User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 5/18/2018 7:21:39 PM EDT
The constant theory I see here on Arfcom is that we need to flee to Right Aing State and boost our numbers. This is partially correct, but in reality there is nowhere to flee to since demographics is the future and Leftists are growing and taking over key cities. With Reynolds v. Sims and the more recently Evenwel v. Abbott.... we're fucked.
Evenwel v. Abbott states that a voting district can me made up via the total population. Meaning that residents not eligible to vote are counted and factored in the general voting population for Reynolds v. Sims and it's "Person, One Vote" mandate. So California leftist counties for example can petition for more seats in the House come the 2020 census since they can claim the illegals are part of the "One Person, One Vote" formula. Colorado, Florida, Georgia, etc.... Leftists are doing it as we speak. Flood certain key areas with illegals, criminals, more Leftists etc... in the end, skew the formula for districts and when redistricting comes, they can take seats away from lower populated Conservative areas of the State and solidify power in the State Legislature. 
How to we fight that? How do we win that? The only way is by increasing our demographics. This was tried in New Hampshire with the Free State Project where a bunch of Libertarians moved. But in the end, Leftists from Massachusetts are out numbering them in migration. The problem we face is we're responsible and thus don't breed like rabbits since we have to pay for our own goods and services and at the same time pay the taxes and benefits that allow the Left to breed more or take care of their imported voter base. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/18/2018 8:18:15 PM EDT
[#1]
In that case, open as many Planned Parenthood branches in liberal places as possible and distribute "free consultation" passes among them as bus passes.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/18/2018 8:23:45 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
In that case, open as many Planned Parenthood branches in liberal places as possible and distribute "free consultation" passes among them as bus passes. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/18/2018 9:24:05 PM EDT
[#3]
Demographics is destiny.
More people having smaller families later in life is literally killing us. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/18/2018 10:24:51 PM EDT
[#4]
Quoted:
The constant theory I see here on Arfcom is that we need to flee to Right Aing State and boost our numbers. This is partially correct, but in reality there is nowhere to flee to since demographics is the future and Leftists are growing and taking over key cities. With Reynolds v. Sims and the more recently Evenwel v. Abbott.... we're fucked. Evenwel v. Abbott states that a voting district can me made up via the total population. Meaning that residents not eligible to vote are counted and factored in the general voting population for Reynolds v. Sims and it's "Person, One Vote" mandate. So California leftist counties for example can petition for more seats in the House come the 2020 census since they can claim the illegals are part of the "One Person, One Vote" formula. Colorado, Florida, Georgia, etc.... Leftists are doing it as we speak. Flood certain key areas with illegals, criminals, more Leftists etc... in the end, skew the formula for districts and when redistricting comes, they can take seats away from lower populated Conservative areas of the State and solidify power in the State Legislature. http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/sSC150526cartoon.jpg How to we fight that? How do we win that? The only way is by increasing our demographics. This was tried in New Hampshire with the Free State Project where a bunch of Libertarians moved. But in the end, Leftists from Massachusetts are out numbering them in migration. The problem we face is we're responsible and thus don't breed like rabbits since we have to pay for our own goods and services and at the same time pay the taxes and benefits that allow the Left to breed more or take care of their imported voter base. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 8:12:21 AM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Article V, but of course you know that. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
The constant theory I see here on Arfcom is that we need to flee to Right Aing State and boost our numbers. This is partially correct, but in reality there is nowhere to flee to since demographics is the future and Leftists are growing and taking over key cities. With Reynolds v. Sims and the more recently Evenwel v. Abbott.... we're fucked. Evenwel v. Abbott states that a voting district can me made up via the total population. Meaning that residents not eligible to vote are counted and factored in the general voting population for Reynolds v. Sims and it's "Person, One Vote" mandate. So California leftist counties for example can petition for more seats in the House come the 2020 census since they can claim the illegals are part of the "One Person, One Vote" formula. Colorado, Florida, Georgia, etc.... Leftists are doing it as we speak. Flood certain key areas with illegals, criminals, more Leftists etc... in the end, skew the formula for districts and when redistricting comes, they can take seats away from lower populated Conservative areas of the State and solidify power in the State Legislature. http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/sSC150526cartoon.jpg How to we fight that? How do we win that? The only way is by increasing our demographics. This was tried in New Hampshire with the Free State Project where a bunch of Libertarians moved. But in the end, Leftists from Massachusetts are out numbering them in migration. The problem we face is we're responsible and thus don't breed like rabbits since we have to pay for our own goods and services and at the same time pay the taxes and benefits that allow the Left to breed more or take care of their imported voter base. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 8:22:34 AM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I doubt a Article V will fix anything. SCOTUS will just over ride it and Congress will fuck it up. There aren't really any rules in place. Of course, there is a substantial possibility that the delegates to such a convention would be a source of serious problems. Many proponents of the idea seem to believe that the delegates would be a group much like the Founding Fathers. The reality is they would be modern American politicians. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 8:47:25 AM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Both of those are real possibilities. Of course, there is a substantial possibility that the delegates to such a convention would be a source of serious problems. Many proponents of the idea seem to believe that the delegates would be a group much like the Founding Fathers. The reality is they would be modern American politicians. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 9:12:19 AM EDT
[#8]
Like it or not, the soft people are in the process of making hard times.
