Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
Previous Page
/ 7
Next Page
7/26/2025 10:46:22 AM EDT
TLDR: He gets five discharges. He pinned the trigger back 1mm and wiggles the slide.

SIGUSA says: "The P320 meets and exceeds all industry safety standards" and "The P320 CANNOT, under any circumstances, discharge without a trigger pull. This is verified through extensive testing by SIG SAUER, the U.S. Military, elite law enforcement agencies, and independent laboratories."   Bullshit!

If you own a P320 you need to watch the full video. My think, full stop. If your trigger return spring is weak. You may have a compromised gun. All of you should test your guns.

The youtuber says it's a post upgrade gun with only sights being changed.

If that is not a shit design I don't know what is.

Non SIG P320 owners. Watch the first 11 mins. You get the full gist of what he is doing.

SIG P320 Un Commanded Discharge and its Repeatable


Added video. Shows same problem. Different youtuber. 23 seconds long. Worth watching.





7/26/2025 10:50:06 AM EDT
[#1]
Quoted:
TLDR: He gets five discharges. He pinned the trigger back 1mm and wiggles the slide.

If that is not a shit design I don't know what is.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOMQOtOQoPk
View Quote

I believe 1 mm is far enough back to defeat the striker safety block. The Sig Mechanic measured it a couple years ago.

Edmund measured it at 0.09 inches, which is more than 2mm, but I'm guessing his measurements are a bit more accurate than the guy in OP's video.

P320 - STRIKER SAFETY DISENGAGEMENT PARAMETERS

7/26/2025 10:51:36 AM EDT
[#2]
Quote History
Quoted:

I believe 1 mm is far enough back to defeat the striker safety block. The Sig Mechanic measured it a couple years ago.
View Quote


That's insane!
7/26/2025 10:52:46 AM EDT
[#3]
Does it end today?
7/26/2025 10:53:48 AM EDT
[#4]
Why haven't P320's been recalled?
7/26/2025 10:55:38 AM EDT
[#5]
so is my Flux Raider deadly like my Glock grenades?
7/26/2025 10:56:32 AM EDT
[#6]
Quote History
Quoted:


That's insane!
View Quote

Keep in mind, it's a second or third level safety, intended to stop the gun from firing if the striker slips off the first sear ledge and then slips off the second more aggresive sear ledge, so I suppose they were just shooting for blocking the striker from passing through the breechface if the trigger was all the way forward.

Although shooting for is probably a bad choice of words.
7/26/2025 10:57:00 AM EDT
[#7]
I predict feathers will be ruffled

7/26/2025 11:04:22 AM EDT
[#8]
Quote History
Quoted:
so is my Flux Raider deadly like my Glock grenades?
View Quote


I wouldn't bump them..
7/26/2025 11:06:13 AM EDT
[#9]
I just did what he did, mine wouldn't do it.

Doesnt mean other P320s won't do it.
7/26/2025 11:07:30 AM EDT
[#10]
Remember that if you prove this, you have to fight that GBRS guy first.
7/26/2025 11:08:37 AM EDT
[#11]
Quote History
Quoted:

I believe 1 mm is far enough back to defeat the striker safety block. The Sig Mechanic measured it a couple years ago.

Edmund measured it at 0.09 inches, which is more than 2mm, but I'm guessing his measurements are a bit more accurate than the guy in OP's video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0MpcFEXWhc
View Quote
0.09" is about three sheets of paper thick.
7/26/2025 11:09:48 AM EDT
[#12]
You guys go ahead and dump your P320s. I'll keep mine.

In 50 years whatever Only Fans model I bequeath my estate to will be sitting on some rare and valuable pistols.
7/26/2025 11:11:29 AM EDT
[#13]
Quote History
Quoted:
I just did what he did, mine wouldn't do it.

Doesnt mean other P320s won't do it.
View Quote


So you have a good one. Praise GOD.
7/26/2025 11:12:08 AM EDT
[#14]
Sig response: the manual will be updated to tell folks not to pull the trigger 1mm and then wiggle the slide.


7/26/2025 11:12:45 AM EDT
[#15]
Quote History
Quoted:
You guys go ahead and dump your P320s. I'll keep mine.

In 50 years whatever Only Fans model I bequeath my estate to will be sitting on some rare and valuable pistols.
View Quote


Right next to your Remington R51's
7/26/2025 11:13:09 AM EDT
[#16]
Quote History
Quoted:
Remember that if you prove this, you have to fight that GBRS guy first.
View Quote


Let me rip my shirt off and flex my big muscles. I got this!
7/26/2025 11:14:05 AM EDT
[#17]
Quote History
Quoted:
You guys go ahead and dump your P320s. I'll keep mine.

