User Panel
Posted: 2/10/2023 2:16:16 AM EDT
I’m trying to understand the Falklands conflict. It happened in my lifetime, but it seems like it doesn’t get a lot of play here.
I am trying understand how it got started, how it was prosecuted by both sides, and the fallout. Anyone have any book suggestions? |
|
Not much to understand, British fleet leaves The Falklands, Argentina sees an opening to invade and claim The Falklands as theirs, Thatcher doesn’t want to look weak so she sends in the Marines and they kill a shit ton of Argentinians, Reagan says please stop Maggie, she says no and blows up some more boats, including one outside of the agreed hostile zone. Thatcher says too bad suck my dick.
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Not much to understand, British fleet leaves The Falklands, Argentina sees an opening to invade and claim The Falklands as theirs, Thatcher doesn’t want to look weak so she sends in the Marines and they kill a shit ton of Argentinians, Reagan says please stop Maggie, she says no and blows up some more boats, including one outside of the agreed hostile zone. Thatcher says too bad suck my dick. View Quote No! British needed our help big time! Begged Reagan for help, especially after the Argentines pushed their shit in by sinking one of their best ships! All those FAL's that went to waste. |
|
I wish we still had disproportionate responses like they did in ancient times
The British should have conquered all of Argentina, taken whatever they wanted, and left them in ruins |
|
Quoted: No! British needed our help big time! Begged Reagan for help, especially after the Argentines pushed their shit in by sinking one of their best ships! All those FAL's that went to waste. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Not much to understand, British fleet leaves The Falklands, Argentina sees an opening to invade and claim The Falklands as theirs, Thatcher doesn’t want to look weak so she sends in the Marines and they kill a shit ton of Argentinians, Reagan says please stop Maggie, she says no and blows up some more boats, including one outside of the agreed hostile zone. Thatcher says too bad suck my dick. No! British needed our help big time! Begged Reagan for help, especially after the Argentines pushed their shit in by sinking one of their best ships! All those FAL's that went to waste. We gave them some sidewinders, but The US did want The British to try diplomacy instead of invading. |
|
Quoted: Not much to understand, British fleet leaves The Falklands, Argentina sees an opening to invade and claim The Falklands as theirs, Thatcher doesn't want to look weak so she sends in the Marines and they kill a shit ton of Argentinians, Reagan says please stop Maggie, she says no and blows up some more boats, including one outside of the agreed hostile zone. Thatcher says too bad suck my dick. View Quote |
|
|
|
Quoted: There was no agreed upon "hostile" zone. The General Belgrano was perfectly capable of attacking British forces and was in route to do so earlier that day. The fact that the attack was canceled and they were outside the exclusion zone doesn't somehow make them a invalid target. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Not much to understand, British fleet leaves The Falklands, Argentina sees an opening to invade and claim The Falklands as theirs, Thatcher doesn't want to look weak so she sends in the Marines and they kill a shit ton of Argentinians, Reagan says please stop Maggie, she says no and blows up some more boats, including one outside of the agreed hostile zone. Thatcher says too bad suck my dick. I don’t care that the ship was sunk. I’m not being critical, my point is Thatcher didn’t give a fuck. |
|
|
WRONG! Reagan directed the US Navy to prepare for the possibility of providing the USS Iwo Jima to the Royal Navy as a replacement carrier in the event the HMS Invincible or HMS Hermes was sunk. Reagan approved the request without hesitation and his instructions to Weinberger had been simple, “Give Maggie everything she needs to get on with it,” https://news.usni.org/2012/06/27/reagan-readied-us-warship-82-falklands-war-0 https://theaviationist.com/2012/08/21/uk-iwo-jima/#:~:text=the%20Falklands%20War-,USS%20Iwo%20Jima%20would%20have%20been%20loaned%20to%20the%20Royal,ships%20during%20the%20Falklands%20War&text=During%20the%201982%20Falklands%20War,the%20U.S.%20publicly%20claimed%20neutrality. Early on in the days directly after the invasion, there was significant doubt that the UK 1.) would have the resolve to try to take back the Falklands by force, and 2.) would have the ability to successfully do so. The latter was considered an impossibility by the US intelligence community, since the UK had just downsized their fleet and all but eliminated the Fleet Air Arm by retiring their RN Phantoms and large carrier(s). Therefore there was some maneuvering on the part of the US to try to find a diplomatic solution that prevented the UK from losing face while keeping the Argies (who were buying Skyhawks and Sidewinders from us, among many other things) as a friend. When it became clear that this wouldn't be possible, and that Maggie had a pair of balls (she was unproven in a crisis up till then), Reagan quickly sided with the UK practically while maintaining a public profession of neutrality for the most part. We provided them fuel (nearly all of the Jet-A and ship fuel used, by the tanker load), late-model Sidewinders, logistical and communications support, and most importantly, intelligence. |
|
The Falklands War (1982) Battle of Goose Green - 2 Para against all Odds (28–29th May 1982) |
|
|
|
About three years ago I finally finished off the last of my Radwsy Green 7.62x51 Fal Food.