Make ready for what is to come. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 9:38:53 AM EDT
[#9]
Quoted:
How to we fight that? How do we win that? The only way is by increasing our demographics. After the 2020 census and 2024 election, I think it will accelerate. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 9:45:35 AM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That's why they import. We also need to send as many back as we can. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 9:48:23 AM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Then we need to back trump and get immigration (imports) dealt with..... We also need to send as many back as we can. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
That's why they import. We also need to send as many back as we can. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 9:56:04 AM EDT
[#12]
'Conservative' States like Tennessee or Texas should restore their Senate apportionment to the way it was before. Reynolds v Sims is completely unconstitutional and hasn't a shred of a basis, other than 'the supreme court said so.' It's time to put USSC back in its place, subordinate to the constitution. Waiting for 'the right appointees' isn't going to do it. Constitutionalist activists at state level have to step up.
And when USDoJ comes down, the States have to fight back, and enforce the tenth amendment against the Feds on their own. Places like Illinois are totally lost because of Reynolds v Sims. In some places, there's still a chance to bring back constitutional values. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 9:57:58 AM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
They're already entranced. We've had rampant immigration since 1965. We can put a Simpson's Movie Dome over the US and their population will increase due to reproductive numbers. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 10:00:14 AM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Physical removal. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
They're already entranced. We've had rampant immigration since 1965. We can put a Simpson's Movie Dome over the US and their population will increase due to reproductive numbers. Good luck. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 10:01:26 AM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I doubt a Article V will fix anything. SCOTUS will just over ride it and Congress will fuck it up. There aren't really any rules in place. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The constant theory I see here on Arfcom is that we need to flee to Right Aing State and boost our numbers. This is partially correct, but in reality there is nowhere to flee to since demographics is the future and Leftists are growing and taking over key cities. With Reynolds v. Sims and the more recently Evenwel v. Abbott.... we're fucked. Evenwel v. Abbott states that a voting district can me made up via the total population. Meaning that residents not eligible to vote are counted and factored in the general voting population for Reynolds v. Sims and it's "Person, One Vote" mandate. So California leftist counties for example can petition for more seats in the House come the 2020 census since they can claim the illegals are part of the "One Person, One Vote" formula. Colorado, Florida, Georgia, etc.... Leftists are doing it as we speak. Flood certain key areas with illegals, criminals, more Leftists etc... in the end, skew the formula for districts and when redistricting comes, they can take seats away from lower populated Conservative areas of the State and solidify power in the State Legislature. http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/sSC150526cartoon.jpg How to we fight that? How do we win that? The only way is by increasing our demographics. This was tried in New Hampshire with the Free State Project where a bunch of Libertarians moved. But in the end, Leftists from Massachusetts are out numbering them in migration. The problem we face is we're responsible and thus don't breed like rabbits since we have to pay for our own goods and services and at the same time pay the taxes and benefits that allow the Left to breed more or take care of their imported voter base. Article V is the last chance to petition the king, so to speak. We say "we exercise our right to change the rules that govern us per the original agreement, feel free to join us abiding or die amd be replaced with just leaders) |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 10:03:15 AM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Pretty that's a declaration of war, though, which would completely justify the populace rising up and destroying the former federal government. Article V is the last chance to petition the king, so to speak. We say "we exercise our right to change the rules that govern us per the original agreement, feel free to join us abiding or die amd be replaced with just