In 50 years whatever Only Fans model I bequeath my estate to will be sitting on some rare and valuable pistols.
View Quote


You drop common loot.
7/26/2025 11:14:18 AM EDT
[#18]
Quote History
Quoted:
You guys go ahead and dump your P320s. I'll keep mine.

In 50 years whatever Only Fans model I bequeath my estate to will be sitting on some rare and valuable pistols.
View Quote

RIP
7/26/2025 11:14:42 AM EDT
[#19]
Quote History
Quoted:


You drop common loot.
View Quote

7/26/2025 11:15:36 AM EDT
[#20]
Quote History
Quoted:
Why haven't P320's been recalled?
View Quote
My guess is there is no fix, a redesign is needed. It's a epic mess they have gotten into.
7/26/2025 11:17:02 AM EDT
[#21]
Quote History
Quoted:


So you have a good one. Praise GOD.
View Quote
I don't have anything to measure with, I just used a screw to remove the take up like he did.

Still not gonna carry it, mine is the first batch and I sent it for the upgrade.

I didn't use primed cases, but it never fired moving the slide. I am not a denier, I just couldn't get mine to go off.
7/26/2025 11:17:35 AM EDT
[#22]
To many moving parts, not even close to PERFECTION.



Why yes, yes I went there.
7/26/2025 11:19:22 AM EDT
[#23]
Quoted:
0.09" is about three sheets of paper thick.
View Quote


No dog in the sig fight, but I've got a dog in the measuring fight. A sheet of paper is around .003", .09" is around 30 sheets of paper.  Sorry, machinist just being a machinist.
7/26/2025 11:20:08 AM EDT
[#24]
Quote History
Quoted:
0.09" is about three sheets of paper thick.
View Quote


0.009 is three sheets of paper.
7/26/2025 11:21:15 AM EDT
[#25]
Quote History
Quoted:
0.09" is about three sheets of paper thick.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

I believe 1 mm is far enough back to defeat the striker safety block. The Sig Mechanic measured it a couple years ago.

Edmund measured it at 0.09 inches, which is more than 2mm, but I'm guessing his measurements are a bit more accurate than the guy in OP's video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0MpcFEXWhc
0.09" is about three sheets of paper thick.


No, a sheet of paper is about 0.003” so 90 thou divided by 3 thou is 30 sheets of paper thick. 0.09” is  2.29 mm.
7/26/2025 11:21:39 AM EDT
[#26]
I wouldn't take one if you gave it to me.
7/26/2025 11:22:43 AM EDT
[#27]
Quote History
Quoted:
Why haven't P320's been recalled?
View Quote


If the cost of lawsuits and settlements is cheaper than a recall....
7/26/2025 11:22:47 AM EDT
[#28]
Quote History
Quoted:
To many moving parts, not even close to PERFECTION.



Why yes, yes I went there.
View Quote
Yea

The one time I took my FCU apart I thought this thing is over complicated.

I like the Ruger example of a FCU for a Glock vs what Sig has done.

Second time Sig has got me, first time was the SIG 556, luckily I was able to sell it. Not a bad rifle just not what I thought it would be.

I have survived too much crazy stuff in life to trust carrying a P320 over my trusted G19.
7/26/2025 11:23:34 AM EDT
[#29]
Quote History
Quoted:
My guess is there is no fix, a redesign is needed. It's a epic mess they have gotten into.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Why haven't P320's been recalled?
My guess is there is no fix, a redesign is needed. It's a epic mess they have gotten into.


The redesign is what the P365 has.
7/26/2025 11:28:38 AM EDT
[#30]
I can't wait to get home, jam something in the trigger, and see if I can fool my NIB Sig P320 to go off.
7/26/2025 11:31:19 AM EDT
[#31]
So this guy modified it to the point it fires on its own and says it fires by itself? Hopefully he has good lawyers.
7/26/2025 11:34:58 AM EDT
[#32]
I think the P320 is a dangerous turd, and there is probably something to do with play in the parts between the upper and lower as a contributing factor in this.

He keeps emphasizing “less than a millimeter!” but in mechanical terms that’s enormous. That’s 0.039”. That’s a lot.

He might have something here if he pulled the trigger to the wall, released it, and then it would go off with slide manipulation.