It was a sad day |
|
"Brezhnev took Afghanistan.
Begin took Beirut. Galtieri took the Union Jack. And Maggie, over lunch one day, Took a cruiser with all hands. Apparently, to make him give it back" Pink Floyd - Get your Filthy Hands Off my Desert ETA: Operation "Black Buck 6" The Missing Vulcan - Falklands 1982 |
|
Quoted: The coming of age of the Sea Harrier https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/99724/20220703_134137_jpg-2705208.JPG View Quote I see "Falklands" I jump into the thread in order to recommend this book. The audiobook is excellent as well as the author himself (Commander Nigel "Sharkey" Ward - Commanding Officer of the 801 Naval Air Squadron on board HMS Invincible during the war) narrates it. |
|
The UK really demonstrated their power on their own halfway around the world, and they won decisively.
|
|
Quoted: I see "Falklands" I jump into the thread in order to recommend this book. The audiobook is excellent as well as the author himself (Commander Nigel "Sharkey" Ward - Commanding Officer of the 801 Naval Air Squadron on board HMS Invincible during the war) narrates it. View Quote Ditto. That is a fabulous book and one of the better written air combat memoirs since WWII. |
|
I highly recommend "3 days in June" 3 Para's battle of Mount Longdon.
I would also recommend the Unconventional Soldier podcasts (made by a couple of my ex colleagues) and the episodes which cover Operation Corporate. S2 #032 22 SAS Operation CORPORATE (Falklands 82) #009 Part 2, 3 PARA Mount Longdon Operation CORPORATE (Falklands 82) |
|
|
Quoted: The UK really demonstrated their power on their own halfway around the world, and they won decisively. View Quote If the Argentinians had a half dozen more Exocets or simply fuzed their bombs properly, the Brits would have been forced to call off the operation. As it was, the number of ships they lost was astounding because most of their naval weapon systems either barely functioned or were horribly out of date. |
|
“Be pleased to inform Her Majesty that the White Ensign flies alongside the Union Jack in South Georgia. God save the Queen.” - Task Group Commander, Captain Brian Young, after the surrender at Grytviken. |
|
Quoted: If the Argentinians had a half dozen more Exocets or simply fuzed their bombs properly, the Brits would have been forced to call off the operation. As it was, the number of ships they lost was astounding because most of their naval weapon systems either barely functioned or were horribly out of date. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: The UK really demonstrated their power on their own halfway around the world, and they won decisively. If the Argentinians had a half dozen more Exocets or simply fuzed their bombs properly, the Brits would have been forced to call off the operation. As it was, the number of ships they lost was astounding because most of their naval weapon systems either barely functioned or were horribly out of date. It’s not that they were fuzed incorrectly. The pilots were flying below the designed minimum release altitude of the fuzes to avoid air defenses. |
|
|
This thread is helping me use all those Audible credits I got for Christmas!
Keep it up, lads! ETA: I find it interesting that the four Typhoons the RAF have stationed there outclass the entire Argentinian Air Force. The Argies have an impressive collection of Bristol F.2’s and A4’s, though… |
|
There's a lot written about it and also some documentaries.
