User Panel
Posted: 10/18/2020 7:28:59 PM EDT
From Fox News
[Excerpts] A U.S. District Judge in San Diego who has issued rulings in two separate lawsuits challenging California’s strict gun control measures will take up another weapons-related case on Monday, sparking criticism from gun-control groups who pro-gun advocates have been given an unfair advantage. Judge Roger Benitez has twice ruled in favor of gun rights: in a case that challenged California’s ban of high-capacity magazines, and another case mandating background checks for buying ammunition, the San Diego Union-Tribune reported. On Monday, he will oversee a case challenging several state laws regulating and defining assault weapons. He is overseeing another case challenging the state’s prohibition on owning batons, billy clubs, and blackjacks. Gun control groups have questioned how Benitez, a pro-Second Amendment judge, has been able to see so many cases involving gun rights. Their scrutiny has drawn attention to an obscure “related case” rule that allows one party in a lawsuit to file cases in certain districts if the issues at hand involve “the same or substantially identical questions of law” as those in another case. All federal courts have this rule. But San Diego is unique in that an opposing side in a case cannot challenge or object to the transfer. Gun control groups maintain that this allows gun rights organizations to go judge shopping: knowing that they will have a more favorable ruling with Benitez than virtually any other federal judge in California. Gun rights groups have disputed this, pointing out that they have other Second Amendment cases in other jurisdictions. Arguments for “Miller et al v. Becerra et al” will commence Monday at 9:30 a.m. at the downtown San Diego federal courthouse. |
|
LOL is there a way to choose or know which judge will get your case?
|
|
|
|
|
Judge shopping where have I seen that happen before? Cry more pussies.
|
|
|
|
|
“sparking criticism from gun-control groups who pro-gun advocates have been given an unfair advantage. “
Fuck you |
|
Free the blackjack! A slap upside the head lays them low (buddy used one on a drunk and flatteneed him).
I never used one msyelf but I carred a lignum-vitae billy club in my sap pocket when I went to work. Never had to use it. |
|
Once again, a Cuban born Judge doing the job American born Judges don't want to do.
|
|
You mean to tell me a judge in a place with blatant violations of the constitution sees many cases about the violations? No fucking way. Didn't see that coming.
|
|
|
If the liberals are upset now, just wait until it gets to the 9th circuit court of appeals.
Instead of being a nearly automatic "win" for the left, we now have a 50/50 chance because of all the great judges Trump has nominated and the GOP Senate has confirmed. |
|
It's funny how they shop around, specifically getting some of the most far-Left district court judges in Hawaii and San Francisco, on such a regular basis that most of us can accurately predict in what court a case from them will be filed, and then complain when the tactic is used against them. But then, a lack of hypocrisy has never been an issue for the Left.
|
|
Quoted: Once again, a Cuban born Judge doing the job American born Judges don't want to do. View Quote Attached File |
|
Quoted: From Fox News [Excerpts] A U.S. District Judge in San Diego who has issued rulings in two separate lawsuits challenging California’s strict gun control measures will take up another weapons-related case on Monday, sparking criticism from gun-control groups who pro-gun advocates have been given an unfair advantage. Judge Roger Benitez has twice ruled in favor of gun rights: in a case that challenged California’s ban of high-capacity magazines, and another case mandating background checks for buying ammunition, the San Diego Union-Tribune reported. On Monday, he will oversee a case challenging several state laws regulating and defining assault weapons. He is overseeing another case challenging the state’s prohibition on owning batons, billy clubs, and blackjacks. Gun control groups have questioned how Benitez, a pro-Second Amendment judge, has been able to see so many cases involving gun rights. Their scrutiny has drawn attention to an obscure “related case” rule that allows one party in a lawsuit to file cases in certain districts if the issues at hand involve “the same or substantially identical questions of law” as those in another case. All federal courts have this rule. But San Diego is unique in that an opposing side in a case cannot challenge or object to the transfer. Gun control groups maintain that this allows gun rights organizations to go judge shopping: knowing that they will have a more favorable ruling with Benitez than virtually any other federal judge in California. Gun rights groups have disputed this, pointing out that they have other Second Amendment cases in other jurisdictions. Arguments for “Miller et al v. Becerra et al” will commence Monday at 9:30 a.m. at the downtown San Diego federal courthouse. View Quote Sorta like a certain type of Hawaiian judge making rulings on illegal aliens? lol |
|
Deleted.
