User Panel
Posted: 1/17/2021 8:59:35 PM EDT
Source
"Stephanopoulos also challenged Castro on questions about the constitutionality of convicting a president who has already left office. Some Members of Congress, like Sen. Tom Cotton, and other legal scholars and experts have raised that concern. "Are you concerned that they may be able to find that this is not constitutional, this trial?" Stephanopoulos asked Castro. "I don't believe so. In fact, one of the other purposes of impeachment in this case is to make sure that the -- that President Trump is not able to run for federal office again, that he's not able to seek the presidency," Castro said. "The reason for that is that somebody who incited a riot, an attempted coup of the United States government should not be president again. So it's not just about making sure that there are consequences to his behavior." The commie socialist marxist commie Democrats are afraid of Trump...even after committing vote fraud to steal an election and overthrow a dukly elected President...which is treason, sedition or some similar act. |
|
|
|
Well if Biden actually won in a landslide, then why do D's want to prevent Trump from running again?
If I had kicked my opponents ass as badly as they claim Biden did, then I would be begging him to run again... |
|
As disgusting as it is, at least they are admitting this impeachment is about politics.
|
|
Are they worried about him becoming a senator and being a legitimate, royal PITA?
|
|
The commi's need 17 turncoats.
I am confident that can happen. The turncoats see Trump as a threat to the party. Political BS is how the swamp works. The needs of The People are not a priority. |
|
|
Article 1 Section 3:
Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law. View Quote The language of the impeachment clause contained in the Constitution's legislative article cannot be divided into either / or. It has to be both removal from office and disqualification. Once POTUS is a private citizen, the clause cannot be legally adhered to. The Senate trying a private citizen is a Bill of Attainder, which is specifically prohibited in the Constitution. Of course that won't stop Schumer, because he defends the Constitution - you know - by pissing on it. |
|
"The reason for that is that somebody who incited a riot, an attempted coup of the United States government should not be president again. So it's not just about making sure that there are consequences to his behavior."
And Trump did none of that. |
|
|
|
Funny how we have not heard anything out of this illegal loving POS or his illegal loving PSO brother for sometime but now they re-appear to start spewing again.
I have no doubt he and the RINO Rubio will be getting together for amnesty legislation soon. |
|
Quoted: "The reason for that is that somebody who incited a riot, an attempted coup of the United States government should not be president again. So it's not just about making sure that there are consequences to his behavior." And Trump did none of that. View Quote This is revenge for trump guys storming the Capitol building and chasing out Congress. He might get impeached this time. Probably no one in either party in Congress wants him running again lol it'd be a riot if he turned around and ran for Congress in two years |
|
The Castro boys look a lot like Howdy Doody. Their mom is a hard core communist, I believe.
|
|
|
Quoted: Article 1 Section 3: The language of the impeachment clause contained in the Constitution's legislative article cannot be divided into either / or. It has to be both removal from office and disqualification. Once POTUS is a private citizen, the clause cannot be legally adhered to. The Senate trying a private citizen is a Bill of Attainder, which is specifically prohibited in the Constitution. Of course that won't stop Schumer, because he defends the Constitution - you know - by pissing on it. View Quote That is the maximal limit, but they need not occur together, but disqualification cannot occur without removal. |
|
Quoted: Source "I don't believe so. In fact, one of the other purposes of impeachment in this case is to make sure that the -- that President Trump is not able to run for federal office again, that he's not able to seek the presidency," Castro said. View Quote I wish sissy George had asked Castro WHY Trump would be elected again over Pedo Joe? Would've loved to see Castro squirm. |
|
|
Quoted: This is revenge for trump guys storming the Capitol building and chasing out Congress. He might get impeached this time. Probably no one in either party in Congress wants him running again lol it'd be a riot if he turned around and ran for Congress in two years View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: "The reason for that is that somebody who incited a riot, an attempted coup of the United States government should not be president again. So it's not just about making sure that there are consequences to his behavior." And Trump did none of that. This is revenge for trump guys storming the Capitol building and chasing out Congress. He might get impeached this time. Probably no one in either party in Congress wants him running again lol it'd be a riot if he turned around and ran for Congress in two years High probability that the capitol storming was an inside job and if they don't get a speedy trial and removal, the evidence is going to pile up against them. |
|
Why would it matter if Trumps runs again?