The Argentine pilots gave a pretty good accounting of themselves against the British invasion fleet. Mostly because the carriers had to be held out of exocet/ Super Etendard range. |
|
Quoted: I wish we still had disproportionate responses like they did in ancient times The British should have conquered all of Argentina, taken whatever they wanted, and left them in ruins View Quote The Brits lacked the power to conquer the mainland, and there was a big fear in both Washington and London that Argentina would go to the Soviets for help if the war spread beyond the islands. |
|
|
Quoted: It’s not that they were fuzed incorrectly. The pilots were flying below the designed minimum release altitude of the fuzes to avoid air defenses. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: The UK really demonstrated their power on their own halfway around the world, and they won decisively. If the Argentinians had a half dozen more Exocets or simply fuzed their bombs properly, the Brits would have been forced to call off the operation. As it was, the number of ships they lost was astounding because most of their naval weapon systems either barely functioned or were horribly out of date. It’s not that they were fuzed incorrectly. The pilots were flying below the designed minimum release altitude of the fuzes to avoid air defenses. It could have all gone very badly wrong for the brits and nearly did. They managed the whole thing on a shoestring. If they had failed it's hard to fathom what could have become of world events. The UK and the west in general would have looked very weak and that would have encouraged shitheads around the world the challenge the existing order. As for causes, it's important to remember that the falklands have been used as a big, fat red herring for decades by the various juntas and regimes that control argentina so they can blame everything on the brits while they continue loot the country. |
|
Quoted: WRONG! Reagan directed the US Navy to prepare for the possibility of providing the USS Iwo Jima to the Royal Navy as a replacement carrier in the event the HMS Invincible or HMS Hermes was sunk. https://news.usni.org/2012/06/27/reagan-readied-us-warship-82-falklands-war-0 https://theaviationist.com/2012/08/21/uk-iwo-jima/#:~:text=the%20Falklands%20War-,USS%20Iwo%20Jima%20would%20have%20been%20loaned%20to%20the%20Royal,ships%20during%20the%20Falklands%20War&text=During%20the%201982%20Falklands%20War,the%20U.S.%20publicly%20claimed%20neutrality. Early on in the days directly after the invasion, there was significant doubt that the UK 1.) would have the resolve to try to take back the Falklands by force, and 2.) would have the ability to successfully do so. The latter was considered an impossibility by the US intelligence community, since the UK had just downsized their fleet and all but eliminated the Fleet Air Arm by retiring their USN Phantoms and large carrier(s). Therefore there was some maneuvering on the part of the US to try to find a diplomatic solution that prevented the UK from losing face while keeping the Argies (who were buying Skyhawks and Sidewinders from us, among many other things) as a friend. When it became clear that this wouldn't be possible, and that Maggie had a pair of balls (she was unproven in a crisis up till then), Reagan quickly sided with the UK practically while maintaining a public profession of neutrality for the most part. We provided them fuel (nearly all of the Jet-A and ship fuel used, by the tanker load), late-model Sidewinders, logistical and communications support, and most importantly, intelligence. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Reagan says please stop Maggie WRONG! Reagan directed the US Navy to prepare for the possibility of providing the USS Iwo Jima to the Royal Navy as a replacement carrier in the event the HMS Invincible or HMS Hermes was sunk. Reagan approved the request without hesitation and his instructions to Weinberger had been simple, “Give Maggie everything she needs to get on with it,” https://news.usni.org/2012/06/27/reagan-readied-us-warship-82-falklands-war-0 https://theaviationist.com/2012/08/21/uk-iwo-jima/#:~:text=the%20Falklands%20War-,USS%20Iwo%20Jima%20would%20have%20been%20loaned%20to%20the%20Royal,ships%20during%20the%20Falklands%20War&text=During%20the%201982%20Falklands%20War,the%20U.S.%20publicly%20claimed%20neutrality. Early on in the days directly after the invasion, there was significant doubt that the UK 1.) would have the resolve to try to take back the Falklands by force, and 2.) would have the ability to successfully do so. The latter was considered an impossibility by the US intelligence community, since the UK had just downsized their fleet and all but eliminated the Fleet Air Arm by retiring their USN Phantoms and large carrier(s). Therefore there was some maneuvering on the part of the US to try to find a diplomatic solution that prevented the UK from losing face while keeping the Argies (who were buying Skyhawks and Sidewinders from us, among many other things) as a friend. When it became clear that this wouldn't be possible, and that Maggie had a pair of balls (she was unproven in a crisis up till then), Reagan quickly sided with the UK practically while maintaining a public profession of neutrality for the most part. We provided them fuel (nearly all of the Jet-A and ship fuel used, by the tanker load), late-model Sidewinders, logistical and communications support, and most importantly, intelligence. Phantoms would have been nice, but the loss of airborne early warning was arguably the biggest loss from the retirement of HMS Ark Royal. Sheffield and several other ships were hit on radar picket duty, which should have been the role of aircraft. The RN did not use USN model Phantoms. They had their own variant with Rolls Royce engines and other changes. The RAF did buy a squadron of ex-USN F-4Js after the war to backfill Phantom FGR.2s sent to guard the Falklands. |
|
View Quote Piles of firearms make me want to dive in them like a cartoon duck and a pile of money. |
|
