Jesse Michaels Thread (Page 6 of 10)
|
Originally Posted By tnriverluver: Isn’t it funny how they listen to our conversations?  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-YJbfAMyxkThat is actually it’s own religion. I went down that rabbit hole on Reddit once. https://www.reddit.com/r/EscapingPrisonPlanet/s/H6jmqS4wct |
“How strange it is that man on earth should roam,
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
|
This is really good! I believe we all Already communicate with aliens already to some extent. ETA Iknow for sure something is trying to communicate with me though these repeating numbers that just never end day after day after dAy like I’m stuck in some timeline like the movie Groundhog Day  "The NSA Trained Me to Communicate With Aliens!" - Dan Sherman |
|
Originally Posted By tnriverluver: This is really good! I believe we all Already communicate with aliens already to some extent. ETA Iknow for sure something is trying to communicate with me though these repeating numbers that just never end day after day after dAy like I’m stuck in some timeline like the movie Groundhog Day https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynQIuhWnJsUThat one was really interesting - I started a thread on the guy but there isn’t much to go on with him. One thing that jumped out at me was him matching tones in his head to external tones to get in sync with the communications. If anyone has any ideas on where to find such tones I’d love to find out more. |
Let's Go Red Wings!
Beautifying the world one logo at a time since 1993.
Soli Deo Gloria
Beautifying the world one logo at a time since 1993.
Soli Deo Gloria
|
Originally Posted By macman37: That one was really interesting - I started a thread on the guy but there isn’t much to go on with him. One thing that jumped out at me was him matching tones in his head to external tones to get in sync with the communications. If anyone has any ideas on where to find such tones I’d love to find out more. Originally Posted By macman37: Originally Posted By tnriverluver: This is really good! I believe we all Already communicate with aliens already to some extent. ETA Iknow for sure something is trying to communicate with me though these repeating numbers that just never end day after day after dAy like I’m stuck in some timeline like the movie Groundhog Day https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynQIuhWnJsUThat one was really interesting - I started a thread on the guy but there isn’t much to go on with him. One thing that jumped out at me was him matching tones in his head to external tones to get in sync with the communications. If anyone has any ideas on where to find such tones I’d love to find out more. I think I had access to them until a short while ago when me and many others apparently lost access to some of the still classified C*I Gateway Project frequencies.  They were literally mind bending but there was no directions on how or what to do with them. All the hypnosis stuff is available and quite powerful itself but not the frequencies you listened to for instance Mon-Fri to clear the Pineal gland. This stuff was just so completely different from anything you've ever heard in your lifetime and nothing I've found on YT even comes close. They were unlisted on a different platform with zero way that I am aware of to find them or to share them. I have three that I actually listened to on that platform instead of a different server such as listening through Arf and they remain in my watch history. I kick myself for not watching all of them at least once on that platform. ETA I was able to listen on all of my devices so I let my wife listen to a couple of them. However I could copy the link and send it to my wife and all sorts of videos with the exact same number sequence in the title would come up but never the correct one. |
|
Originally Posted By macman37: Started the Gary MacKinnon interview. Dunno what to make of the guy; he doesn’t give me bad vibes and he’s interesting. I’m excited to get through it. I listened to it in the truck today. It was less information than I had hoped for but it was entertaining enough. |
TEAM GIMMICK 2026
|
Jesse’s Patreon has a 4 hour Eric Davis / Eric Weinstein interview up. This one is epic. Both Erics makes a great point. Scientific or engineering data needs to leak from the reverse engineering program. We need to see a few formulas to see if there is actual physics going on with ARVs. @Kagetora will love this one. Soon as it releases on youtube ill post it. https://www.patreon.com/posts/eric-weinstein-152478629 Attached File |
“How strange it is that man on earth should roam,
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
| Jesse is one very busy guy as of late with the UFO subject. I got into him when he was doing the ancient Egypt stuff that I was posting about in General. The dude is smart and at least researches as much as possible before each long interview. I myself don't know how he does it all. |
|
Originally Posted By tnriverluver: Jesse is one very busy guy as of late with the UFO subject. I got into him when he was doing the ancient Egypt stuff that I was posting about in General. The dude is smart and at least researches as much as possible before each long interview. I myself don't know how he does it all. Young energetic man, eidetic memory, with Peter Theil’s backing. |
“How strange it is that man on earth should roam,
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
|
Originally Posted By sq40: Jesse’s Patreon has a 4 hour Eric Davis / Eric Weinstein interview up. This one is epic. Both Erics makes a great point. Scientific or engineering data needs to leak from the reverse engineering program. We need to see a few formulas to see if there is actual physics going on with ARVs. @Kagetora will love this one. Soon as it releases on youtube ill post it. https://www.patreon.com/posts/eric-weinstein-152478629 https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/49447/IMG_3389_jpeg-3725758.JPG I'm ~1 hour in great listen so far.  Eric Weinstein Demands UFO Secrets From Pentagon Scientist |
|
Originally Posted By anothermisanthrope: I'm ~1 hour in great listen so far. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnxasfyHtfoThe second half with just Weinstein, he is brutal man. His take that Lazar was just a “janitor” at S4 and is repeating “water cooler” talk in layman's terms… it’s interesting, because he says there are some uncommon scientific ideas that back up what Lazar says if you interpret them a different way, around zero point energy. I do think he misses the point on physicists. He says the notable ones are such a small group you can meet all of them. The whole community is small, and none are really working on UAPs. He notes the people with physics graduate degrees don’t seem to get recruited. But who is to say that they are in official public or private universities? What if they scout talent from an early age and have special schools for these minds that aren't public knowledge. |
“How strange it is that man on earth should roam,
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
|
Originally Posted By sq40: The second half with just Weinstein, he is brutal man. His take that Lazar was just a “janitor” at S4 and is repeating “water cooler” talk in layman's terms… it’s interesting, because he says there are some uncommon scientific ideas that back up what Lazar says if you interpret them a different way, around zero point energy. I do think he misses the point on physicists. He says the notable ones are such a small group you can meet all of them. The whole community is small, and none are really working on UAPs. He notes the people with physics graduate degrees don’t seem to get recruited. But who is to say that they are in official public or private universities? What if they scout talent from an early age and have special schools for these minds that aren't public knowledge. Originally Posted By sq40: Originally Posted By anothermisanthrope: I'm ~1 hour in great listen so far. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnxasfyHtfoThe second half with just Weinstein, he is brutal man. His take that Lazar was just a “janitor” at S4 and is repeating “water cooler” talk in layman's terms… it’s interesting, because he says there are some uncommon scientific ideas that back up what Lazar says if you interpret them a different way, around zero point energy. I do think he misses the point on physicists. He says the notable ones are such a small group you can meet all of them. The whole community is small, and none are really working on UAPs. He notes the people with physics graduate degrees don’t seem to get recruited. But who is to say that they are in official public or private universities? What if they scout talent from an early age and have special schools for these minds that aren't public knowledge. Finally finished - I really enjoyed the episode. A lot of meat on that bone. I think it's good for the brain to listen to Really Smart Guys talk about things like General Relativity. And do it politely. I think Dr. Weinstein takes too strong of a pragmatic approach, maybe to detriment, but I appreciate why. You could tell who the adult was in the room. To the Lazar thing - it sounds like someone like me trying to describe whatever the fuck they were talking about with equations (in regards to Bob's gravity A and B claims) when you're just a dummy who strapped rockets to cars. That's gonna get a second listen. |