leaders) Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The constant theory I see here on Arfcom is that we need to flee to Right Aing State and boost our numbers. This is partially correct, but in reality there is nowhere to flee to since demographics is the future and Leftists are growing and taking over key cities. With Reynolds v. Sims and the more recently Evenwel v. Abbott.... we're fucked. Evenwel v. Abbott states that a voting district can me made up via the total population. Meaning that residents not eligible to vote are counted and factored in the general voting population for Reynolds v. Sims and it's "Person, One Vote" mandate. So California leftist counties for example can petition for more seats in the House come the 2020 census since they can claim the illegals are part of the "One Person, One Vote" formula. Colorado, Florida, Georgia, etc.... Leftists are doing it as we speak. Flood certain key areas with illegals, criminals, more Leftists etc... in the end, skew the formula for districts and when redistricting comes, they can take seats away from lower populated Conservative areas of the State and solidify power in the State Legislature. http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/sSC150526cartoon.jpg How to we fight that? How do we win that? The only way is by increasing our demographics. This was tried in New Hampshire with the Free State Project where a bunch of Libertarians moved. But in the end, Leftists from Massachusetts are out numbering them in migration. The problem we face is we're responsible and thus don't breed like rabbits since we have to pay for our own goods and services and at the same time pay the taxes and benefits that allow the Left to breed more or take care of their imported voter base. Article V is the last chance to petition the king, so to speak. We say "we exercise our right to change the rules that govern us per the original agreement, feel free to join us abiding or die amd be replaced with just leaders) You believe the Constitution actually means anything today. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 10:07:11 AM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
When a number of them are either American Citizens due to Birth or Naturalization but have no cultural heritage/connection/adoption of the American Way of Life and Value. Good luck. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 10:07:44 AM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Both of those are real possibilities. Of course, there is a substantial possibility that the delegates to such a convention would be a source of serious problems. Many proponents of the idea seem to believe that the delegates would be a group much like the Founding Fathers. The reality is they would be modern American politicians. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I doubt a Article V will fix anything. SCOTUS will just over ride it and Congress will fuck it up. There aren't really any rules in place. Of course, there is a substantial possibility that the delegates to such a convention would be a source of serious problems. Many proponents of the idea seem to believe that the delegates would be a group much like the Founding Fathers. The reality is they would be modern American politicians. Is there a realistic chance that we hold onto our rights for even another fifty years on our present course? Is there a realistic chance armed revolt delivers a better system on the other side? Are there very nearly enough states on board for Article V? Are the people armed such they could realistically resist a tyrannical government in rebellion that tries to shut down the convention or deny the lawful amendments? Is there a realistic chance that a convention proceeds per the agrees-upon rules, produces useful changes which are then ratified, and respected enough by the feds to reign them in for the foreseeable future? |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 10:09:57 AM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
HAHAHAHAHA..... You believe the Constitution actually means anything today. As it is, WV has just under 2 million people. The Greater LA area has 20 million. We have a total of 5 in Congress (3 in the house + 2 in the Senate). The LA area has about 30. Our interests are ignored and we simply have nothing in common with those people. So, why should WV stay in a union with CA? |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 10:11:44 AM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
They're already entranced. We've had rampant immigration since 1965. We can put a Simpson's Movie Dome over the US and their population will increase due to reproductive numbers. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
That's why they import. We also need to send as many back as we can. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 10:12:04 AM EDT
[#21]
I'm wonderful my if there's a change in the congregational formula coming. Trumps populism could be part of this.
