If the Oath Keepers are a dangerous militia as we’ve been told, why is their kingpin still an untouchable figure to Congress—a He Who Shall Not Be Named? And why is the government only interested in searching or pursuing Rhodes’ alleged underlings, if the “goldmine” of evidence sits with Rhodes himself?

There may in the end be some exotic yet innocent explanation for the seeming protection the Feds have afforded Rhodes from indictment and from search and seizure. We maintain an open mind and are ready to follow the evidence wherever it leads.

But we have seen this movie before in the so-called Michigan Kidnapping Plot that occurred just months prior to January 6. In that “plot”, at least 12 undercover informants were outed in the months after the initial arrests after accidental disclosures from the FBI. There, the Feds for months afforded virtually identical protection to Steve Robeson, the alleged leader of a Wisconsin Patriot Three Percenters militia group, as they seem to be giving to Rhodes in the wake of January 6. Robeson’s inexplicable protection ended up having a very simple explanation in the end, which tied up all the strange loose ends surrounding the FBI’s failure to either properly search or indict him. That explanation, as Revolver will cover in our next report, was that Robeson had been working with the Feds all along.

Given the weight of evidence in the case of Rhodes, the onus is now on the Justice Department, the FBI, or the Commission to come forward and either dispel or confirm this striking parallel immediately.

Quoted:
Interestingly, I found on the Montana State Supreme Court docket that he was disbarred in 2015.  He's admitted to practice in Montana, but not in Arizona -- yet according to the docket he filed a lawsuit in federal court in Arizona without being admitted to practice or being admitted pro hac vice (meaning just for purposes of that lawsuit), and didn't represent his clients properly.  Nor did he respond to the Montana State Bar's disciplinary notice or show up for his disciplinary hearing.  So the Montana SC (which governs attorneys) said "oh, you don't want to play? Here's your disbarment."  

Which raises an interesting issue of, if he couldn't practice law then how was he supporting himself since 2015?

Quoted:
all those groups are feds and snitches for the feds

Quoted:
Interestingly, I found on the Montana State Supreme Court docket that he was disbarred in 2015.  He's admitted to practice in Montana, but not in Arizona -- yet according to the docket he filed a lawsuit in federal court in Arizona without being admitted to practice or being admitted pro hac vice (meaning just for purposes of that lawsuit), and didn't represent his clients properly.  Nor did he respond to the Montana State Bar's disciplinary notice or show up for his disciplinary hearing.  So the Montana SC (which governs attorneys) said "oh, you don't want to play? Here's your disbarment."  

Which raises an interesting issue of, if he couldn't practice law then how was he supporting himself since 2015?

...Joshua Caleb Sutter. However, Sutter has been an FBI operative since 2003, and has been paid more than $140,000 by the Feds, including $80,000 since 2018, to take over Atomwaffen.

Quoted:
Why are you even asking.  You already know the answer.

Meanwhile I wonder how many spies and plants are on arfcom and how many have posted in this thread.

Quoted:
Lets be honest, The FBI likes to keep track of those guys and what they are doing.

Lots of the guys in those orgs are fuck ups and if you get on the wrong side of the law the FBI comes and make you a deal.

Im not sure how much the instigate activity but for example the guys that took over the Malheur marsh in WA state had multiple FBI informants in there with them. They actually had too many and ended up blowing their case against the Bundy's because of it.


I would not be surprised if some of the Jan 6 people were FBI snitches.  


What surprises me is that these orgs don't seem to make any effort to avoid being penetrated by the FBI.

Quoted:
Some days I want to form a militia group just to fuck with the glowies.  

"For today's team building exercise we're all going to a Nickelback concert."  

Within days, Rhodes pulled the Oath Keepers out, claiming he was concerned about the possibility of a government drone strike.

According to three former group members, the Bundy standoff had been a bonanza for the organization. Membership soared, two of them said, and donations poured into the group’s PayPal account. But despite pledges to support other militant groups involved in the standoff, little if any money ever reached them, according to Gary Hunt, who helped to lead a coalition of those groups.

“It was bullshit,” said Hunt, who characterized the Oath Keepers as deserters. Local militant groups banned them from returning, telling them “You’re lucky that you’re not getting shot in the back.”

His wife, Sue DeLemus, a Republican member of the New Hampshire House of Representatives, remembers the phone ringing a few days later. “Rhodes had one of his men call me and say, ‘Sue, it’s so sad. We want to help you. You can call us any time,’” she said. “What a joke. They never provided any help at all.”

Rhodes would repeat this shtick in various permutations from 2015 and 2016 with similar outings, like the Kim Davis affair and the Malheur National Wildlife Reserve stand-off. To fully go into these events would fall outside the scope of this study.

Quoted:
Next do the Richard Spencer guy. He had an amazing story of going from an Obama loving democrat, to neo Nazi, and then back to a Biden and Harris supporting democrat.

You'd think the media would love his story of redemption.