|
Originally Posted By anothermisanthrope: Finally finished - I really enjoyed the episode. A lot of meat on that bone. I think it's good for the brain to listen to Really Smart Guys talk about things like General Relativity. And do it politely. I think Dr. Weinstein takes too strong of a pragmatic approach, maybe to detriment, but I appreciate why. You could tell who the adult was in the room. To the Lazar thing - it sounds like someone like me trying to describe whatever the fuck they were talking about with equations (in regards to Bob's gravity A and B claims) when you're just a dummy who strapped rockets to cars. That's gonna get a second listen. Originally Posted By anothermisanthrope: Originally Posted By sq40: Originally Posted By anothermisanthrope: I'm ~1 hour in great listen so far. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnxasfyHtfoThe second half with just Weinstein, he is brutal man. His take that Lazar was just a "janitor" at S4 and is repeating "water cooler" talk in layman's terms it's interesting, because he says there are some uncommon scientific ideas that back up what Lazar says if you interpret them a different way, around zero point energy. I do think he misses the point on physicists. He says the notable ones are such a small group you can meet all of them. The whole community is small, and none are really working on UAPs. He notes the people with physics graduate degrees don't seem to get recruited. But who is to say that they are in official public or private universities? What if they scout talent from an early age and have special schools for these minds that aren't public knowledge. Finally finished - I really enjoyed the episode. A lot of meat on that bone. I think it's good for the brain to listen to Really Smart Guys talk about things like General Relativity. And do it politely. I think Dr. Weinstein takes too strong of a pragmatic approach, maybe to detriment, but I appreciate why. You could tell who the adult was in the room. To the Lazar thing - it sounds like someone like me trying to describe whatever the fuck they were talking about with equations (in regards to Bob's gravity A and B claims) when you're just a dummy who strapped rockets to cars. That's gonna get a second listen. I think he's on to something big that's buried beneath the "sick pedophile that was trying to make baby factories" top layer and we have to wonder how much nonsense was added to the story of Epstein to throw people off the trail and dismiss everything as "he was just a nutcase with sick interests". |
Everything posted above is factual. Maybe.
|
Originally Posted By Cypher214: Eric is piecing things together that nobody has even thought to look at involving anti-gravity research clues and, separately, Epstein's interest in nuclear scientists. It's taboo to say it but, in a nutshell: "I don't give a shit about the pedophilia, tell me where his money came from and why he was trying to get close to our top scientists in the fields most vital to national security?" I think he's on to something big that's buried beneath the "sick pedophile that was trying to make baby factories" top layer and we have to wonder how much nonsense was added to the story of Epstein to throw people off the trail and dismiss everything as "he was just a nutcase with sick interests". Originally Posted By Cypher214: Originally Posted By anothermisanthrope: Originally Posted By sq40: Originally Posted By anothermisanthrope: I'm ~1 hour in great listen so far. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnxasfyHtfoThe second half with just Weinstein, he is brutal man. His take that Lazar was just a "janitor" at S4 and is repeating "water cooler" talk in layman's terms it's interesting, because he says there are some uncommon scientific ideas that back up what Lazar says if you interpret them a different way, around zero point energy. I do think he misses the point on physicists. He says the notable ones are such a small group you can meet all of them. The whole community is small, and none are really working on UAPs. He notes the people with physics graduate degrees don't seem to get recruited. But who is to say that they are in official public or private universities? What if they scout talent from an early age and have special schools for these minds that aren't public knowledge. Finally finished - I really enjoyed the episode. A lot of meat on that bone. I think it's good for the brain to listen to Really Smart Guys talk about things like General Relativity. And do it politely. I think Dr. Weinstein takes too strong of a pragmatic approach, maybe to detriment, but I appreciate why. You could tell who the adult was in the room. To the Lazar thing - it sounds like someone like me trying to describe whatever the fuck they were talking about with equations (in regards to Bob's gravity A and B claims) when you're just a dummy who strapped rockets to cars. That's gonna get a second listen. I think he's on to something big that's buried beneath the "sick pedophile that was trying to make baby factories" top layer and we have to wonder how much nonsense was added to the story of Epstein to throw people off the trail and dismiss everything as "he was just a nutcase with sick interests". Somewhere in the 3 million other pages we will not see. Epstein has long been said to be heavily involved with this subject and he and Glistine were absolutely fascinated with finding Atlantis. Maybe if Trump actually is able to disclose some stuff that truth will come out as well. Not holding my breath though. But we deserve to know the truth! ETA Just pray the world doesn't blow up before the truth comes out! ETA2 As well as why JFK was really assassinated
|
|
Originally Posted By sq40: The second half with just Weinstein, he is brutal man. His take that Lazar was just a “janitor” at S4 and is repeating “water cooler” talk in layman's terms… it’s interesting, because he says there are some uncommon scientific ideas that back up what Lazar says if you interpret them a different way, around zero point energy. I do think he misses the point on physicists. He says the notable ones are such a small group you can meet all of them. The whole community is small, and none are really working on UAPs. He notes the people with physics graduate degrees don’t seem to get recruited. But who is to say that they are in official public or private universities? What if they scout talent from an early age and have special schools for these minds that aren't public knowledge. Originally Posted By sq40: Originally Posted By anothermisanthrope: I'm ~1 hour in great listen so far. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnxasfyHtfoThe second half with just Weinstein, he is brutal man. His take that Lazar was just a “janitor” at S4 and is repeating “water cooler” talk in layman's terms… it’s interesting, because he says there are some uncommon scientific ideas that back up what Lazar says if you interpret them a different way, around zero point energy. I do think he misses the point on physicists. He says the notable ones are such a small group you can meet all of them. The whole community is small, and none are really working on UAPs. He notes the people with physics graduate degrees don’t seem to get recruited. But who is to say that they are in official public or private universities? What if they scout talent from an early age and have special schools for these minds that aren't public knowledge. He misses the point IMO that "they" don't want these things figured out by mankind. If this tech originates from other "people" they can and maybe have simply explained the physics to those that have needed to know. I feel like the truth is the tech is so energy dense as to be so potentially dangerous that the entire plan at this point is to supress the tech/physics at all costs. The experience of the leaking of atomic bomb knowledge so fast demonstrates the importance of sequestration. |
|