As the positions are drawn now the Republicans are going to fall eventually. As Goldwater said, Hitching the GOP wagon to the Christian conservatives did get a lot of vote but that segment is shrinking and polarizing. Trump moves away from this and more to populism to win. I suspect more of the same to win in the future keeping the critical core issues of the GOP will be important going forward. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 10:12:44 AM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That is exactly why I disapprove it. We would never have a group like the Founders running a Art V. It would be the Cuomos, Clintons, McCains, their ilk. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 10:12:50 AM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
HAHAHAHAHA..... You believe the Constitution actually means anything today. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The constant theory I see here on Arfcom is that we need to flee to Right Aing State and boost our numbers. This is partially correct, but in reality there is nowhere to flee to since demographics is the future and Leftists are growing and taking over key cities. With Reynolds v. Sims and the more recently Evenwel v. Abbott.... we're fucked. Evenwel v. Abbott states that a voting district can me made up via the total population. Meaning that residents not eligible to vote are counted and factored in the general voting population for Reynolds v. Sims and it's "Person, One Vote" mandate. So California leftist counties for example can petition for more seats in the House come the 2020 census since they can claim the illegals are part of the "One Person, One Vote" formula. Colorado, Florida, Georgia, etc.... Leftists are doing it as we speak. Flood certain key areas with illegals, criminals, more Leftists etc... in the end, skew the formula for districts and when redistricting comes, they can take seats away from lower populated Conservative areas of the State and solidify power in the State Legislature. http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/sSC150526cartoon.jpg How to we fight that? How do we win that? The only way is by increasing our demographics. This was tried in New Hampshire with the Free State Project where a bunch of Libertarians moved. But in the end, Leftists from Massachusetts are out numbering them in migration. The problem we face is we're responsible and thus don't breed like rabbits since we have to pay for our own goods and services and at the same time pay the taxes and benefits that allow the Left to breed more or take care of their imported voter base. Article V is the last chance to petition the king, so to speak. We say "we exercise our right to change the rules that govern us per the original agreement, feel free to join us abiding or die amd be replaced with just leaders) You believe the Constitution actually means anything today. Don't tell me you don't believe in self-government (which is what we're discussing) and simultaneously believe in rights. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 10:16:42 AM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
... and paid for by AT&T, Comcast, Pharma, ADM, Monsanto, GM, Ford, Disney, Google, Facebook, Apple, Microsoft and just about every big name corporation out there looking to alter the constitution to give them unlimited power at the expense of the citizenry. If they had their way, there would be ZERO taxes whatsoever on corporations while at the same time they would be vested 100% in the rights of living breathing humans with the right to vote and do whatever else they so please. I wish an Article V was possible BUT I just do not trust the human's in power these days to do it right. We had one shot at it back in 1788 and that was it. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
That is exactly why I disapprove it. We would never have a group like the Founders running a Art V. It would be the Cuomos, Clintons, McCains, their ilk. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 10:17:59 AM EDT
[#25]
This is where I part company with my Conservative brethren.
We should encourage and promote abortion among the Leftist. We need to make sure that they never get an opportunity to vote. Abortion is key to the Conservative's salvation. Fireproof suit on !!! 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 10:18:48 AM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If we don't have the Constitution, why bother with the rest? Just let the 50 states go their own way. As it is, WV has just under 2 million people. The Greater LA area has 20 million. We have a total of 5 in Congress (3 in the house + 2 in the Senate). The LA area has about 30. Our interests are ignored and we simply have nothing in common with those people. So, why should WV stay in a union with CA? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
HAHAHAHAHA..... You believe the Constitution actually means anything today. As it is, WV has just under 2 million people. The Greater LA area has 20 million. We have a total of 5 in Congress (3 in the house + 2 in the Senate). The LA area has about 30. Our interests are ignored and we simply have nothing in common with those people. So, why should WV stay in a union with CA? |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 10:25:23 AM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
This is where I part company with my Conservative brethren. We should encourage and promote abortion among the Leftist. We need to make sure that they never get an opportunity to vote. Abortion is key to the Conservative's salvation. Fireproof suit on !!! Get these micromanagers out of the picture, and maybe we can focus on actual strategic issues like civil rights, representation, and restoring checks & balances. Abortion is just another "peculiar institution" that will correct itself given time, but is disastrous to confront directly. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 10:26:19 AM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Why because you're slaves, of course. Force would be the only reason to stay, thank you very much to the Great Emancipator |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 10:26:37 AM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