Quoted: Ditto. That is a fabulous book and one of the better written air combat memoirs since WWII. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I see "Falklands" I jump into the thread in order to recommend this book. The audiobook is excellent as well as the author himself (Commander Nigel "Sharkey" Ward - Commanding Officer of the 801 Naval Air Squadron on board HMS Invincible during the war) narrates it. Ditto. That is a fabulous book and one of the better written air combat memoirs since WWII. It seems that the role of the Sea Harriers (and the few other models of Harrier GR's ) was downplayed in the media - the Brits could not have won without the Harriers and late model Sidewinders |
|
Quoted: If the Argentinians had a half dozen more Exocets or simply fuzed their bombs properly, the Brits would have been forced to call off the operation. As it was, the number of ships they lost was astounding because most of their naval weapon systems either barely functioned or were horribly out of date. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: The UK really demonstrated their power on their own halfway around the world, and they won decisively. If the Argentinians had a half dozen more Exocets or simply fuzed their bombs properly, the Brits would have been forced to call off the operation. As it was, the number of ships they lost was astounding because most of their naval weapon systems either barely functioned or were horribly out of date. I've read that the bombs WERE properly fuzed, but the Argie Skyhawks had to fly low to avoid AA missiles and to lower the risk of being jumped by Harriers, thus many times the bombs were dropped at too low of altitude to properly fuse |
|
Quoted: It seems that the role of the Sea Harriers (and the few other models of Harrier GR's ) was downplayed in the media - the Brits could not have won without the Harriers and late model Sidewinders View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I see "Falklands" I jump into the thread in order to recommend this book. The audiobook is excellent as well as the author himself (Commander Nigel "Sharkey" Ward - Commanding Officer of the 801 Naval Air Squadron on board HMS Invincible during the war) narrates it. Ditto. That is a fabulous book and one of the better written air combat memoirs since WWII. It seems that the role of the Sea Harriers (and the few other models of Harrier GR's ) was downplayed in the media - the Brits could not have won without the Harriers and late model Sidewinders The Falklands showed both the value of carriers in general and the limitations of small carriers. The Brits could not have won without carriers. They could have won with less loss of life if they had carriers big enough to operate AEW/AWACS aircraft. More capable fighters operating from such a carrier would be a bonus. |
|
Quoted: I don’t care that the ship was sunk. I’m not being critical, my point is Thatcher didn’t give a fuck. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Not much to understand, British fleet leaves The Falklands, Argentina sees an opening to invade and claim The Falklands as theirs, Thatcher doesn't want to look weak so she sends in the Marines and they kill a shit ton of Argentinians, Reagan says please stop Maggie, she says no and blows up some more boats, including one outside of the agreed hostile zone. Thatcher says too bad suck my dick. I don’t care that the ship was sunk. I’m not being critical, my point is Thatcher didn’t give a fuck. she didn't give a fuck about her own citizens either |
|
I'll just add- the fire on the British ships hit by Exocets made the US Navy realize how bad burning plastic and other modern materials were in generating toxic fumes that can kill crew members that would have otherwise been able to evacuate and survive a fire, hastening the US Navy to spend alot more money ensuring Emergency Escape Breathing Devices were more widely available on every ship in both work and berthing compartments.
|
|
|
The Exploited - Let's Start a War |
|
|
Quoted: Not much to understand, British fleet leaves The Falklands, Argentina sees an opening to invade and claim The Falklands as theirs, Thatcher doesn't want to look weak so she sends in the Marines and they kill a shit ton of Argentinians, Reagan says please stop Maggie, she says no and blows up some more boats, including one outside of the agreed hostile zone. Thatcher says too bad suck my dick. View Quote You are right about Maggie, though: Had it been any other post-war British PM they would have folded and negotiated a settlement. |
|
Quoted: The UK really demonstrated their power on their own halfway around the world, and they won decisively. View Quote |
|
Quoted: Yep, and it was the last time the Royal Navy was able to do it. They're just a defensive force now, and considering the quality of their new carriers they had better hope that the Argies don't get any ideas about pulling a Falklands 2: Amphibious Boogaloo. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: The UK really demonstrated their power on their own halfway around the world, and they won decisively. there's enough of a garrison down there to be able to push the argies shit in if they get froggy |
|
Quoted: "Brezhnev took Afghanistan. Begin took Beirut. Galtieri took the Union Jack. And Maggie, over lunch one day, Took a cruiser with all hands. Apparently, to make him give it back" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiDe6Hm5dtA ETA: Operation "Black Buck 6" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ng_X2dHJpZ4 View Quote Brave airmen, but a bit of a clusterfuck. The fact that they had to pull their only long range bombers out of mothballs showed the sad state of the RAF's strategic air power at time of the attack. |
|
This one is a favorite.
Falklands War - The first strike - HD |
|
Quoted: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/80279/7731BDBE-14AA-46E2-A827-14AD106AE375_jpe-2705328.JPG View Quote Great book. Definitely recommend picking up a copy. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.