Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 3
Posted: 10/18/2020 7:28:59 PM EDT
From Fox News

[Excerpts]

A U.S. District Judge in San Diego who has issued rulings in two separate lawsuits challenging California’s strict gun control measures will take up another weapons-related case on Monday, sparking criticism from gun-control groups who pro-gun advocates have been given an unfair advantage.  

Judge Roger Benitez has twice ruled in favor of gun rights: in a case that challenged California’s ban of high-capacity magazines, and another case mandating background checks for buying ammunition, the San Diego Union-Tribune reported.

On Monday, he will oversee a case challenging several state laws regulating and defining assault weapons. He is overseeing another case challenging the state’s prohibition on owning batons, billy clubs, and blackjacks.

Gun control groups have questioned how Benitez, a pro-Second Amendment judge, has been able to see so many cases involving gun rights. Their scrutiny has drawn attention to an obscure “related case” rule that allows one party in a lawsuit to file cases in certain districts if the issues at hand involve “the same or substantially identical questions of law” as those in another case.

All federal courts have this rule. But San Diego is unique in that an opposing side in a case cannot challenge or object to the transfer. Gun control groups maintain that this allows gun rights organizations to go judge shopping: knowing that they will have a more favorable ruling with Benitez than virtually any other federal judge in California. Gun rights groups have disputed this, pointing out that they have other Second Amendment cases in other jurisdictions.

Arguments for “Miller et al v. Becerra et al” will commence Monday at 9:30 a.m. at the downtown San Diego federal courthouse.

Link Posted: 10/18/2020 7:30:24 PM EDT
[#1]
They're only mad that it's not their side judge shopping.
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 7:31:21 PM EDT
[#2]
Taggy

In before Saint Benitez
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 7:31:31 PM EDT
[#3]
LOL is there a way to choose or know which judge will get your case?
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 7:32:26 PM EDT
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
They're only mad that it's not their side judge shopping.
View Quote



Yeah, they are all fine and dandy with that Hawaii piece of shit getting all the immigration stuff.
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 7:32:34 PM EDT
[#5]
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 7:32:45 PM EDT
[#6]
How's it feel to get the Hawaiian judge treatment?
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 7:33:22 PM EDT
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
They're only mad that it's not their side judge shopping.
View Quote

That's damn right, they want it all, they can suck it.
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 7:33:52 PM EDT
[#8]
They're fine with Hawaii judge, though.
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 7:34:01 PM EDT
[#9]
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 7:35:25 PM EDT
[#10]
Judge shopping where have I seen that happen before? Cry more pussies.
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 7:35:27 PM EDT
[#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
LOL is there a way to choose or know which judge will get your case?
View Quote
The snippet says they can transfer similar cases to a judge that has handled them and that the other side cannot stop it.
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 7:35:39 PM EDT
[#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
They're only mad that it's not their side judge shopping.
View Quote


Indeed. Fuck the left...
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 7:44:58 PM EDT
[#13]
Go get ‘em boys
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 7:47:06 PM EDT
[#14]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
They're only mad that it's not their side judge shopping.
View Quote


Yes, you can bet they were the ones first responsible for this rule.
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 7:47:18 PM EDT
[#15]
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 7:51:17 PM EDT
[#16]
But, but, but the arfcom squad says "judges don't matter"!

Link Posted: 10/18/2020 7:51:52 PM EDT
[#17]
“sparking criticism from gun-control groups who pro-gun advocates have been given an unfair advantage. “

Fuck you
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 7:53:41 PM EDT
[#18]
Free the blackjack!   A slap upside the head lays them low (buddy used one on a drunk and flatteneed him).

I never used one msyelf but I carred a lignum-vitae billy club in my sap pocket when I went to work.  Never had to use it.
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 7:54:09 PM EDT
[#19]
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 7:58:08 PM EDT
[#20]
God bless Benitez!!!
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 7:59:33 PM EDT
[#21]
You mean to tell me a judge in a place with blatant violations of the constitution sees many cases about the violations?  No fucking way.  Didn't see that coming.
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 8:00:26 PM EDT
[#22]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Once again, a Cuban born Judge doing the job American born Judges don't want to do.
View Quote
hell yeah!!!
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 8:02:30 PM EDT
[#23]
God bless Judge Roger Benitez.
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 8:03:10 PM EDT
[#24]
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 8:26:29 PM EDT
[#25]
If the liberals are upset now, just wait until it gets to the 9th circuit court of appeals.

Instead of being a nearly automatic "win" for the left, we now have a 50/50 chance because of all the great judges Trump has nominated and the GOP Senate has confirmed.
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 8:40:13 PM EDT
[#26]
It's funny how they shop around, specifically getting some of the most far-Left district court judges in Hawaii and San Francisco, on such a regular basis that most of us can accurately predict in what court a case from them will be filed, and then complain when the tactic is used against them.  But then, a lack of hypocrisy has never been an issue for the Left.
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 8:48:53 PM EDT
[#27]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Once again, a Cuban born Judge doing the job American born Judges don't want to do.
View Quote

Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 8:50:20 PM EDT
[#28]
Quoted:
From Fox News

[Excerpts]

A U.S. District Judge in San Diego who has issued rulings in two separate lawsuits challenging California’s strict gun control measures will take up another weapons-related case on Monday, sparking criticism from gun-control groups who pro-gun advocates have been given an unfair advantage.  

