User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 2/5/2021 10:04:53 AM EDT
[#1]
I have this lens, I've discussed it here a few times.
For me, it fits a nice niche for travel (real travel) when I just simply don't want to lug a bunch of stuff that I may or may not use, and then gets in the way of enjoying the trip. This lens does pretty much everything, and pretty well, too, but does nothing spectacularly except save space and weight. It's not crazy fast, it's not crazy sharp. It IS lightweight and versatile. Overall, it fits my needs well, and I give it 4 out of 5 stars. It is nice quality, feels good in hand, and has taken a few knocks will no ill effects. I have the trinity, great primes, micro(macro), and a couple of specialty lenses, all by Nikkor, and I am not afraid to spend on quality gear, so I have a good perspective on what it is and isn't. I think it's worth the $1K. Unfortunatley, I do not have any real experience side by side with a Sigma or Tamron equivalent lens. edit to add: It rides on a D850, if that matters to you. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/5/2021 5:04:38 PM EDT
[#2]
maybe try ebay for a good used Tamron? even more savings. don't know how the Tamron compares to the Nikon, tho.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/5/2021 7:34:34 PM EDT
[#3]
80-400 is a better lens for reaching out. Faster motors ime, and one of the all-time greats for Nikons.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/6/2021 7:43:42 AM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted: 80-400 is a better lens for reaching out. Faster motors ime, and one of the all-time greats for Nikons. I would think that is a bit too bulky for my tastes. ETA: I went back & looked at the 80-400 lens. At 3lbs or so it may not be as bad as I thought. Do you always use a tri or monopod with your lens? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/6/2021 12:49:50 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted: maybe try ebay for a good used Tamron? even more savings. don't know how the Tamron compares to the Nikon, tho. I watch a lot of reviews, Tamron doesn't fare well all that often when compared to Nikon the 28-300 seems to get good reviews, for a all-in-one travel lens |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/6/2021 11:47:04 PM EDT
[#6]
28-300 is probably your best bet. I haven't used one but from what i have seen/heard it is a good one.
I have also used an 18-300 and was surprised to see that it performed better than what the internet said. Also used a 70-300 VR FX my friend paid less than $300 used which is probably hard to beat at that price. I wouldn't hesitate to use any of these for walking about, but i wouldn't pay for new. I went to Norway in March and i just missed the travel ban on the way out, I brought Tamron 24-70 G2, Old Nikon 200mm f4 ai and Voigtlander 58mm. That is my high speed low drag option for now  I have a Tamron 70-200 G1, both my Tamrons are damn good! |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/7/2021 1:11:12 AM EDT
[#7]
I have never been a fan of the superzooms like the 28-300mm due to the optical corner cuts needed to keep the lens affordable.
The 24-120mm is reported to be a great lens. If you are willing to go with a two-lens solution, my recommendation would be to get the 70-300mm AF-S VR lens $500-ish. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/7/2021 9:28:14 AM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I have never been a fan of the superzooms like the 28-300mm due to the optical corner cuts needed to keep the lens affordable. The 24-120mm is reported to be a great lens. If you are willing to go with a two-lens solution, my recommendation would be to get the 70-300mm AF-S VR lens $500-ish. I've got a 70-300mm Nikon AF-S VR 4.5-5.6 but the one time I used it the photos didn't seem "sharp" to me. I probably need to revisit that lens, see if I was doing something wrong with it? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/7/2021 10:50:22 AM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I've got a 70-300mm Nikon AF-S VR 4.5-5.6 but the one time I used it the photos didn't seem "sharp" to me. I probably need to revisit that lens, see if I was doing something wrong with it? If your body supports automatic fine tuning, it might help a bit. It's more effective for primes and smaller range zooms, but for the few minutes it takes to set up, it's probaly worth it. The superzooms are always a compromise. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2021 4:48:49 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I would think that is a bit too bulky for my tastes. ETA: I went back & looked at the 80-400 lens. At 3lbs or so it may not be as bad as I thought. Do you always use a tri or monopod with your lens? I never used it with a tripod, etc., I think with good camera posture just about anyone could handle it easily. It's roughly the same size as Canon's 70-200 if you've ever used one (since they're so popular/common). That said, I am a fairly big guy, so imo. The only lens that I ever really needed a tripod was a 800mm f5.6 prime...that thing was a beast, but it sure was fun. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2021 7:35:48 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The superzooms are always a compromise. Shit, so are the women I go out with............... |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2021 7:58:23 PM EDT
[#12]
What camera are you using, OP?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2021 7:56:02 AM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted: If your body supports automatic fine tuning, it might help a bit. It's more effective for primes and smaller range zooms, but for the few minutes it takes to set up, it's probaly worth it. The superzooms are always a compromise. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: I've got a 70-300mm Nikon AF-S VR 4.5-5.6 but the one time I used it the photos didn't seem "sharp" to me. I probably need to revisit that lens, see if I was doing something wrong with it? If your body supports automatic fine tuning, it might help a bit. It's more effective for primes and smaller range zooms, but for the few minutes it takes to set up, it's probaly worth it. The superzooms are always a compromise. Definitely check to see if AF fine tuning is an option for you. Also check your hand-holding technique and your VR settings. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2021 8:23:33 AM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted: What camera are you using, OP? Nikon D600. Love this camera. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2021 8:24:51 AM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Definitely check to see if AF fine tuning is an option for you. Also check your hand-holding technique and your VR settings. Hand-holding is ok as my other lenses are all sharp on pics except for this one. I probably had an incorrect setting when I was using it. I'll try it again this weekend if the weather co-operates. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