FFS if you even punctuate incorrectly you’re a Nazi. @Miami_JBT please delete your non-COC approved quote and put this thread back on track. |
|
|
|
Quoted: CNN: Biden will stand up against the powerful gun lobby to close the (((sympathetic judge loophole))) View Quote ~MIAMI_JBT @leftytheking I know from the way you wrote it, you didn't mean it to be antisemitic. But just giving you a heads up. |
|
Haven’t the commies used Hawaii judge to block Trump’s border and immigration?
|
|
Quoted: Triple parentheses or triple brackets, also known as an (((echo))), are an antisemitic symbol that has been used to highlight the names of individuals of a Jewish background, or organizations thought to be owned by Jews. ~MIAMI_JBT @leftytheking I know from the way you wrote it, you didn't mean it to be antisemitic. But just giving you a heads up. View Quote Are you serious about the parenthesis? |
|
Quoted: Triple parentheses or triple brackets, also known as an (((echo))), are an antisemitic symbol that has been used to highlight the names of individuals of a Jewish background, or organizations thought to be owned by Jews. ~MIAMI_JBT @leftytheking I know from the way you wrote it, you didn't mean it to be antisemitic. But just giving you a heads up. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: CNN: Biden will stand up against the powerful gun lobby to close the (((sympathetic judge loophole))) ~MIAMI_JBT @leftytheking I know from the way you wrote it, you didn't mean it to be antisemitic. But just giving you a heads up. Does this post imply we are not allowed to do that? |
|
Quoted: Does this post imply we are not allowed to do that? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: CNN: Biden will stand up against the powerful gun lobby to close the (((sympathetic judge loophole))) ~MIAMI_JBT @leftytheking I know from the way you wrote it, you didn't mean it to be antisemitic. But just giving you a heads up. Does this post imply we are not allowed to do that? lol |
|
|
Haha fuck off, we've been dealing with assholes who go find sympathetic judges abd keep fucking up the wolf and grizzly delisting.
|
|
LOMFL.
Shitbag libs won't or can't accept the fact that the person is the problem, not the weapon. |
|
Yeah, it is a known thing online like how 88er means a Neo-Nazi.
Quoted: Does this post imply we are not allowed to do that? |
|
Quoted: Yeah, it is a known thing online like how 88er means a Neo-Nazi. It is one of those things that is a case by case issue. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Are you serious about the parenthesis? Quoted: Does this post imply we are not allowed to do that? So it’s all in how (((they))) interpret it? Jk don’t ban me please |
|
|
Quoted: Triple parentheses or triple brackets, also known as an (((echo))), are an antisemitic symbol that has been used to highlight the names of individuals of a Jewish background, or organizations thought to be owned by Jews. ~MIAMI_JBT @leftytheking I know from the way you wrote it, you didn't mean it to be antisemitic. But just giving you a heads up. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: CNN: Biden will stand up against the powerful gun lobby to close the (((sympathetic judge loophole))) ~MIAMI_JBT @leftytheking I know from the way you wrote it, you didn't mean it to be antisemitic. But just giving you a heads up. Care to site that? |
|
Isn’t this akin to the Hawaii judge? They weren’t complaining then...
|
|
Quoted: Triple parentheses or triple brackets, also known as an (((echo))), are an antisemitic symbol that has been used to highlight the names of individuals of a Jewish background, or organizations thought to be owned by Jews. ~MIAMI_JBT @leftytheking I know from the way you wrote it, you didn't mean it to be antisemitic. But just giving you a heads up. View Quote The shit people look for |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: CNN: Biden will stand up against the powerful gun lobby to close the (((sympathetic judge loophole))) ~MIAMI_JBT @leftytheking I know from the way you wrote it, you didn't mean it to be antisemitic. But just giving you a heads up. Care to site that? Don't. He'll have the Wikipedia entry paraphrased on here in no time. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: CNN: Biden will stand up against the powerful gun lobby to close the (((sympathetic judge loophole))) ~MIAMI_JBT @leftytheking I know from the way you wrote it, you didn't mean it to be antisemitic. But just giving you a heads up. Care to site that? He’s not BSing. Go on 4chan for 30 seconds and you’ll see it. I think it’s just a humorous way to dig on Jewish people but they just plain don’t like Jews over there to a worrying degree lol |
|
|
Quoted: From Fox News [Excerpts] A U.S. District Judge in San Diego who has issued rulings in two separate lawsuits challenging California’s strict gun control measures will take up another weapons-related case on Monday, sparking criticism from gun-control groups who pro-gun advocates have been given an unfair advantage. Judge Roger Benitez has twice ruled in favor of gun rights: in a case that challenged California’s ban of high-capacity magazines, and another case mandating background checks for buying ammunition, the San Diego Union-Tribune reported. On Monday, he will oversee a case challenging several state laws regulating and defining assault weapons. He is overseeing another case challenging the state’s prohibition on owning batons, billy clubs, and blackjacks. Gun control groups have questioned how Benitez, a pro-Second Amendment judge, has been able to see so many cases involving gun rights. Their scrutiny has drawn attention to an obscure “related case” rule that allows one party in a lawsuit to file cases in certain districts if the issues at hand involve “the same or substantially identical questions of law” as those in another case. All federal courts have this rule. But San Diego is unique in that an opposing side in a case cannot challenge or object to the transfer. Gun control groups maintain that this allows gun rights organizations to go judge shopping: knowing that they will have a more favorable ruling with Benitez than virtually any other federal judge in California. Gun rights groups have disputed this, pointing out that they have other Second Amendment cases in other jurisdictions. Arguments for “Miller et al v. Becerra et al” will commence Monday at 9:30 a.m. at the downtown San Diego federal courthouse. View Quote |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.