Originally Posted By TLD05: He misses the point IMO that "they" don't want these things figured out by mankind. If this tech originates from other "people" they can and maybe have simply explained the physics to those that have needed to know. I feel like the truth is the tech is so energy dense as to be so potentially dangerous that the entire plan at this point is to supress the tech/physics at all costs. The experience of the leaking of atomic bomb knowledge so fast demonstrates the importance of sequestration. The same can be said of CERN. They are playing with things we have no real understanding of. Between the possible time manipulation and the possibility of opening a giant black hole my personal feelings are they need to shut that thing down now. Once they started operating at very high power levels weird shit has started happening. I have no understanding of the physics/quantum physics involved but I don’t think they know much better either. Especially if it is true that beings from 45,000 years in the future stepped through that portal they opened up. And that video has mysteriously vanished! |
|
Originally Posted By TLD05: He misses the point IMO that "they" don't want these things figured out by mankind. If this tech originates from other "people" they can and maybe have simply explained the physics to those that have needed to know. I feel like the truth is the tech is so energy dense as to be so potentially dangerous that the entire plan at this point is to supress the tech/physics at all costs. The experience of the leaking of atomic bomb knowledge so fast demonstrates the importance of sequestration. Originally Posted By TLD05: Originally Posted By sq40: Originally Posted By anothermisanthrope: I'm ~1 hour in great listen so far. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnxasfyHtfoThe second half with just Weinstein, he is brutal man. His take that Lazar was just a "janitor" at S4 and is repeating "water cooler" talk in layman's terms it's interesting, because he says there are some uncommon scientific ideas that back up what Lazar says if you interpret them a different way, around zero point energy. I do think he misses the point on physicists. He says the notable ones are such a small group you can meet all of them. The whole community is small, and none are really working on UAPs. He notes the people with physics graduate degrees don't seem to get recruited. But who is to say that they are in official public or private universities? What if they scout talent from an early age and have special schools for these minds that aren't public knowledge. He misses the point IMO that "they" don't want these things figured out by mankind. If this tech originates from other "people" they can and maybe have simply explained the physics to those that have needed to know. I feel like the truth is the tech is so energy dense as to be so potentially dangerous that the entire plan at this point is to supress the tech/physics at all costs. The experience of the leaking of atomic bomb knowledge so fast demonstrates the importance of sequestration. Tesla's work might have been scooped up and classified for a VERY good reason that went much deeper than "oil companies need to make money". |
Everything posted above is factual. Maybe.
|
One of the sub plots of the Hyperion Cantos has a team in Kiev trying to create an artificial black hole to create an Einstein-Rosen bridge. It went wrong and slowly destroyed the world. If you follow Wolfram’s unified theory. Which bad branching AND merging timelines, it could be inferred that naturally timelines diverge and the. Come together sometimes many branches later, creating the Mandela effect. But really. Back on the Eric interview, his most logical explanation is that because the NHI are humanoid or human like, they must be part of the primate family tree. Perhaps they evolved here and choose to live in a safer pocket universe/dimension? |
“How strange it is that man on earth should roam,
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
|
This guy, who I don’t personally like, has put together a theory that the whole Epstein operation was a continuation of the Third Reich. It makes sense if what he says is true.  The Epstein UFO Theory No One Talks About (ft. Jason Jorjani) |
“How strange it is that man on earth should roam,
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
|
Originally Posted By HighlanderI: In order to avoid recurring cataclysms; giant asteroids, huge volcanic eruptions, massive solar flares, ice ages, etc. Originally Posted By HighlanderI: Originally Posted By sq40: Perhaps they evolved here and choose to live in a safer pocket universe/dimension? In order to avoid recurring cataclysms; giant asteroids, huge volcanic eruptions, massive solar flares, ice ages, etc. The surface of the Earth is a dangerous place on even a millennial timeline. |
“How strange it is that man on earth should roam,
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
|
Originally Posted By Cypher214: It would be interesting to learn the suppression of zero point energy had nothing to do with protecting oil profits but was actually done because the technology is capable of extraordinary destruction. Tesla's work might have been scooped up and classified for a VERY good reason that went much deeper than "oil companies need to make money". Originally Posted By Cypher214: Originally Posted By TLD05: Originally Posted By sq40: Originally Posted By anothermisanthrope: I'm ~1 hour in great listen so far. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnxasfyHtfoThe second half with just Weinstein, he is brutal man. His take that Lazar was just a "janitor" at S4 and is repeating "water cooler" talk in layman's terms it's interesting, because he says there are some uncommon scientific ideas that back up what Lazar says if you interpret them a different way, around zero point energy. I do think he misses the point on physicists. He says the notable ones are such a small group you can meet all of them. The whole community is small, and none are really working on UAPs. He notes the people with physics graduate degrees don't seem to get recruited. But who is to say that they are in official public or private universities? What if they scout talent from an early age and have special schools for these minds that aren't public knowledge. He misses the point IMO that "they" don't want these things figured out by mankind. If this tech originates from other "people" they can and maybe have simply explained the physics to those that have needed to know. I feel like the truth is the tech is so energy dense as to be so potentially dangerous that the entire plan at this point is to supress the tech/physics at all costs. The experience of the leaking of atomic bomb knowledge so fast demonstrates the importance of sequestration. Tesla's work might have been scooped up and classified for a VERY good reason that went much deeper than "oil companies need to make money". To me it is logical. Eric gets into a fit about these programs not having theoretical physicists to help figure out the modalities of the tech. IMO it speaks to the possibility that the point might be to not find the answers. When I replied to this thread last night I hadn't heard the last 30 minutes of the interview and he does postulate that String was made to throw the rest of the world off the trail of this very powerful physics paradigm. He simultaneously holds that idea but cannot reconcile it with the idea that it may be figured out, hidden from him and the public and he isn't in the inner circle.  He's a very smart guy with some cognitive dissonance. |
|
Originally Posted By TLD05: To me it is logical. Eric gets into a fit about these programs not having theoretical physicists to help figure out the modalities of the tech. IMO it speaks to the possibility that the point might be to not find the answers. When I replied to this thread last night I hadn't heard the last 30 minutes of the interview and he does postulate that String was made to throw the rest of the world off the trail of this very powerful physics paradigm. He simultaneously holds that idea but cannot reconcile it with the idea that it may be figured out, hidden from him and the public and he isn't in the inner circle. He's a very smart guy with some cognitive dissonance. Originally Posted By TLD05: Originally Posted By Cypher214: Originally Posted By TLD05: Originally Posted By sq40: Originally Posted By anothermisanthrope: I'm ~1 hour in great listen so far. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnxasfyHtfoThe second half with just Weinstein, he is brutal man. His take that Lazar was just a "janitor" at S4 and is repeating "water cooler" talk in layman's terms it's interesting, because he says there are some uncommon scientific ideas that back up what Lazar says if you interpret them a different way, around zero point energy. I do think he misses the point on physicists. He says the notable ones are such a small group you can meet all of them. The whole community is small, and none are really working on UAPs. He notes the people with physics graduate degrees don't seem to get recruited. But who is to say that they are in official public or private universities? What if they scout talent from an early age and have special schools for these minds that aren't public knowledge. He misses the point IMO that "they" don't want these things figured out by mankind. If this tech originates from other "people" they can and maybe have simply explained the physics to those that have needed to know. I feel like the truth is the tech is so energy dense as to be so potentially dangerous that the entire plan at this point is to supress the tech/physics at all costs. The experience of the leaking of atomic bomb knowledge so fast demonstrates the importance of sequestration. Tesla's work might have been scooped up and classified for a VERY good reason that went much deeper than "oil companies need to make money". To me it is logical. Eric gets into a fit about these programs not having theoretical physicists to help figure out the modalities of the tech. IMO it speaks to the possibility that the point might be to not find the answers. When I replied to this thread last night I hadn't heard the last 30 minutes of the interview and he does postulate that String was made to throw the rest of the world off the trail of this very powerful physics paradigm. He simultaneously holds that idea but cannot reconcile it with the idea that it may be figured out, hidden from him and the public and he isn't in the inner circle. He's a very smart guy with some cognitive dissonance. I've heard more than once from different sources that String, which I don't understand to begin with, was just that and continues to be used by most. |
|
Originally Posted By TLD05: To me it is logical. Eric gets into a fit about these programs not having theoretical physicists to help figure out the modalities of the tech. IMO it speaks to the possibility that the point might be to not find the answers. When I replied to this thread last night I hadn't heard the last 30 minutes of the interview and he does postulate that String was made to throw the rest of the world off the trail of this very powerful physics paradigm. He simultaneously holds that idea but cannot reconcile it with the idea that it may be figured out, hidden from him and the public and he isn't in the inner circle. He's a very smart guy with some cognitive dissonance. Originally Posted By TLD05: Originally Posted By Cypher214: Originally Posted By TLD05: Originally Posted By sq40: Originally Posted By anothermisanthrope: I'm ~1 hour in great listen so far. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnxasfyHtfoThe second half with just Weinstein, he is brutal man. His take that Lazar was just a "janitor" at S4 and is repeating "water cooler" talk in layman's terms it's interesting, because he says there are some uncommon scientific ideas that back up what Lazar says if you interpret them a different way, around zero point energy. I do think he misses the point on physicists. He says the notable ones are such a small group you can meet all of them. The whole community is small, and none are really working on UAPs. He notes the people with physics graduate degrees don't seem to get recruited. But who is to say that they are in official public or private universities? What if they scout talent from an early age and have special schools for these minds that aren't public knowledge. He misses the point IMO that "they" don't want these things figured out by mankind. If this tech originates from other "people" they can and maybe have simply explained the physics to those that have needed to know. I feel like the truth is the tech is so energy dense as to be so potentially dangerous that the entire plan at this point is to supress the tech/physics at all costs. The experience of the leaking of atomic bomb knowledge so fast demonstrates the importance of sequestration. Tesla's work might have been scooped up and classified for a VERY good reason that went much deeper than "oil companies need to make money". To me it is logical. Eric gets into a fit about these programs not having theoretical physicists to help figure out the modalities of the tech. IMO it speaks to the possibility that the point might be to not find the answers. When I replied to this thread last night I hadn't heard the last 30 minutes of the interview and he does postulate that String was made to throw the rest of the world off the trail of this very powerful physics paradigm. He simultaneously holds that idea but cannot reconcile it with the idea that it may be figured out, hidden from him and the public and he isn't in the inner circle. He's a very smart guy with some cognitive dissonance. I don’t know if EW has cognitive dissonance or not; I do know that last year-ish (maybe 16 months ago by now) he was hard at work on a new unified theory of physics and was sticking with the string theory being a red herring thing then. He had an interesting interview with Chris Williams IIRC last year (which was the last long-form interview I heard from him) in which he seemed much happier and philosophical, and he seemed like he was getting closer to publishing or revealing this new theory. All this to ask, did he allude to a new theory in this new interview? And, I’ll listen to it asap, but is the purpose of this interview with him and Davis to go head-to-head, or did Jesse put this discussion together so they can try to get to the bottom of what’s going on in UAP-world…? |
Let's Go Red Wings!
Beautifying the world one logo at a time since 1993.
Soli Deo Gloria
Beautifying the world one logo at a time since 1993.
Soli Deo Gloria
|
Originally Posted By tnriverluver: I've heard more than once from different sources that String, which I don't understand to begin with, was just that and continues to be used by most. Originally Posted By tnriverluver: Originally Posted By TLD05: Originally Posted By Cypher214: Originally Posted By TLD05: Originally Posted By sq40: Originally Posted By anothermisanthrope: I'm ~1 hour in great listen so far. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnxasfyHtfoThe second half with just Weinstein, he is brutal man. His take that Lazar was just a "janitor" at S4 and is repeating "water cooler" talk in layman's terms it's interesting, because he says there are some uncommon scientific ideas that back up what Lazar says if you interpret them a different way, around zero point energy. I do think he misses the point on physicists. He says the notable ones are such a small group you can meet all of them. The whole community is small, and none are really working on UAPs. He notes the people with physics graduate degrees don't seem to get recruited. But who is to say that they are in official public or private universities? What if they scout talent from an early age and have special schools for these minds that aren't public knowledge. He misses the point IMO that "they" don't want these things figured out by mankind. If this tech originates from other "people" they can and maybe have simply explained the physics to those that have needed to know. I feel like the truth is the tech is so energy dense as to be so potentially dangerous that the entire plan at this point is to supress the tech/physics at all costs. The experience of the leaking of atomic bomb knowledge so fast demonstrates the importance of sequestration. Tesla's work might have been scooped up and classified for a VERY good reason that went much deeper than "oil companies need to make money". To me it is logical. Eric gets into a fit about these programs not having theoretical physicists to help figure out the modalities of the tech. IMO it speaks to the possibility that the point might be to not find the answers. When I replied to this thread last night I hadn't heard the last 30 minutes of the interview and he does postulate that String was made to throw the rest of the world off the trail of this very powerful physics paradigm. He simultaneously holds that idea but cannot reconcile it with the idea that it may be figured out, hidden from him and the public and he isn't in the inner circle. He's a very smart guy with some cognitive dissonance. I've heard more than once from different sources that String, which I don't understand to begin with, was just that and continues to be used by most. I am talking strictly out of my armpit here - I freely admit I an not a theorist or mathematician or physicist - but my going theory is that String may have been invented to keep us rooted in the material… but the truth is closer to what the Donald Hoffmans and other people talking about the nature of consciousness itself are saying. I can’t escape the words (paraphrased; they all say it slightly differently) I keep seeing pop up from a variety of people across many disciplines: Reality is stranger than we think. |
Let's Go Red Wings!
Beautifying the world one logo at a time since 1993.
Soli Deo Gloria
Beautifying the world one logo at a time since 1993.