Seriously, the Democrats can just cheat again and no one will care or do anything about it just like in 2020... |
|
Quoted: Well if Biden actually won in a landslide, then why do D's want to prevent Trump from running again? If I had kicked my opponents ass as badly as they claim Biden did, then I would be begging him to run again... View Quote Even by the "official certified" count, Biden only won the EC because of 42,918 votes TOTAL from AZ(10,457) GA(11,779) and WI(20,682) That's how little cheating it took to rig this election. |
|
Quoted: Article 1 Section 3: The language of the impeachment clause contained in the Constitution's legislative article cannot be divided into either / or. It has to be both removal from office and disqualification. Once POTUS is a private citizen, the clause cannot be legally adhered to. The Senate trying a private citizen is a Bill of Attainder, which is specifically prohibited in the Constitution. Of course that won't stop Schumer, because he defends the Constitution - you know - by pissing on it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Article 1 Section 3: Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law. The language of the impeachment clause contained in the Constitution's legislative article cannot be divided into either / or. It has to be both removal from office and disqualification. Once POTUS is a private citizen, the clause cannot be legally adhered to. The Senate trying a private citizen is a Bill of Attainder, which is specifically prohibited in the Constitution. Of course that won't stop Schumer, because he defends the Constitution - you know - by pissing on it. The left is hanging their hat on the history books showing Congress impeached a cabinet secretary back in the 1800s after he resigned from office, specifically to avoid his own impeachment. Kharn |
|
funny that they want to bar him from running for President again... because apparently they believe there's a good chance the American taxpayer my want to vote him in and choose him as President again...
Hmm... can't have that.. |
|
|
Riddle me this Bat Man. How does Alcee Hastings get elected to Congress after his impeachment and removal from the Federal Bench?
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/09/16/democrat-rep-alcee-hastings-one-of-eight-federal-judges-impeached-and-convicted-by-u-s-senate/ Just three years after his impeachment, conviction, and removal from the federal bench, Hastings was elected in November 1992 as a Democrat to represent Florida's 23rd Congressional District in the U.S. House of Representatives. He has subsequently been re-elected to 13 additional terms. Due to redistricting, he now represents Florida's 20th Congressional District. View Quote |
|
|
Quoted: This is revenge for trump guys storming the Capitol building and chasing out Congress. He might get impeached this time. Probably no one in either party in Congress wants him running again lol it'd be a riot if he turned around and ran for Congress in two years View Quote he is not running again. he is done. you really think he wants more of this shit? ya know, the dem-commie shit? he did what he could, he is gone. now, it appears this country is consolidating voters into the respective commie and anyone left who still believes in the constitution. |
|
Quoted: He did within the confines of the law. Too bad the swamp has judges, prosecutors and the media in their back pocket. View Quote Oh bullshit. It was entirely possible for him to order every department to have their files pertaining to XY and Z on his desk for review by this date, and if they failed to do so he could fire the head of the department that failed to do so for cause. He also has authority to seize the air waves to declare an emergency. He should have had regular story time with the American people on the MSM every Friday for a while now going over the swamps dirty laundry. If the media refused to carry it law enforcement could get involved to force the issue. There was a LOT more he could have done. He just failed to do so. |
|
Quoted: Why would it matter if Trumps runs again? Seriously, the Democrats can just cheat again and no one will care or do anything about it just like in 2020... View Quote exactly! think the commies wouldn't pull out an even more openly fraudulent election? they got a completely controlled, media supported, and court suppressing election process. stick a fork in it, the Constitution is no longer an "equal protection under the law" document. as a matter of course, it is not even a legal document referenced in courts. |
|
Quoted: Oh bullshit. It was entirely possible for him to order every department to have their files pertaining to XY and Z on his desk for review by this date, and if they failed to do so he could fire the head of the department that failed to do so for cause. He also has authority to seize the air waves to declare an emergency. He should have had regular story time with the American people on the MSM every Friday for a while now going over the swamps dirty laundry. If the media refused to carry it law enforcement could get involved to force the issue. There was a LOT more he could have done. He just failed to do so. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: He did within the confines of the law. Too bad the swamp has judges, prosecutors and the media in their back pocket. Oh bullshit. It was entirely possible for him to order every department to have their files pertaining to XY and Z on his desk for review by this date, and if they failed to do so he could fire the head of the department that failed to do so for cause. He also has authority to seize the air waves to declare an emergency. He should have had regular story time with the American people on the MSM every Friday for a while now going over the swamps dirty laundry. If the media refused to carry it law enforcement could get involved to force the issue. There was a LOT more he could have done. He just failed to do so. Attached File He failed yet I know more about the swamp now than I ever cared to know before he became President. |
|
Quoted: he is not running again. he is done. you really think he wants more of this shit? ya know, the dem-commie shit? he did what he could, he is gone. now, it appears this country is consolidating voters into the respective commie and anyone left who still believes in the constitution. View Quote |
|
Quoted: Riddle me this Bat Man. How does Alcee Hastings get elected to Congress after his impeachment and removal from the Federal Bench? https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/09/16/democrat-rep-alcee-hastings-one-of-eight-federal-judges-impeached-and-convicted-by-u-s-senate/ View Quote Oh that's different.gif |
|
Quoted: Riddle me this Bat Man. How does Alcee Hastings get elected to Congress after his impeachment and removal from the Federal Bench? View Quote Federal Judgeship isn't a Congressional seat for starters. Nor is an impeachment a Felony. Hell, Nixon could've run again for office had he wanted to. Can't remember which one, but one former president ran for & got elected Senator after he got out of POTUS office. Not to mention Hastings is black & could literally do anything he wanted if he played the race card. Read about his impeachment, he was incredibly corrupt. |
|
It is really telling how worried they are about him running again. They know he will win another office.
