User Panel
Posted: 4/14/2021 3:54:45 PM EDT
Does the US Military hate the SCAR H? If you've ever hated on a gun you don't really know about, hit the subscribe button. |
|
|
Kicks hard, destroys optics, uncontrollable on full auto.
Wish I was issued one, cause 308 |
|
I liked mine.....and it made me look even cooler with my Hawaiian shirt and 5/11 pants at the entrance to the DFAC. I would say it was an excellent gategun /recruiting tool for batt boys looking to trade up.
18Z50 |
|
It’s overly expensive, not really in the DOD pipeline and there is literally nothing wrong with the m16 platform unless there is something that the scar can do that the m16/m4 platform can’t do
|
|
Quoted: It’s overly expensive, not really in the DOD pipeline and there is literally nothing wrong with the m16 platform unless there is something that the scar can do that the m16/m4 platform can’t do View Quote From my understanding SCAR is probably best 7.62 but in 5.56 not much purpose to it. |
|
|
In before the poors and pussies?
Eh nope a few got in already. |
|
|
Having owned both (16 and 17), I won’t say I hate them but I do think they’re overrated. Also, based on the customer service a good friend received from FN when his 16 was having feeding issues, if I still owned them I would pray nothing happened to them.
|
|
|
|
|
The SCAR doesn't recoil hard. This being said, it would suck on full auto.
|
|
My BIL was issued one and said he really liked it. Even got one after he got out.
|
|
|
Quoted: Having owned both (16 and 17), I won’t say I hate them but I do think they’re overrated. Also, based on the customer service a good friend received from FN when his 16 was having feeding issues, if I still owned them I would pray nothing happened to them. View Quote I currently own both and these are my thoughts exactly. The gun may have been cutting edge in 2009, but its ergonomics, some aspects of its design and its price are not competitive in today’s market. The gun is actually more deserving of an overhaul than what the Bren 2 did for the 805. |
|
|
Quoted: Do you really put that much faith in an organization that frowns upon putting your hands in your pockets? https://i.pinimg.com/originals/50/ba/57/50ba57a94dc08f2f58bf312ba827a138.jpg View Quote The guys carrying MK17's don't care about hands in pockets. |
|
Does the US Military hate the SCAR H? View Quote 2. USASOC eventually responded to USSOCOM, "We don't want it." The SOCOM money managers then told Naval Special Warfare Command that if they wanted it, SOCOM would buy them using the SEALs' share of SOCOM's budget, or the SEALs could go back to parent service (Navy) to buy them using Navy Money. They'll probably be traded around until no longer economically sustainable-repairable, then be retired. |
|
Quoted: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/311651/26B76FE2-55B0-46D7-8ADC-5E347771DCDF_jpe-1904913.JPG View Quote LMT MARS-H master race |
|
My cousin was with 10th group and they hate the scar L and the scar H. They just flat out refused to carry them. They have them available, but they use what they want. His team also did a combat evaluation of the HKXM8. They hated those too.
|
|
10 years ago a Navy SEAL told me he “hates that gun with a f’in passion”.
He explained that it was guaranteed to jam at the wrong time and got a good friend of his killed when doing an raid. |
|
Scar 17 are very nice. Shoot soft for a 7.62 (much softer than a 308 based AR). I remember when they were $2,100 not that long ago.
|
|
Quoted: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELf7xtiEmDk If you've ever hated on a gun you don't really know about, hit the subscribe button. View Quote Every Joe in the .mil loves the weapon that the other 99% of the .mil doesn't have. Holy shit, if you told a IBCT they would be given half dozen 50 Beowulf uppers and only 50 rounds of ammo for all of them, there would be fistfights and blowjobs over the fucking things. The .mil, on the other hand, loves what the fedgov will buy and and provide repair parts and training ammo for. Institutionally they could give fuck-all bout small arms. |
|
That compensator on the commercially sold version is doing a lot for the recoil. The military version has a flash hider.
|
|
|
LOL, ahhh yes, the answer to the question nobody asked......the SCAR
|
|
I rarely watch his videos but this one caught my eye. 25 minutes later I felt the question still hadn’t been answered.
|
|
|
Civilian side, FN's CS sucks, really, really sucks. It's a cool rifle, the SR25 ACC/APC is a better rifle.
Quoted: That compensator on the commercially sold version is doing a lot for the recoil. The military version has a flash hider. View Quote Very, very true. Even on the 16S/Light there is a noticeable difference. |
|
|
|
|
|
Here we go again...GD asshats making obtuse statements about a rifle that most can’t afford or haven’t shot. “But my SEAL buddy said it sucks!” How long ago was this? “Durrr, 10 years ago...”
The video is spot on. The SCAR shines for engagements beyond 200yds but only if you keep the longer barrel. Using a 762 with a 13” barrel is retardation, and negates almost every positive that comes from a 16” 762 select-fire rifle. It’s one of, if not the softest shooting, magazine-fed 762 rifles on the market. Mag capacity is limited but duh, you’re carrying 762. So no, the SCAR doesn’t shine in all aspects, under all conditions but it CAN do a lot of things. Those who have SCARs know three things, the stock trigger blows, an extended forend is needed and don’t buy a cheap optic. GBPSE. |
|
We liked them quite a bit. They were reliable and accurate enough. Most commonly configured with the short barrel.
Our SCAR 16's sat in the armory and everyone hated them. |
|
|
|
Quoted: Those who have SCARs know three things, the stock trigger blows, an extended forend is needed and don’t buy a cheap optic. GBPSE. View Quote And that's the problem, for a gun at that price point it needs to do better. You shouldn't have to throw it through a PMM/KDG catalog just to make it as ergonomic as a high end AR. Even then it doesn't solve certain inherent issues (reciprocating CH limits where you can place your hand/accessories, on a SBR that fat handguard is difficult to work with remote switches for lights/lasers) It's not a bad gun, but a very overrated one. |
|
Quoted: It's not a bad gun, but a very overrated one. View Quote It’s overrated if you try and make it a CQB rifle. Can you build a similar shooting AR-10 rifle with these characteristics for the same price as a decently equipped SCAR? Folding stock Extremely soft recoil 16” Chrome barrel Lightweight Geisselle trigger KDG/extended forend If so, which rifles out there match these exact characteristics for roughly $3800 |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.