Judge Roger Benitez has twice ruled in favor of gun rights: in a case that challenged California’s ban of high-capacity magazines, and another case mandating background checks for buying ammunition, the San Diego Union-Tribune reported.

On Monday, he will oversee a case challenging several state laws regulating and defining assault weapons. He is overseeing another case challenging the state’s prohibition on owning batons, billy clubs, and blackjacks.

Gun control groups have questioned how Benitez, a pro-Second Amendment judge, has been able to see so many cases involving gun rights. Their scrutiny has drawn attention to an obscure “related case” rule that allows one party in a lawsuit to file cases in certain districts if the issues at hand involve “the same or substantially identical questions of law” as those in another case.

All federal courts have this rule. But San Diego is unique in that an opposing side in a case cannot challenge or object to the transfer. Gun control groups maintain that this allows gun rights organizations to go judge shopping: knowing that they will have a more favorable ruling with Benitez than virtually any other federal judge in California. Gun rights groups have disputed this, pointing out that they have other Second Amendment cases in other jurisdictions.

Arguments for “Miller et al v. Becerra et al” will commence Monday at 9:30 a.m. at the downtown San Diego federal courthouse.

View Quote


Sorta like a certain type of Hawaiian judge making rulings on illegal aliens?  lol
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 8:54:44 PM EDT
[#29]
Deleted.

FFS if you even punctuate incorrectly you’re a Nazi.

@Miami_JBT please delete your non-COC approved quote and put this thread back on track.
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 8:57:47 PM EDT
[#30]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
How's it feel to get the Hawaiian judge treatment?
View Quote



This right here!
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 8:59:56 PM EDT
[#31]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Sorta like a certain type of Hawaiian judge making rulings on illegal aliens?  lol
View Quote


And their piece of shit is legislating from the bench, bringing politics into the courtroom.

Benitez is simply doing his job, following the constitution.
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 9:02:19 PM EDT
[#32]
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 9:04:50 PM EDT
[#33]
Haven’t the commies used Hawaii judge to block Trump’s border and immigration?

Link Posted: 10/18/2020 9:38:25 PM EDT
[#34]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Triple parentheses or triple brackets, also known as an (((echo))), are an antisemitic symbol that has been used to highlight the names of individuals of a Jewish background, or organizations thought to be owned by Jews.

~MIAMI_JBT


@leftytheking

I know from the way you wrote it, you didn't mean it to be antisemitic. But just giving you a heads up.
View Quote


Are you serious about the parenthesis?
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 9:42:19 PM EDT
[#35]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Triple parentheses or triple brackets, also known as an (((echo))), are an antisemitic symbol that has been used to highlight the names of individuals of a Jewish background, or organizations thought to be owned by Jews.

~MIAMI_JBT


@leftytheking

I know from the way you wrote it, you didn't mean it to be antisemitic. But just giving you a heads up.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
CNN:  Biden will stand up against the powerful gun lobby to close the (((sympathetic judge loophole)))
Triple parentheses or triple brackets, also known as an (((echo))), are an antisemitic symbol that has been used to highlight the names of individuals of a Jewish background, or organizations thought to be owned by Jews.

~MIAMI_JBT


@leftytheking

I know from the way you wrote it, you didn't mean it to be antisemitic. But just giving you a heads up.

Does this post imply we are not allowed to do that?
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 9:49:36 PM EDT
[#36]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Does this post imply we are not allowed to do that?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
CNN:  Biden will stand up against the powerful gun lobby to close the (((sympathetic judge loophole)))
Triple parentheses or triple brackets, also known as an (((echo))), are an antisemitic symbol that has been used to highlight the names of individuals of a Jewish background, or organizations thought to be owned by Jews.

~MIAMI_JBT


@leftytheking

I know from the way you wrote it, you didn't mean it to be antisemitic. But just giving you a heads up.

Does this post imply we are not allowed to do that?


lol
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 9:53:37 PM EDT
[#37]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
How's it feel to get the Hawaiian judge treatment?
View Quote




This. The socialist, anti American, commies think judge shopping is great when it benefits them.
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 9:55:23 PM EDT
[#38]
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 9:55:45 PM EDT
[#39]
Haha fuck off, we've been dealing with assholes who go find sympathetic judges abd keep fucking  up the wolf and grizzly delisting.
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 9:57:54 PM EDT
[#40]
LOMFL.