They are trying to deny voters the ability to pick whom they want in office |
|
After trump leaves office and they vote to impeach the president, wouldn’t that mean they impeached bidet?
|
|
Joaquin Castro’s mother was a real piece of work back in her commie aggregator days. Like Mom, like son.
|
|
Quoted: Are they worried about him becoming a senator and being a legitimate, royal PITA? View Quote They know full well that if the MAGA Party is created, and Trump makes a presidential run in 2024, that they won't be able to cheat their way out of the crushing defeat he'd hand the other two major parties. |
|
Quoted: Riddle me this Bat Man. How does Alcee Hastings get elected to Congress after his impeachment and removal from the Federal Bench? https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/09/16/democrat-rep-alcee-hastings-one-of-eight-federal-judges-impeached-and-convicted-by-u-s-senate/ View Quote The house impeaches. The senate debates and votes remove from office or not. If voted to remove from office some one can make motion to prevent from holding future office if the motion passes, they debate and vote again. So, removed by impeachment is not automatically preventing from holding future office, there is a lot more has to happen. |
|
The GOP knows Trump would flatten Rubio in a primary race. They can’t allow that.
|
|
Quoted: Riddle me this Bat Man. How does Alcee Hastings get elected to Congress after his impeachment and removal from the Federal Bench? https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/09/16/democrat-rep-alcee-hastings-one-of-eight-federal-judges-impeached-and-convicted-by-u-s-senate/ View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Riddle me this Bat Man. How does Alcee Hastings get elected to Congress after his impeachment and removal from the Federal Bench? https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/09/16/democrat-rep-alcee-hastings-one-of-eight-federal-judges-impeached-and-convicted-by-u-s-senate/ Just three years after his impeachment, conviction, and removal from the federal bench, Hastings was elected in November 1992 as a Democrat to represent Florida's 23rd Congressional District in the U.S. House of Representatives. He has subsequently been re-elected to 13 additional terms. Due to redistricting, he now represents Florida's 20th Congressional District. to prevent the pol running for office again they have to be impeached on a two-step process. the impeachment only voted on one count instead of both. And that's how he could continue his government sponsored employment. |
|
|
I don't get it. I've gone back and watched a bunch of his speeches. I see him calling the election rigged, being arrogant and pompous, and calling for constitutionally protected peaceful protest. I've seen him condemn rioters and threaten jail time for anyone harming the structures where they protest. I have not found anywhere him calling for violence, or inciting a riot. Yet this is the words they always use. But its ok for Chris cuomo to say protests don't have to be peaceful.
|
|
Quoted: I don't get it. I've gone back and watched a bunch of his speeches. I see him calling the election rigged, being arrogant and pompous, and calling for constitutionally protected peaceful protest. I've seen him condemn rioters and threaten jail time for anyone harming the structures where they protest. I have not found anywhere him calling for violence, or inciting a riot. Yet this is the words they always use. But its ok for Chris cuomo to say protests don't have to be peaceful. View Quote It was implied. They can read his mind. How else could it be interpreted for a pussy-grabber? |
|
Wouldn't a trial of Trump after he's out be admitting that Trump won the election? And wouldn't they also have to "remove" Pence as well?
|
|
Quoted: "The reason for that is that somebody who incited a riot, an attempted coup of the United States government should not be president again. So it's not just about making sure that there are consequences to his behavior." View Quote There are many Dems and MSM personalities who incited riots and insurrection this past summer. What about the MSM who are currently attempting to incite violence against anyone who supported Trump? |
|
Quoted: Well if Biden actually won in a landslide, then why do D's want to prevent Trump from running again? If I had kicked my opponents ass as badly as they claim Biden did, then I would be begging him to run again... View Quote That's the million dollar question. I'd guess they're terrified this charade will crumble and this is smoke and mirrors to keep the citizens from paying attention to the real crime of stealing this election. Was Castro born without eyelids? |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.