... and paid for by AT&T, Comcast, Pharma, ADM, Monsanto, GM, Ford, Disney, Google, Facebook, Apple, Microsoft and just about every big name corporation out there looking to alter the constitution to give them unlimited power at the expense of the citizenry. If they had their way, there would be ZERO taxes whatsoever on corporations while at the same time they would be vested 100% in the rights of living breathing humans with the right to vote and do whatever else they so please. I wish an Article V was possible BUT I just do not trust the human's in power these days to do it right. We had one shot at it back in 1788 and that was it. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
That is exactly why I disapprove it. We would never have a group like the Founders running a Art V. It would be the Cuomos, Clintons, McCains, their ilk. Notice how all the corporations you mention buy off Democrats and push for higher taxes. They can avoid taxes, but high taxes and regulation create barriers to entry, and keep competition from growing and taking their market share. They are loaded with cash and can pay it. They big government to protect their monopolies with regulation. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 10:28:19 AM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That is exactly why I disapprove it. We would never have a group like the Founders running a Art V. It would be the Cuomos, Clintons, McCains, their ilk. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 10:29:18 AM EDT
[#31]
Quoted:
The constant theory I see here on Arfcom is that we need to flee to Right Aing State and boost our numbers. This is partially correct, but in reality there is nowhere to flee to since demographics is the future and Leftists are growing and taking over key cities. With Reynolds v. Sims and the more recently Evenwel v. Abbott.... we're fucked. Evenwel v. Abbott states that a voting district can me made up via the total population. Meaning that residents not eligible to vote are counted and factored in the general voting population for Reynolds v. Sims and it's "Person, One Vote" mandate. So California leftist counties for example can petition for more seats in the House come the 2020 census since they can claim the illegals are part of the "One Person, One Vote" formula. Colorado, Florida, Georgia, etc.... Leftists are doing it as we speak. Flood certain key areas with illegals, criminals, more Leftists etc... in the end, skew the formula for districts and when redistricting comes, they can take seats away from lower populated Conservative areas of the State and solidify power in the State Legislature. http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/sSC150526cartoon.jpg How to we fight that? How do we win that? The only way is by increasing our demographics. This was tried in New Hampshire with the Free State Project where a bunch of Libertarians moved. But in the end, Leftists from Massachusetts are out numbering them in migration. The problem we face is we're responsible and thus don't breed like rabbits since we have to pay for our own goods and services and at the same time pay the taxes and benefits that allow the Left to breed more or take care of their imported voter base. Trump and the republicans need to make sure illegal alien numbers will not count. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 10:31:31 AM EDT
[#32]
Right now my boss is filing a mandatory municipal census for our business it will include all of our green card employees who are ineligible to vote but will be utilized as demographics supporting representation...
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 10:32:13 AM EDT
[#33]
Welfare has been encouraging the irresponsible reproduction habits of urban left voting communities for decades. The working middle class family stops at two kids because they actually have to pay their own bills while ghetto families crank out 4 kids.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 10:34:21 AM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
This is where I part company with my Conservative brethren. We should encourage and promote abortion among the Leftist. We need to make sure that they never get an opportunity to vote. Abortion is key to the Conservative's salvation. Fireproof suit on !!! If your the type of woman that would murder your unborn child I don't want you having children anyways. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 10:35:28 AM EDT
[#35]
The overwhelming advice here is to run from the confrontation - to flee from the battle.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 10:35:51 AM EDT
[#36]
Quoted:
The constant theory I see here on Arfcom is that we need to flee to Right Aing State and boost our numbers. This is partially correct, but in reality there is nowhere to flee to since demographics is the future and Leftists are growing and taking over key cities. With Reynolds v. Sims and the more recently Evenwel v. Abbott.... we're fucked. Evenwel v. Abbott states that a voting district can me made up via the total population. Meaning that residents not eligible to vote are counted and factored in the general voting population for Reynolds v. Sims and it's "Person, One Vote" mandate. So California leftist counties for example can petition for more seats in the House come the 2020 census since they can claim the illegals are part of the "One Person, One Vote" formula. Colorado, Florida, Georgia, etc.... Leftists are doing it as we speak. Flood certain key areas with illegals, criminals, more Leftists etc... in the end, skew the formula for districts and when redistricting comes, they can take seats away from lower populated Conservative areas of the State and solidify power in the State Legislature. http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/sSC150526cartoon.jpg How to we fight that? How do we win that? The only way is by increasing our demographics. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 10:36:27 AM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That is exactly why I disapprove it. We would never have a group like the Founders running a Art V. It would be the Cuomos, Clintons, McCains, their ilk. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 10:38:27 AM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Welfare has been encouraging the irresponsible reproduction habits of urban left voting communities for decades. The working middle class family stops at two kids because they actually have to pay their own bills while ghetto families crank out 4 kids. Even people who dropped out of high school know that 4 x $825 is more than 2 x $825 in welfare. The American tribe is being invaded by low intelligence and low education people from third world countries. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 10:42:21 AM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:Why because you're slaves, of course. Force would be the only reason to stay, thank you very much to the Great Emancipator Every additional tax passed, every regulation dropped on us, every restriction and limitation is another link in the chains that bind us. The Founding Father's had about 99% freedom. I would guess we're at about 70-80% slavery now and progressing a couple of percent a year towards complete power by the government. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 10:45:09 AM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The overwhelming advice here is to run from the confrontation - to flee from the battle. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 11:07:35 AM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If we don't have the Constitution, why bother with the rest? Just let the 50 states go their own way. As it is, WV has just under 2 million people. The Greater LA area has 20 million. We have a total of 5 in Congress (3 in the house + 2 in the Senate). The LA area has about 30. Our interests are ignored and we simply have nothing in common with those people. So, why should WV stay in a union with CA? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
HAHAHAHAHA..... You believe the Constitution actually means anything today. As it is, WV has just under 2 million people. The Greater LA area has 20 million. We have a total of 5 in Congress (3 in the house + 2 in the Senate). The LA area has about 30. Our interests are ignored and we simply have nothing in common with those people. So, why should WV stay in a union with CA? |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 11:08:35 AM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Pass laws to discourage rampant reproduction, deport the 14 million or so that you can, change public education to promote assimilation and citizenship. Actively prosecute sedition and tax fraud. Curtail remittances. Completely constitutional. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
When a number of them are either American Citizens due to Birth or Naturalization but have no cultural heritage/connection/adoption of the American Way of Life and Value. Good luck. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 11:10:15 AM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
For the record, subsequent generations absent continued influx will moderate and do the "melting pot" thing. Very well documented. Problem is, there's an ice-machine pouring cubes into melting pot, so obviously they just keep piling up & keeping eachother solid. A generational immigration freeze (like we used to do after massive influxes) would probably stop the communists cold. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
That's why they import. We also need to send as many back as we can. 
Cubans were once the bedrock in Florida for solid GOP Conservative Support. Their kids who are moderating into the melting pot are becoming more and more Leftist. Don't bet on it being what you think. The same has happened with Koreans and Vietnamese in California. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 11:11:19 AM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'm wonderful my if there's a change in the congregational formula coming. Trumps populism could be part of this. As the positions are drawn now the Republicans are going to fall eventually. As Goldwater said, Hitching the GOP wagon to the Christian conservatives did get a lot of vote but that segment is shrinking and polarizing. Trump moves away from this and more to populism to win. I suspect more of the same to win in the future keeping the critical core issues of the GOP will be important going forward. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 11:11:23 AM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If we don't have the Constitution, why bother with the rest? Just let the 50 states go their own way. As it is, WV has just under 2 million people. The Greater LA area has 20 million. We have a total of 5 in Congress (3 in the house + 2 in the Senate). The LA area has about 30. Our interests are ignored and we simply have nothing in common with those people. So, why should WV stay in a union with CA? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
HAHAHAHAHA..... You believe the Constitution actually means anything today. As it is, WV has just under 2 million people. The Greater LA area has 20 million. We have a total of 5 in Congress (3 in the house + 2 in the Senate). The LA area has about 30. Our interests are ignored and we simply have nothing in common with those people. So, why should WV stay in a union with CA?  ...