Shitbag libs won't or can't accept the fact that the person is the problem,  not the weapon.
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 10:08:29 PM EDT
[#41]
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 10:14:25 PM EDT
[#42]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Yeah, it is a known thing online like how 88er means a Neo-Nazi.
It is one of those things that is a case by case issue.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:


Are you serious about the parenthesis?
Yeah, it is a known thing online like how 88er means a Neo-Nazi.
Quoted:

Does this post imply we are not allowed to do that?
It is one of those things that is a case by case issue.

So it’s all in how (((they))) interpret it?
Jk don’t ban me please
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 10:17:40 PM EDT
[#43]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
They're only mad that it's not their side judge shopping.
View Quote


4 more years of Trump appointing judges and shopping may not be necessary.
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 10:18:21 PM EDT
[#44]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Triple parentheses or triple brackets, also known as an (((echo))), are an antisemitic symbol that has been used to highlight the names of individuals of a Jewish background, or organizations thought to be owned by Jews.

~MIAMI_JBT


@leftytheking

I know from the way you wrote it, you didn't mean it to be antisemitic. But just giving you a heads up.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
CNN:  Biden will stand up against the powerful gun lobby to close the (((sympathetic judge loophole)))
Triple parentheses or triple brackets, also known as an (((echo))), are an antisemitic symbol that has been used to highlight the names of individuals of a Jewish background, or organizations thought to be owned by Jews.

~MIAMI_JBT


@leftytheking

I know from the way you wrote it, you didn't mean it to be antisemitic. But just giving you a heads up.

Care to site that?
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 10:20:55 PM EDT
[#45]
Isn’t this akin to the Hawaii judge? They weren’t complaining then...
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 10:22:38 PM EDT
[#46]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Triple parentheses or triple brackets, also known as an (((echo))), are an antisemitic symbol that has been used to highlight the names of individuals of a Jewish background, or organizations thought to be owned by Jews.

~MIAMI_JBT


@leftytheking

I know from the way you wrote it, you didn't mean it to be antisemitic. But just giving you a heads up.
View Quote





The shit people look for
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 10:25:15 PM EDT
[#47]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Care to site that?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
CNN:  Biden will stand up against the powerful gun lobby to close the (((sympathetic judge loophole)))
Triple parentheses or triple brackets, also known as an (((echo))), are an antisemitic symbol that has been used to highlight the names of individuals of a Jewish background, or organizations thought to be owned by Jews.

~MIAMI_JBT


@leftytheking

I know from the way you wrote it, you didn't mean it to be antisemitic. But just giving you a heads up.

Care to site that?


Don't.

He'll have the Wikipedia entry paraphrased on here in no time.

Link Posted: 10/18/2020 10:27:11 PM EDT
[#48]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Care to site that?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
CNN:  Biden will stand up against the powerful gun lobby to close the (((sympathetic judge loophole)))
Triple parentheses or triple brackets, also known as an (((echo))), are an antisemitic symbol that has been used to highlight the names of individuals of a Jewish background, or organizations thought to be owned by Jews.

~MIAMI_JBT


@leftytheking

I know from the way you wrote it, you didn't mean it to be antisemitic. But just giving you a heads up.

Care to site that?

He’s not BSing. Go on 4chan for 30 seconds and you’ll see it. I think it’s just a humorous way to dig on Jewish people but they just plain don’t like Jews over there to a worrying degree lol
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 10:27:45 PM EDT
[#49]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
They're only mad that it's not their side judge shopping.
View Quote



FPNI
Link Posted: 10/18/2020 10:28:10 PM EDT
[#50]
Quoted:
From Fox News

[Excerpts]

A U.S. District Judge in San Diego who has issued rulings in two separate lawsuits challenging California’s strict gun control measures will take up another weapons-related case on Monday, sparking criticism from gun-control groups who pro-gun advocates have been given an unfair advantage.  

Judge Roger Benitez has twice ruled in favor of gun rights: in a case that challenged California’s ban of high-capacity magazines, and another case mandating background checks for buying ammunition, the San Diego Union-Tribune reported.

On Monday, he will oversee a case challenging several state laws regulating and defining assault weapons. He is overseeing another case challenging the state’s prohibition on owning batons, billy clubs, and blackjacks.

Gun control groups have questioned how Benitez, a pro-Second Amendment judge, has been able to see so many cases involving gun rights. Their scrutiny has drawn attention to an obscure “related case” rule that allows one party in a lawsuit to file cases in certain districts if the issues at hand involve “the same or substantially identical questions of law” as those in another case.

All federal courts have this rule. But San Diego is unique in that an opposing side in a case cannot challenge or object to the transfer. Gun control groups maintain that this allows gun rights organizations to go judge shopping: knowing that they will have a more favorable ruling with Benitez than virtually any other federal judge in California. Gun rights groups have disputed this, pointing out that they have other Second Amendment cases in other jurisdictions.

Arguments for “Miller et al v. Becerra et al” will commence Monday at 9:30 a.m. at the downtown San Diego federal courthouse.

View Quote
And the left went all the way to Hawaii to do there judge shopping.
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 3
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top