Soli Deo Gloria
|
Originally Posted By macman37: I don’t know if EW has cognitive dissonance or not; I do know that last year-ish (maybe 16 months ago by now) he was hard at work on a new unified theory of physics and was sticking with the string theory being a red herring thing then. He had an interesting interview with Chris Williams IIRC last year (which was the last long-form interview I heard from him) in which he seemed much happier and philosophical, and he seemed like he was getting closer to publishing or revealing this new theory. All this to ask, did he allude to a new theory in this new interview? And, I’ll listen to it asap, but is the purpose of this interview with him and Davis to go head-to-head, or did Jesse put this discussion together so they can try to get to the bottom of what’s going on in UAP-world…? Originally Posted By macman37: Originally Posted By TLD05: Originally Posted By Cypher214: Originally Posted By TLD05: Originally Posted By sq40: Originally Posted By anothermisanthrope: I'm ~1 hour in great listen so far. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnxasfyHtfoThe second half with just Weinstein, he is brutal man. His take that Lazar was just a "janitor" at S4 and is repeating "water cooler" talk in layman's terms it's interesting, because he says there are some uncommon scientific ideas that back up what Lazar says if you interpret them a different way, around zero point energy. I do think he misses the point on physicists. He says the notable ones are such a small group you can meet all of them. The whole community is small, and none are really working on UAPs. He notes the people with physics graduate degrees don't seem to get recruited. But who is to say that they are in official public or private universities? What if they scout talent from an early age and have special schools for these minds that aren't public knowledge. He misses the point IMO that "they" don't want these things figured out by mankind. If this tech originates from other "people" they can and maybe have simply explained the physics to those that have needed to know. I feel like the truth is the tech is so energy dense as to be so potentially dangerous that the entire plan at this point is to supress the tech/physics at all costs. The experience of the leaking of atomic bomb knowledge so fast demonstrates the importance of sequestration. Tesla's work might have been scooped up and classified for a VERY good reason that went much deeper than "oil companies need to make money". To me it is logical. Eric gets into a fit about these programs not having theoretical physicists to help figure out the modalities of the tech. IMO it speaks to the possibility that the point might be to not find the answers. When I replied to this thread last night I hadn't heard the last 30 minutes of the interview and he does postulate that String was made to throw the rest of the world off the trail of this very powerful physics paradigm. He simultaneously holds that idea but cannot reconcile it with the idea that it may be figured out, hidden from him and the public and he isn't in the inner circle. He's a very smart guy with some cognitive dissonance. I don’t know if EW has cognitive dissonance or not; I do know that last year-ish (maybe 16 months ago by now) he was hard at work on a new unified theory of physics and was sticking with the string theory being a red herring thing then. He had an interesting interview with Chris Williams IIRC last year (which was the last long-form interview I heard from him) in which he seemed much happier and philosophical, and he seemed like he was getting closer to publishing or revealing this new theory. All this to ask, did he allude to a new theory in this new interview? And, I’ll listen to it asap, but is the purpose of this interview with him and Davis to go head-to-head, or did Jesse put this discussion together so they can try to get to the bottom of what’s going on in UAP-world…? Theory of Geometric Unity |
|
Originally Posted By macman37: I don’t know if EW has cognitive dissonance or not; I do know that last year-ish (maybe 16 months ago by now) he was hard at work on a new unified theory of physics and was sticking with the string theory being a red herring thing then. He had an interesting interview with Chris Williams IIRC last year (which was the last long-form interview I heard from him) in which he seemed much happier and philosophical, and he seemed like he was getting closer to publishing or revealing this new theory. All this to ask, did he allude to a new theory in this new interview? And, I’ll listen to it asap, but is the purpose of this interview with him and Davis to go head-to-head, or did Jesse put this discussion together so they can try to get to the bottom of what’s going on in UAP-world…? It was kind of combative in a way. Weinstein was kind of bullying Davis on his ideas and even said something to the effect Davis was wasting is time on his work. |
“How strange it is that man on earth should roam,
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
|
Originally Posted By anothermisanthrope: Theory of Geometric Unity Originally Posted By anothermisanthrope: Originally Posted By macman37: Originally Posted By TLD05: Originally Posted By Cypher214: Originally Posted By TLD05: Originally Posted By sq40: Originally Posted By anothermisanthrope: I'm ~1 hour in great listen so far. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnxasfyHtfoThe second half with just Weinstein, he is brutal man. His take that Lazar was just a "janitor" at S4 and is repeating "water cooler" talk in layman's terms it's interesting, because he says there are some uncommon scientific ideas that back up what Lazar says if you interpret them a different way, around zero point energy. I do think he misses the point on physicists. He says the notable ones are such a small group you can meet all of them. The whole community is small, and none are really working on UAPs. He notes the people with physics graduate degrees don't seem to get recruited. But who is to say that they are in official public or private universities? What if they scout talent from an early age and have special schools for these minds that aren't public knowledge. He misses the point IMO that "they" don't want these things figured out by mankind. If this tech originates from other "people" they can and maybe have simply explained the physics to those that have needed to know. I feel like the truth is the tech is so energy dense as to be so potentially dangerous that the entire plan at this point is to supress the tech/physics at all costs. The experience of the leaking of atomic bomb knowledge so fast demonstrates the importance of sequestration. Tesla's work might have been scooped up and classified for a VERY good reason that went much deeper than "oil companies need to make money". To me it is logical. Eric gets into a fit about these programs not having theoretical physicists to help figure out the modalities of the tech. IMO it speaks to the possibility that the point might be to not find the answers. When I replied to this thread last night I hadn't heard the last 30 minutes of the interview and he does postulate that String was made to throw the rest of the world off the trail of this very powerful physics paradigm. He simultaneously holds that idea but cannot reconcile it with the idea that it may be figured out, hidden from him and the public and he isn't in the inner circle. He's a very smart guy with some cognitive dissonance. I don’t know if EW has cognitive dissonance or not; I do know that last year-ish (maybe 16 months ago by now) he was hard at work on a new unified theory of physics and was sticking with the string theory being a red herring thing then. He had an interesting interview with Chris Williams IIRC last year (which was the last long-form interview I heard from him) in which he seemed much happier and philosophical, and he seemed like he was getting closer to publishing or revealing this new theory. All this to ask, did he allude to a new theory in this new interview? And, I’ll listen to it asap, but is the purpose of this interview with him and Davis to go head-to-head, or did Jesse put this discussion together so they can try to get to the bottom of what’s going on in UAP-world…? Theory of Geometric Unity Which is his theory, that goes way over my head, but the leaders and the followers in that proximate field of study pretty much hold their noses when he tries to discuss it with them. It is difficult to listen to him (as a total layperson) at times because he is on one hand so butthurt by academia being so dismissive of his ideas without proof but on the other hand he is the exact dismissive academic to others stories/reporting/experiences while shouting for the same "proof". He may very well be correct but he might be the world's most correct hypocrite of all time. LOL I appreciate him though and I'm glad he uses some portion of his cognitive function to think about important things. |