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 11:17:41 AM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That's why they import. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 11:18:21 AM EDT
[#47]
Here is my thread, touching on the same topic. Eventually, we are going to have to do exactly what Liberals have done to us...or we will be extinct. We need to establish territory and make it unbearably Conservative, as hostile to liberal colonization as New York and California are to Conservatives who try to colonize there. We've got a "numbers" problem that needs to be addressed- and we need to be able to have some quality of life/freedom while we work on increasing our reproductive rate. Let them infest the inner cities...while we defend our state borders...they will crumble and fall without a shot fired. All we need to do is outlast Communism, let nature take it's course and establish defensible territory that they do not WANT to infest. We can make it as hostile to them as NY/CA are to us- we will build our empire while they collapse theirs. We will create laws that prevent their migration in to our regions/states. Liberals won't even want to open businesses where people who open carry machineguns are a protected class, can sue businesses for discriminating against them. They'll stay the fuck away from areas where there are no entitlements or any environments conducive to their parasitism.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 11:25:25 AM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Here is my thread, touching on the same topic. Eventually, we are going to have to do exactly what Liberals have done to us...or we will be extinct. We need to establish territory and make it unbearably Conservative, as hostile to liberal colonization as New York and California are to Conservatives who try to colonize there. We've got a "numbers" problem that needs to be addressed- and we need to be able to have some quality of life/freedom while we work on increasing our reproductive rate. Let them infest the inner cities...they will crumble and fall without a shot fired. All we need to do is outlast Communism, let nature take it's course and establish defensible territory that they do not WANT to infest. We can make it as hostile to them as NY/CA are to us- we will build our empire while they collapse theirs. We will create laws that prevent their migration in to our regions/states. Liberals won't even want to open businesses where people who open carry machineguns are a protected class, can sue businesses for discriminating against them. They'll stay the fuck away from areas where there are no entitlements or any environments conducive to their parasitism. They are locusts. The other issue is that they grow in number in their inner cities and they strip us of representation in the legislature in the states and federal level. They don't need to take over the whole state. Just key areas and make those populations grow. Look at Chicago, New York City, Los Angeles, Miami, etc.... they have stripped legislative representation from other areas due to redistricting. Chicago controls Illinois. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 12:01:23 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Problem is, our solution to make it inviting to our own kind is what attracts our enemies. We promote civil and economic freedom. That means lower costs of living, friendly business environments, lower taxes, personal freedom, etc.... that attracts the Left escaping their fuck ups. The problem is, they bring their voting patterns with them and create the fuck ups that they flee. They are locusts. The other issue is that they grow in number in their inner cities and they strip us of representation in the legislature in the states and federal level. They don't need to take over the whole state. Just key areas and make those populations grow. Look at Chicago, New York City, Los Angeles, Miami, etc.... they have stripped legislative representation from other areas due to redistricting. Chicago controls Illinois. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Here is my thread, touching on the same topic. Eventually, we are going to have to do exactly what Liberals have done to us...or we will be extinct. We need to establish territory and make it unbearably Conservative, as hostile to liberal colonization as New York and California are to Conservatives who try to colonize there. We've got a "numbers" problem that needs to be addressed- and we need to be able to have some quality of life/freedom while we work on increasing our reproductive rate. Let them infest the inner cities...they will crumble and fall without a shot fired. All we need to do is outlast Communism, let nature take it's course and establish defensible territory that they do not WANT to infest. We can make it as hostile to them as NY/CA are to us- we will build our empire while they collapse theirs. We will create laws that prevent their migration in to our regions/states. Liberals won't even want to open businesses where people who open carry machineguns are a protected class, can sue businesses for discriminating against them. They'll stay the fuck away from areas where there are no entitlements or any environments conducive to their parasitism. They are locusts. The other issue is that they grow in number in their inner cities and they strip us of representation in the legislature in the states and federal level. They don't need to take over the whole state. Just key areas and make those populations grow. Look at Chicago, New York City, Los Angeles, Miami, etc.... they have stripped legislative representation from other areas due to redistricting. Chicago controls Illinois. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2018 12:50:15 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What's that they say, "no risk, no reward?" Is there a realistic chance that we hold onto our rights for even another fifty years on our present course? Is there a realistic chance armed revolt delivers a better system on the other side? Are there very nearly enough states on board for Article V? Are the people armed such they could realistically resist a tyrannical government in rebellion that tries to shut down the convention or deny the lawful amendments? Is there a realistic chance that a convention proceeds per the agrees-upon rules, produces useful changes which are then ratified, and respected enough by the feds to reign them in for the foreseeable future? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I doubt a Article V will fix anything. SCOTUS will just over ride it and Congress will fuck it up. There aren't really any rules in place. Of course, there is a substantial possibility that the delegates to such a convention would be a source of serious problems. Many proponents of the idea seem to believe that the delegates would be a group much like the Founding Fathers. The reality is they would be modern American politicians. Is there a realistic chance that we hold onto our rights for even another fifty years on our present course? Is there a realistic chance armed revolt delivers a better system on the other side? Are there very nearly enough states on board for Article V? Are the people armed such they could realistically resist a tyrannical government in rebellion that tries to shut down the convention or deny the lawful amendments? Is there a realistic chance that a convention proceeds per the agrees-upon rules, produces useful changes which are then ratified, and respected enough by the feds to reign them in for the foreseeable future? |
|
|
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