Likewise, if he could demonstrate a somewhat consistent method of the trigger staying back at the wall after it had been released that doesn’t involve a wood screw falling up into the trigger pocket.

This is an interesting observation, but I don’t think it alone explains what’s going on.
7/26/2025 11:35:10 AM EDT
[#33]
Quote History
Quoted:
0.09" is about three sheets of paper thick.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

I believe 1 mm is far enough back to defeat the striker safety block. The Sig Mechanic measured it a couple years ago.

Edmund measured it at 0.09 inches, which is more than 2mm, but I'm guessing his measurements are a bit more accurate than the guy in OP's video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0MpcFEXWhc
0.09" is about three sheets of paper thick.

9 hundredths, not 9 thousandths.
7/26/2025 11:36:37 AM EDT
[#34]
Quote History
Quoted:
So this guy modified it to the point it fires on its own and says it fires by itself? Hopefully he has good lawyers.
View Quote


You didn't watch the video. OK we can't help you.
7/26/2025 11:37:14 AM EDT
[#35]
Quote History
Quoted:
Yea

The one time I took my FCU apart I thought this thing is over complicated.

I like the Ruger example of a FCU for a Glock vs what Sig has done.

Second time Sig has got me, first time was the SIG 556, luckily I was able to sell it. Not a bad rifle just not what I thought it would be.

I have survived too much crazy stuff in life to trust carrying a P320 over my trusted G19.
View Quote


Amen.
7/26/2025 11:37:25 AM EDT
[#36]
Quote History
Quoted:
0.09" is about three sheets of paper thick.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

I believe 1 mm is far enough back to defeat the striker safety block. The Sig Mechanic measured it a couple years ago.

Edmund measured it at 0.09 inches, which is more than 2mm, but I'm guessing his measurements are a bit more accurate than the guy in OP's video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0MpcFEXWhc
0.09" is about three sheets of paper thick.

More like three credit cards.

Still not enough for an internal safety feature.
7/26/2025 11:37:46 AM EDT
[#37]
Quote History
Quoted:

9 hundredths, not 9 thousandths.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

I believe 1 mm is far enough back to defeat the striker safety block. The Sig Mechanic measured it a couple years ago.

Edmund measured it at 0.09 inches, which is more than 2mm, but I'm guessing his measurements are a bit more accurate than the guy in OP's video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0MpcFEXWhc
0.09" is about three sheets of paper thick.

9 hundredths, not 9 thousandths.

Right, sheet of paper about .002.
7/26/2025 11:37:52 AM EDT
[#38]
Look, I think SIG needs to take action here, but defeating safeties and being surprised when it goes off does not seem like true evidence.

And if anyone’s holster depresses the trigger at all allowing it to go off… who’s fault is that? Both?

Seriously. If your evidence requires having to manipulate the gun to make this happen … you’re gaming it.

I’ll give this a shot with mine for grins.

Edit: that trigger is pulled back quite a bit and then the slide is manipulated, but since SIG says it can’t fire without a full trigger press this is bad.

I just disagree with having to jury-rig the system to make it happen.
7/26/2025 11:38:40 AM EDT
[#39]
Quote History
Quoted:
I think the P320 is a dangerous turd, and there is probably something to do with play in the parts between the upper and lower as a contributing factor in this.

He keeps emphasizing “less than a millimeter!” but in mechanical terms that’s enormous. That’s 0.039”. That’s a lot.

He might have something here if he pulled the trigger to the wall, released it, and then it would go off with slide manipulation.

Likewise, if he could demonstrate a somewhat consistent method of the trigger staying back at the wall after it had been released that doesn’t involve a wood screw falling up into the trigger pocket.

This is an interesting observation, but I don’t think it alone explains what’s going on.
View Quote


But! What if he has a weak trigger return spring?
7/26/2025 11:39:30 AM EDT
[#40]
Quote History
Quoted:
Look, I think SIG needs to take action here, but defeating safeties and being surprised when it goes off does not seem like true evidence.

And if anyone’s holster depresses the trigger at all allowing it to go off… who’s fault is that? Both?

Seriously. If your evidence requires having to manipulate the gun to make this happen … you’re gaming it.

I’ll give this a shot with mine for grins.
View Quote


Not if you have a weak return spring..
7/26/2025 11:39:57 AM EDT
[#41]
Quote History
Quoted:
You guys go ahead and dump your P320s. I'll keep mine.

