tech approach has the power to reshape one of the biggest hurdles to conservativism: youth indoctrination through education


Lets think innovatively one side has and they are dominating



Glad to be a part of PSA

I think it comes down to the fact that there are a lot of Big Government elites and Big Business elites joining together to control us. Everyone can see it happening, no one likes the feeling, but no one knows how to stop it. Stopping that is the goal

I'm no politician and I will never go into politics, but the bold in your comment above is the avenue I am looking at pushing.

In to see where this goes.....

Whether this ends up as a “thought exercise “ or something that gets off the ground, Thank you for at least trying....

The patriot party

And campaign spending limits from all sources.

Maybe

150 M representative
250 M senate

750 M president

At least it would clear the airwaves and mailbox.

This. There is one. The GOP is shit.

Obama rocked the political landscape when he hired a design firm out of Chicago to brand him. Logo, mission statement, keywords analysis to put in his speeches etc all came from studying people.

I'm a firm believer that a good "end-user design" approach can uncover qualitative and quantitative data and insights. Insights will give us an idea of possible products/system solutions. We are talking about people at the root of this. Let's study people. Hate to be vague but it's a complicated issue that needs to start by stepping back for a min, analyzing, and innovating. Like I said earlier one solution may be something unorthodox like funding a new modern boy scouts.

A Video Channel or Social Media Platform is just asking to be built for us.

I agree with this. We need to have a funding mechanism to support conservative values. Such as a credit card company that can be used and a portion of the profits go to pro American causes. This could be done in insurance, media, banking etc. The companies would reject woke ideology. It would simply be we are a XYZ company that loves America and Americans, we will never use profits off of you to tear down this country.

I would love to invest in something like that, If someone had a skill set to start it I would fund it.

I’m right up the road, I’m in with our PSA overlords.

One for us would be a good and start. But I'm thinking along the lines of a widespread adoption platform. An open house, not a clubhouse. One where we have liberals using it without them knowing it's a "conservative " platform. Gab and Parler are just red twitter.

All for it, but how will you get candidates in when you're going up against blatant fraud when it comes to voting?

Everything that comes out of this needs to be for the masses.

Let’s do it    


I have no idea how.  

We will push for voting reforms like the left pushes their issues. This is surprisingly not that difficult to get things done. We changed the brace debacle within about 5 days. If you professionally put pressure on issues, explain it to the people and don't sound shrill you can get a lot done.

Nice! Welcome aboard.
My thoughts on the points so far:

1. This one is going to be hard, while allowing people and the businesses they run to make their own decisions. It could probably be accomplished by getting rid of section 230 though. Take the hit, let the social media that fails because they get sued out of existence fail and let the market work it out. Realistically social media should not be done by large companies, they will ALWAYS end up corrupt. Something more akin to bittorrent or encrypted file sharing that works faster and better when more people join would be better. No source to shut down then. Nobody to sue either.

2. No argument on this one.

3. Needs rewording. My dad doesn't know WTF wokeness is. Needs to be on the flip side like "feeling hurt about something does not result in the right to anything"

4. Add a clause about "immigration will be strictly controlled and with the sole goal of benefiting the Citizens of the United States".  Someone who is poor is not let in simply because they are poor. Same with "broken country" or whatever else. Most of the time the reason those countries are poor or broken, are the ones trying to get here.  Also, we need to get with the rest of the world and drop birthplace citizenship. That was useful in the 1800s. It is not now.

5. I agree, but that's a hard a hard road to climb.

6. This is our only hope to get out of economic collapse. Reducing spending, stopping taxes, or any other bullshit won't work.

7. Yes, however, this needs a "how will that get done" clause. bureaucrats are 99% of the problem here, the revolving door from pentagon to defense contractor (as an example) causes this.

8. Yup.

I'm certainly in to hear more.

Honestly anyone who doesn't what to be a politician, is the exact persons we need doing so. I've never had proper political representation my entire life, so if this gets off the ground I'll be exited.

How about a "draftee" politician, who's only power is to force a new state election. Selected by playing the lottery (so if you play, you might win money, but you also might win politician draft).  They are in for 1 year or until they call their first mandatory re-election. The state they are gets all their senators and representatives sent home until they are elected.

At first I was suspicious of the new account but if indeed you are owner of PSA then I am glad and excited to read your plan.

We really do need a new movement that isn't tied to a single personality and can encompass all of us who have become disillusioned and need a better way. I'm in.

