User Panel
Posted: 5/8/2024 7:24:49 PM EDT
Its a short video so just watch it.
The GOA caused the ATF to make some changes to the new "rule" https://youtu.be/xov8nJznVks?feature=shared |
|
|
[#1]
11 minutes is not a short video
|
|
|
[#2]
|
|
Please help St Jude children's hospital.
|
[#3]
Proper hotlink
Here's What Our Lawyers Found In ATF's New Rule OP need to post a summary |
|
|
[#4]
Tagarooni for later
|
|
In memory of my son Sean James, born 6/25/97. Died 9/16/13.
We will be reunited in heaven. |
[#5]
Which "rule"? The ATF has issued all sorts of rules. Context would be nice.
|
|
Get Active or Get Disarmed! That means get involved in helping good candidates in primary and general election. That is in addition to being politically active once they are elected.
|
[#6]
|
|
|
[#7]
Originally Posted By FreefallRet: It's all about trying to make individuals be treated as FFLs when selling a firearm. good video btw. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By FreefallRet: Originally Posted By SWIRE: Which "rule"? The ATF has issued all sorts of rules. Context would be nice. good video btw. Ok, the gun control that some Republicans helped pass late last year and opened the door for the ATF to do this. Since the legislature opened the door I do not think this will end up well for us...just like Obamacare. I hope it does go our way but I wouldn't hold my breath on this one. |
|
Get Active or Get Disarmed! That means get involved in helping good candidates in primary and general election. That is in addition to being politically active once they are elected.
|
[#8]
Originally Posted By SWIRE: Ok, the gun control that some Republicans helped pass late last year and opened the door for the ATF to do this. Since the legislature opened the door I do not think this will end up well for us...just like Obamacare. I hope it does go our way but I wouldn't hold my breath on this one. View Quote When the ATF was doing deliberate misinterpretations of long standing GCA '68 law after 50 years of having the opposite interpretation, it was easy to say "bzzzt, wrong". When the ATF is developing original regulations to interpret fresh Bipartisan Fuck Your Rights legislation, it's a lot harder to overrule the new regs. |
|
I think the hardest thing for good LE working for good agencies to really absorb is that there are whole departments full of exactly the complete fuckheads we rail against here. - vectorsc
|
[#9]
Originally Posted By PepePewPew: When the ATF was doing deliberate misinterpretations of long standing GCA '68 law after 50 years of having the opposite interpretation, it was easy to say "bzzzt, wrong". When the ATF is developing original regulations to interpret fresh Bipartisan Fuck Your Rights legislation, it's a lot harder to overrule the new regs. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By PepePewPew: Originally Posted By SWIRE: Ok, the gun control that some Republicans helped pass late last year and opened the door for the ATF to do this. Since the legislature opened the door I do not think this will end up well for us...just like Obamacare. I hope it does go our way but I wouldn't hold my breath on this one. When the ATF was doing deliberate misinterpretations of long standing GCA '68 law after 50 years of having the opposite interpretation, it was easy to say "bzzzt, wrong". When the ATF is developing original regulations to interpret fresh Bipartisan Fuck Your Rights legislation, it's a lot harder to overrule the new regs. Exactly, the Dems and establishment Republicans in the legislatures said "Yes ATF, you can have more leeway in determining regulations". The courts can still intervein but it is now almost at the level where they would be telling Congress no and that is rare. |
|
Get Active or Get Disarmed! That means get involved in helping good candidates in primary and general election. That is in addition to being politically active once they are elected.
|
[#10]
Originally Posted By Bellows1: We ain't got no time for gun Rights. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Bellows1: Originally Posted By TargetTime: 11 minutes is not a short video We ain't got no time for gun Rights. Wait we’re supposed to talk about guns? |
|
|
[#11]
|
|
|
[Last Edit: FlashMan-7k]
[#12]
Originally Posted By FreefallRet: Proper hotlink https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xov8nJznVks OP need to post a summary View Quote I wonder how secession would be viewed if you told everyone you wouldn't have to deal with the atf, fbi, or irs... After waching the video ... I'm happy they got some decent revisions, but at this point it's like being happy that the bear only bit off one of your arms instead of both. |
|
|
[#13]
|
|
|
[#14]
Originally Posted By SWIRE: Exactly, the Dems and establishment Republicans in the legislatures said "Yes ATF, you can have more leeway in determining regulations". The courts can still intervein but it is now almost at the level where they would be telling Congress no and that is rare. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By SWIRE: Originally Posted By PepePewPew: Originally Posted By SWIRE: Ok, the gun control that some Republicans helped pass late last year and opened the door for the ATF to do this. Since the legislature opened the door I do not think this will end up well for us...just like Obamacare. I hope it does go our way but I wouldn't hold my breath on this one. When the ATF was doing deliberate misinterpretations of long standing GCA '68 law after 50 years of having the opposite interpretation, it was easy to say "bzzzt, wrong". When the ATF is developing original regulations to interpret fresh Bipartisan Fuck Your Rights legislation, it's a lot harder to overrule the new regs. Exactly, the Dems and establishment Republicans in the legislatures said "Yes ATF, you can have more leeway in determining regulations". The courts can still intervein but it is now almost at the level where they would be telling Congress no and that is rare. Aycshully, the problem is that the Supreme Court already settled this in 2022. In Bruen, it became the government's burden to prove that their law fits within the text of the 2a, is constant with other similar or analogous gun control from the time of adoption, AND that is aligns with America's firearm tradition. 3 out of 3 are required, but they score a 0. Yet they still shove it through. And of course we have w. VA vs epa more specifically reeling in rogue bureaucratic rule making. In short, even if Congress passed a bill labeling every person a firearms dealer, it would be invalid via the 2a and further obliterated with Bruen. That's what it says on paper anyway. |
|
|
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.