[ARCHIVED THREAD] - BREAKING House Intel Com. votes release FISA Abuse report. Getting hotter. (Page 4 of 36)
Byron York broke the story.
|
|
Just make up something which is 10X as damning as this (if that is possible) and leak it.
They they would have to release the real report to cover their asses. Seems to be the only way to motivate the corrupt bastards, and the media has no problem with made up documents. |
|
Quoted:
The entire House gets access, what are the odds it gets leaked? 
I can see the Congress Critters literally racing for the door to be the first. |
|
Quoted:
If someone leaks it they need to be prosecuted. There is surely a process to release it properly. Follow those procedures. Quoted:
Quoted:
The entire House gets access, what are the odds it gets leaked?
I can see the Congress Critters literally racing for the door to be the first. |
|
Quoted:
The leaking has to stop. This is especially true for leaking of classified materials. Leaking sensitive materials, which you agreed to protect, are bad enough. Divulging classified material is a crime, a felony and possibly treasonous. There is NO excuse. Former First Lady, don't you see. |
|
Quoted:
@Top_Secret @Bullet_Sponge Dear Sirs, You both have such insight into current events and I wondered if you had time to comment on this troubling situation. Thanks in advance.
#MAGA https://www.ar15.com/forums/general/Congress-about-to-vote-on-NSA-surveillance/5-2069676/ |
|
Quoted: Oddly enough, not a peep in the news headlines this morning  |
|
Furthermore, by law, information may not be classified merely because it would be embarrassing or to cover illegal activity; information may only be classified to protect national security objectives.
Wikipedia link ETA: Meant to quote this: Quoted:
The leaking has to stop. This is especially true for leaking of classified materials. Leaking sensitive materials, which you agreed to protect, are bad enough. Divulging classified material is a crime, a felony and possibly treasonous. There is NO excuse. |
|
Quoted:
I totally disagree with this. Become your enemy, and what are you actually fighting for? Quoted:
Quoted: Why? Do not live by rules your opponents refuse to abide by. Become your enemy, and what are you actually fighting for? Would you rather die and keep your principles? I wouldn't. By any means necessary until victory is assured. Using your enemies tactics isn't becoming who they are. It's using tactics they use. It is fighting fire with fire. Mutually assured destruction is the same thing. |
|
Quoted:
They dropped by this thread about the vote before it happened https://www.ar15.com/forums/general/Congress-about-to-vote-on-NSA-surveillance/5-2069676/
|
|
Quoted: Your survival. Would you rather die and keep your principles? I wouldn't. By any means necessary until victory is assured. Using your enemies tactics isn't becoming who they are. It's using tactics they use. It is fighting fire with fire. Mutually assured destruction is the same thing. |
|
The Dems and MSM are upping the game.
Now accusing Trump of money laundering. Cornered rats are always dangerous. |
|
Quoted:
The Dems and MSM are upping the game. Now accusing Trump of money laundering. Cornered rats are always dangerous. |
|
Quoted:
The Dems and MSM are upping the game. Now accusing Trump of money laundering. Cornered rats are always dangerous. Good luck with that. Bitch. |
|
Quoted:
I totally disagree with this. Become your enemy, and what are you actually fighting for? Quoted:
Quoted: Why? Do not live by rules your opponents refuse to abide by. Become your enemy, and what are you actually fighting for? |
|
Quoted:
Except we are talking about principles and ideals here. So yeah, adopting their tactics is becoming them, and then you are fighting for your team to be the rulers, not for the law. So you lose if you win. Quoted:
Quoted: Your survival. Would you rather die and keep your principles? I wouldn't. By any means necessary until victory is assured. Using your enemies tactics isn't becoming who they are. It's using tactics they use. It is fighting fire with fire. Mutually assured destruction is the same thing. These domestic subversives are fighting to win, the end justifies the means. All they need is one more election and its checkmate. Sticking to Queensberry Rules is fighting with one hand tied behind your back. |
|
Quoted:
"You are........such a Boy Scout!" These domestic subversives are fighting to win, the end justifies the means. All they need is one more election and its checkmate. Sticking to Queensberry Rules is fighting with one hand tied behind your back. |
|
|
Quoted:
The Dems and MSM are upping the game. Now accusing Trump of money laundering. Cornered rats are always dangerous. |
|
Quoted:
A majority of the intel committee need to agree it is necessary for public viewing. It has to get run by the executive branch which I would imagine should be a rubber stamp. After that it can be made available for public viewing. A full house vote is unnecessary unless somehow the intel committee has decided to tack that onto their already well established rules to see what the Dems will do (they won't vote to release it publicly). |
|
|
Quoted:
Obama is a fucking criminal. We don't blame guns when a criminal uses one to rob a weave store inside a 7-11 do we? That a criminal used it to do criminal stuff isn't really relevant to the tool. Surveillance sucks, unfettered surveillance sucks even more. But, guess what, it's here, it's not going away. Throwing the whole system out because some affirmative action hired president was a criminal with it is stupid. Quoted:
Quoted: Nunes, who was apparently horrified by what occurred under Obama, also wanted it reauthorized. It is apparently powerful stuff. We don't blame guns when a criminal uses one to rob a weave store inside a 7-11 do we? That a criminal used it to do criminal stuff isn't really relevant to the tool. Surveillance sucks, unfettered surveillance sucks even more. But, guess what, it's here, it's not going away. Throwing the whole system out because some affirmative action hired president was a criminal with it is stupid. |
|
Quoted:
Awe shit.... 
|
|
Quoted:
|
| I can see twitter going out of business in about 5 or 6 years |