Mods need to sticky this.

1. It needs Money.

2. Most likely that money will come in the form of small donations from average people. Don't expect any big donors or corporations (and really, you wouldn't want that anyways)

3. To convince people to send the money, you'd damn well need to be trustworthy, accountable, and transparent.        Have a good plan for where that money will go.  

4. You will need to spend much of that money on media. There will be no free media coverage for such an effort.  That includes social media.    

5. See #1.



By "you" I'm of course not referring specifically to the OP, but to anybody who would set up a new party.

100% term limits. It should be a government of the people by the people not for the elite by the career politicians.
I've been thinking about this. Maybe 2 4 year terms in any political position and then you are out for life

Secure Vote

Should be interesting to see how the silicon valley tech innovators will develop blockchain voting, presuming they are at the forefront of most tech. I understand the principle of blockchain and how it can be used to create a secure ledger of voters hopefully putting an end to the mess that is voter roles but the problem I see is that you have to make transparent everyone's vote to ensure accuracy. When people are this divided, it's better we don't have "lists of the opposition". I can't see anyone getting on board with that transparency in the current tribal climate. maybe some IT wizards have some comments.

I think you'd achieve your goals easier by taking over the republican party.

Start by running candidates in primaries against the worst of the R's

Start running candidates in local school boards against the left leaning board members

Start taking over local Republican cities, counties and precinct groups.

Once you take over these areas go on to the next level up.

Count me in. We definitely need a new party to represent the people.

The media platforms as well.

This is a little off topic but falls in the overall aspect of the assault on us we see daily.

I assume PSA has pockets deep enough to establish a financial channel that cannot be influenced by the anti's and cancel culture and can distribute a portion of the profits to such causes?

I imagine if PSA had it's own bank/credit union with signature credit card (or partnership cards) some of the hurdles current card companies and banks are throwing at the gun industry could be dismissed as it would open many many doors for PSA and the gun/pro American community.

Just thinking out loud.

I'm in. 100% agree.

The Republican party will not allow itself to be taken over, that alone should be clear after the last 4 years. The truth is it can't be taken over because it is just one half of the system that controls us.

The Republican party will need to fade away and be replaced by something real. I doubt it can be done within the current system without a reset, but we need to start somewhere when it comes to organizing together.

That could be a good marketing allure to get new independents or crossover voters onboard to our party and make it seem more open than inclusive. You can get in and out, don't have to wear the colors or buy the jersey. Just support a candidate for a term or two then go back to your party.  We, as a new party, have our own internal self-imposed term limits.

Kinda like when you just buy a meme lower for your other brand build, then your back three months later for 4 rifle kits at 399$

The political side would be funded by the media, credit card, banking, insurance etc companies that we would start that are pro American. Their charter would be that they can only support pro American causes. They would be "patriot companies". This way people would not have to send their money to companies to have it used to tear America down. The left has funded their anti American crusades with big business for years and we need to do the same.

We are no longer one country. One persons' terrorist is now anothers' Martyr. We are the disunited states of America. When the Dems use Kamala Harris's VP override to usher in the 51st and 52nd "States" the Republican party will have no means to ever regain majority not that it really mattered. It became a cultural civil war as soon as they decided to infringe on our personal lives and hold themselves to different standards. The only answer is to start anew and try to learn from prior mistakes. GODSPEED

I've had people already ask me if PSA has a credit card ...
HD, Lowes, Harbor Freight, why not PSA

Correct. We establish with these eighth principles what it means to be a republican. We give the party its vision back and fund the proper candidates.

I like the name that someone else came up with in another thread; the Freedom America Party.

F
A
P

The Tea Party set very ambitious goals, and fizzled out. Working from the bottom up is sensible.

We are thinking the same. It is already in the works. We want it to be card and banking for daily use. It would not be affiliated with PSA.

JJE Capital has the resources to do this. The nice thing is that there is only JJ&E and the three of us support the cause 100 percent. There is no board that we have to answer to that can change things. Just two friends who met at Clemson ROTC and a third friend we have done business with for years.

That would be awesome.  Even being in Iowa I would consider it as it would remove the concern of a big bank or other trying to decide what is best for me.

Kudos to you and I hope this pans out as it will certainly open a lot of doors and a large influx of cash to be used for Pro American/America agendas.

God Bless America and God Bless PSA!

Tag. Want to believe.