In 50 years whatever Only Fans model I bequeath my estate to will be sitting on some rare and valuable pistols.
View Quote


Dibs on guns.

Oh wait, never mind.
7/26/2025 11:41:58 AM EDT
[#42]
Quote History
Quoted:
0.09" is about three sheets of paper thick.
View Quote


Or about 2-3 human hairs.
7/26/2025 11:42:24 AM EDT
[#43]
Quote History
Quoted:
I think the P320 is a dangerous turd, and there is probably something to do with play in the parts between the upper and lower as a contributing factor in this.

He keeps emphasizing “less than a millimeter!” but in mechanical terms that’s enormous. That’s 0.039”. That’s a lot.

He might have something here if he pulled the trigger to the wall, released it, and then it would go off with slide manipulation.

Likewise, if he could demonstrate a somewhat consistent method of the trigger staying back at the wall after it had been released that doesn’t involve a wood screw falling up into the trigger pocket.

This is an interesting observation, but I don’t think it alone explains what’s going on.
View Quote


This is where I am, too. If the trigger is pulled back 1mm, You are pulling the trigger. How is that happening with holstered weapons?
7/26/2025 11:44:28 AM EDT
[#44]
Quote History
Quoted:


But! What if he has a weak trigger return spring?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
I think the P320 is a dangerous turd, and there is probably something to do with play in the parts between the upper and lower as a contributing factor in this.

He keeps emphasizing “less than a millimeter!” but in mechanical terms that’s enormous. That’s 0.039”. That’s a lot.

He might have something here if he pulled the trigger to the wall, released it, and then it would go off with slide manipulation.

Likewise, if he could demonstrate a somewhat consistent method of the trigger staying back at the wall after it had been released that doesn’t involve a wood screw falling up into the trigger pocket.

This is an interesting observation, but I don’t think it alone explains what’s going on.


But! What if he has a weak trigger return spring?


How so? Just worn out? Broken? Defective?

Trigger springs do break. I’ve broken them in both a Beretta 92FS and a Gen3 Glock 19 owned by me personally.

I would think if this was the culprit, though, a drastically weak trigger spring would be obvious in the samples which have fired uncommanded in practice.

7/26/2025 11:48:13 AM EDT
[#45]
If you took a shot every time he says "less than 1mm", you'd take as many shots as a P320 does on accident.
7/26/2025 11:49:18 AM EDT
[#46]
Quote History
Quoted:
Remember that if you prove this, you have to fight that GBRS guy first.
View Quote


I’m out.

I’ve had my ass beat by dudes with a lot less training…
7/26/2025 11:49:33 AM EDT
[#47]
Quote History
Quoted:


You drop common loot.
View Quote

Lmao
7/26/2025 11:51:08 AM EDT
[#48]
Sig issues not withstanding, I can’t get past the part where he keeps chirping about the gun going off with out manipulating the trigger, while he is manipulating the trigger the entire time.
7/26/2025 11:51:10 AM EDT
[#49]
Quote History
Quoted:


Not if you have a weak return spring..
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Look, I think SIG needs to take action here, but defeating safeties and being surprised when it goes off does not seem like true evidence.

And if anyone’s holster depresses the trigger at all allowing it to go off… who’s fault is that? Both?

Seriously. If your evidence requires having to manipulate the gun to make this happen … you’re gaming it.

I’ll give this a shot with mine for grins.


Not if you have a weak return spring..


So if you have a weak return spring and a bad holster that allows the slide to be jostled it is a possibility. I mean, if that’s repeatable, maybe it’s even a proof point. But this would shoot your own (heh) conjecture in the foot since the guy in the video’s gun doesn’t have that. He has to literally put a wood screw in the frame to hold the trigger back enough to make the mechanism susceptible to such manipulation.

I can’t imagine the hue and cry if we defeated a safety or two on any other gun and started slagging it. Earned reputation or not, this is not how engineering or science fixes this problem.

Again so nobody thinks I’m white-knighting Sig: There is fire with this smoke; even as a Sig P22X fan and P320 owner, I want Sig to fix this.
7/26/2025 11:52:07 AM EDT
[#50]
I get that it shouldn't fire with the trigger pulled halfway back and the slide wiggled, but how does this explain all of the "it was just sitting in its holster and went off" claims? I mean, he's literally pulling the trigger.

Sign up to continue the discussion

Create a free account to share your thoughts, follow topics, and connect with the AR15.COM community.

Already a member? Sign In

Previous Page
/ 7
Next Page