|
Originally Posted By TLD05: Which is his theory, that goes way over my head, but the leaders and the followers in that proximate field of study pretty much hold their noses when he tries to discuss it with them. It is difficult to listen to him (as a total layperson) at times because he is on one hand so butthurt by academia being so dismissive of his ideas without proof but on the other hand he is the exact dismissive academic to others stories/reporting/experiences while shouting for the same "proof". He may very well be correct but he might be the world's most correct hypocrite of all time. LOL I appreciate him though and I'm glad he uses some portion of his cognitive function to think about important things. Originally Posted By TLD05: Originally Posted By anothermisanthrope: Originally Posted By macman37: Originally Posted By TLD05: Originally Posted By Cypher214: Originally Posted By TLD05: Originally Posted By sq40: Originally Posted By anothermisanthrope: I'm ~1 hour in great listen so far. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnxasfyHtfoThe second half with just Weinstein, he is brutal man. His take that Lazar was just a "janitor" at S4 and is repeating "water cooler" talk in layman's terms it's interesting, because he says there are some uncommon scientific ideas that back up what Lazar says if you interpret them a different way, around zero point energy. I do think he misses the point on physicists. He says the notable ones are such a small group you can meet all of them. The whole community is small, and none are really working on UAPs. He notes the people with physics graduate degrees don't seem to get recruited. But who is to say that they are in official public or private universities? What if they scout talent from an early age and have special schools for these minds that aren't public knowledge. He misses the point IMO that "they" don't want these things figured out by mankind. If this tech originates from other "people" they can and maybe have simply explained the physics to those that have needed to know. I feel like the truth is the tech is so energy dense as to be so potentially dangerous that the entire plan at this point is to supress the tech/physics at all costs. The experience of the leaking of atomic bomb knowledge so fast demonstrates the importance of sequestration. Tesla's work might have been scooped up and classified for a VERY good reason that went much deeper than "oil companies need to make money". To me it is logical. Eric gets into a fit about these programs not having theoretical physicists to help figure out the modalities of the tech. IMO it speaks to the possibility that the point might be to not find the answers. When I replied to this thread last night I hadn't heard the last 30 minutes of the interview and he does postulate that String was made to throw the rest of the world off the trail of this very powerful physics paradigm. He simultaneously holds that idea but cannot reconcile it with the idea that it may be figured out, hidden from him and the public and he isn't in the inner circle. He's a very smart guy with some cognitive dissonance. I don’t know if EW has cognitive dissonance or not; I do know that last year-ish (maybe 16 months ago by now) he was hard at work on a new unified theory of physics and was sticking with the string theory being a red herring thing then. He had an interesting interview with Chris Williams IIRC last year (which was the last long-form interview I heard from him) in which he seemed much happier and philosophical, and he seemed like he was getting closer to publishing or revealing this new theory. All this to ask, did he allude to a new theory in this new interview? And, I’ll listen to it asap, but is the purpose of this interview with him and Davis to go head-to-head, or did Jesse put this discussion together so they can try to get to the bottom of what’s going on in UAP-world…? Theory of Geometric Unity Which is his theory, that goes way over my head, but the leaders and the followers in that proximate field of study pretty much hold their noses when he tries to discuss it with them. It is difficult to listen to him (as a total layperson) at times because he is on one hand so butthurt by academia being so dismissive of his ideas without proof but on the other hand he is the exact dismissive academic to others stories/reporting/experiences while shouting for the same "proof". He may very well be correct but he might be the world's most correct hypocrite of all time. LOL I appreciate him though and I'm glad he uses some portion of his cognitive function to think about important things. I have to agree. Eric comes across as a true genius most times, with all the ups and downs that come with that: mania, intelligence, brutal truth and crushing depression. He can be difficult to track, I’ve noticed as well. Bret is much more of a down-to-earth guy and even he has moments of being stuck in eyes-rolled-back Big Thoughts, though he’s gotten better. When I first started listening to the Weinstein brothers I thought “Thanksgiving must be weird at their house.”  But directly to your post: I do think Eric is on to something with how he’s gotten to where he is with his theory. The story is fascinating, he was trying to find where the academics who are researching String theory go and started pulling at the thread (heh) and found a whole lot of interesting things along the way. IIRC there was about a two year period where he was just focused on figuring that out, and his interviews were very scrambly at that time - coherent in sentence form but tough to follow in paragraph form, if that makes any kind of sense. He’d talk to someone on a pod and you’d understand a, say, five minute portion… but once you thought about the fifteen minute or half-hour segment, you lost the track. And maybe that was part of the problem - he was still putting it together himself. And that is not a criticism from me; he’s thinking on a level I’m honestly not capable of, and also, trying to funnel these massive concepts through the filter of language for much simpler people (even more difficult!) to understand in abstract has to be brutal. Maybe that’s why he always relays the Ed Whitten stories - if I was to try and keep up with Eric I’d feel like he does talking with Whitten.
|
Let's Go Red Wings!
Beautifying the world one logo at a time since 1993.
Soli Deo Gloria
Beautifying the world one logo at a time since 1993.
Soli Deo Gloria
| The thing about Eric Davis that he doesn't talk about now is that at a SOL conference a while back he alluded to the fact that he actually went into or looked inside a crashed UFO and it was quite possibly the one that crashed at Roswell. This was about 2 years ago now and he is under a NDA like so many of these guys. It stirred up a bit of a stink when it happened but has been radio silence since. Now he says he has never seen a UFO. |
|
Originally Posted By tnriverluver: The thing about Eric Davis that he doesn't talk about now is that at a SOL conference a while back he alluded to the fact that he actually went into or looked inside a crashed UFO and it was quite possibly the one that crashed at Roswell. This was about 2 years ago now and he is under a NDA like so many of these guys. It stirred up a bit of a stink when it happened but has been radio silence since. Now he says he has never seen a UFO. Davis sounded completely intellectually under gunned. When confronted with pointed questions he had no good answers IMO. He came off as a part of the control system more than a renegade trying to bring knowledge to us sorry people. |
| It might be telling that Davis continues to pursue General Relativity related science after supposedly working with and viewing UAP/NHI. |
“How strange it is that man on earth should roam,
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
|
Originally Posted By sq40: It might be telling that Davis continues to pursue General Relativity related science after supposedly working with and viewing UAP/NHI. |
Everything posted above is factual. Maybe.
|
Originally Posted By Cypher214: I think, and Davis says as much in the podcast, that he's just trying to make the observables fit the existing framework because it's what we have. Weinstein's approach is more "if they don't fit known physics, we need new physics", which is predictable from him. Originally Posted By Cypher214: Originally Posted By sq40: It might be telling that Davis continues to pursue General Relativity related science after supposedly working with and viewing UAP/NHI. Interested in yours and everyone’s take, but I appreciate him thinking outside the proverbial box and seeing if there’s a there, there. |
Let's Go Red Wings!
Beautifying the world one logo at a time since 1993.
Soli Deo Gloria
Beautifying the world one logo at a time since 1993.
Soli Deo Gloria
|
Originally Posted By TLD05: Which is his theory, that goes way over my head, but the leaders and the followers in that proximate field of study pretty much hold their noses when he tries to discuss it with them. It is difficult to listen to him (as a total layperson) at times because he is on one hand so butthurt by academia being so dismissive of his ideas without proof but on the other hand he is the exact dismissive academic to others stories/reporting/experiences while shouting for the same "proof". He may very well be correct but he might be the world's most correct hypocrite of all time. LOL I appreciate him though and I'm glad he uses some portion of his cognitive function to think about important things. Originally Posted By TLD05: Which is his theory, that goes way over my head, but the leaders and the followers in that proximate field of study pretty much hold their noses when he tries to discuss it with them. It is difficult to listen to him (as a total layperson) at times because he is on one hand so butthurt by academia being so dismissive of his ideas without proof but on the other hand he is the exact dismissive academic to others stories/reporting/experiences while shouting for the same "proof". He may very well be correct but he might be the world's most correct hypocrite of all time. LOL I appreciate him though and I'm glad he uses some portion of his cognitive function to think about important things. He is shitting all over string theory and the folks who've spent decades pursuing it are pissed. I have no idea who is right but E.W.'s criticisms of the lack of progress sure hits home to my ears. I think his proofs are out there but aren't looked at for the wrong reasons.  Geometric Unity: Unifying All Forces + Generations | Eric Weinstein  A Portal Special Presentation- Geometric Unity: A First Look ---------------------------------- Today's episode - haven't gotten though much yet:  BREAKING: Massive Energy Grid Found Beneath Pyramids of Egypt 00:00 Introduction 9:12 The Science of Scanning 19:53 Challenging Conventional Theories 27:55 Water as a Key Element 30:51 The Sphinx and Its Significance 31:15 Rewriting History 33:31 Decoding Tomographic Data 35:50 Future of Scanning Technology 1:11:52 New Discoveries Await 1:23:46 Archaeological Discoveries Beneath the Pyramid 1:25:12 Limitations of Tomographic Detection 1:28:32 The Challenge of Background Noise 1:30:17 Commercial Applications of Scanning Technology 1:31:38 Hidden Metal Deposits in the Giza Plateau 1:36:45 Discovering New Passages 1:40:49 Advances in Scanning Technology 1:46:54 Addressing Skepticism in Archaeology 1:50:32 The Role of Patents in Innovation 1:55:33 Understanding Cosmic Rays and Muons 2:08:10 The Complexity of Data Interpretation 2:12:44 Comparing Detected Structures 2:18:48 Misinterpretations of Archaeological Data 2:21:20 Engaging with Experts in the Field 2:30:41 New Discoveries Inside the Pyramid 2:40:08 Visualizing the 3D Model of the Pyramid 2:43:52 Below the Queen's Chamber 2:47:11 Detecting the Grand Gallery 2:53:50 Scanning Modern Structures 3:08:49 Proving Concepts at the Mosul Dam 3:16:55 Investigating the Osiris Shaft 3:22:25 The Challenge of Limestone 3:32:20 Exploring Hydrothermal Vents 4:06:55 Mining and Metallurgy at Giza |
|
both of those pyramid guys are sus: -the scans are absolute Ai trash and techno lying -the pyramid pump, I debunked. He thinks water can compress which invalidates his whole theory. Also told me to F off when I told him thru youtube chat that water doesn't compress. And he still continues to sell his theory today. |
|
Originally Posted By gaspain: both of those pyramid guys are sus: -the scans are absolute Ai trash and techno lying I'm going to assume you've only read the sensationalized articles and haven't listened to Biondi's interviews. He explains the technology, he explains how the data is interpreted using scans of known structures for comparison, he says very clearly that the hyped-up illustrations take a lot of liberties but the data shows a definite void that's connected to the pyramid by vertical shafts and he is advocating for a strictly controlled scientific study to determine what's being detected by the scans. The technology is legit. I don't have a clue how accurate the scans are but we know for a fact there are manmade shafts all over the plateau and many of them are full of debris so it's unknown where they lead. Even if the scans are wildly inaccurate and there's just a natural void attached to the great pyramid, it's still interesting information. |
Everything posted above is factual. Maybe.
|
I know the technology. It cannot do the resolution he is claiming. His Ai system "analyzed" the data and literally put spiral staircases on columns deep underground. This is not reality, nor is it peer reviewed science. Share the data and the algo. He won't. grok, peer review says it has been peer reviewed, you might say Told u so. But really its not helpful to Filippo, with the reviews being anonymous and not agreeable to his paper. Click To View Spoiler |
|
Originally Posted By gaspain: I know the technology. It cannot do the resolution he is claiming. His Ai system "analyzed" the data and literally put spiral staircases on columns deep underground. This is not reality, nor is it peer reviewed science. Share the data and the algo. He won't. grok, peer review says it has been peer reviewed, you might say Told u so. But really its not helpful to Filippo, with the reviews being anonymous and not agreeable to his paper. Click To View Spoiler Biondi said he doesn't know what the spiral is, but the scan appears to show a spiral. The staircase bit is pure speculation, and he says as much. Again, I don't know how accurate the scans are and I don't pretend to know what's there, if anything, but if you're going to shit on the whole thing, at least do it with the right information. |
Everything posted above is factual. Maybe.
|
Originally Posted By Cypher214: When you say "the AI put spiral staircases on columns", that's not correct. Again, you're repeating what you've read in articles and using that to dismiss it all out of hand. It's akin to saying "this kook thinks aliens built the pyramids" anytime somebody questions the official story. Biondi said he doesn't know what the spiral is, but the scan appears to show a spiral. The staircase bit is pure speculation, and he says as much. Again, I don't know how accurate the scans are and I don't pretend to know what's there, if anything, but if you're going to shit on the whole thing, at least do it with the right information. Radar can do weird things with reflections. I was flippant saying its a staircase, sure. The Ai he is using is filling in a lot of blanks, that's the problem and makes it fantasy. And when you say the "right information", watching a youtube is not the whole story. I watched a couple hours of his and read a few pages of this paper. I decided with my own experience in Ai and radar that its junk until proven otherwise. I call it techno lying because the average guy does not know the limitations of technology or would even think that someone would mis-use the technology for clicks, such as the UFO tv shows that use thermal cameras that are not calibrated to show show weird effects. This is what it is, until proven otherwise. |
|
Originally Posted By gaspain: Radar can do weird things with reflections. I was flippant saying its a staircase, sure. The Ai he is using is filling in a lot of blanks, that's the problem and makes it fantasy. And when you say the "right information", watching a youtube is not the whole story. I watched a couple hours of his and read a few pages of this paper. I decided with my own experience in Ai and radar that its junk until proven otherwise. I call it techno lying because the average guy does not know the limitations of technology or would even think that someone would mis-use the technology for clicks, such as the UFO tv shows that use thermal cameras that are not calibrated to show show weird effects. This is what it is, until proven otherwise. Originally Posted By gaspain: Originally Posted By Cypher214: When you say "the AI put spiral staircases on columns", that's not correct. Again, you're repeating what you've read in articles and using that to dismiss it all out of hand. It's akin to saying "this kook thinks aliens built the pyramids" anytime somebody questions the official story. Biondi said he doesn't know what the spiral is, but the scan appears to show a spiral. The staircase bit is pure speculation, and he says as much. Again, I don't know how accurate the scans are and I don't pretend to know what's there, if anything, but if you're going to shit on the whole thing, at least do it with the right information. Radar can do weird things with reflections. I was flippant saying its a staircase, sure. The Ai he is using is filling in a lot of blanks, that's the problem and makes it fantasy. And when you say the "right information", watching a youtube is not the whole story. I watched a couple hours of his and read a few pages of this paper. I decided with my own experience in Ai and radar that its junk until proven otherwise. I call it techno lying because the average guy does not know the limitations of technology or would even think that someone would mis-use the technology for clicks, such as the UFO tv shows that use thermal cameras that are not calibrated to show show weird effects. This is what it is, until proven otherwise. |
Everything posted above is factual. Maybe.
|
Originally Posted By anothermisanthrope: He is shitting all over string theory and the folks who've spent decades pursuing it are pissed. I have no idea who is right but E.W.'s criticisms of the lack of progress sure hits home to my ears. I think his proofs are out there but aren't looked at for the wrong reasons. Well, to be fair...string theory hasn't produced anything but theory. I follow the topic pretty close (hobbyist level, but I read a lot of books/articles/etc., watch show and videos, and the like). String theory has been the most promising candidate for a GUT for what...50 years now? And has produced nothing of substance. The problem, if I understand it correctly, is that is makes essentially an infinite number of "valid" predictions, none of which can actually be tested (or, at least, we haven't figured out how to test them yet). The people who are pissed might as well be pissed at themselves for spending entire careers fruitlessly pursuing it. Could it solve everything? Sure. Hell yeah it could. Will it? Well, let's see how many other physicists spend lifetimes exploring it with no real results. Apropos of nothing...a BFF sent me a short clip today about another potential candidate for dark matter. A Bose-Einstein Condensate equivalent particle, that solves one of the gravity problems by having a wavelength larger than most galaxies. I haven't had a chance to really dig into it yet, but it seems like a really intriguing idea. Something about the DeBroglie wavelength calculation. Google brings up a bunch of stuff about it, but I just haven't had time yet. |
Pope Gregorius Billingsgate Callipygian Quimtickler, First of His Name
Chakravartin of the Feculent Multiversal Litterbox
Protodeacon of the Iniquitous
Gurkhan of the Illimitable Feline Hordes
Chakravartin of the Feculent Multiversal Litterbox
Protodeacon of the Iniquitous
Gurkhan of the Illimitable Feline Hordes
|
Originally Posted By tnriverluver: How about maybe we just soon find out by doing some digging at the pyramids which apparently is fixing to or already happening instead of arguing over this technology that appears to do exactly what he says it does. There is only one way to really find out! |
Everything posted above is factual. Maybe.
|
Originally Posted By Cypher214: I'm going to assume you've only read the sensationalized articles and haven't listened to Biondi's interviews. He explains the technology, he explains how the data is interpreted using scans of known structures for comparison, he says very clearly that the hyped-up illustrations take a lot of liberties but the data shows a definite void that's connected to the pyramid by vertical shafts and he is advocating for a strictly controlled scientific study to determine what's being detected by the scans. The technology is legit. I don't have a clue how accurate the scans are but we know for a fact there are manmade shafts all over the plateau and many of them are full of debris so it's unknown where they lead. Even if the scans are wildly inaccurate and there's just a natural void attached to the great pyramid, it's still interesting information. Originally Posted By Cypher214: Originally Posted By gaspain: both of those pyramid guys are sus: -the scans are absolute Ai trash and techno lying I'm going to assume you've only read the sensationalized articles and haven't listened to Biondi's interviews. He explains the technology, he explains how the data is interpreted using scans of known structures for comparison, he says very clearly that the hyped-up illustrations take a lot of liberties but the data shows a definite void that's connected to the pyramid by vertical shafts and he is advocating for a strictly controlled scientific study to determine what's being detected by the scans. The technology is legit. I don't have a clue how accurate the scans are but we know for a fact there are manmade shafts all over the plateau and many of them are full of debris so it's unknown where they lead. Even if the scans are wildly inaccurate and there's just a natural void attached to the great pyramid, it's still interesting information. Would be interesting if the Pyramids were built as a lid to keep people out, or something in, like toxic waste. |
“How strange it is that man on earth should roam,
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
|
Originally Posted By sq40: Would be interesting if the Pyramids were built to keep people out, or something in, like toxic waste. Originally Posted By sq40: Originally Posted By Cypher214: Originally Posted By gaspain: both of those pyramid guys are sus: -the scans are absolute Ai trash and techno lying I'm going to assume you've only read the sensationalized articles and haven't listened to Biondi's interviews. He explains the technology, he explains how the data is interpreted using scans of known structures for comparison, he says very clearly that the hyped-up illustrations take a lot of liberties but the data shows a definite void that's connected to the pyramid by vertical shafts and he is advocating for a strictly controlled scientific study to determine what's being detected by the scans. The technology is legit. I don't have a clue how accurate the scans are but we know for a fact there are manmade shafts all over the plateau and many of them are full of debris so it's unknown where they lead. Even if the scans are wildly inaccurate and there's just a natural void attached to the great pyramid, it's still interesting information. Would be interesting if the Pyramids were built to keep people out, or something in, like toxic waste. |
Everything posted above is factual. Maybe.
|
Originally Posted By Cypher214: The original entryway for Khufu's pyramid was concealed by the casing stones so unless it was meant to be accessed from tunnels, it seems it was never intended to be a place of regular visitation. Yeah, this. It was a one-and-done, sealed up and hidden probably with the intention of never being found. 56 feet off the ground and blocked by heavy stones. The entrance we use in modern times is a tunnel that grave robbers used to break into the place. Well, Caliph al-Ma'mun in 832 AD. But he was looking for treasure. They must have known roughly where the original entrance was though, or at least had an idea, because starting their tunnel under it and intersecting the ascending passageway would have been an incredibly lucky coincidence otherwise. ETA: It appears that is somewhat false. It's likely the pyramid had already been robbed by the time of the New Kingdom, when the tombs were being dug in the Valley of the Kings. The Caliph's men may have just expanded an already-existing tunnel that tomb robbers had used, possibly multiple times over the centuries. Anyway, there's a fair bit of speculation about it all. |
Pope Gregorius Billingsgate Callipygian Quimtickler, First of His Name
Chakravartin of the Feculent Multiversal Litterbox
Protodeacon of the Iniquitous
Gurkhan of the Illimitable Feline Hordes
Chakravartin of the Feculent Multiversal Litterbox
Protodeacon of the Iniquitous
Gurkhan of the Illimitable Feline Hordes
 Meet The Scientist Who Studies Alien Implants in Human Bodies |
“How strange it is that man on earth should roam,
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats
And lead a life of woe, but not forsake
His rugged path; nor dare he view alone
His future doom which is but to awake.” - John Keats